Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 181–187 | Cite as

There is no common ground between science and religion

  • Antonio G Valdecasas
  • Luis Boto
  • Ana Maria Correas


It is fairly common to introduce science and religion as relatively different modes of understanding the world in which we live that may interconnect in several ways, and that this interaction is useful and may promote the advancement and development of both fields. We strongly object to this perspective.

Although usually restricted to ‘humanities’ journals, we found surprising the publication of an article in the scientific journal Evolution (Reiss 2009) on the relationship between evolutionary biology and religion that we think lacks sufficient scholarship to be relevant to the subject and is clearly negative for the teaching of the scientific approach to objective knowledge.

In that paper, Reiss argues that science and religion may offer various ways of interpreting our world. Reiss deals with the problem of teaching evolution in the presence of creationist believers in classroom. As we see it, this question is inappropriate. From our point of view, Reiss could, too,...


Conflict evolution religion scientific knowledge 



Sanda Iepure, Nuria Polo, Antonio Taibo, Prof V Nanjundiah and an anonymous referee gave very useful suggestions on a previous version of this manuscript. A professional company reviewed the English.


  1. Bartel DP and Szostak JV 1993 Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences. Science 261 1411–1418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boto L 2010 Horizontal gene transfer in evolution facts and challenges. Proc. R. Soc. B 277 819–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boto L, Doadrio I and Diogo R 2009 Prebiotic world macroevolution and Darwin´s theory a new insight. Biol. Philos. 24 119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrel A 1912/1994 The voyage to Lourdes (Michigan: Real View Books)Google Scholar
  5. Collins FS 2006 The language of God A scientist presents evidence for belief (New York: Free Press)Google Scholar
  6. Darwin C 1857 Letter to AR Wallace (
  7. de Solla Price DJ 1963 Little science big science (Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
  8. du Pinet A 1584 L’Histoire des plantes avec leurs pourtraicts noms qualitez & lieux où elles croissant (Translated from Latin into French by Geoffrey Linocier (Paris: Charles Macé)Google Scholar
  9. Futuyma DJ and Bennett AF 2009 The importance of experimental studies in evolutionary theory; in Experimental Evolution Concepts methods and applications of selection experiments (eds) T Garland Jr and MR Rose (Berkeley: University of California Press) pp 15–30Google Scholar
  10. Galison P 1987 How experiments end (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
  11. Galison P 1997 Image and logic A material culture of microphysics (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
  12. Garfield E 1977 Essays of an information scientist (Philadelphia: ISI Press)Google Scholar
  13. Gilbert W 1986 The RNA world. Nature 319 618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goff SA, Ricke D, Lan TH, Presting G, Wang R, Dunn M, Glazebrook J, Sessions A, et al. 2002 A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L ssp japonica). Science 296 92–100PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gotelli NJ and Ellison AM 2004 A primer of ecological studies (Sunderland, Massachussetts: Sinauer Associates Inc)Google Scholar
  16. Hansson SO 2008 Science and pseudo-science; in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (http://platostanfordedu/entries/pseudo-science)
  17. Hájek A 2001 Probability interpretations of; in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Phylosophy (ed) Edward N Zalta (http://platostanfordedu/archives/spr2003/entries/probability-interpret/)
  18. Henrich J, Heine SJ and Norenzayan A 2010 The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33 61–83Google Scholar
  19. Hilario E and Gogarten JP 1993 Horizontal gene transfer of ATPase genes-the tree of life becomes a net of life. BioSystems 31 111–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howie D 2002 Interpreting probability controversies and developments in the early twentieth century (Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  21. Ma W and Yu C 2005 Intramolecular RNA replicasepossibly the first self-replicating molecule in the RNA world. Origins Life Evol. Biosphere 36 413–420Google Scholar
  22. Merton RK 1979 The sociology of science Theoretical and empirical investigations (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
  23. Nola R and Sankey H 2007 Theories of scientific method (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press)Google Scholar
  24. Oakley TH 2009 A critique of experimental phylogenetics; in Experimental Evolution Concepts methods and applications of selection experiments (eds) T Garland Jr and MR Rose (Berkeley: University of California Press) pp 659–669Google Scholar
  25. Ogilvie BW 2006 The science of describing (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
  26. Orgel LE 2004 Prebiotic chemistry and the origin of the RNA world. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39 99–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reiss M 2009 The relationship between evolutionary biology and religion. Evolution 63 1934–1941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roughgarden J 2006 Evolution and Christian faith reflections of an evolutionary biologist (Washington, DC: Island Press)Google Scholar
  29. Rose MR and Garland T Jr 2009 Darwin’s other mistake; in Experimental evolution concepts methods and applications of selection experiments (eds) T Garland Jr and MR Rose (Berkeley: University of California Press)Google Scholar
  30. Sedley D 2007 Creationism and its critics in Antiquity (Berkeley: University of California Press)Google Scholar
  31. Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF and Crandall KA 2008 Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. PNAS 105 13486–13491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Strobel L 2005 The case for a Creator: A journalist investigates scientific evidence that points toward God (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan)Google Scholar
  33. Vicens Q and Cech TR 2009 A natural ribozyme with 3′,5′RNA ligase activity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5 97–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weinberg S 1993 Dreams of a final theory: The scientist’s search for the ultimate laws of nature (New York: Pantheon Books)Google Scholar
  35. Weinberg S 2003 Scientist: Four golden lessons. Nature 426 389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood TC 2002 The AGEing process: Rapid post-Flood intrabaraminic diversification caused by altruistic genetic elements (AGEs). Origins 54 5–34Google Scholar
  37. Wood TC 2006 The current status of baraminology. CRSQ 43 149–158Google Scholar
  38. Wulff DM 2002 Mystical experience; in Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (eds) E Cardeña, SJ Lynn and S Krippner (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association) pp 397–439Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio G Valdecasas
    • 1
  • Luis Boto
    • 1
  • Ana Maria Correas
    • 2
  1. 1.Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSICMadridSpain
  2. 2.MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations