Advertisement

Development of typological classification and its relationship to microdifferentiation in ethnic India

  • K C MalhotraEmail author
  • T S Vasulu
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

The history of the racial classification of the people of India can be looked at in three temporal phases: (1) at the national level, the initial studies of racial classification attempted along with the Census of India; (2) at the regional level, studies by anthropologists and statisticians following systematic sampling and statistical procedures were conducted after the initial national-level studies and (3) population-specific studies in different regions across the country including micro-evolutionary studies of individual populations followed the regional studies. Initially the racial classification was part of the Census survey conducted by British anthropologists in some parts of the country among castes and tribes and was based on a few physical traits. This was followed by a systematic anthropometric survey in particulars regions (e.g., UP, Bengal, etc.) by anthropologists and statisticians. This was followed by population specific micro-evolutionary studies across different regions by numerous anthropologists investigating the role of selection, drift, migration and admixture and other population structure variables among endogamous castes and tribes.

Keywords

Anthropometric survey biological affinities caste jati/varna race tribe 

References

  1. AK 1922 Prof. V. Giuffrida-Ruggeri (1872–1922), Obituary (9th Feb, 1922). Nature 109 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu A, Mukherjee DP, Dutta PC, Bose DK, Basu MP, Ghosh GD, Kumar GC and Haq F 1994 All India anthropometric survey: North zone basic anthropometric data, Vol I (Madhya Pradesh, Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India)Google Scholar
  3. Bhanu BV 2004 People of India: Maharashtra Part I, Vol 30 People of India (Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India)Google Scholar
  4. Bhasin MK 2006 Genetics of castes and tribes of India: Indian population milieu. Int. J. Hum. Genet. 6 233–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Census of India 1931 Part III: Ethnographical, racial affinities of the people of India. Report, Vol I, Sec. A. (Simla: Government of India) 1935Google Scholar
  6. Chatterjee BK 1934 A comparative study of the somatic affinities of the Mithili and Kanaujia Brahmans of Bihar. Anthropol. Bull.-2 (Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta)Google Scholar
  7. Chatterjee AN 1948 The variation in stature and cephalic index among Bengalee college students; in Proc. of the 25th Indian Science Congress, Part II. Presidential addressGoogle Scholar
  8. Chowdhuri A 1936 Preliminaries to a study of the racial problems in India. Man India 16 16Google Scholar
  9. Crooke W 1896 Castes and Tribes of the North Western Provinces and OudhGoogle Scholar
  10. Das BM 1961 Outlines of physical anthropology (Allahabad: Kitab Mahal)Google Scholar
  11. Eickstedt EF 1952, 1934 Von. Die Rassengeschichte von Indien mit besonder Berucksichtigung von Mysore. Zeits. Morph. Anth. 32 77–124Google Scholar
  12. Fisher RA 1936 The coefficient of racial likeness and the future of craniometry. J. Roy. Anth. Inst. 66 57–63Google Scholar
  13. Gadgil M and Malhotra KC 1982 Adaptive significance of the Indian caste system: An ecological perspective. South Asian StudyGoogle Scholar
  14. Ganguly PK 1976 Physical anthropology of the Nicobarese (Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India)Google Scholar
  15. Gautam RK, Adak DK, Pal M and Bharati P 2013 Morphometric variation among the central Indian populations. Hum. Biol. 2 153–175Google Scholar
  16. Giuddurida-Ruggeri V 1921 First outlines of a systematic (Calcutta: Anthropology of Asia)Google Scholar
  17. Guha BS 1935 Census of India 1931, 1-India, Part III, Ethnographical (Simla: Govt. India Press)Google Scholar
  18. Guha BS 1937, 1944 Racial elements in the population. issue 22 Oxford pamphlets of Indian affairs. (H. Milford 1944) p 30Google Scholar
  19. Gupta P and Dutta PC 1966 Anthropometry in India (Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India)Google Scholar
  20. Hough W 1910 The People of India. By Sir Herbert Risley. Am. Anthropol 12 105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutton JH 1933 Ethnographic notes; in: Census of India, 1931, Vol I-India, Part III-Ethnographical (ed.) BS Guha (Simla: Govt. India Press) p 306Google Scholar
  22. Karve I 1954 Anthropometric measurements in Karnataka and Orissa and a comparison of these two regions with Maharashtra. J. Anthropol. Soc.Bom. Bombay 8:47–75.Google Scholar
  23. Karve I and Dandekar VM 1951 Anthropometric measurements of Maharashtra. Deccan College Monograph series 8 (Pune: Deccan College)Google Scholar
  24. Karve I and Malhotra KC 1968 A biological comparison of eight endogamous groups of the same rank. Curr. Anthropol. 9 109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keith Sir A 1928 The evolution of the human races. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. GB Ireland 58 305–321Google Scholar
  26. Mahalanobis PC 1922 Anthropological observations on the Anglo-Indians of Calcutta, Part I, analysis male stature. Rec. Indian Museum 23 1–96Google Scholar
  27. Mahalanobis PC 1925a Presidential Address to Anthropology Section of Ind. Sc. CongressGoogle Scholar
  28. Mahalanobis PC 1925b Analysis of race mixture in Bengal. Presidential address to Anthropological section of Ind. Sc. Congress. Benares. J. Asiatic Soc. Bengal 23 301–333Google Scholar
  29. Mahalanobis PC 1930 A statistical study of certain anthropometric measurements from Sweden. Biometrika 22 98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mahalanobis PC 1931 Anthropological observations on the Anglo-Indians of Calcutta, Part II, analysis of Anglo-Indian head length. Rec. Indian Museum 23 97–149Google Scholar
  31. Mahalanobis PC 1933 A revision of Risley’s anthropometric data relating to the tribes and castes of Bengal. Sankhya 1 76–105Google Scholar
  32. Mahalanobis PC 1934 A revision of Risley’s anthropometric data relating to the Chittagong hill tribes. Sankhya 1 267–276Google Scholar
  33. Mahalanobis PC 1940 Anthropological observations on the Anglo-Indians of Calcutta, statistical analysis of measurements of seven characters. Rec. Indian Museum 23 151–187Google Scholar
  34. Mahalanobis PC and Bose C 1941 Correlation between anthropometric characters in some Bengal castes and tribes. Sankhya 5 249–260Google Scholar
  35. Mahalanobis PC, Majumdar DN and Rao CR 1949 Anthropometric survey of the United Provinces, 1941: A statistical study. Sankhya, Indian J. Stat. (1933–1960). 9 89–324Google Scholar
  36. Majumdar DN 1938 The relationships of the Austric-speaking tribes of India with specific reference to the measurements of Hos and Saoras. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 7 6Google Scholar
  37. Majumdar DN 1949 Part 1. The filed study, UP anthropometric survey. Sankhya 9 93–110.Google Scholar
  38. Majumdar DN 1950 Race elements in cultural Gujarat (Gujarat Research Society)Google Scholar
  39. Majumdar DN and Rao CR 1958 Bengal anthropometry survey: A statistical study (Jun., 1958). Sankhya, Indian J. Stat. 19 201–408Google Scholar
  40. Malhotra KC 1978a Microevolutionary dynamics among the Gadavas of Goa; in: Evolutionary models and studies in human diversity (eds) Meier RJ, Otten CM and Hameed FA (The Hague: Mouton Publishers) pp 315–323Google Scholar
  41. Malhotra KC 1978b Founder effect, gene drift and natural selection among four nomadic Mendelian isolates; in: Evolutionary models and studies in human diversity (eds) Meier RJ, Otten CM and Hameed FA (The Hague: Mouton Publishers) pp 279–314Google Scholar
  42. Malhotra KC 1978c Morphological composition of the people of India. J. Hum. Evol. 7 45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Malhotra KC 1979 Qualitative finger dermatoglyphic variation among 21 endogamous Dhangar castes of Maharashtra, India; in: Dermatoglyphicsfifty year later (eds) Werteleck V, Plato CC, Alan R (New York: Liss, Inc.) pp 335–346Google Scholar
  44. Malhotra KC, Reddy BM and Bhanu BV 1996 Anthropometric affinities among the 20 endogamous groups of Dhangars of Maharashtra, India. Zeits. Morphol. Anthropol. 81 79–90Google Scholar
  45. Pearson K 1926 On the coefficient of racial likeness. Biometrika 18 105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Penrose LS 1954 Distance, size and shape. Ann Eugenics 18 337–343Google Scholar
  47. Perkins JM, Khan KT, Smith GD and Subramanian SV 2011 Patterns and trends of adult height in India in 2005–2006. Econ. Hum. Biol. 9 184–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rakshit HK 1975 Bio-anthropological research in India (Calcutta: Anthropological Survey of India)Google Scholar
  49. Rao DC 1969 Tongue pigmentation in man: A new genetic trait. Curr. Sci. 39 161–162Google Scholar
  50. Rao DC 1970a Tongue pigmentation in man. Hum. Hered. 20 8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rao DC 1970b Genetics of tongue pigmentation in man. Hum. Hered. 20 590–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reddy Chengal P 1993 A genetic study on the relationship between total finger ridge count and its variability. Int. J. Anthropol. 8 87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Risley HH 1891a The tribes and castes of Bengal: Ethnographic glossary. 2 vols. (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press)Google Scholar
  54. Risley HH 1891b The tribes and castes of Bengal: Anthropometric data. 2 vols. (Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press)Google Scholar
  55. Risley HH 1908, 1915 The people of India, 2nd edition (ed.) W Thacker (Calcutta & Simla: Spink & Co.)Google Scholar
  56. Roy SC 1934 Caste, race and religion in India. Man. India. 14: 39–63, 75–220, 271–311; 1937: Man in India 17: 147–176, 212–254; 1938: Man in India 18: 85–105Google Scholar
  57. Sanghvi LD, Balakrishnan V and Irawati Karve 1981 Biology of the people of Tamil Nadu. Ind. Soc. Hum. Genet, Pune and Ind Soc Anthrop Soc, Calcutta (Calcutta: IMPRINTA)Google Scholar
  58. Sarkar SS 1954 The aboriginal races of India (Calcutta: Bookland Ltd.)Google Scholar
  59. Sarkar SS 1958 Race and race movements in India. In: The cultural heritage of India. Calcutta I: 17–32Google Scholar
  60. Sarkar SS 1961 A racial classification of India. Bull. Anthropol. Surv. India 10 27–34Google Scholar
  61. Seltzer CC 1937 A critique of the coefficient of racial likeness. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 23 101–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Trautmann TR 1977 Aryans and British India (University of California Press)Google Scholar
  63. Walsh JE 2011 A Brief History of India, Facts on File, ISBN 978-0-8160-8143-1Google Scholar
  64. World Health Organization (WHO) 1995 Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. WHO Technical Report Series No. 854 (Geneva: World Health Organisation, WHO)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Formerly Professor of Anthropology & Human GeneticsIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia
  2. 2.NoidaIndia
  3. 3.Formerly Associate Professor of Anthropology & Human GeneticsIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia
  4. 4.KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations