Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 969–976 | Cite as

Correlations between soil microbial and physicochemical variations in a rice paddy: implications for assessing soil health

  • Ryoichi Doi
  • Senaratne Leelananda Ranamukhaarachchi


This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that spatial variations in soil microbial variables in a Thai rice paddy are accurately described by multivariate profiles of the soil bacterial communities. We found that community-level physiological profiles of soil bacterial communities could better describe the population density of Rhizoctonia solani in soil than the physicochemical profiles do. However, soil dehydrogenase levels were closely correlated with soil fertility (P<0.05), and these were better described by the physicochemical profiles. Hence, the hypothesis was rejected, and we suspect that soil microbial variables react differently to the same physicochemical changes. The average population density of R. solani (35 colony-forming units/g dry soil) was relatively high in the soil we studied, and the soil fertility was found to be among the poorest in Thailand. The soil quality was comparable to the most degraded bare ground soil in an adjacent bioreserve in terms of Shannon diversity index based on the communitylevel physiological profile as well as values of soil fertility indices. Overall, the soil microbial and physicochemical indicators showed that the paddy soil needs to be supplemented with soil nutrients. Otherwise, R. solani may cause a significant reduction in rice production.


Bacterial and physicochemical datasets multivariate analysis Rhizoctonia solani rice paddy 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvim P de T and Cabala-Rosand F P 1974 Um novo sistema de representação gráfica da fertilidade dos solos para cacao; Cacau Atualidades 11 2–6Google Scholar
  2. Belmar S B, Jones R K and Starr J L 1987 Influence of crop rotation on inoculum density of Rhizoctonia solani and sheath blight indices in rice; Phytopathology 77 1138–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bray H R and Kurtz L T 1945 Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil; Soil Sci. 59 39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casida L E, Klein D A and Santoro T 1964 Soil dehydrogenase activity; Soil Sci. 98 371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Covelo F, Rodríguez A and Gallardo A 2008 Spatial pattern and scale of leaf N and P resorption efficiency and proficiency in a Quercus robur population; Plant Soil 311 109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis R M, Nunez J J and Subbarao K V 1997 Benefits of cotton seed treatments for the control of seedling diseases in relation to inoculum densities of Pythium species and Rhizoctonia solani; Plant Dis. 81 766–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doi R 2005 Effects of air-drying soils on discriminating the soils with community-level physiological profiling; J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 51 379–383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Doi R and Puriyakorn B 2007 Physico-chemical and bacterial profiling of soils for describing a land-degradation gradient; Curr. Sci. 92 1050–1054Google Scholar
  9. Doi R and Ranamukhaarachchi S L 2007 Integrative evaluation of rehabilitative effects of Acacia auriculiformis on degraded soil; J. Trop. For. Sci. 19 150–163Google Scholar
  10. Doi R and Ranamukhaarachchi S L 2009 Soil dehydrogenase in a land degradation-rehabilitation gradient: observations from a savanna site with a wet/dry seasonal cycle; Rev. Biol. Trop. 57 223–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Doi R and Sakurai K 2004 Principal component analysis derived from soil physico-chemical data explained a land degradation gradient and suggested the applicability of new indexes for estimation of soil productivity in the Sakaerat Environmental Research Station, Thailand; Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 11 298–311Google Scholar
  12. Garland J L and Mills A L 1991 Classification and characterization of heterotrophic microbial communities on the basis of patterns of community-level sole-carbon-source utilization; Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57 2351–2359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghini R and Morandi M A B 2006 Biotic and abiotic factors associated with soil suppressiveness to Rhizoctonia solani; Sci. Agric. 63 153–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hackett C A and Griffiths B S 1997 Statistical analysis of the timecourse of Biolog substrate utilization; J. Microbiol. Meth. 30 63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jha D K, Sharma G D and Mishra R R 1992 Soil microbial population numbers and enzyme activities in relation to altitude and forest degradation; Soil Biol. Biochem. 24 761–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keinath A P, Harrison H F, Marino P C, Jackson D M and Pullaro T C 2003 Increase in populations of Rhizoctonia solani and wirestem of collard with velvet bean cover crop mulch; Plant Dis. 87 719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirk J L, Beaudette L A, Hart M, Moutoglis P, Klironomos J N, Lee H and Trevors J T 2004 Methods of studying soil microbial diversity; J. Microbiol. Meth. 58 169–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ko W and Hora F K 1971 A selective medium for the quantitative determination of Rhizoctonia solani in soil; Phytopathology 61 707–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindstrom J E, Barry R P and Braddock J F 1998 Microbial community analysis: a kinetic approach to constructing potential C source utilization patterns; Soil Biol. Biochem. 30 231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu D, Moran E and Mausel P 2002 Linking Amazonian secondary succession forest growth to soil properties; Land Degrad. Dev. 13 331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matson P A, Parton W J, Power A G and Swift M J 1997 Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties; Science 77 505–509Google Scholar
  22. Mausbach M J and Seybold C A 1998 Assessment of soil quality; in Soil quality and agricultural sustainability (ed.) R Lal (Chelsea: Ann Arbor Press) pp 33–43Google Scholar
  23. Mazzola M 1999 Transformation of soil microbial community structure and Rhizoctonia-suppressive potential in response to apple roots; Phytopathology 89 920–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Moran E F, Brondizion E S, Tucker J M, Da Silva-Forsberg M C, Mccracken S and Falesi I 2000 Effects of soil fertility and landuse on forest succession in Amazônia; For. Ecol. Manage. 139 93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pal K K, Tilak K V B R, Saxena A K, Dey R and Singh C S 2000 Anti-fungal characteristics of a fluorescent Pseudomonas strain involved in the biological control of Rhizoctonia solani; Microbiol. Res. 155 233–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pankhurst C E, Doube B M and Gupta V V S R 1997 Biological indicators of soil health (Wallingford, UK: CAB International)Google Scholar
  27. Prakongkep N, Suddhiprakarn A, Kheoruenromne I, Smirk M and Gilkes R J 2008 The geochemistry of Thai paddy soils; Geoderma 144 310–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rautaray S K 2005 Nutrient dynamics, dehydrogenase activity, and response of the rice plant to fertilization sources in an acid lateritic soil; Acta Agric. Scand. B Soil Plant Sci. 55 162–169Google Scholar
  29. Sena M M, Poppi R J, Frighetto R T S and Valarini P J 2000 Avaliação do uso de métodos quimiométricos em análise de solos; Quím. Nova 23 547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shim G Y, Kim J W and Kim H K 1994 Occurrence of Rhizoctonia blight of zoysiagrasses in golf courses in Korea; Korean J. Plant Pathol. 10 54–60Google Scholar
  31. Staddon W J, Duchesne L C and Trevors J T 1997 Microbial diversity and community structure of postdisturbance forest soils as determined by sole-carbon-source utilization patterns; Microb. Ecol. 34 125–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. van Elsas J D, Garbeva P and Salles J 2002 Effects of agronomical measures on the microbial diversity of soils as related to the suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens; Biodegradation 13 29–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. van Straalen N M 2002 Assessment of soil contamination — a functional perspective; Biodegradation 13 41–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Woodard K E and Jones B L 1983 Soil populations and anastomosis groups of Rhizoctonia solani associated with peanut in Texas and New Mexico; Plant Dis. 7 385–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryoichi Doi
    • 1
  • Senaratne Leelananda Ranamukhaarachchi
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environment, Resources and DevelopmentAsian Institute of TechnologyKlong Luang, PathumthaniThailand

Personalised recommendations