Journal of Chemical Sciences

, Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 103–116 | Cite as

Three-dimensional Morphology and X-ray Scattering Structure of Aqueous tert-Butanol Mixtures: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Regular Article
  • 221 Downloads

Abstract

It is well established that water-alcohol mixtures exhibit anomalous properties at very low as well as at very high alcohol concentrations. Almost all the studies in this regard intend to link these anomalies to the microscopic structural changes as water (or alcohol) concentration increases in the mixture. However, it is important to note that the nature of these structural changes could be different at the water- and TBA-rich concentrations. In this article, our goal is to address such structural change overs, if really present, in the mixtures of water and tert-butanol (TBA) by using simulated X-ray scattering structure function, S(q), real space radial and spatial distribution functions and heterogeneity order parameter. By using a judicial partitioning scheme, we show that structural characteristic of pure water is qualitatively retained for X TBA < 0.1. The simulated S(q) peaks at around q = 2 and q = 2.8 Å−1, which correspond to water oxygen correlations, begin to fade away only after X TBA ≥ 0.1. This is a clear indication of microscopic structural transition at X TBA ≈ 0.1. Beyond X TBA = 0.1, the TBA structural features begin to take over to that of water. The peak at q =1.3 Å−1 which primarily corresponds to nonpolar-nonpolar correlations in pure TBA begin to rise at X TBA ≈ 0.1. However, the pre-peak at around q = 0.75 Å−1, which is due to polar-polar and nonpolar-polar correlations in pure TBA, seems to appear at lower q value only at the equi-molar concentration of the mixture. From the solvent cage surrounding the TBA molecules, we observe that while the aggregation of TBA alkyl groups, due to hydrophobic interaction, is maximum at 10% TBA, the intervening hydrogen bonding interactions between water and TBA molecules tend to lower the hydrophobic interactions between the alkyl groups of alcohol with increasing concentration of TBA. In addition to this, we also observe dimers and small clusters of water molecules in the TBA-rich regime. The computed heterogeneity order parameters for the individual components of the mixture reveal enhanced non-uniform distribution of the TBA molecules near X TBA≈ 0.1 to 0.3. These results are also supported by the radial distribution functions and nearest neighbour coordination numbers of water and TBA oxygen atoms around TBA oxygen.

Graphical Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulation results show that for less than 10% concentration of TBA, the water-like structural arrangement is apparently present and beyond 50:50 composition, TBA-like microscopic structure gradually takes over. Hydrophobic aggregation is maximum at 10% TBA concentration of the mixture.

Keywords

Water tertiary-butanol x-ray scattering molecular dynamics. 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank Prof. Ranjit Biswas for insightful discussion and feedback. H.K.K. thanks Indian Institute of Technology Delhi and Department of Science and Technology (DST), India for financial support. S.K. thanks University Grants Commission (UGC), India for fellowship.

Supplementary material

12039_2016_1207_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.6 mb)
(DOCX 1.63 MB)

References

  1. 1.
    Koga Y 1988 Excess partial molar enthalpies of water in water–tert-butanol mixtures Can. J. Chem. 66 3171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koga Y, Siu W W Y and Wang T Y H 1990 Excess partial molar free energies and entropies in aqueous tert-butyl alcohol solutions at 25C J. Phys. Chem. 94 7700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iwasaki K and Fujiyama T 1979 Light-scattering study of clathrate hydrate formation in binary mixtures of tert-butyl alcohol and water. J. Phys. Chem. 83 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Euliss G W and Sorensen C M 1984 Dynamic light scattering studies of concentration fluctuations in aqueous t-butyl alcohol solutions J. Chem. Phys. 80 4767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nishikawa K, Kodera Y and Iijima T 1987 Fluctuations in the particle number and concentration and the Kirkwood-Buff parameters of tert-butyl alcohol and water mixtures studied by small-angle x-ray scattering J. Phys. Chem. 91 3694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishikawa K and Iijima T 1993 Small-angle x-ray scattering study of fluctuations in ethanol and water mixtures J. Phys. Chem. 97 10824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dixit S, Crain J, Poon W C K, Finney J L and Soper A K 2002 Molecular segregation observed in a concentrated alcohol–water solution Nature 416 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowron D T, Finney J L and Soper A K 1998 The structure of pure tertiary butanol Mol. Phys. 93 531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bowron D T, Finney J L and Soper A K 1998 Structural investigation of solute-solute interactions in aqueous solutions of tertiary butane J. Phys. Chem. B 102 3551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bowron D T, Soper A K and Finney J L 2001 Temperature dependence of the structure of a 0.06 mole fraction tertiary butanol-water solution J. Chem. Phys. 114 6203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bowron D T and Moreno S D 2003 Structural correlations of water molecules in a concentrated alcohol solution J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15 S121Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bowron D T and Moreno S D 2002 The structure of a concentrated aqueous solution of tertiary butanol: Water pockets and resulting perturbations J. Chem. Phys. 117 3753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowron D T and Finney J L 2007 Association and Dissociation of an Aqueous Amphiphile at Elevated Temperatures J. Phys. Chem. B 111 9838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bowron D T and Moreno S D 2005 The Structure of a Trimolecular Liquid: Tert-Butyl Alcohol:Cyclohexene:Water J. Phys. Chem. B 109 16210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gazi H A R and Biswas R 2011 Heterogeneity in Binary Mixtures of (Water + Tertiary Butanol): Temperature Dependence Across Mixture Composition J. Phys. Chem. A 115 2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Broadwater T L and Kay R L 1970 Solvent structure in aqueous mixtures II. Ionic mobilities in tert-butyl alcohol-water mixtures at 25 deg J. Phys. Chem. 74 3802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calandrini V, Deriu A, Onori G, Lechner R E and Pieper J 2004 Diffusive dynamics of water in tert-butyl alcohol/water mixtures J. Chem. Phys. 120 4759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakanishi K, Ikari K, Okazaki S and Touhara H 1984 Computer experiments on aqueous solutions III. Monte Carlo calculation on the hydration of tertiary butyl alcohol in an infinitely dilute aqueous solution with a new water–butanol pair potential J. Chem. Phys. 80 1656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tanaka H, Nakanishi K and Touhara H 1984 Computer experiments on aqueous solutions. VI. Potential energy function for tert-butyl alcohol dimer and molecular dynamics calculation of 3 mol% aqueous solution of tert-butyl alcohol J. Chem. Phys. 81 4065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tanaka H and Nakanishi K 1993 Structure of aqueous solutions of amphiphilies: t-butyl alcohol and urea solutions Fluid Phase Equilib. 83 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Noto R, Martorana V, Emanuele A and Fornili S L 1995 Comparison of the water perturbations induced by two small organic solutes: ab initio calculations and molecular dynamics simulation J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 91 3803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wensink E J W, Hoffmann A C, van M. P J and der S. D v. 2003 Dynamic properties of water/alcohol mixtures studied by computer simulation J. Chem. Phys. 119 7308Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yoshida K, Yamaguchi T, Kovalenko A and Hirata F 2002 Structure of tert-Butyl Alcohol −Water Mixtures Studied by the RISM Theory J. Phys. Chem. B 106 5042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Omelyan I, Kovalenko A and Hirata F 2003 Compressibility of tert-Butyl Alcohol-Water Mixtures: The Rism Theory J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 2 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee M E and der V. N F A v. 2005 A new force field for atomistic simulations of aqueous tertiary butanol solutions J. Chem. Phys. 122 114509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferrari E S, Burton R C, Davey R J and Gavezzotti A 2006 Simulation of phase separation in alcohol/water mixtures using two-body force field and standard molecular dynamics J. Comput. Chem. 27 1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Parera A, Sokolic F, Almasy L and Koga Y 2006 Kirkwood-Buff integrals of aqueous alcohol binary mixtures J. Chem. Phys. 124 124515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kiselev M and Ivlev D 2004 The study of hydrophobicity in water–methanol and water–tert-butanol mixtures J. Mol. Liq. 110 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kusalik P G, Lyubartsev A P, Bergman D L and Laaksonen A 2000 Computer Simulation Study of tert-Butyl Alcohol. 2. Structure in Aqueous Solution J. Phys. Chem. B 104 9533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Paul S and Patey G N 2006 Why tert-Butyl Alcohol Associates in Aqueous Solution but Trimethylamine-N-oxide Does Not J. Phys. Chem. B 110 10514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gupta R and Patey G N 2012 Aggregation in dilute aqueous tert-butyl alcohol solutions: Insights from large-scale simulations J. Chem. Phys. 137 034509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Banerjee S, Furtado J and Bagchi B 2014 Fluctuating micro-heterogeneity in water–tert-butyl alcohol mixtures and lambda-type divergence of the mean cluster size with phase transition-like multiple anomalies J. Chem. Phys. 140 194502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarkar S, Banerjee R. S, Ghosh R, Ray P P and Bagchi B 2015 Composition dependent non-ideality in aqueous binary mixtures as a signature of avoided spinodal decomposition J. Chem. Sci. 127 49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Artola P A, Raihane A, Crauste-Thibierge C, Merlet D, Emo M, Alba-Simionesco C and Rousseau B 2013 Limit of miscibility and nanophase separation in associated mixtures J. Phys. Chem. B 117 9718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berendsen H J C, Grigera J R and Straatsma T P 1987 The missing term in effective pair potentials J. Phys. Chem. 91 6269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kaminski G and Jorgensen W L 1996 Performance of the AMBER94, MMFF94, and OPLS-AA Force Fields for Modeling Organic Liquids J. Phys. Chem. 100 18010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Price M L P, Ostrovsky D and Jorgensen W L 2001 Gas-Phase and Liquid-State Properties of Esters, Nitriles, and Nitro Compounds with the OPLS-AA Force Field J. Comput. Chem. 22 1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abascal J L F and Vega C 2005 A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005 J. Chem. Phys. 123 234505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maerzke K A, Schultz N E, Ross R B and Siepmann J I 2009 TraPPE-UA Force Field for Acrylates and Monte Carlo Simulations for Their Mixtures with Alkanes and Alcohols J. Phys. Chem. B 113 6415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hess B, Kutzner C, der S. D v. and Lindahl E 2008 GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 4 435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    der S. D v., Lindahl E, Hess B, Groenhof G, Mark A E and Berendsen H J C 2005 GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free J. Comput. Chem. 26 1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nosé S 1984 A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble Mol. Phys. 52 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nosé S 1984 A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods J. Chem. Phys. 81 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hoover W G 1985 Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions Phys. Rev. A 31 1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tukerman M, Berne B and Martyna G 1992 Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics J. Chem. Phys. 97 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Parrinello M and Rahman A 1981 Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method J. Appl. Phys. 52 7182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kipkemboi P K and Easteal E J 1994 Self-Diffusion Coefficients of Each Component in Water + t-Butyl Alcohol and Water + t-Butylamine Binary Mixtures Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 67 2956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Egorov G I and Makarov D M 2011 Densities and volume properties of (water + tert-butanol) over the temperature range of 274.15 to 348.15 K at pressure of 0.1 MPa J. Chem. Thermodyn. 43 430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lorch E 1969 Neutron diffraction by germania, silica and radiation-damaged silica glasses J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 2 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Du J, Benmore C J, Corrales R, Hart R T and Weber J K R 2009 A molecular dynamics simulation interpretation of neutron and x-ray diffraction measurements on single phase Y2O3–Al2O3 glasses J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21 205102Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    E Prince (Ed). 2006 In International Tables for Crystallography Vol. C: Mathematical, physical and chemical tables (Netherlands: Springer)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Annapureddy H V R, Kashyap H K, De B. P M and Margulis C J 2010 What is the origin of the prepeak in the X-ray scattering of imidazolium-based room-temperature ionic liquids? J. Phys. Chem. B 114 16838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Santos C S, Annapureddy H V R, Murthy N S, Kashyap H K, Castner E W Jr. and Margulis C J 2011 Temperature-dependent structure of methyltributylammoniumbis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) amide: X ray scattering and simulations J. Chem. Phys. 134 064501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kashyap H K, Santos C S, Annapureddy H V R, Murthy N S, Margulis C J and Castner E W J. 2012 Temperature-dependent structure of ionic liquids: X-ray scattering and simulations Faraday Discuss 154 133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kashyap H K, Hettige J J, Annapureddy H V R and Margulis C J 2012 SAXS anti-peaks reveal the length-scales of dual positive–negative and polar–apolar ordering in room-temperature ionic liquids Chem. Comm. 48 5103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kashyap H K and Margulis C J 2013 (Keynote) Theoretical Deconstruction of the X-ray Structure Function Exposes Polarity Alternations in Room Temperature Ionic Liquids ECS Trans. 50 301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kashyap H K, Santos C S, Daly R P, Hettige J J, Murthy N S, Shirota H, Castner E W Jr. and Margulis C J 2013 How does the ionic liquid organizational landscape change when nonpolar cationic alkyl groups are replaced by polar isoelectronic diethers? J. Phys. Chem. B 117 1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kashyap H K, Santos C S, Murthy N S, Hettige J J, Kerr K, Ramati S, Gwon J, Gohdo M, Lall-Ramnarine S I, Wishart J F, Margulis C J and Castner E W J. 2013 Structure of 1-alkyl-1-methylpyrrolidinium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl) amide ionic liquids with linear, branched, and cyclic alkyl groups J. Phys. Chem. B 117 15328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gupta A, Sharma S and Kashyap H K 2015 Composition dependent structural organization in trihexyl (tetradecyl) phosphonium chloride ionic liquid-methanol mixtures J. Chem. Phys. 142 134503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kaur S, Gupta A and Kashyap H K 2016 Nanoscale Spatial Heterogeneity in Deep Eutectic Solvents J. Phys. Chem. B 120 6712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Deng L, Wang Y and Ou-yang Z 2012 Concentration and Temperature Dependences of Polyglutamine Aggregation by Multiscale Coarse-Graining Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 116 10135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wei K, Deng L, Wang Y, Ou-Yang Z and Wang G 2014 Effect of Side-Chain Length on Structural and Dynamic Properties of Ionic Liquids with Hydroxyl Cationic Tails J. Phys. Chem. B 118 3642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tanaka H, Nakanishi K and Touhara H 1984 Computer experiments on aqueous solutions. VI. Potential energy function for tert-butyl alcohol dimer and molecular dynamics calculation of 3 mol% aqueous solution of tert-butyl alcohol J. Chem. Phys. 81 4065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Laaksonen A, Kusalik P G and Svishchev I M 1997 Three-Dimensional Structure in Water −Methanol Mixtures J. Phys. Chem. A 101 5910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ghoufi A, Artzer F and Malfreyt P 2016 Physical Properties and Hydrogen-Bonding Network of Water–Ethanol Mixtures from Molecular Dynamics Simulations J. Phys. Chem. B 120 793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Indra S and Biswas R 2016 Are N-methyl groups of Tetramethylurea (TMU) Hydrophobic? A composition and temperature-dependent fluorescence spectroscopic investigation of TMU/water binary mixtures J. Chem. Sci. 128 753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Indra S and Biswas R 2015 Heterogeneity in (2-butoxyethanol + water) mixtures: Hydrophobicity-induced aggregation or criticality-driven concentration fluctuations? J. Chem. Phys. 142 204501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Indra S, Guchhait B and Biswas R 2016 Structural anomaly and dynamic heterogeneity in cycloether/water binary mixtures: Signatures from composition dependent dynamic fluorescence measurements and computer simulations J. Chem. Phys. 144 124506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kashyap H K and Biswas R 2007 Ions in a binary asymmetric dipolar mixture: Mole fraction dependent Born energy of solvation and partial solvent polarization structure J. Chem. Phys. 127 184502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology DelhiHauz KhasIndia

Personalised recommendations