Skills of different mesoscale models over Indian region during monsoon season: Forecast errors
Performance of four mesoscale models namely, the MM5, ETA, RSM and WRF, run at NCMRWF for short range weather forecasting has been examined during monsoon-2006. Evaluation is carried out based upon comparisons between observations and day-1 and day-3 forecasts of wind, temperature, specific humidity, geopotential height, rainfall, systematic errors, root mean square errors and specific events like the monsoon depressions.
It is very difficult to address the question of which model performs best over the Indian region? An honest answer is ‘none’. Perhaps an ensemble approach would be the best. However, if we must make a final verdict, it can be stated that in general, (i) the WRF is able to produce best All India rainfall prediction compared to observations in the day-1 forecast and, the MM5 is able to produce best All India rainfall forecasts in day-3, but ETA and RSM are able to depict the best distribution of rainfall maxima along the west coast of India, (ii) the MM5 is able to produce least RMSE of wind and geopotential fields at most of the time, and (iii) the RSM is able to produce least errors in the day-1 forecasts of the tracks, while the ETA model produces least errors in the day-3 forecasts.
KeywordsMesoscale modeling monsoon forecast errors atmospheric sciences meteorology
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Abhilash S, Someshwar Das, Mohankumar K, Kalsi S R, Das Gupta M, John P George, Banerjee S K, Thampi S B and Pradhan D 2007: Assimilation of Doppler Weather Radar observations in a Mesoscale model for the Prediction of Intense Rainfall Events Associated with Mesoscale Convective Systems using 3DVAR; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 116(3) 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bohra A K, Basu S, Rajagopal E N, Iyengar G R, Das Gupta M, Ashrit R and Athiyaman B 2006 Heavy rainfall episode over Mumbai on 26th July 2005: Assessment of NWP guidance; Curr. Sci. 90(9) 1188–1194.Google Scholar
- Das Someshwar 2002a Real time mesoscale weather forecasting over Indian region using MM5 modeling system; NCMRWF Research Report No. NMRF/RR/3/2002 77.Google Scholar
- Das Someshwar 2002b Evaluation and verification of MM5 forecasts over Indian region; 12th PSU/NCAR mesoscale model users workshop, 24–25 June, 2002, Boulder, CO, USA 77–81.Google Scholar
- Das Someshwar 2005 Mountain weather forecasting using MM5 modeling system; Curr. Sci. 88(6) 899–905.Google Scholar
- Das Someshwar, Ashrit R, Mohandas S, Iyengar G R, Das Gupta M, George J P, Rajagopal E N and Dutta S K 2007 Performance of Mesoscale Models over India during Monsoon season; NCMRWF Research Report, 144 pp.Google Scholar
- Davis C, Warner T, Astling E and Bowers J 1999 Development and application of an operational, relocatable, mesogamma-scale weather analysis and forecasting system; Tellus 51A 710–727.Google Scholar
- Doswell C A III, Davies-Jones R and Keller D L 1990 On summary measures of skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tables; Mon. Wea. Rev. 118 576–585.Google Scholar
- Ferranti L, Klinker E, Hollingsworth A and Hoskins B J 2000 Diagnosis of systematic forecast errors dependent on flow pattern; WCRP/WGNE Workshop on systematic errors, 16–20 October, 2000, BMRC, Australia, pp 57–60.Google Scholar
- Grell G A, Dudhia J and Stauffer D R 1994 A description of the 5th generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale model (MM5); NCAR tech. note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, 117 pp.Google Scholar
- Kuo Y-H 2003 Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction. H.D; Orville Symposium, Institute of Atmospheric Science, SDSMT, 26 April 2003, USA, pp 122–130.Google Scholar
- Kuo Y-H and Wang W 1996 Simulation of a prefrontal rain-band observed in TAMEX IOP 13; Preprints, Seventh Conference on Mesoscale Processes; Reading, U.K., 9–13 September 1996, 335–338.Google Scholar
- Mohandas S and Rajagopal E N 2005 Sensitivity of land-surface parameterization on regional spectral model forecasts; Curr. Sci. 88(6) 935–941.Google Scholar
- Mureau R 1990 The decrease of the systematic error and the increased predictability of the long waves in the ECMWF model; ECMWF Tech. Mem. No. 167. Google Scholar
- NCAR 2003 PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System (MM5 version 3) tutorial class notes and user’s guide. Available from the National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA, June 2003.Google Scholar
- Rajagopal E N and Iyengar G R 2002 Implementation of Mesoscale ETA model at NCMRWF; NCMRWF research report no. NMRF/RR/4/2002.Google Scholar
- Rajagopal E N and Iyengar G R 2003 Performance of Mesoscale Eta model over Indian region; Weather and Climate Modeling (eds) Singh et al (New Delhi: New Age Intl. Ltd.) 118–131.Google Scholar
- Rajagopal E N and Iyengar G R 2005 Mesoscale forecasts with Eta model over Indian region; Curr. Sci. 88(6) 906–912.Google Scholar
- Wilks D S 1995 Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences; Academic Press, 467 pp.Google Scholar