Advertisement

Paleosol at the Archean—Proterozoic contact in NW India revisited: Evidence for oxidizing conditions during paleo-weathering?

  • Manoj K. PanditEmail author
  • Helga de Wall
  • Narendra K. Chauhan
Article

Abstract

A number of fine-grained sericite bearing pelitic, schistose lithologies occur along the Archean (Banded Gneiss Complex)-Proterozoic (Aravalli Supergroup) contact (APC) in the Udaipur valley in NW Indian craton. These Al-rich lithologies (subsequently metamorphosed) have been described as ‘paleosols’, developed over a 3.3 Ga old Archean gneissic basement and are overlain by Paleoproterozoic Aravalli quartzite. The paleosol was developed between 2.5 and 2.1, coincident with the globally recognized Great Oxidation Event (GOE). In previous studies these paleosol sections were interpreted to have developed under reducing environment, however, the finding of a ‘ferricrete’ zone in the upper part of Tulsi Namla section (east of Udaipur) during the present study (in addition to earlier reported lithologies) has led to an alternative suggestion of oxygen-rich conditions during paleosol development. The Tulsi Namla paleosol section shows all the features characteristic of a complete paleosol section described from other Archean cratons. The paleosol includes sericite schist with kyanite as the prevalent Al-silicate in the lower part of profile while chloritoid and Fe-oxides typify the Fe-rich upper part. Alumina has remained immobile during the weathering process while Fe and Mn show a decrease in the lower part of the section and an abrupt rise in the upper part, in the ferricrete zone. The field and geochemical data indicate that the Tulsi Namla section is an in situ weathering profile and at least the upper part shows evidence of oxidizing conditions.

Keywords

Archean-Proterozoic contact paleosol Aravalli craton oxidation NW India 

References

  1. Ahmad T and Rajamani V 1988 Geochemistry and petrogenesis of mafic intrusions within the Banded Gneissic Complex near Nathdwara: Implications to BGC-Aravalli relationship; In: Precambrian of Aravalli Mountain, Rajasthan, India, A B Roy (ed.) Geol. Soc. India Memoir 7 327–340.Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee D M 1996 A Lower Proterozoic paleosol at BGC-Aravalli boundary in south-central Rajasthan, India; J. Geol. Soc. 48 277–288.Google Scholar
  3. Chauhan D S 1970 Pyrophyllite deposit of Barara village, Udaipur district, Rajasthan; Bull. Indian Geol. Assoc. 3 9–12.Google Scholar
  4. Choudhary A K, Gopalan K and Sastry C A 1984 Present status of the geochronology of Precambrian rocks of Rajasthan; Tectonophys. 105 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deb M 1999 Metallic mineral deposits of Rajasthan; In: Proc. Sem. on Geology of Rajasthan Status and Perspective (ed.) P Kataria (Geology Dept. MLSU, Udaipur, India) 213–237.Google Scholar
  6. Farquhar J, Bao H and Thiemens M 2000 Atmospheric influence of Earth’s earliest sulfur cycle; Science 289 756–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gopalan K, Macdougall J D, Roy A B and Murali A V 1990 Sm-Nd evidence for 3.3 Ga old rocks in Rajasthan, northwestern India; Precamb. Res. 48 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta S N, Arora Y K, Mathur R K. Iqballuddin, Prasad B, Sahai T N and Sharma S B 1997 The Precambrian Geology of the Aravalli Region, Southern Rajasthan and Northeastern Gujarat; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 123 262p.Google Scholar
  9. Heron A M 1953 Geology of Central Rajputana; Geol. Surv. India Memoir 79 339p.Google Scholar
  10. Holland H D 1992 Distribution and paleoenvironment interpretation of Proterozoic paleosols; In: The Proterozoic Biosphere, (eds) Schopf J W and Klein C (Cambridge Univ. Press) 153–155.Google Scholar
  11. Holland H D 1994 Early Proterozoic atmospheric change; In: Early Life on Earth, Noble Symposium, (ed.) S Bengston (New York: Columbia Univ. Press) 237–244.Google Scholar
  12. Holland H D 1999 When did the Earth’s atmosphere become oxic? A Reply; Geochem. News 100 20–22.Google Scholar
  13. Karhu J A and Holland H D 1996 Carbon isotopes and the rise of atmospheric oxygen; Geology 24 867–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Minter W E L 1999 Irrefutable detrital origin of the Witwatersrand gold and evidence of eolian signatures; Econ. Geol. 94 665–670.Google Scholar
  15. Murakami T, Utsunomiya S, Imazu Y and Prasad N 2001 Direct evidence of late Archean to early Proterozoic anoxic atmosphere from a product of 2.5 Ga old weathering; Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 184 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohmoto H 1996 Evidence in pre-2.2 Ga paleosols for the early evolution of atmospheric oxygen and terrestrial biota; Geology 24 1135–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohmoto H 1997 When did the Earth atmosphere become oxic?; Geochem. News 93 12–13.Google Scholar
  18. Palmer J A, Phillips G N and McCarthy T S 1989 Paleosols and their relevance to Precambrian atmospheric composition; J. Geol. 97 77–92.Google Scholar
  19. Panahi A, Young G M and Rainbird R H 2000 Behavior of major and trace elements (including REE) during Paleoproterozoic pedogenesis and diagenetic alteration of an Archean granite near Ville Marie, Quebec, Canada; Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 64 2199–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phillips G N and Law D M 1997 Hydrothermal origin for Witwatersrand gold; Soc. Econ. Geol. Newslett. 31 26–33.Google Scholar
  21. Retallack G J 1990 Soils of the past — An introduction to paleopedology; (Boston: Unwin and Heyman Inc) 520 p.Google Scholar
  22. Roy A B and Jakhar S R 2002 Geology of Rajasthan (Northwest India) — Precambrian to Recent; Scientific Publishers (India), Jodhpur, 421p.Google Scholar
  23. Roy A B and Kröner A 1996 Single zircon evaporation ages constraining growth of the Aravalli craton, northwestern Indian shield; Geol. Mag. 133 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roy A B and Paliwal B S 1981 Evolution of lower Proterozoic epicontinental deposits: Stromatolite-bearing Aravalli rocks of Udaipur, Rajasthan, India; Precamb. Res. 14 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rye R and Holland H D 1998 Paleosols and the evolution of atmospheric oxygen; Am. J. Sci. 298 621–675.Google Scholar
  26. Rye R and Holland H D 2000 Geology and geochemistry of paleosols developed on the Hekpoort basalt, Pretoria Group, South Africa; Am. J. Sci. 300 85–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheldon N D 2006 Precambrian paleosols and atmospheric CO2 levels; Precamb. Res. 147 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma R P 1979 Origin of pyrophyllite-diaspore deposits of the Bundelkhand Complex, central India; Mineral. Deposita 14 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sreenivas B, Roy A B and Srinivasan R 2001 Geochemistry of sericite deposits at the base of the Paleoproterozoic Aravalli supergroup, Rajasthan, India: Evidence for metamorphosed and metasomatised Precambrian Paleosol; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.) 110 39–61.Google Scholar
  30. Sreenivas B and Srinivasan R 1994 Identification of paleosols in the Precambrian metapelitic assemblages of Peninsular India — A major element geochemical approach; Curr. Sci. 67 89–94.Google Scholar
  31. Wiedenbeck M, Goswami J N and Roy A B 1996 Stabilization of the Aravalli craton (northwestern India) at 2.5Ga: Evidence from Ion Microprobe zircon ages; Chem. Geol. 129 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang W and Holland H D 2003 The Hekpoort paleosol in strata 1 at Garborone, Botswana: soil formation during the Great Oxidation Event; Am. J. Sci. 303 187–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manoj K. Pandit
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helga de Wall
    • 2
  • Narendra K. Chauhan
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of RajasthanJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Institut für GeologieJulius-Maximilians-Universitat WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of GeologyMLS UniversityUdaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations