Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 120, Issue 4, pp 557–572 | Cite as

Modelling the response of an alluvial aquifer to anthropogenic and recharge stresses in the United States Southern Great Plains


This paper uses Visual MODFLOW to simulate potential impacts of anthropogenic pumping and recharge variability on an alluvial aquifer in semi-arid northwestern Oklahoma. Groundwater withdrawal from the aquifer is projected to increase by more than 50% (relative to 1990) by the year 2050. In contrast, climate projections indicate declining regional precipitation over the next several decades, creating a potential problem of demand and supply. The following scenarios were simulated: (1) projected groundwater withdrawal, (2) a severe drought, (3) a prolonged wet period, and (4) a human adjustment scenario, which assumes future improvements in water conservation measures. Results indicate that the combined impacts of anthropogenic pumping and droughts would create drawdown of greater than 12 m in the aquifer. Spatially, however, areas of severe drawdown will be localized around large-capacity well clusters. The worst impacts of both pumping and droughts will be on stream–aquifer interaction. For example, the projected aquifer pumpage would lead to a total streamflow loss of 40%, creating losing stream system regionally. Similarly, a severe drought would lead to a total streamflow loss of >80%. A post-audit of the model was also carried out to evaluate model performance. By simulating various stress scenarios on the alluvial aquifer, this study provides important information for evaluating management options for alluvial aquifers.


Numerical modelling northwestern Oklahoma MODFLOW alluvial aquifers recharge variability US Southern Great Plains Hydrology modelling coupled systems general/other 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abderrahman W A and Rasheeduddin M 1994 Future groundwater conditions under long-term water stresses in an arid urban area; Water Resour. Manag. 8 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams G P and Bergmann D L 1996 Geohydrology of alluvium and terrace deposits of the Cimarron River from Freedom to Guthrie, Oklahoma; U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95–4066, 57p.Google Scholar
  3. Adams G P, Donna R and Alan R 1997 Digital datasets that describe aquifer characteristics of the alluvium and terrace deposits along the BNCR from the Panhandle to Canton lake in Northwestern Oklahoma; U.S. Geological Survey Open-file report 96–447.Google Scholar
  4. Alemayehu T, Furi F and Legesse D 2007 Impact of water overexploitation on highland lakes of eastern Ethiopia; Envrion. Geol. 52 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen D M, Mackie D C and Wei M 2004 Groundwater and climate change: A sensitivity analysis for the Grand Forks aquifer, southern British Columbia; Hydrogeol. J. 12 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson P F and Lu S 2003 A post audit of a model-designed groundwater extraction system; Groundwater 41(2) 212–218.Google Scholar
  7. Bartolino J R 2007 Assessment of areal recharge to the Spokane Valley–Rathdrum Prairie aquifer, Spokane County, Washington, and Bonner and Kootenai Counties, Idaho; U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5038, 38p.Google Scholar
  8. Bredehoeft J D 2003 From models to performance assessment: The conceptualization problem; Groundwater 41(5) 571–577.Google Scholar
  9. Bredehoeft J 2005 The conceptualization model problem–surprise; Hydrogeol. J. 13(1) 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bronstert A, Hauschild M and Doll P et al 2000 Integrated modelling of water availability and water use in the semi-arid Northeast Brazil; Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmospheres 25(3) 227–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brouyère S, Carabin G and Dassargues A 2004 Climate change impacts on groundwater resources: Modeled deficits in a chalky aquifer, Geer Basin, Belgium; Hydrogeol. J. 12 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cater R C and Alkali A G 1996 Shallow groundwater in the northeast arid zone of Nigeria; Q. J. Eng. Geol. 29(4) 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen C C, Gillig D and McCarl B A 2001 Effects of climate change on a water dependent regional economy: A study of the Texas Edwards Aquifer; Climatic Change 49(4) 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen X H and Yin Y 2001 Streamflow depletion: Modelling of baseflow reduction and stream infiltration from seasonally pumped wells; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 37(1) 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen X H 2003 Analysis of pumping-induced stream–aquifer interactions for gaining streams; J. Hydrol. 275 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen X and Chen X 2004 Simulating the effects of reduced precipitation on groundwater and streamflow in the Nebraska sand hills; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 40(2) 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christensen J H, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli R K, Kwon W.-T., Laprise R, Magaña R V, Mearns L, Menéndez C G, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A and Whetton P 2007 Regional Climate Projections; In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds) Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K B, Tignor M and Miller H L, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA.Google Scholar
  18. Covich A P, Fritz S C and Lamb P J et al 1997 Potential effects of climate change on aquatic ecosystems of the great Plains of North America; Hydrol. Proc. 11 993–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Croley T E and Luukkonen C L 2003 Potential effects of climate change on groundwater in Lansing, Michigan; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 39(1) 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cui Y and Shao J 2005 The role of groundwater in arid/semiarid ecosystems, northwest China; Groundwater 43(4) 471–477.Google Scholar
  21. Davis R E and Christenson S C 1981 Geohydrology and numerical simulation of the alluvium and terrace aquifer along the Beaver–North Canadian River from the Panhandle to Canton Lake, Northwestern Oklahoma; U.S. Geological Survey, Open-file Report, 81–483.Google Scholar
  22. Doherty J 2001 PEST groundwater data utilities; Brisbane, Australia: Watermark Numerical Computing, Scholar
  23. Don N C, Araki H, Yamanishi H and Koga K 2005 Simulation of groundwater flow and environmental effects resulting from pumping; Environ. Geol. 47 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eckhardt K and Ulbrich U 2003 Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater recharge and streamflow in a central European low mountain range; J. Hydrol. 284(1–4) 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holman I P 2006 Climate change impacts on groundwater recharge-uncertainty, the way forward; Hydrogeol. J. 14 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirshen P H 2002 Potential impacts of global warming on groundwater in eastern Massachusetts; J. Water Resour. Plann. Manag. 128 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loáiciga H A, Maidment D R and Valdes J B 2000 Climate-change impacts in a regional Karst aquifer, Texas, USA; J. Hydrol. 227 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDonald M G and Harbaugh A W 1988 A modular three dimensional finite-element groundwater flow model; Techniques of water resources investigations of the USGS Book 6, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  29. Mehl S, Hill M C and Leake S A 2006 Comparison of local grid refinement methods for MODFLOW; Groundwater 44(6) 792–796.Google Scholar
  30. OWRB 1997 1995 Update of the Oklahoma comprehensive water plan; Publication of Oklahoma Water Resources Board no. 139.Google Scholar
  31. Oreskes N and Belitz K 2001 Philosophical issues in model assessment; In: Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science (eds) Anderson M G and Bates P D, John Willey & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  32. Prudic D E 1989 Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream–aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference, groundwater flow model; U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 88–729, 113p.Google Scholar
  33. Rainwater K, Stovall J, Frailey S and Urban L 2005 Transboundary impacts on regional ground water modelling in Texas; Groundwater 43(5) 706–716.Google Scholar
  34. Rejani R, Madan K, Jha M K, Panda S N and Mull R 2007 Simulation modelling for efficient groundwater management in Balasore coastal basin, India; Water Resources Management, Springer-online first, doi: 10.1007/s11269–006–9142-z.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenberg J, Epstein D J and Wang D et al 1999 Possible impacts of global warming on the hydrology of the Ogallala aquifer region; Climatic Change 42 677–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryder P D 1996 Groundwater atlas of the United States, Oklahoma, Texas; U.S. Geological Survey Publication, HA 730-E.Google Scholar
  37. Senthilkumar M and Elango L 2004 3-dimensional mathematical model to simulate groundwater flow in the lower Palar River basin, southern India; Hydrogeol. J. 12(2) 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stewart M and Langevin 1999 Post audit of a numerical prediction of well field drawdown in a semiconfined aquifer system; Ground Water 37(2) 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tarhule A and Woo M 1997 Characteristics and use of shallow wells in a stream fadama: A case study in northern Nigeria; Appl. Geogr. 17(1) 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tarhule A and Woo M K 2002 Adaptations to the dynamics of rural water supply from natural sources: A village example in semi-arid Nigeria; Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7(3) 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. USGCRP 2000 Climate Change Impacts on the United States. The Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change. Overview: Great Plains; Publication of the National Assessment Synthesis Team, US Global Change Research Program ( Scholar
  42. Varni M R and Usunoff E J 1999 Simulation of regional-scale groundwater flow in the Azul River basin, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; Hydrogeol. J. 7 180–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waterloo Hydrogeologic Inc. 2005 Visual MODFLOW v. 4.1, Premium edn. User’s Manual, 611p.Google Scholar
  44. Wilsnack M M, Welter D E and Montoya A M et al 2001 Simulating flow in regional wetlands with the Modflow wetland package; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 37(3) 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wood P R and Stacey B L 1965 Geology and ground-water resources of Woodward County, Oklahoma; Oklahoma Water Resources Board Bulletin 21, 79p.Google Scholar
  46. Workman S R and Serrano S E 1999 Recharge to alluvial valley aquifers from overbank flow and excess infiltration; J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35(2) 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zume J T and Tarhule A 2006 Precipitation and streamflow variability in northwestern Oklahoma, 1894–2003; Phys. Geogr. 27(3) 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zume J T and Tarhule A 2008 Simulating the impacts of groundwater pumping on stream–aquifer dynamics in semiarid northwestern Oklahoma, USA; Hydrogeol. J. 16 797–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Earth ScienceShippensburg UniversityShippensburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations