Magnetotelluric investigations for imaging electrical structure of Garhwal Himalayan corridor, Uttarakhand, India

Article
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

Magnetotelluric investigations have been carried out in the Garhwal Himalayan corridor to delineate the electrical structure of the crust along a profile extending from Indo-Gangetic Plain to Higher Himalayan region in Uttarakhand, India. The profile passing through major Himalayan thrusts: Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFF), Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and Main Central Thrust (MCT), is nearly perpendicular to the regional geological strike. Data processing and impedance analysis indicate that out of 44 stations MT data recorded, only 27 stations data show in general, the validity of 2D assumption. The average geoelectric strike, N70°W, was estimated for the profile using tensor decomposition. 2D smooth geoelectrical model has been presented, which provides the electrical image of the shallow and deeper crustal structure. The major features of the model are (i) a low resistivity (<50Ωm), shallow feature interpreted as sediments of Siwalik and Indo-Gangetic Plain, (ii) highly resistive (> 1000Ωm) zone below the sediments at a depth of 6 km, interpreted as the top surface of the Indian plate, (iii) a low resistivity (< 10Ωm) below the depth of 6 km near MCT zone coincides with the intense micro-seismic activity in the region. The zone is interpreted as the partial melting or fluid phase at mid crustal depth. Sensitivity test indicates that the major features of the geoelectrical model are relevant and desired by the MT data.

Keywords

Magnetotelluric Himalayan region impedance decomposition 2-D inversion 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arora B R, Lilley F E M, Sloane M N, Singh B P, Srivastava B J and Prasad S N 1982 Geomagnetic induction and conductive structures in northwest India; Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 69 459–475.Google Scholar
  2. Bahr K 1988 Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion; J. Geophys. 62 119–127.Google Scholar
  3. Bahr K 1991 Geological noise in magnetotelluric data: a classification of distortion types; Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 66 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai D and Meju M A 2003 Deep structure of the Longing-Ruili fault underneath Ruili basin near the eastern Himalayan syntaxis: insights from magnetotelluric imaging; Tectonophys. 364 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berdichevsky M N, Dmitriev V I and Pozdnjakova E E 1998 On two-dimensional interpretation of magnetotelluric soundings; Geophys. J. Int. 133 585–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chave A D and Smith J T 1994 On electric and magnetic galvanic distortion tensor decompositions; J. Geophys. Res. 99 4669–4682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen L, Booker J R, Jones A G, Wu N, Unsworth M J, Wei W and Tan H 1996 Electrically conductive crust in southern Tibet from in depth MT surveying; Science 274 1694–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedrichs B 2003 MAPROS: magnetotelluric data processing software; Metronix GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Gokarn S G, Rao C K and Gupta G 2002 Crustal structure in the Siwalik Himalayas using magnetotelluric studies; Earth Planets Space 54 19–30.Google Scholar
  10. Groom R W and Bailey R C 1989 Decomposition of Magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion; J. Geophys. Res. 94 1913–1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groom R W, Kurtz R D, Jones A G and Boerner D E 1993 A quantitative methodology to extract regional magnetotelluric impedances and determine the dimension of conductive structure; Geophys. J. Int. 115 1095–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Groom R W and Bahr K 1992 Correction for near surface effects: decomposition of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor and scaling corrections for regional resistivities: a tutorial; Surveys in Geophysics 13 341–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. GSI 1991 Geothermal Atlas of India, Geological Survey of India, Special Publication, 19 143.Google Scholar
  14. Gupta G, Gokarn S G and Singh B P 1994 Thickness of the Siwalik Sediments in the Mohand-Ramnagar region using magnetotelluric studies; Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 83 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen, P C 1998 Rank deficient and discrete III-posed problems, numerical aspects of linear inversion; SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  16. Khattri K N 1992 Local seismic investigations in the Garhwal-Kumaun Himalaya; Geol. Soc. IndiaMemoir 23 45–66.Google Scholar
  17. Kumar R, Ghosh S K, Sangode S J and Thakur V C 2002 Manifestation of Intra — Foreland thrusting in the Neogene Himalaya foreland basin fill; J. Geol. Soc. India 59 547–560.Google Scholar
  18. LeFort P 1975 Himalaya: the collided range. Present knowledge of the continental arc; Am. J. Sci. 275 7–44.Google Scholar
  19. Larsen J C 1977 Removal of local surface conductivity effects from low frequency mantle response curves; Acta Geodaet., Geophys. Montanist. Acad. Sci. Hung. 12 183–186.Google Scholar
  20. Lemonnier C, Marquis G, Perrier F, Avouac J P, Chitrakar G, Kafle B, Sapkota S, Gautam U, Tiwari D and Bano M 1999 Electrical structure of the Himalaya of central Nepal: high conductivity around the mid-crustal ramp along the MHT; Geophys. Res. Let. 26 3261–3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lilley F E M, Singh B, Arora B R, Srivastava B J, Prasad S N and Sloane M N 1981 A magnetometer array study in northwest India; Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 25 232–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McNeice G W and Jones A G 2001 Multisite, multifrequency tenser decomposition of magnetotelluric data; Geophysics 66 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Molnar P 1990 A review of the seismicity and the rate of active underthrusting and deformation at the Himalaya; J. Himalayan Geol. 1(2) 131–154.Google Scholar
  24. Park S K and Mackie R L 1997 Crustal structure at Naga Parbat, north Pakistan, from magnetotelluric soundings; Geophys. Res. Lett. 24 2415–2418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patro B P K, Brasse H, Sarma S V S and Harinarayana 2005a Electrical structure of the crust below the Deccan Flood Basalts (India), inferred from magnetotelluric soundings; Geophys. J. Int. 163 931–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patro B P K, Harinarayana T, Sastry R S, Rao M, Manoj C, Naganjaneyulu K and Sarma S V S 2005b Electrical image of Narmada-Son lineament zone, central India from magnetotelluric; Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 148 215–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rodi W L and Mackie R L 2001 Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion; Geophysics 66 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sarma S V S, Patro B P K, Harinarayana T, Veeraswamy K, Sastry R S and Sarma M V C 2004 A magnetotelluric (MT) study across the Koyna seismic zone, Western India: evidence for block structure; Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 142 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Seeber L, Armbruster J and Quittmeyer R C 1981 Seismicity and continental subduction in the Himalayan arc; In: Zagros-Hindukush-Himalaya Geodynamic Evolution (eds.) H Gupta and F Delany, American Geophysical Union, Geodynamics Series 3 215–242.Google Scholar
  30. Sorkhabi R B, Stump E, Foland K and Jain A K 1999 Tectonic and cooling history of the Garhwal Higher Himalaya (Bhagirathi Valley): constraints from thermochronological data; Gondwana Research Group Memoir 6 217–235.Google Scholar
  31. Swift C M J 1967 A magnetotelluric investigation of an electrical conductivity anomaly in the southwestern United State; Ph.D. Dissertation Geophysics Laboratory M I T, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  32. Tikhonov A N and Arsenin V Y 1977 Solutions of ill-posed problems (V H Winston & Sons.)Google Scholar
  33. Unsworth M J, Jones A G, Wei W, Marquis G, Gokarn S G, Spratt J E and INDEPTH-MT Team 2005 Crustal rheology of the Himalaya and Southern Tibet inferred from magnetotelluric data; Nature 438 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Valdiya K S 2003 Reactivation of Himalayan Frontal Fault; Curr. Sci. 85 1031–1040.Google Scholar
  35. Virdi N S 1988 Pre-Tertiary geotectonic events in the Himalaya; Z. Geol. Wiss, Berlin 16 571–585.Google Scholar
  36. Vozoff K 1984 Model study for the proposed magnetotelluric (MT) traverse in north India; Tectonophys. 105 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiao W 2004 Magnetotelluric exploration in the rocky mountain foothills, Alberta; Master of Science dissertation, Department of Physics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 117, No. 3, June 2008, pp. 181–188Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Israil
    • 1
  • D. K. Tyagi
    • 1
  • P. K. Gupta
    • 1
  • Sri Niwas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesIndian Institute of Technology RoorkeeRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations