Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Sciences

, Volume 119, Issue 2, pp 169–174 | Cite as

Effect of sodium deoxycholate and sodium cholate on DPPC vesicles: A fluorescence anisotropy study with diphenylhexatriene

  • Usharani Subuddhi
  • Ashok K MishraEmail author
Article

Abstract

Effects of two bile salts, namely sodium deoxycholate (NaDC) and sodium cholate (NaC), on DPPC small unilamellar vesicles have been investigated using the steady-state fluorescence anisotropy (r ss ) of diphenylhexatriene (DPH) as a tool. It was found that the variation of r ss is sensitive enough to monitor different stages of interaction of bile salts with DPPC vesicles. NaDC induced significant changes in the membrane well below its CMC (6 mM). Even at 4 mM, which is still lower than the CMC, the phospholipids were completely solubilised by the NaDC micelles. The effect of NaC on DPPC vesicles, however, was much less significant, especially in the sub-micellar concentration regime. Being more hydrophilic NaC does not interact with the membrane efficiently. Complete solubilisation of phospholipids took place only when the concentration of NaC was above its CMC (16 mM). The experiments also showed that the bile salt-induced changes of vesicle structure were strongly dependent on the concentration of the bile salt and not on the molar ratio of lipid and bile salt.

Keywords

Bile salt DPPC vesicle fluorescence anisotropy 1,6-diphenylhexatriene 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blume A and Garidel P 1999 The handbook of thermal analysis and calorimetry, Vol. 4, From macromolecules to man (ed.) R B Kemp (Amsterdam: Elsevier) ch. 4, p. 109Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marsh D 1996 Handbook of nonmedical application of liposomes (eds) D Lasic and Y Barenholz (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press) vol. 2, ch. 1, p. 1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lichtenberg D 1993 Biomembranes — physical aspects (ed.) M Shinitzky (Weinheim: VCH) p. 63Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carey M C, Small D M and Bliss C M 1983 Annu. Rev. Physiol. 45 651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elorza M A, Elorza B and Chantres J R 1997 Int. J. Pharma. 158 173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schubert R, Wolburg H, Schmidt K H and Roth H J 1991 Chem. Phys. Lip. 58 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coleman R 1987 Biochem. Soc. Trans. 15 S68Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hildebrand A, Neubert R, Garidel P and Blume A 2002 Langmuir 18 2836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hildebrand A, Beyer K, Neubert R, Garidel P and Blume A 2003 Colloids Surf. B32 335Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    New R R C 1990 Liposomes, a practical approach (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santos N C, Prieto M and Castanho M A R B 2003 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1612 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shinitzky M and Barenholz Y 1978 Biochem. Biophys. Acta 515 367Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glatz P 1978 Anal. Biochem. 87 187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaiser R D and London E 1998 Biochemistry 37 8180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chattopadhyay A and London E 1984 Anal. Biochem. 139 408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Subuddhi U 2006 Fluorescent molecular probes for phospholipid vesicles and bile salt micelles, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Technology — Madras, ChennaiGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chantres J R, Elorza B, Elorza M A and Rodado P 1996 Int. J. Pharm. 138 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carey M C and Small D M 1972 Arch. Int. Med. 130 506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Small D M 1971 The bile acids — Chemistry, physiology and metabolism (eds) P P Nair and D Kritchevsky (New York: Plenum) vol. 1, pp 247–354Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lasch J 1995 Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1241 269Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology — MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations