New clues into the mechanisms of rice domestication

  • Padubidri V ShivaprasadEmail author


Domestication of rice involved incorporation of specific yield-related changes in wild species of rice. This agricultural process has been of significant interest for plant biologists. The recent advance in genomics has provided new tools to investigate the genetic basis and consequences of domestication. Several genes involved in domestication and diversification process have been characterized, and as expected, this list is over-represented by transcription factors and their co-factors. Most often the modification orchestrated expression levels of genes such as those coding for transcription factors. It has been proposed that transcriptional regulators and their regulation is likely a major theme controlling morphological differences between crops and their progenitors. However, recent data indicate that single amino acid changes in genes coding for key proteins as well as epigenetic and small RNA-mediated pathways also contributed towards domestication-associated phenotypes.


Crop improvement domestication phenotypes rice small RNA 



PVS acknowledges support from Ramanujan Fellowship (SR/S2/RJN-109/2012; Department of Science and Technology, Government of India). The PI’s lab is supported by NCBS-TIFR core funds and a grant (BT/PR12394/AGIII/103/891/2014) from Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. The author thanks Vivek Hari Sundar for comments.


  1. Ahmad A, Zhang Y and Cao XF 2010 Decoding the epigenetic language of plant development. Mol. Plant 3 719–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali A, Raddatz N, Aman R, Kim S, Park HC, Jan M, Baek D, Khan IU, Oh DH, Lee SY, Bressan RA, Lee KW, Maggio A, Pardo JM, Bohnert HJ and Yun DJ 2016 A single amino-acid substitution in the sodium transporter HKT1 associated with plant salt tolerance. Plant Physiol. 171 2112–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber WT, Zhang W, Win H, Varala KK, Dorweiler JE, Hudson ME and Moose SP 2012 Repeat associated small RNAs vary among parents and following hybridization in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109 10444–10449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baulcombe D 2004 RNA silencing in plants. Nature 431 356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bond DM and Baulcombe DC 2014 Small RNAs and heritable epigenetic variation in plants. Trends Cell Biol. 24 100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Callaway E 2014 The birth of rice. Nature 514 S58–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campo S, Peris-Peris C, Siré C, Moreno AB, Donaire L, Zytnicki M, Notredame C, Llave C and San Segundo B 2013 Identification of a novel microRNA (miRNA) from rice that targets an alternatively spliced transcript of the Nramp6 (Natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 6) gene involved in pathogen resistance. New Phytol. 199 212–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi JY, Platts AE, Fuller DQ, Hsing YI, Wing RA, Purugganan MD and Kim Y 2017 The rice paradox: multiple origins but single domestication in Asian rice. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34 969–979PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Doebley JF, Gaut BS and Smith BD 2006 The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127 1309–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groszmann M, Greaves IK, Albert N, Fujimoto R, Helliwell CA, Dennis ES and Peacock WJ 2011 Epigenetics in plants—vernalisation and hybrid vigour. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1809 427–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Groszmann M, Greaves IK, Fujimoto R, James Peacock W and Dennis ES 2013 The role of epigenetics in hybrid vigour. Trends Genet. 29 684–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollick JB and Chandler VL 2001 Genetic factors required to maintain repression of a paramutagenic maize pl1 allele. Genetics 157 369–378PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Houston K, McKim SM, Comadran J, Bonar N, Druka I, Uzrek N, Cirillo E, Guzy-Wrobelska J, Collins NC, Halpin C, Hansson M, Dockter C, Druka A and Waugh R 2013 Variation in the interaction between alleles of HvAPETALA2 and microRNA172 determines the density of grains on the barley inflorescence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110 16675–16680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huo X, Wu S, Zhu Z, Liu F, Fu Y, Cai H, Sun X, Gu P, Xie D, Tan L and Sun C 2017 NOG1 increases grain production in rice. Nat. Commun. 8 1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Izawa T 2008 The process of rice domestication: a new model based on recent data. Rice 1 127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Izawa T, Konishi S, Shomura A and Yano M 2009 DNA changes tell us about rice domestication. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12 185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenan-Eichler M, Leshkowitz D, Tal L, Noor E, Melamed-Bessudo C, Feldman M and Levy AA 2011 Wheat hybridization and polyploidization results in deregulation of small RNAs. Genetics 188 263–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kharabian-Masouleh A, Waters DL, Reinke RF, Ward R and Henry RJ 2012 SNP in starch biosynthesis genes associated with nutritional and functional properties of rice. Sci. Rep. 2 557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khush GS 1997 Origin, dispersal, cultivation and variation of rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 35 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Konishi S, Izawa T, Lin SY, Ebana K, Fukuta Y, Sasaki T and Yano M 2006 An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 312 1392–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kovach MJ, Sweeney MT and McCouch SR 2007 New insights into the history of rice domestication. Trends Genet. 23 578–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li C, Zhou A and Sang T 2006 Rice domestication by reducing shattering. Science 311 1936–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li T, Chen J, Qiu S, Zhang Y, Wang P, Yang L, Lu Y and Shi J 2012 Deep sequencing and microarray hybridization identify conserved and species-specific MicroRNAs during somatic embryogenesis in hybrid yellow poplar. PLoS ONE 7 e43451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li XM, Chao DY, Wu Y, Huang X, Chen K, Cui LG, Su L, Ye WW, Chen H, Chen HC, Dong NQ, Guo T, Shi M, Feng Q, Zhang P, Han B, Shan JX, Gao JP and Lin HX 2015 Natural alleles of a proteasome α2 subunit gene contribute to thermotolerance and adaptation of African rice. Nat. Genet. 47 827–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li X, Guo K, Zhu X, Chen P, Li Y, Xie G, Wang L, Wang Y, Persson S and Peng L 2017 Domestication of rice has reduced the occurrence of transposable elements within gene coding regions. BMC Genom. 18 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li X, Guo K, Zhu X, Chen P, Li Y, Xie G, Wang L, Wang Y, Persson S and Peng L 2017 Domestication of rice has reduced the occurrence of transposable elements within gene coding regions. BMC Genom. 18 55Google Scholar
  27. Ma Y, Dai X, Xu Y, Luo W, Zheng X, Zeng D, Pan Y, Lin X, Liu H, Zhang D, Xiao J, Guo X, Xu S, Niu Y, Jin J, Zhang H, Xu X, Li L, Wang W, Qian Q, Ge S and Chong K 2015 COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160 1209–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer RS and Purugganan MD 2013 Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14 840–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morrell PL, Buckler ES and Ross-Ibarra J 2011 Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13 85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niederhuth CE and Schmitz RJ 2014 Covering your bases: inheritance of DNA methylation in plant genomes. Mol. Plant 7 472–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qin C, Yu C, Shen Y, Fang X, Chen L, Min J, Cheng J, Zhao S, Xu M, Luo Y, Yang Y, Wu Z, Mao L, Wu H, Ling-Hu C, Zhou H, Lin H, González-Morales S, Trejo-Saavedra DL, Tian H, Tang X, Zhao M, Huang Z, Zhou A, Yao X, Cui J, Li W, Chen Z, Feng Y, Niu Y, Bi S, Yang X, Li W, Cai H, Luo X, Montes-Hernández S, Leyva-González MA, Xiong Z, He X, Bai L, Tan S, Tang X, Liu D, Liu J, Zhang S, Chen M, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Liao W, Zhang Y, Wang M, Lv X, Wen B, Liu H, Luan H, Zhang Y, Yang S, Wang X, Xu J, Li X, Li S, Wang J, Palloix A, Bosland PW, Li Y, Krogh A, Rivera-Bustamante RF, Herrera-Estrella L, Yin Y, Yu J, Hu K and Zhang Z 2014 Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 5135–5140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rapp RA and Wendel JF 2005 Epigenetics and plant evolution. New Phytol. 168 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ren ZH, Gao JP, Li LG, Cai XL, Huang W, Chao DY, Zhu MZ, Wang ZY, Luan S and Lin HX 2005 A rice quantitative trait locus for salt tolerance encodes a sodium transporter. Nat. Genet. 37 1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanchez PL, Wing RA and Brar DS 2013 The wild relative of rice: genomes and genomics; in Zhang Q, Wing RA (eds.) Genetics and genomics of rice, plant genetics and genomics: crops and models, vol. 5, pp. 9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seymour G, Poole M, Manning K and King GJ 2008 Genetics and epigenetics of fruit development and ripening. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 11 58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shivaprasad PV, Dunn RM, Santos BA, Bassett A and Baulcombe DC 2012 Extraordinary transgressive phenotypes of hybrid tomato are influenced by epigenetics and small silencing RNAs. EMBO J. 31 257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simon SA and Meyers BC 2011 Small RNA-mediated epigenetic modifications in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14 148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Song Q, Zhang T, Stelly DM and Chen ZJ 2017 Epigenomic and functional analyses reveal roles of epialleles in the loss of photoperiod sensitivity during domestication of allotetraploid cottons. Genom. Biol. 18 99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sweeney M and McCouch S 2007 The complex history of the domestication of rice. Ann. Bot. 100 951–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Swetha C, Debjani B, Pachamuthu K, Tirumalai V, Nair A, Prasad M and Shivaprasad PV 2018 Major domestication-related phenotypes in Indica rice are due to loss of miRNA-mediated laccase silencing. Plant Cell 30 2649–2662PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Swinnen G, Goossens A and Pauwels L 2016 Lessons from domestication: targeting cis-regulatory elements for crop improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 21 506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thomson MJ, Tai TH, McClung AM, Lai XH, Hinga ME, Lobos KB, Xu Y, Martinez CP and McCouch SR 2003 Mapping quantitative trait loci for yield, yield components and morphological traits in an advanced backcross population between Oryza rufipogon and the Oryza sativa cultivar Jefferson. Theory Appl. Genet. 107 479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vierstra RD 2009 The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10 385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Y, Shen D, Bo S, Chen H, Zheng J, Zhu QH, Cai D, Helliwell C and Fan L 2010 Sequence variation and selection of small RNAs in domesticated rice. BMC Evol. Biol. 10 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Biological SciencesBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations