A map of taste neuron projections in the Drosophila CNS
- 467 Downloads
We provide a map of the projections of taste neurons in the CNS of Drosophila. Using a collection of 67 GAL4 drivers representing the entire repertoire of Gr taste receptors, we systematically map the projections of neurons expressing these drivers in the thoracico-abdominal ganglion and the suboesophageal ganglion (SOG). We define 9 categories of projections in the thoracico-abdominal ganglia and 10 categories in the SOG. The projection patterns are modular, and can be interpreted as combinations of discrete pattern elements. The elements can be interpreted in terms of the taste organ from which the projections originate, the structures from which they originate, and the quality of taste information that they represent. The extensive diversity in projection patterns provides an anatomical basis for functional diversity in responses elicited by different taste stimuli.
KeywordsDrosophila taste taste receptors
We thank Zev Wisotsky for determining the pattern of Gr64d-GAL4 labelling in the SOG. This work was supported by NIH grants to JC.
- Dahanukar A, Foster K, van der Goes van Naters WM and Carlson JR 2001 A Gr receptor is required for response to the sugar trehalose in taste neurons of Drosophila. Nat. Neurosci. 4 1182–1186Google Scholar
- Dahanukar A, Lei YT, Kwon JY and Carlson JR 2007 Two Gr genes underlie sugar reception in Drosophila. Neuron 56 503–516Google Scholar
- Dethier VG 1976 The Hungry Fly (Harvard University Press: Cambridge)Google Scholar
- Jiao Y, Moon SJ, Wang X, Ren Q and Montell C 2008 Gr64f is required in combination with other gustatory receptors for sugar detection in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 18 1797-1801Google Scholar
- Lee Y, Moon SJ and Montell C 2009 Multiple gustatory receptors required for the caffeine response in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106 4495–4500Google Scholar
- Ling F, Dahanukar A, Weiss LA, Kwon JY and Carlson JR 2014 The molecular and cellular basis of taste coding in the legs of Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 34 7148–7164Google Scholar