Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 191–200 | Cite as

Evolution, epigenetics and cooperation

  • Patrick Bateson
Article

Abstract

Explanations for biological evolution in terms of changes in gene frequencies refer to outcomes rather than process. Integrating epigenetic studies with older evolutionary theories has drawn attention to the ways in which evolution occurs. Adaptation at the level of the gene is giving way to adaptation at the level of the organism and higher-order assemblages of organisms. These ideas impact on the theories of how cooperation might have evolved. Two of the theories, i.e. that cooperating individuals are genetically related or that they cooperate for self-interested reasons, have been accepted for a long time. The idea that adaptation takes place at the level of groups is much more controversial. However, bringing together studies of development with those of evolution is taking away much of the heat in the debate about the evolution of group behaviour.

Keywords

Cooperation epigenetics evolution levels of selection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article grew out of a lecture that I gave at a meeting held in Almora, India, in May 2012. I thank Vidyanand Nanjundiah for his friendship and encouragement. A question that he posed to all those attending the meeting was the following: ‘To what extent can one account for group behaviour in terms of the properties of its constituent units as exhibited when they are isolated, and to what extent does one need to invoke group-level, emergent traits?’ It is an important challenge. I am grateful to Stuart Newman and Madeleine Beekman for their comments on my earlier attempt to meet the challenge.

References

  1. Abbot P, Abe J, Alcock J, Alizon S, Alpedrinha J, Andersson M, et al. 2011 Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471 E1–E4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badyaev AV 2009 Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environment: An empirical test of the Baldwin effect. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 364 1125–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin JM 1896 A new factor in evolution. Am. Nat. 30 441–451, 536–553Google Scholar
  4. Bateson M, Nettle D and Roberts G 2006 Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol. Lett. 2 412–414PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateson P 1988 The biological evolution of cooperation and trust; in Trust: Making a breaking cooperative relations (ed) D Gambetta (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 14–30Google Scholar
  6. Bateson P 2005 The return of the whole organism. J. Biosci. 30 31–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bateson P 2006 The nest’s tale: a reply to Richard Dawkins. Biol. Philos. 21 553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bateson P 2010 The evolution of evolutionary theory. Eur. Rev. 18 287–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bateson P and Gluckman P 2011 Plasticity, robustness, development and evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bateson P 2012 The impact of the organism on its descendants. Genet. Res. Int. doi: 10.1155/2012/640612 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Birch J (in press) Hamilton’s rule and its discontents. Br. J. Philos. Sci. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axt016
  12. Braun E and David L 2011 The role of cellular plasticity in the evolution of regulatory novelty; in Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular biology (eds) SB Gissis and E Jablonka (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clutton-Brock TH and Parker GA 1995 Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373 209–216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chase ID 1980 Cooperative and non-cooperative behaviour in animals. Am. Nat. 115 827–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cubas P, Vincent C and Coen E 1999 An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401 157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies NB 1985 Cooperation and conflict among dunnocks, Prunella modularis, in a variable mating system. Anim. Behav. 33 628–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies NB, Krebs JR, and West SA 2012 An introduction to behavioural ecology 4th edition (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell)Google Scholar
  18. Dawkins R 1976 The selfish gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  19. Dawkins R 1982 The extended phenotype (Oxford: Freeman)Google Scholar
  20. Eldakar OT and Wilson DS 2011 Eight criticisms not to make about group selection. Evolution 65 1523–1526PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gissis SB and Jablonka E 2011 Transformations of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular biology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  22. Gardner A and Grafen A 2009 Capturing the superorganism: a formal theory of group adaptation. J. Evol. Biol. 22 659–671PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert SF 2014 Symbiosis as the way of eukaryotic life: the dependent co-origination of the body. J. Biosci. 39 201–209Google Scholar
  24. Grafen A 1984 Natural selection, kin selection and group selection; in Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach 2nd edition (eds) JR Krebs and NB Davies (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 62–84Google Scholar
  25. Haldane JBS 1955 Population genetics. New Biol. 18 34–51Google Scholar
  26. Hamilton WJ 1964 The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. J. Theor. Biol. 7 1–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton WD 1996 Narrow roads of gene land: the collected papers of WD Hamilton Volume 1: Evolution of social behaviour (New York: WH Freeman)Google Scholar
  28. Harvey PH, Kavanagh M and Clutton-Brock TH 1978 Sexual dimorphism in human teeth. J. Zool. 186 475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Houston AI and Davies NB 1985 The evolution of cooperation and life history in the dunnock, Prunella modularis; in Behavioural ecology (ed) RM Sibly and RH Smith (Oxford: Blackwell) pp 471–487Google Scholar
  30. Johannes F, Porcher E, Teixeira FK, Saliba-Colombani V, Simon M, Agier N, et al. 2009 Assessing the Impact of transgenerational epigenetic variation on complex traits. PloS Genet. 5 e1000530PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kropotkin P 1915 Mutual aid: a factor in evolution (London: Heinemann)Google Scholar
  32. Laland KN, Sterelny K, Odling-Smee FJ, Hoppitt W and Uller T 2011 Cause and effect in biology revisited: is Mayr’s proximate–ultimate dichotomy still useful? Science 334 1512–1516Google Scholar
  33. Lloyd Morgan C 1896 On modification and variation. Science 4 733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mayr E 1961 Cause and effect in biology. Science 134 1501–1506Google Scholar
  35. Maynard Smith J 1976 Group selection. Quart. Rev. Biol. 51 277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maynard Smith J 1977 Parental investment: a prospective analysis. Anim. Behav. 25 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nowak MA and Highfield R 2011 SuperCooperators: Evolution, altruism, and why we need each other to succeed (New York: Free Press)Google Scholar
  38. Nowak MA, Tarnita CE and Wilson EO 2010 The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466 1057–1062PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Okasha S 2006 Evolution and the levels of selection (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Osborn HF 1896 Ontogenic and phylogenic variation. Science 4 786–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Packer C 1977 Reciprocal altruism in Papio anubis. Nature 265 441–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pfeifer GP 2006 Mutagenesis at methylated CpG sequences. Curr. Topics Microbiol. Immunol. 301 259–281Google Scholar
  43. Pigliucci M and Müller GB 2010 Evolution - the extended synthesis (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rassoulzadegan M 2011 An evolutionary role for RNA-mediated epigenetic variation? in Transformation of Lamarckism: From subtle fluids to molecular biology (eds) SB Gissis and E Jablonka (Cambridge MA: MIT Press) pp 227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raihani NJ, Thornton A and Bshary R 2012 Punishment and cooperation in nature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27 288–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shapiro JA 2011 Evolution: A view from the 21st century (Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press Science)Google Scholar
  47. Spalding DA 1873 Instinct with original observations on young animals. Macmillan’s Magazine 27 282–293Google Scholar
  48. Trivers R 1971 The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quart. Rev. Biol. 46 35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trivers R 1985 Social evolution (Menlo Park: Benjamin/Cummings)Google Scholar
  50. Waddington CH 1957 The strategy of the genes (London: Allen and Unwin)Google Scholar
  51. Wagner GP, Pavlicev M and Cheverud JM 2007 The road to modularity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8 921–931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weber BH and Depew DJ 2003 Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  53. West SA, El Mouden C and Gardner A 2011 Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 32 231–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson DS and Wilson EO 2007 Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quart. Rev. Biol. 82 327–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yazbek SN, Nadeau JH and Buchner DA 2010 Ancestral paternal genotype controls body weight and food intake for multiple generations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 19 4134–4144PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations