Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 117, Issue 5, pp 589–602 | Cite as

The WRF model performance for the simulation of heavy precipitating events over Ahmedabad during August 2006

Article

Abstract

The summer monsoon season of the year 2006 was highlighted by an unprecedented number of monsoon lows over the central and the western parts of India, particularly giving widespread rainfall over Gujarat and Rajasthan. Ahmedabad had received 540.2mm of rainfall in the month of August 2006 against the climatological mean of 219.8mm. The two spells of very heavy rainfall of 108.4mm and 97.7mm were recorded on 8 and 12 August 2006 respectively. Due to meteorological complexities involved in replicating the rainfall occurrences over a region, the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF-ARW version) modeling system with two different cumulus schemes in a nested configuration is chosen for simulating these events. The spatial distributions of large-scale circulation and moisture fields have been simulated reasonably well in this model, though there are some spatial biases in the simulated rainfall pattern. The rainfall amount over Ahmedabad has been underestimated by both the cumulus parameterization schemes. The quantitative validation of the simulated rainfall is done by calculating the categorical skill scores like frequency bias, threat scores (TS) and equitable threat scores (ETS). In this case the KF scheme has outperformed the GD scheme for the low precipitation threshold.

Keywords

Rainfall TRMM inner and outer domains 

References

  1. Chang H I, Kumar A, Niyogi D, Mohanty U C, Chen F and Dudhia J 2007 The Role of Land Surface Processes on the Mesoscale Simulation of the July 26, 2005 Heavy Rain Event over Mumbai, India; Global Planet. Change, submitted.Google Scholar
  2. Chen F and Dudhia J 2001 Coupling an advanced landsurface/hydrology model with the Penn State/NCAR MM5 modeling system. Part-I: Model description and implementation; Mon. Wea. Rev. 129 569–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ching F C, Jou B J D, Lin P-L and Hong J S 2005 A real-time MM5/WRF forecasting system in Taiwan, www.mmm.ucar.edu/MM5/workshops/ws04/PosterSession/Chien.Fang-Ching.pdf.
  4. Deb S K, Kishtawal C M, Pal P K and Joshi P C 2008 Impact of TMI SST for the simulation of heavy rainfall episode over Mumbai on 26th July 2005; Mon. Wea. Rev. (doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2291.1), in press.Google Scholar
  5. Dorita R-E, Lui L, Ge M, Warner T and Swaerdlin S 2006 Simulation of high impact weather event over Isreal with WRF-RTFDDA System — A Case Study, www.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2006/abstracts/psession/P8_09_Rostkier_Edestien.pdf.
  6. Dudhia J 1989 Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a meso-scale two-dimensional model; J. Atmos. Sci. 46 3077–3107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gallus Jr W A and Bresch J 2006 Comparison of impacts of WRF dynamic core, physics package, and initial conditions on warm season rainfall forecasts; Mon. Wea. Rev. 134 2632–2641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gandin L S and Murphy A H 1992 Equitable skill scores for categorical forecasts; Mon. Wea. Rev. 120 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grell G A and Devenyi D 2002 A Generalised Approach to Parameterising Convection Combining Ensemble and Data Assimilation Techniques; Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 38:1–38:4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hong S Y and Pan H L 1996 Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a medium-range forecast model; Mon. Wea. Rev. 124 2322–2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kain J S and Fritsch J M 1990 A One Dimensional Entraining/Detraining Plume Model and its Application in Convective Parameterisation; J. Atmos. Sci. 47 2784–2802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kain J S and Fritsch J M 1993 Convective parameterisation of mesoscale models: The Kain-Fritsch scheme; In: The Represenation of Cumulus Convection in Numerical Models (eds) Emanuel K A and Raymonds D J, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, pp. 165–170.Google Scholar
  13. Lagouvardos K, Kotroni V, Koussis A, Feidas C, Buzzi A and Malguzzi P 2003 The meteorological model BOLAM at the National Observatory of Athens: assessment of two-year operational use; J. Appl. Meteorol. 42 1667–1678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laprise R 1992 The Eular equations of motion with hydrostatic pressure as independent variable; Mon. Wea. Rev. 120 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazarakis N, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K and Music Nickovic S 2006 Impact of the assimilation of conventional data on the quantitative precipitation forecasts in the Eastern Mediterranean; Adv. Geo. Sci. 7 237–242.Google Scholar
  16. Mesinger F 1996 Improvements in Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts with the ETA Regional Model at National Centers for Environmental Prediction: The 48-km Upgrade; Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 2637–2649.Google Scholar
  17. Mlawer E J, Taubman S J, Brown P D, Iacono M J and Clough S A 1997 Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated k-model for the longwave; J. Geophys. Res. 102(D14) 16,663–16,682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skamarock W C, Klemp J B, Dudhia J, Gill D O, Barker D M, Wang W and Powers J G 2005 A description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2; NCAR Tech Note, NCAR/TN-468+STR, 88 pp. (Available from UCAR Communications, P. O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307).Google Scholar
  19. Vaidya S S and Kulkarni J R 2007 Simulation of heavy precipitation over Santacruz, Mumbai on 26 July 2005, using Mesoscale model; Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 98 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vaidya S S 2007 Simulation of weather systems over Indian region using mesoscale models; Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 95(1–2) 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Deb
    • 1
  • T. P. Srivastava
    • 2
  • C. M. Kishtawal
    • 1
  1. 1.Atmospheric Sciences Division, Meteorology and Oceanography GroupSpace Applications Centre, ISROAhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.Indian Air ForceAFCNWPNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations