Advertisement

MusatransSSRDB (a transcriptome derived SSR database) – An advanced tool for banana improvement

  • Suthanthiram Backiyarani
  • Arumugam Chandrasekar
  • Subbaraya UmaEmail author
  • Marimuthu Somasundaram Saraswathi
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Availability of transcriptome datasets for use in accelerated molecular-based breeding in Musa species is limited. Illumina Hiseq technology was employed to determine differential gene expression between the contrasting cultivars for three different stresses (Eumusae leaf spot –Mycosphaerella eumusae, root lesion nematode – Pratylenchus coffeae and moisture deficit stress) under challenged and unchallenged conditions. An average of 34.72 million of reads was assembled into ~47629 contigs, and ~5,466 simple sequence repeats (SSR) from each library were identified. GO annotation and KEGG pathway analysis were carried for all the transcripts and the SSR, SNPs were also detected. Based on this information, a MusatransSSRDB has been developed. Currently, the database consists of 32,800 SSRs with the unique information like putative function of the SSR-containing genes and their metabolic pathway and expression profiling under various stress conditions. This database provides information on in silico polymorphic SSRs (2830 SSRs) between the contrasting cultivars for each stress and within stress. Information on in silico polymorphic SSRs specific to differentially expressed genes under challenged condition for each stress can also be accessed. This database facilitates the retrieval of results by navigating the tabs for cultivars, stress and polymorphism. This database was developed using HTML, Java and PHP; datasets are stored in MySQL database and accessible in the public domain (http://bioinfnrcb.byethost7.com/nrcbbio/). This unique information facilitates the banana breeder to select the SSR primers based on specific objectives. MusatransSSRDB along with other genomics databases will facilitate the genetic dissection and breeding for complex traits in banana. Thus, this database is a step forward in economizing cost, time, manpower and other resources.

Keywords

Banana database in silico polymorphism SSR transcriptome 

Abbreviations used

BLAST

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

GO

gene ontology

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

SCTs

SSR-containing transcripts

SSR

simple sequence repeats

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), India, under the project NPTC–Functional Genomics. We express our sincere gratitude to Director, ICAR–National Research Centre for Banana, India, for the facilities provided to develop this database.

Supplementary material

12038_2018_9819_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 14 kb)
12038_2018_9819_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (24 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 23 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson NJ and Urwin PE 2012 The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J. Exp. Bot. 63 3523–3543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backiyarani S, Uma S, Saraswathi MS and Chandrasekar A 2014 Transcriptome Analysis of Musa and its applications in banana improvement; in Sustainable Horticultural Systems (eds) Nandwani D (Springer, Cham) pp 275–299Google Scholar
  3. Backiyarani S, Uma S, Saraswathi MS, Saravanakumar AS and Chandrasekar A 2015 Transcriptome analysis of banana (Musa balbisiana) based on next generation sequencing technology. Turk. J. Agric. Forest 39 705–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Backiyarani S, Uma S, Varatharj P and Saraswathi MS 2012 Mining of EST-SSR markers of Musa and their transferability studies among the members of order the Zingiberales. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 169 228–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dela Cruz FS, Jr., Gueco LS, Damasco OP, Huelgas VC, dela Cueva FM, Dizon TO, Sison MLJ, Banasihan IG, Sinohin VO and Molina AB Jr 2008 Farmers’ handbook on introduced and local banana cultivars in the Philippines. (Bioversity Int) p 67Google Scholar
  6. Doddamani D, Katta MA, Khan AW, Agarwal G, Shah TM and Varshney RK 2014 CicArMiSatDB: the chickpea microsatellite database. BMC Bioinformatics 15 212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gadaleta A, Giancaspro A, Giove SL, Zacheo S, Mangini G, Simeone R, Signorile A and Blanco A 2009 Genetic and physical mapping of new EST-derived SSRs on A and B genome chromosomes of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118 1015–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heslop-Harrison JS and Schwarzacher T 2007 Domestication, genomics and the future for banana. Ann. Bot. 100 1073–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kadkhodaei S, Khayyam Nekouei M, Shahnazari M, Etminani H, Imani A, Ghaderi Zefrehei M, Elahy M and Arbakariya BA 2011 Molecular tagging of agronomic traits using simple sequence repeats: Informative markers for almond (Prunusdulcis) molecular breeding. Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 5 1199–1209Google Scholar
  10. Kaliyappan R, Viswanathan S, Suthanthiram B, Subbaraya U, MarimuthuSomasundram S and Muthu M 2016 Evolutionary expansion of WRKY gene family in banana and its expression profile during the infection of root lesion nematode, Pratylenchuscoffeae. PLoS ONE 11 e0162013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li C, Shao J, Wang Y, Li W, Guo D, Yan B, Xia Y and Peng M 2013 Analysis of banana transcriptome and global gene expression profiles in banana roots in response to infection by race 1 and tropical race 4 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cubense. BMC Genomics 14 851Google Scholar
  12. Loh JP, Kiew K, Set O, Gan LH and Gan YY 2000 Amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting of 16 banana cultivars (Musa cvs.). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17 360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. MathiThumilan B, Sajeevan RS, Biradar J, Madhuri T, Nataraja K and Sreeman SM 2016 Development and characterization of genic SSR MARKERS from Indian mulberry transcriptome and their transferability to related species of Moraceae. PLoS ONE 11 e0162909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Menon R, Cherian A, Suma A, Maicykutty Mathew P, Nair S and Aipe KC 2011 Developing resistant banana and plantain cultivars through conventional breeding techniques. Acta Hort. 897 207–213Google Scholar
  15. Muthusamy M, Uma S, Backiyarani S, Saraswathi MS and Chandrasekar A 2016 Transcriptomic changes of drought-tolerant and sensitive banana cultivars exposed to drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 7 1609PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Passos MA, de Cruz VO, Emediato FL, de Teixeira CC, Azevedo VC, Brasileiro AC, Amorim EP, Ferreira CF, et al. 2013 Analysis of the leaf transcriptome of Musa acuminata during interaction with Mycosphaerella musicola: gene assembly, annotation and marker development. BMC Genomics 14 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ravi I, Uma S, Vaganan MM and Mustaffa MM 2013 Phenotyping bananas for drought resistance. Front. Physiol. 4 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saha S, Karaca M, Jenkins J N, Zipf AE, Reddy O U K and Kantety RV 2003 Simple sequence repeats as useful resources to study transcribed genes of cotton. Euphytica 130 355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tabbasam N, Zafa Y and Mehboob-ur-Rahman 2014 Pros and cons of using genomic SSRs and EST-SSRs for resolving phylogeny of the genus Gossypium. Plant. Syst. Evol. 300 559–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney RK and Graner A 2003 Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 106 411–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Uma S, Backiyarani S, Saravanakumar AS, Chandrasekar A, Thangavelu R and Saraswathi MS 2016 Identification of Mycosphaerella eumusae responsive unique genes/transcripts from a resistant banana cultivar. Acta Hortic. 1114  https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2016.1114.16

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suthanthiram Backiyarani
    • 1
  • Arumugam Chandrasekar
    • 1
  • Subbaraya Uma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marimuthu Somasundaram Saraswathi
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR–National Research Centre for BananaTiruchirapalliIndia

Personalised recommendations