Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, 44:14 | Cite as

AtMBD4: A methylated DNA binding protein negatively regulates a subset of phosphate starvation genes

  • Adwaita Prasad Parida
  • Amrapali Sharma
  • Arun Kumar SharmaEmail author
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic modification that governs transcriptional regulation. The methylation mark is read by a special class of proteins called methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins. The role of DNA methylation has been found in X-chromosome inactivation, genomic imprinting, transposon silencing, and self-incompatibility. Recently, remodeling of global DNA methylation was demonstrated in Arabidopsis during low phosphate availability. The present study reports that AtMBD4 gene of Arabidopsis negatively regulates phosphate starvation. The T-DNA insertion mutation at the AtMBD4 locus exhibited altered root architecture as compared to wild-type plants. Using microarray hybridization and analysis, an increased transcript accumulation of 242 genes was observed in the mutant. Many of these genes were related to phosphate transporters and transcription factors, involved in phosphate starvation response. Comparison of data of atmbd4 mutant with publicly available microarray data of phosphate starvation response indicated the role of AtMBD4 protein in phosphate starvation response. Further, promoter analysis of up-regulated genes suggested that cis-regulatory elements like MBS, W-box, and B1BS are more prominent in the promoters of up-regulated genes. Upon performing a methylation-specific PCR, a decreased DNA methylation in the promoter regions of up-regulated genes was observed. The accumulation of anthocyanin and inorganic phosphate in the atmbd4 mutant was found to be higher than the wild-type plant. Altered root morphology, up-regulation of phosphate starvation-induced genes in atmbd4 mutant suggests that AtMBD4 negatively regulates the phosphate starvation response.

Keywords

Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation methyl CpG binding domain protein phosphate starvation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

APP acknowledges Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, for providing research fellowship. AS acknowledges University Grand Commission, India, for providing research fellowship. AKS acknowledges Purse grant from the Department of Science and Technology provided through the University of Delhi. The SAP grant of University Grant Commission and FIST grant of DST to the Department of Plant Molecular Biology for support of infrastructure is also acknowledged.

Supplementary material

12038_2018_9843_MOESM1_ESM.docx (11 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 11 kb)
12038_2018_9843_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 13 kb)
12038_2018_9843_MOESM3_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 18 kb)
12038_2018_9843_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (1.9 mb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLSX 1955 kb)
12038_2018_9843_MOESM5_ESM.eps (3.2 mb)
Supplementary material 5 (EPS 3272 kb)

References

  1. Arpat AB, Magliano P, Wege S, et al 2012 Functional expression of PHO1 to the Golgi and trans-Golgi network and its role in export of inorganic phosphate. Plant J. 71 479–491.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05004.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bari R, Datt Pant B, Stitt M, Scheible WR 2006 PHO2, MicroRNA399, and PHR1 Define a Phosphate-Signaling Pathway in Plants. Plant Physiol. 141 988–999PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bariola PA, Howard CJ, Taylor CB, Verburg MT, Jaglan VD and Green PJ 1994 The Arabidopsis ribonuclease gene RNS1 is tightly controlled in response to phosphate limitation. Plant J. 6 673–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates TR and Lynch JP 2001 Root hairs confer a competitive advantage under low phosphorus availability. Plant Soil 236 243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg A, Meza TJ, Mahic M, Thorstensen T, Kristiansen K and Aalen RB 2003 Ten members of the Arabidopsis gene family encoding methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins are transcriptionally active and at least one, AtMBD11, is crucial for normal development. Nucleic Acids Res. 31 5291–5304PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogdanovic O and Veenstra GJ 2009 DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins: developmental requirements and function. Chromosoma 118 549–565PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bustos R, Castrillo G, Linhares F, Puga MI, Rubio V, Perez-Perez J, Solano R, Leyva A and Paz-Ares J 2010 A central regulatory system largely controls transcriptional activation and repression responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 6 e1001102PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bustos R, Castrillo G, Linhares F, Puga MI, Rubio V, Perez-Perez J, Solano R, Leyva A, and Paz-Ares J 2010 A central regulatory system largely controls transcriptional activation and repression responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 6 e1001102PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campos EI 2013 Identification of OsSPX1 interacting proteins and their function in low-temperature tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. MSc thesis, Dept. of biology, San Diego state university. (http://hdl.handle.net/10211.10/4966)
  10. Chen YF, Li LQ, Xu Q, Kong YH, Wang H and Wu WH 2009 The WRKY6 transcription factor modulates PHOSPHATE1 expression in response to low Pi stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21 3554–3566PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen ZH, Nimmo GA, Jenkins GI and Nimmo HG 2007 BHLH32 modulates several biochemical and morphological processes that respond to Pi starvation in Arabidopsis. Biochem. J. 405 191–198PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa-Nunes P, Pontes O, Preuss SB and Pikaard CS 2010 Extra views on RNA-dependent DNA methylation and MBD6-dependent heterochromatin formation in nucleolar dominance. Nucleus 1 254–259PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dai X, Wang Y, Yang A and Zhang WH 2012 OsMYB2P-1, an R2R3 MYB transcription factor, is involved in the regulation of phosphate-starvation responses and root architecture in rice. Plant Physiol. 159 169–183PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. del Pozo JC, Allona I, Rubio V, Leyva A, de la Pena A, Aragoncillo C and Paz-Ares J 1999 A type 5 acid phosphatase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana is induced by phosphate starvation and by some other types of phosphate mobilising/oxidative stress conditions. Plant J. 19 579–589PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Devaiah BN and Raghothama KG 2007 Transcriptional Regulation of Pi Starvation Responses by WRKY75. Plant Signal. Behav. 2 424–425PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devaiah BN, Karthikeyan AS and Raghothama KG 2007a WRKY75 transcription factor is a modulator of phosphate acquisition and root development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 143 1789–1801PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Devaiah BN, Madhuvanthi R, Karthikeyan AS and Raghothama KG 2009 Phosphate starvation responses and gibberellic acid biosynthesis are regulated by the MYB62 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2 43–58PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Devaiah BN, Nagarajan VK and Raghothama KG 2007b Phosphate homeostasis and root development in Arabidopsis are synchronized by the zinc finger transcription factor ZAT6. Plant Physiol. 145 147–159PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dietrich K, Weltmeier F, Ehlert A, Weiste C, Stahl M, Harter K and Droge-Laser W 2011 Heterodimers of the Arabidopsis transcription factors bZIP1 and bZIP53 reprogram amino acid metabolism during low energy stress. Plant Cell 23 381–395PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farras R, Ferrando A, Jasik J, Kleinow T, Okresz L, Tiburcio A, Salchert K, del Pozo C, Schell J and Koncz C 2001 SKP1-SnRK protein kinase interactions mediate proteasomal binding of a plant SCF ubiquitin ligase. EMBO J. 20 2742–2756PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Figueroa P, Gusmaroli G, Serino G, Habashi J, Ma L, Shen Y, Feng S, Bostick M, Callis J, Hellmann H and Deng XW 2005 Arabidopsis has two redundant Cullin3 proteins that are essential for embryo development and that interact with RBX1 and BTB proteins to form multisubunit E3 ubiquitin ligase complexes in vivo. Plant Cell 17 1180–1195PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujii H, Chiou TJ, Lin SI, Aung K and Zhu JK 2005 A miRNA involved in phosphate-starvation response in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 15 2038–2043PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Gao P, Xin Z and Zheng ZL 2008 The OSU1/QUA2/TSD2-encoded putative methyltransferase is a critical modulator of carbon and nitrogen nutrient balance response in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 3 e1387PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamburger D, Rezzonico E, MacDonald-Comber Petetot J, Somerville C and Poirier Y 2002 Identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene involved in phosphate loading to the xylem. Plant Cell 14 889–902PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammond JP and White PJ 2011 Sugar signaling in root responses to low phosphorus availability. Plant Physiol. 156 1033–1040PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison AF 1987 Soil organic phosphorus-a review of world literature (CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK)Google Scholar
  27. Hartmann L, Pedrotti L, Weiste C, Fekete A, Schierstaedt J, Gottler J, Kempa S, Krischke M, Dietrich K, Mueller MJ, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Hanson J and Droge-Laser W 2015 Crosstalk between two bZIP signaling pathways orchestrates salt-induced metabolic reprogramming in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 27 2244–2260PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang TK, Han CL, Lin SI, Chen YJ, Tsai YC, Chen YR, Chen JW, Lin WY, Chen PM, Liu TY, Chen YS, Sun CM and Chiou TJ 2013 Identification of downstream components of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme PHOSPHATE2 by quantitative membrane proteomics in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 25 4044–4060PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Iglesias J, Trigueros M, Rojas-Triana M, Fernández M, Albar JP, Bustos R, Paz-Ares J and Rubio V 2013 Proteomics identifies ubiquitin–proteasome targets and new roles for chromatin-remodeling in the Arabidopsis response to phosphate starvation. J. Proteomics 94 1–22PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Ito M, Koike A, Koizumi N and Sano H 2003 Methylated DNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 133 1747–1754PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiang C, Gao X, Liao L, Harberd NP and Fu X 2007 Phosphate starvation root architecture and anthocyanin accumulation responses are modulated by the gibberellin-DELLA signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 145 1460–1470PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuo HF and Chiou TJ 2011 The role of microRNAs in phosphorus deficiency signaling. Plant Physiol. 156 1016–1024PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lang Z, Lei M, Wang X, Tang K, Miki D, Zhang H, Mangrauthia SK, Liu W, Nie W, Ma G, Yan J, Duan CG, Hsu CC, Wang C, Tao WA, Gong Z and Zhu JK 2015 The methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD7 facilitates active DNA demethylation to limit DNA hyper-methylation and transcriptional gene silencing. Mol. Cell 57 971–983PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li D, Zhu H, Liu K, Liu X, Leggewie G, Udvardi M and Wang D 2002 Purple acid phosphatases of Arabidopsis thaliana. Comparative analysis and differential regulation by phosphate deprivation. J. Biol. Chem. 277 27772–27781PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Q, Wang X, Sun H, Zeng J, Cao Z, Li Y and Qian W 2015 Regulation of active DNA demethylation by a methyl-CpG-binding domain protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 11 e1005210PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Libault M, Wan J, Czechowski T, Udvardi M and Stacey G 2007 Identification of 118 Arabidopsis transcription factor and 30 ubiquitin-ligase genes responding to chitin, a plant-defense elicitor. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20 900–911PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu J, Yang L, Luan M, Wang Y, Zhang C, Zhang B, Shi J, Zhao FG, Lan W and Luan S 2015 A vacuolar phosphate transporter essential for phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 E6571–6578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liu TY, Huang TK, Tseng CY, Lai YS, Lin SI, Lin WY, Chen JW and Chiou TJ 2012 PHO2-dependent degradation of PHO1 modulates phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24 2168–2183PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liu TY, Huang TK, Yang SY, Hong YT, Huang SM, Wang FN, Chiang SF, Tsai SY, Lu WC and Chiou TJ 2016 Identification of plant vacuolar transporters mediating phosphate storage. Nat. Commun. 7 11095PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lopez-Bucio J, Hernandez-Abreu E, Sanchez-Calderon L, Nieto-Jacobo MF, Simpson J and Herrera-Estrella L 2002 Phosphate availability alters architecture and causes changes in hormone sensitivity in the Arabidopsis root system. Plant Physiol. 129 244–256PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morcuende R, Bari R, Gibon Y, Zheng W, Pant BD, Blasing O, Usadel B, Czechowski T, Udvardi MK, Stitt M and Scheible WR 2007 Genome-wide reprogramming of metabolism and regulatory networks of Arabidopsis in response to phosphorus. Plant Cell Environ. 30 85–112PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Mudge SR, Rae AL, Diatloff E and Smith FW 2002 Expression analysis suggests novel roles for members of the Pht1 family of phosphate transporters in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 31 341–353PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Murashige T and Skoog F 1962 A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nagarajan VK, Satheesh V, Poling MD, Raghothama KG and Jain A 2016 Arabidopsis MYB-related HHO2 exerts a regulatory influence on a subset of root traits and genes governing phosphate homeostasis. Plant Cell Physiol. 57 1142–1152PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Neff MM and Chory J 1998 Genetic interactions between phytochrome A, phytochrome B, and cryptochrome 1 during Arabidopsis development. Plant Physiol. 118 27–35PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Okada K and Shimura Y 1990 Reversible root tip rotation in Arabidopsis seedlings induced by obstacle-touching stimulus. Science 250 274–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Para A, Li Y, Marshall-Colon A, Varala K, Francoeur NJ, Moran TM, Edwards MB, Hackley C, Bargmann BO, Birnbaum KD, McCombie WR, Krouk G and Coruzzi GM 2014 Hit-and-run transcriptional control by bZIP1 mediates rapid nutrient signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 10371–10376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Parida AP, Raghuvanshi U, Pareek A, Singh V, Kumar R and Sharma AK 2018 Genome-wide analysis of genes encoding MBD domain-containing proteins from tomato suggest their role in fruit development and abiotic stress responses. Mol. Biol. Rep. 45 2653–2669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Parida AP, Sharma A and Sharma AK 2017 AtMBD6, a methyl CpG binding domain protein, maintains gene silencing in Arabidopsis by interacting with RNA binding proteins. J. Biosci. 42 57–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng M, Cui Y, Bi YM and Rothstein SJ 2006 AtMBD9: a protein with a methyl-CpG-binding domain regulates flowering time and shoot branching in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 46 282–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poirier Y, Thoma S, Somerville C and Schiefelbein J 1991 Mutant of Arabidopsis deficient in xylem loading of phosphate. Plant Physiol. 97 1087–1093PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Preuss SB, Costa-Nunes P, Tucker S, Pontes O, Lawrence RJ, Mosher R, Kasschau KD, Carrington JC, Baulcombe DC, Viegas W and Pikaard CS 2008 Multimegabase silencing in nucleolar dominance involves siRNA-directed DNA methylation and specific methylcytosine-binding proteins. Mol. Cell 32 673–684PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Puga MI, Mateos I, Charukesi R, Wang Z, Franco-Zorrilla JM, de Lorenzo L, Irigoyen ML, Masiero S, Bustos R, Rodriguez J, Leyva A, Rubio V, Sommer H and Paz-Ares J 2014 SPX1 is a phosphate-dependent inhibitor of phosphate starvation response 1 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 14947–14952PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Raghothama KG 1999 Phosphate acquisition. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50 665–693PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Remy E, Cabrito TR, Batista RA, Teixeira MC, Sa-Correia I and Duque P 2012 The Pht1;9 and Pht1;8 transporters mediate inorganic phosphate acquisition by the Arabidopsis thaliana root during phosphorus starvation. New Phytol. 195 356–371PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Risseeuw EP, Daskalchuk TE, Banks TW, Liu E, Cotelesage J, Hellmann H, Estelle M, Somers DE and Crosby WL 2003 Protein interaction analysis of SCF ubiquitin E3 ligase subunits from Arabidopsis. Plant J. 34 753–767PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Ruan W, Guo M, Cai L, Hu H, Li C, Liu Y, Wu Z, Mao C, Yi K, Wu P and Mo X 2015 Genetic manipulation of a high-affinity PHR1 target cis-element to improve phosphorous uptake in Oryza sativa L. Plant Mol. Biol. 87 429–440PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Rubio V, Linhares F, Solano R, Martin AC, Iglesias J, Leyva A and Paz-Ares J 2001 A conserved MYB transcription factor involved in phosphate starvation signaling both in vascular plants and in unicellular algae. Genes Dev. 15 2122–2133PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Scebba F, Bernacchia G, De Bastiani M, Evangelista M, Cantoni RM, Cella R, Locci MT and Pitto L 2003 Arabidopsis MBD proteins show different binding specificities and nuclear localization. Plant Mol. Biol. 53 715–731PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Scebba F, De Bastiani M, Bernacchia G, Andreucci A, Galli A and Pitto L 2007 PRMT11: a new Arabidopsis MBD7 protein partner with arginine methyltransferase activity. Plant J. 52 210–222PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Scheible WR, Morcuende R, Czechowski T, Fritz C, Osuna D, Palacios-Rojas N, Schindelasch D, Thimm O, Udvardi MK and Stitt M 2004 Genome-wide reprogramming of primary and secondary metabolism, protein synthesis, cellular growth processes, and the regulatory infrastructure of Arabidopsis in response to nitrogen. Plant Physiol. 136 2483–2499PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schönberger B, Chen X, Mager S and Ludewig U 2016 Site-dependent differences in DNA methylation and their impact on plant establishment and phosphorus nutrition in Populus trichocarpa. PLoS One 11 e0168623PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shi J, Hu H, Zhang K, Zhang W, Yu Y, Wu Z and Wu P 2014 The paralogous SPX3 and SPX5 genes redundantly modulate Pi homeostasis in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 65 859–870PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith AP, Jain A, Deal RB, Nagarajan VK, Poling MD, Raghothama KG and Meagher RB 2010 Histone H2A. Z regulates the expression of several classes of phosphate starvation response genes but not as a transcriptional activator. Plant Physiol. 152 217–225PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Smith FW, Rae AL and Hawkesford MJ 2000 Molecular mechanisms of phosphate and sulphate transport in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1465 236–245PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Springer NM and Kaeppler SM 2005 Evolutionary divergence of monocot and dicot methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins. Plant Physiol. 138 92–104PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sun L, Song L, Zhang Y, Zheng Z and Liu D 2016 Arabidopsis PHL2 and PHR1 act redundantly as the key components of the central regulatory system controlling transcriptional responses to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 170 499–514PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Svistoonoff S, Creff A, Reymond M, Sigoillot-Claude C, Ricaud L, Blanchet A, Nussaume L and Desnos T 2007 Root tip contact with low-phosphate media reprograms plant root architecture. Nat. Genet. 39 792–796PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Thimm O, Blasing O, Gibon Y, Nagel A, Meyer S, Kruger P, Selbig J, Muller LA, Rhee SY and Stitt M 2004 MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes. Plant J. 37 914–939PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang C, Huang W, Ying Y, et al 2012 Functional characterization of the rice SPX-MFS family reveals a key role of OsSPX-MFS1 in controlling phosphate homeostasis in leaves. New Phytol. 196 139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04227.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang C, Dong X, Jin D, Zhao Y, Xie S, Li X, He X, Lang Z, Lai J, Zhu JK and Gong Z 2015a Methyl-CpG-binding domain protein MBD7 is required for active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 167 905–914PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang C, Yue W, Ying Y, Wang S, Secco D, Liu Y, Whelan J, Tyerman SD and Shou H 2015b Rice SPX-Major Facility Superfamily3, a vacuolar phosphate efflux transporter, is involved in maintaining phosphate homeostasis in rice. Plant Physiol. 169 2822–2831PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Wang F, Deng M, Xu J, Zhu X and Mao C 2017 Molecular mechanisms of phosphate transport and signaling in higher plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 74 114–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang H, Xu Q, Kong YH, Chen Y, Duan JY, Wu WH and Chen YF 2014a Arabidopsis WRKY45 transcription factor activates PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1;1 expression in response to phosphate starvation. Plant Physiol. 164 2020–2029PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang Z, Ruan W, Shi J, Zhang L, Xiang D, Yang C, Li C, Wu Z, Liu Y, Yu Y, Shou H, Mo X, Mao C and Wu P 2014b Rice SPX1 and SPX2 inhibit phosphate starvation responses through interacting with PHR2 in a phosphate-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111 14953–14958PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Williamson LC, Ribrioux SP, Fitter AH and Leyser HM 2001 Phosphate availability regulates root system architecture in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 126 875–882PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wu P, Ma L, Hou X, Wang M, Wu Y, Liu F and Deng XW 2003 Phosphate starvation triggers distinct alterations of genome expression in Arabidopsis roots and leaves. Plant Physiol. 132 1260–1271PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yaish MW, Peng M and Rothstein SJ 2009 AtMBD9 modulates Arabidopsis development through the dual epigenetic pathways of DNA methylation and histone acetylation. Plant J. 59 123–135PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Yang WT, Baek D, Yun DJ, Hwang WH, Park DS, Nam MH, Chung ES, Chung YS, Yi YB and Kim DH 2014 Overexpression of OsMYB4P, an R2R3-type MYB transcriptional activator, increases phosphate acquisition in rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 80 259–267PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Yang XJ and Finnegan PM 2010 Regulation of phosphate starvation responses in higher plants. Ann. Bot. 105 513–526PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yano A, Kodama Y, Koike A, Shinya T, Kim HJ, Matsumoto M, Ogita S, Wada Y, Ohad N and Sano H 2006 Interaction between methyl CpG-binding protein and ran GTPase during cell division in tobacco cultured cells. Ann. Bot. 98 1179–1187PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yao ZF, Liang CY, Zhang Q, Chen ZJ, Xiao BX, Tian J and Liao H 2014 SPX1 is an important component in the phosphorus signalling network of common bean regulating root growth and phosphorus homeostasis. J. Exp. Bot. 65 3299–3310PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yi K, Wu Z, Zhou J, Du L, Guo L, Wu Y and Wu P 2005 OsPTF1, a novel transcription factor involved in tolerance to phosphate starvation in rice. Plant Physiol. 138 2087–2096PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yong-Villalobos L, Cervantes-Perez SA, Gutierrez-Alanis D, Gonzales-Morales S, Martinez O and Herrera-Estrella L 2016 Phosphate starvation induces DNA methylation in the vicinity of cis-acting elements known to regulate the expression of phosphate-responsive genes. Plant Signal. Behav. 11 e1173300PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Yong-Villalobos L, Gonzalez-Morales SI, Wrobel K, Gutierrez-Alanis D, Cervantes-Perez SA, Hayano-Kanashiro C, Oropeza-Aburto A, Cruz-Ramirez A, Martinez O and Herrera-Estrella L 2015 Methylome analysis reveals an important role for epigenetic changes in the regulation of the Arabidopsis response to phosphate starvation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 E7293–7302PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. Zemach A and Grafi G 2003 Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD) proteins. Plant J. 34 565–572PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. Zemach A, Li Y, Wayburn B, Ben-Meir H, Kiss V, Avivi Y, Kalchenko V, Jacobsen SE and Grafi G 2005 DDM1 binds Arabidopsis methyl-CpG binding domain proteins and affects their subnuclear localization. Plant Cell 17 1549–1558PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zhou J, Jiao F, Wu Z, Li Y, Wang X, He X, Zhong W and Wu P 2008 OsPHR2 is involved in phosphate-starvation signaling and excessive phosphate accumulation in shoots of plants. Plant Physiol. 146 1673–1686PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adwaita Prasad Parida
    • 1
  • Amrapali Sharma
    • 1
  • Arun Kumar Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Plant Molecular BiologyUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations