Effect of optimized structure and electronic properties of some benzimidazole derivatives on corrosion inhibition of mild steel in hydrochloric acid medium: Electrochemical and theoretical studies
- 148 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
The corrosion inhibitive action of a few benzimidazole derivatives namely 2-(benzamido) ethylbenzimidazole (BAEBI), 2-(β-benzenesulphonamido) ethylbenzimidazole (BSAEBI), 2-(benzamido) methylbenzimidazole (BAMBI) and 2-(β-benzenesulphonamido) methylbenzimidazole (BSAMBI), towards mild steel in hydrochloric acid has been studied using potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) methods. The results show that these compounds get adsorbed on the mild steel surface following Temkin adsorption isotherm, and act as mixed-type inhibitors. The inhibition efficiencies are found to follow the order, BAEBI > BSAEBI > BAMBI > BSAMBI. This observation is explained in terms of chain length, relative effects of amido and sulphonamido groups, possible structural factors, spatial orientations, energy gap between the frontier molecular orbitals, different intrinsic molecular parameters, like, global hardness and softness, and number of electrons transferred.
Corrosion inhibition property of four different benzamido and benzenesulphonamido derivatives of methylbenzimidazole and ethylbenzimidazole for mild steel in HCl depends on various molecular parameters, including chain length, substituent group, spatial orientation, energy gap between the frontier molecular orbitals, global hardness, softness, and number of electron transferred.
Keywords
Adsorption corrosion inhibition electrochemical techniques quantum mechanical calculations.Notes
Acknowledgements
DS thanks Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India for supporting a research project under Fast Track Scheme for Young Scientists (no. SR/FT/CS-110/2010).
Supplementary material
References
- 1.Khaled K F 2010 Mater. Chem. Phys. 124 760Google Scholar
- 2.Popova A, Christov M, Raicheva S and Sokolova E 2004 Corros. Sci. 46 1333Google Scholar
- 3.Bentiss F and Lagrenée M 2010 J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2 13Google Scholar
- 4.Quraishi M A and Sardar R 2003 J. Appl. Electrochem. Soc. 33 1163Google Scholar
- 5.Palomar-Pardavé M, Romero-Romo M, Herrera-Hernández H, Abreu-Quijano M A, Likhanova N V, Uruchurtu J and Juárez-García J M 2012 Corros. Sci. 54 231Google Scholar
- 6.Ahamad I, Prasad R, Ebenso Eno E and Quraishi M A 2012 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 3436Google Scholar
- 7.Hassan N and Holze R 2009 J. Chem. Sci. 121 693Google Scholar
- 8.Nataraja S E, Venkatesha T V, Tandon H C and Shylesha B S 2011 Corros. Sci. 53 4109Google Scholar
- 9.Khaled K F and Al-Qahtani M M 2009 Mater. Chem. Phys. 113 150Google Scholar
- 10.Kovačević N and Kokalj A 2012 Mater. Chem. Phys. 137 331Google Scholar
- 11.Abd El-Maksoud S A and Fouda A S 2005 Mater. Chem. Phys. 93 84Google Scholar
- 12.Obot I B, Obi-Egbedi N O and Umoren S A 2009 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 4 863Google Scholar
- 13.El Ashry E S H, El Nemr A, Essawy S A and Ragab S 2008 Prog. Org. Coat. 61 11Google Scholar
- 14.Popova A, Christov M and Vasilev A 2011 Corros. Sci. 53 1770Google Scholar
- 15.Abboud Y, Abourriche A, Saffaj T, Berrada M, Charrouf M, Bennamara A, Cherqaoui A and Takky D 2006 Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 8178Google Scholar
- 16.Aljourani J, Golozar M A and Raeissi K 2010 Mater. Chem. Phys. 121 320Google Scholar
- 17.Tang Y, Zhang F, Huc S, Cao Z, Wua Z and Jing W 2013 Corros. Sci. 74 271Google Scholar
- 18.Chohan Z H, Shaibh A U, Rauf A and Supuran C T 2006 J. Enz. Inh. Med. Chem. 21 741Google Scholar
- 19.Urra L, Gonzalez M P, Collado Isidro G and Hernandez-Galan R 2007 J. Mol Graphics Model 25 680Google Scholar
- 20.Ozden S, Karates H, Yidiz S and Goker H 2004 Archiv der Pharmazie 337 556Google Scholar
- 21.Nandi M M and Ray R 1987 Ind. J. Chem. 26A 345Google Scholar
- 22.Nandi M M and Ray R 1988 Ind. J. Chem. 27A 687Google Scholar
- 23.Ranjana and Nandi M M 2011 Ind. J. Chem. Tech. 18 29Google Scholar
- 24.Frisch M J et al. 2009 Gaussian 09, Rev: D.01 (Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT)Google Scholar
- 25.Pajkossy T 2005 Solid State Ionics 176 1997Google Scholar
- 26.Rammelt U and Reinhard G 1987 Corros. Sci. 27 373Google Scholar
- 27.Jorcin J B O. M E, Pébère N and Tribollet B 2006 Electrochim. Acta 51 1473Google Scholar
- 28.Obot I B and Obi-Egbedi N O 2010 Mater. Chem. Phys. 122 325Google Scholar
- 29.Foo K Y and Hameed B 2010 Chem. Eng. J. 156 2Google Scholar
- 30.ElBribri A, Tabyaoui M, Tabyaoui B, El Attari H and Bentiss F 2013 Mater. Chem. Phys. 141 240Google Scholar
- 31.Fuchs-Godec R, Palavic M G and Tomic M V 2012 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51 274Google Scholar
- 32.Zarrouk A, Hammouti B, Dafali A and Bentiss F 2013 Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52 2560Google Scholar
- 33.Wang X, Wan Y, Zeng Y and Gu Y 2012 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 2403Google Scholar
- 34.Jørgensen C K 1963 In Inorganic complexes (London: Academic) p. 40Google Scholar
- 35.Bhattacharyya A 1989 Asian J. Chem. 2 166Google Scholar
- 36.Ghosh N N and Nandi M M 1976 Ind. J. Chem. 14A 778Google Scholar
- 37.Khaled K F 2010 Electrochim. Acta 55 6523Google Scholar
- 38.Gece G 2008 Corros. Sci. 50 2981Google Scholar
- 39.Panja S S and Chakraborty T 2003 J. Chem. Phys. 118 6200Google Scholar
- 40.Pauling L 1960 In The Nature of the Chemical Bond (New York: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
- 41.Parr R G and Pearson R G 1983 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 7512Google Scholar
- 42.Geerlings P, De Proft F and Langenaeker W 2003 Chem. Rev. 103 1793Google Scholar
- 43.Kabanda M M, Murulana L C, Ozcan M, Karadag F, Dehri I, Obot I B and Ebenso E E 2012 Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7 5035Google Scholar
- 44.Lukovits I, Kálmán E and Zucchi F 2001 Corrosion 57 3Google Scholar
