Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 485–495

Complex regulation of sister kinetochore orientation in meiosis-I



Kinetochores mediate chromosome movement during cell division by interacting with the spindle microtubules. Sexual reproduction necessitates the daunting task of reducing ploidy (number of chromosome sets) in the gametes, which depends upon the specialized properties of meiosis. Kinetochores have a central role in the reduction process. In this review, we discuss the complexity of this role of kinetochores in meiosis-I.


Biorientation kinetochore meiosis monopolin REC8 ZIP1 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akiyoshi B, Nelson C R, Ranish J A and Biggins S 2009 Quantitative proteomic analysis of purified yeast kinetochores identifies a PP1 regulatory subunit; Genes Dev. 23 2887–2899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardhan A, Chuong H and Dawson D 2010 Meiotic cohesin promotes pairing of non-homologous centromeres in early meiotic prophase; Mol. Biol. Cell. (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Bernard P, Maure J F and Javerzat J P 2001 Fission yeast Bub1 is essential in setting up the meiotic pattern of chromosome segregation; Nat. Cell Biol. 3 522–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhalla N and Dernburg A F 2008 Prelude to a division; Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24 397–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brar G A and Amon A 2008 Emerging roles for centromeres in meiosis-I chromosome segregation; Nat. Rev. Genet. 9 899–910CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buonomo S B, Clyne R K, Fuchs J, Loidl J, Uhlmann F and Nasmyth K 2000 Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis-I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin; Cell 103 387–398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chelysheva L, Diallo S, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Vrielynck N, Belcram K, Rocques N, Márquez-Lema A et al. 2005 AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis; J. Cell Sci. 118 4621–4632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciferri C, Musacchio A and Petrovic A 2007 The Ndc80 complex: hub of kinetochore activity; FEBS Lett. 581 2862–2869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke L and Carbon J 1980 Isolation of the centromere-linked CDC10 gene by complementation in yeast; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 2173–2177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clyne R K, Katis V L, Jessop L, Benjamin K R, Herskowitz I, Lichten M and Nasmyth K 2003 Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis-I; Nat. Cell Biol. 5 480–485CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cottarel G, Shero J H, Hieter P and Hegemann J H 1989 A 125-base-pair CEN6 DNA fragment is sufficient for complete meiotic and mitotic centromere functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Mol. Cell Biol. 9 3342–3349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis T N and Wordeman L 2007 Rings, bracelets, sleeves, and chevrons: new structures of kinetochore proteins; Trends Cell Biol. 17 377–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding R, McDonald K L and McIntosh J R 1993 Three-dimensional reconstruction and analysis of mitotic spindles from the yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; J. Cell Biol. 120 141–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong H and Roeder G S 2000 Organization of the yeast Zip1 protein within the central region of the synaptonemal complex; J. Cell Biol. 148 417–426CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fitzgerald-Hayes M, Buhler J M, Cooper T G and Carbon J 1982 Isolation and subcloning analysis of functional centromere DNA (CEN11) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome XI; Mol. Cell Biol. 2 82–87PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitzgerald-Hayes M, Clarke L and Carbon J 1982 Nucleotide sequence comparisons and functional analysis of yeast centromere DNAs; Cell 29 235–244CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Francisco L, Wang W and Chan C S 1994 Type 1 protein phosphatase acts in opposition to IpL1 protein kinase in regulating yeast chromosome segregation; Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 4731–4740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Furuyama S and Biggins S 2007 Centromere identity is specified by a single centromeric nucleosome in budding yeast; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104 14706–14711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Glynn E F, Megee P C, Yu H-G, Mistrot C, Unal E, Koshland D E, DeRisi J L and Gerton J L 2004 Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae; PLoS Biol. 2 e259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregan J, Spirek M and Rumpf C 2008 Solving the shugoshin puzzle; Trends Genet. 24 205–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hauf S, Biswas A, Langegger M, Kawashima S A, Tsukahara T and Watanabe Y 2007 Aurora controls sister kinetochore monoorientation and homolog bi-orientation in meiosis-I; EMBO J. 26 4475–4486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ishiguro K and Watanabe Y 2007 Chromosome cohesion in mitosis and meiosis; J. Cell Sci. 120 367–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Joglekar A P, Bouck D, Finley K, Liu X, Wan Y, Berman J, He X, Salmon E D and Bloom K S 2008 Molecular architecture of the kinetochore-microtubule attachment site is conserved between point and regional centromeres; J. Cell Biol. 181 587–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Johzuka K and Horiuchi T 2009 The cis element and factors required for condensin recruitment to chromosomes; Mol. Cell 34 26–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Katis V L, Matos J, Mori S, Shirahige K, Zachariae W and Nasmyth K 2004 Spo13 facilitates monopolin recruitment to kinetochores and regulates maintenance of centromeric cohesion during yeast meiosis; Curr. Biol. 14 2183–2196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kawashima S A, Tsukahara T, Langegger M, Hauf S, Kitajima T S and Watanabe Y 2007 Shugoshin enables tension-generating attachment of kinetochores by loading Aurora to centromeres; Genes Dev. 21 420–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Keating P, Rachidi N, Tanaka T U and Stark M J 2009 Ipl1-dependent phosphorylation of Dam1 is reduced by tension applied on kinetochores; J. Cell Sci. 122 4375–4382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelly A E and Funabiki H 2009 Correcting aberrant kinetochore microtubule attachments: an Aurora B-centric view; Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21 51–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. King E M, van der Sar S J and Hardwick K G 2007 Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint; PLoS One 2 e342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Klapholz S and Esposito R E 1980 Isolation of SPO12-1 and SPO13-1 from a natural variant of yeast that undergoes a single meiotic division; Genetics 96 567–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleckner N 2006 Chiasma formation: chromatin/axis interplay and the role(s) of the synaptonemal complex; Chromosoma 115 175–194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Klein F, Mahr P, Galova M, Buonomo S B, Michaelis C, Nairz K and Nasmyth K 1999 A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements, and recombination during yeast meiosis; Cell 98 91–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kotwaliwale C and Biggins S 2006 Microtubule capture: a concerted effort; Cell 127 1105–1108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kudo N R, Anger M, Peters A H, Stemmann O, Theussl H C, Helmhart W, Kudo H, Heyting C et al. 2009 Role of cleavage by separase of the Rec8 kleisin subunit of cohesin during mammalian meiosis-I; J. Cell Sci. 122 2686–2698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kudo N R, Wassmann K, Anger M, Schuh M, Wirth K G, Xu H, Helmhart W, Kudo H et al. 2006 Resolution of chiasmata in oocytes requires separase-mediated proteolysis; Cell 126 135–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lacefield S and Murray A W 2007 The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere; Nat. Genet. 39 1273–1277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee B H and Amon A 2003 Polo kinase—meiotic cell cycle coordinator; Cell Cycle. 2 400–402PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee B H, Kiburz B M and Amon A 2004 Spo13 maintains centromeric cohesion and kinetochore coorientation during meiosis-I; Curr. Biol. 14 2168–2182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Li X and Dawe R K 2009 Fused sister kinetochores initiate the reductional division in meiosis-I; Nat. Cell Biol. 11 1103–1108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu D and Lampson M A 2009 Regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by Aurora B kinase; Biochem. Soc. Trans. 37 976–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu D, Vader G, Vromans M J, Lampson M A and Lens S M 2009 Sensing chromosome bi-orientation by spatial separation of aurora B kinase from kinetochore substrates; Science 323 1350–1353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lo H C, Wan L, Rosebrock A, Futcher B and Hollingsworth N M 2008 Cdc7-Dbf4 regulates NDT80 transcription as well as reductional segregation during budding yeast meiosis; Mol. Biol. Cell 19 4956–4967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Matos J, Lipp J J, Bogdanova A, Guillot S, Okaz E, Junqueira M, Shevchenko A and Zachariae W 2008 Dbf4-dependent CDC7 kinase links DNA replication to the segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis-I; Cell 135 662–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Moens P B and Spyropoulos B 1995 Immunocytology of chiasmata and chromosomal disjunction at mouse meiosis; Chromosoma 104 175–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Monje-Casas F, Prabhu V R, Lee B H, Boselli M and Amon A 2007 Kinetochore orientation during meiosis-Is controlled by Aurora B and the monopolin complex; Cell 128 477–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Nakaseko Y, Niwa O and Yanagida M 1984 A meiotic mutant of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe that produces mature asci containing two diploid spores; J. Bacteriol. 157 334–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Nasmyth K and Haering C H 2009 Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms; Annu. Rev. Genet. 43 525–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Newman J R, Wolf E and Kim P S 2000 A computationally directed screen identifying interacting coiled coils from Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97 13203–13208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Nicklas R B 1997 How cells get the right chromosomes; Science 275 632–637CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Onn I, Heidinger-Pauli J M, Guacci V, Unal E and Koshland D E 2008 Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality; Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24 105–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Page S L and Hawley R S 2004 The genetics and molecular biology of the synaptonemal complex; Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 20 525–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Parra M T, Viera A, Gomez R, Page J, Carmena M, Earnshaw W C, Rufas J S and Suja J A 2003 Dynamic relocalization of the chromosomal passenger complex proteins inner centromere protein (INCENP) and aurora-B kinase during male mouse meiosis; J. Cell Sci. 116 961–974CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Parra M T, Viera A, Gómez R, Page J, Benavente R, Santos J L, Rufas J S and Suja J A 2004 Involvement of the cohesin Rad21 and SCP3 in monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores during mouse meiosis-I; J. Cell Sci. 117 1221–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Parra M T, Gomez R, Viera A, Page J, Calvente A, Wordeman L, Rufas J S and Suja J A 2006 A perikinetochoric ring defined by MCAK and Aurora-B as a novel centromere domain; PLoS Genet. 2 e84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peters J M, Tedeschi A and Schmitz J 2008 The cohesin complex and its roles in chromosome biology; Genes Dev. 22 3089–3114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Petronczki M, Matos J, Mori S, Gregan J, Bogdanova A, Schwickart M, Mechtler K, Shirahige K et al. 2006 Monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores at meiosis-I requires casein kinase 1; Cell 126 1049–1064CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Petronczki M, Siomos M F and Nasmyth K 2003 Un ménage à quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis; Cell 112 423–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Pidoux A L and Allshire R C 2004 Kinetochore and heterochromatin domains of the fission yeast centromere; Chromosome Res. 12 521–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pinsky B A, Kotwaliwale C V, Tatsutani S Y, Breed C A and Biggins S 2006 Glc7/protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunits can oppose the Ipl1/Aurora protein kinase by redistributing Glc7; Mol. Cell Biol. 26 2648–2660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Rabitsch K P, Petronczki M, Javerzat J P, Genier S, Chwalla B, Schleiffer A, Tanaka T U and Nasmyth K 2003 Kinetochore recruitment of two nucleolar proteins is required for homolog segregation in meiosis-I; Dev. Cell 4 535–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rabitsch K P, Tóth A, Gálová M, Schleiffer A, Schaffner G, Aigner E, Rupp C, Penkner A M et al. 2001 A screen for genes required for meiosis and spore formation based on whole-genome expression; Curr. Biol. 11 1001–1009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Sakuno T, Tada K and Watanabe Y 2009 Kinetochore geometry defined by cohesion within the centromere; Nature (London) 458 852–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shonn M A, McCarroll R and Murray A W 2000 Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis; Science 289 300–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Shonn M A, Murray A L and Murray A W 2003 Spindle checkpoint component Mad2 contributes to biorientation of homologous chromosomes; Curr. Biol. 13 1979–1984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Shuda K, Schindler K, Ma J, Schultz R M and Donovan P J 2009 Aurora kinase B modulates chromosome alignment in mouse oocytes; Mol. Reprod. Dev. 76 1094–1105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Skibbens R V 2008 Mechanisms of sister chromatid pairing. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 269 283–339CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sym M, Engebrecht J A and Roeder G S 1993 ZIP1 is a synaptonemal complex protein required for meiotic chromosome synapsis; Cell 72 365–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Tanaka T U and Desai A 2008 Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: the means to the end; Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 20 53–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Tóth A, Rabitsch K P, Gálová M, Schleiffer A, Buonomo S B and Nasmyth K 2000 Functional genomics identifies monopolin: a kinetochore protein required for segregation of homologs during meiosis-I; Cell 103 1155–1168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Tsubouchi T and Roeder G S 2005 A synaptonemal complex protein promotes homology independent centromere coupling; Science 308 870–873CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Tsubouchi T, Macqueen A J and Roeder G S 2008 Initiation of meiotic chromosome synapsis at centromeres in budding yeast; Genes Dev. 22 3217–3226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Watanabe Y 2006 A one-sided view of kinetochore attachment in meiosis; Cell 126 1030–1032CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber S A, Gerton J L, Polancic J E, DeRisi J L, Koshland D and Megee P C 2004 The kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesion binding; PLoS Biol. 2 e260CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Westermann S, Drubin D G and Barnes G 2007 Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes; Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76 563–591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Winey M, Morgan G P, Straight P D, Giddings T H Jr and Mastronarde D N 2005 Mol. Biol. Cell 16 1178–1188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Wong J, Nakajima Y, Westermann S, Shang C, Kang J S, Goodner C, Houshmand P, Fields S et al. 2007 A protein interaction map of the mitotic spindle; Mol. Biol. Cell 18 3800–3809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Yamamoto A and Hiraoka Y 2003 Monopolar spindle attachment of sister chromatids is ensured by two distinct mechanisms at the first meiotic division in fission yeast; EMBO J. 22 2284–2296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Yokobayashi S and Watanabe Y 2005 The kinetochore protein Moa1 enables cohesion-mediated monopolar attachment at meiosis-I; Cell 123 803–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Yu H G and Dawe R K 2000 Functional redundancy in the maize meiotic kinetochore; J. Cell Biol. 151 131–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Yu H G and Koshland D 2007 The Aurora kinase Ipl1 maintains the centromeric localization of PP2A to protect cohesin during meiosis; J. Cell Biol. 176 911–918CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chinsurah, HooghlyIndia

Personalised recommendations