Impact of light pollution on the visibility of astronomical objects in medium-sized cities in Central Europe on the example of the city of Rzeszów, Poland

  • M. WesołowskiEmail author


This paper discusses the influence of light pollution of the night sky on the conditions of visibility of astronomical objects such as planets, stars and comets. This phenomenon has a huge impact on the observability of astronomical objects, especially in cities, where the brightness of the sky makes it difficult or even impossible to conduct astronomical observations. The main purpose of this article is to measure and analyse the surface brightness of the night sky in Rzeszów and its surroundings. A device called the Sky Quality Meter was used to measure the brightness of the night sky. This paper presents measurement results for the years 2015 and 2018, from which it is clear that the quality of the night sky has been deteriorated in terms of the observability of celestial bodies. As an example, the numerical value of the measurement for the centre of Rzeszów has been taken. In 2015, this value was \(18.70\pm 1.87\) mag/arcsec\(^{2}\), while in 2018, it was equal to \(16.73\pm 1.67\) mag/arcsec\(^{2}\). The results obtained were used to analyse the visibility of celestial bodies. Here, particular attention was paid to the analysis of the visibility of comets (also during the outburst), in the context of increasing light pollution of the night sky. Observers in neighboring villages have also experienced a change in the sky quality from Bortle Class V to Class VII, requiring objects to be approximately one magnitude brighter in order to be visible.


Light pollution cometary outburst visibility of astronomical objects 



The author would like to express his gratitude to the anonymous reviewer for very helpful comments that have considerably improved the quality of the manuscript. This paper was written due to the support the author received from the Centre for Innovation and Transfer of Natural Sciences and Engineering Knowledge at the University of Rzeszów.


  1. Aubé M., Kocifaj M. 2012, Using two light-pollution models to investigate artificial sky radiances at Canary Islands observatories, MNRAS, 422, 819 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohren C. F., Huffman D. 1983, Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bortle J. E. 2001, Introducing the Bortle Dark-Sky Scale, Sky and Telescope, vol. 101, p. 126Google Scholar
  4. Cabot H. et al. 1996, Complementary studies on the unexpected activity of comet Schwassmann–Wachmann 1, Planet & Space Sci., 44, 1015ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cinzano P., Falchi F., Elvidge C. D. 2001a, Naked-eye star visibility and limiting magnitude mapped from DMSP-OLS satellite data, MNRAS, 323, 34ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cinzano P., Falchi F., Elvidge C. D. 2001b, The first World Atlas of the artificial night sky brightness, MNRAS, 328, 689ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cinzano P., Elvidge C. D. 2004, Night sky brightness at sites from DMSP-OLS satellite measurements, MNRAS, 353, 1107ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cinzano P. 2004, A portable spectrophotometer for light pollution measurements, Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana Suppl., 5, 395ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtis H. D. 1903, On the limits of unaided vision, Lick Observatory Bull., 2, 67ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidsson B. J. R., Skorov Y. V. 2002, On the Light-Absorbing Surface Layer of Cometary Nuclei, I, Radiative Transfer, Icarus, 156, 223ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enzian A. et al. 1997, A 2 1/2 D thermodynamic model of cometary nuclei, I, Application to the activity of comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1, A&A, 319, 995ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Falchi F., Cinzano P., Kyba Ch., Portnov B. 2015, The New World Atlas of Artificial Sky Brightness, IAU Gen. Assemb. 22: 47038FADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernández J. A. et al. 1999, The population, magnitudes, and sizes of Jupiter family comets, A&A, 352, 327ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Garstang R. H. 1989, Night-sky brightness at observatories and sites, Astron. Soc. Pac., 101, 306ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gronkowski P. 2007, The search for a cometary outbursts mechanism: a comparison of various theories, Astron. Nachr., 328, 126ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Gronkowski P. 2009, Cometary outbursts: the post-deep impact outlook on collisions as possible causes, MNRAS, 397, 883ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gronkowski P., Wesołowski M. 2012, Collisions of comets and meteoroids: the post stardust-NExT discussion, Astron. Nachr., 333, 721ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gronkowski P., Wesołowski M. 2015, A model of cometary outbursts: a new simple approach to the classical question, MNRAS, 451, 3068ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gronkowski P., Wesołowski M. 2016, A Review of Cometary Outbursts at Large Heliocentric Distances, Earth Moon Planets, 119, 23ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gronkowski P., Wesołowski M. 2017, Ejection of large particles from cometary nuclei in the shape of prolate ellipsoids, Astron. Nachr., 338, 385ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gronkowski P., Tralle I., Wesołowski M. 2018, Visibility of comets during their outbursts and the night sky light pollution – Use the Bortle scale, Astron. Nachr., 339, 37ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groussin O., Lamy P., Jorda L. 2004, The nuclei of comets 126P/IRAS and 103P/Hartley 2, A&A, 419, 375ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes D. W. (1990) Cometary outbursts: a review, R. Astron. Soc. Q. J., 31, 6Google Scholar
  24. Hughes D. W. 1991, Comet Halley’s outburst, MNRAS, 251, 26ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivanova O. V. et al. 2011, Observations of the long-lasting activity of the distant Comets 29P Schwassmann–Wachmann 1, C/2003 WT42 (LINEAR) and C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR), Icarus, 211, 559ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kossacki K. J., Szutowicz S. 2013, Activity of Comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1, Icarus, 225, 111ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montalto M. et al. 2008, The comet 17P/Holmes 2007 outburst: the early motion of the outburst material, A&A, 479, L45ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reach W. T. et al. (2010) Explosion of Comet 17P/Holmes as revealed by the Spitzer Space Telescope. Icarus, 208: 276ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson J. E. et al. 2007, A ballistics analysis of the Deep Impact ejecta plume: Determining Comet Tempel 1’s gravity, mass, and density, Icarus, 190, 357ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richter N. B. 1954, Die Helligkeitsausbrüche des Kometen 1925 II und ihre Zusammenhänge mit der Sonnentätigkeit, Astron. Nachr., 281, 241ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ściȩżor T. 2013, A new astronomical method for determining the brightness of the night sky and its application to study long-term changes in the level of light pollution, MNRAS, 435, 303ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tancredi G. et al. 2000, A catalog of observed nuclear magnitudes of Jupiter family comets, A&A Suppl., 146, 73ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trigo-Rodriguez J. M. et al. 2008a, Outburst activity in comets. I. Continuous monitoring of comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1, A&A, 485, 599Google Scholar
  34. Trigo-Rodriguez J. M. et al. 2008b, All-Sky Cameras Detection and Telescope Follow-Up of the 17P/Holmes Outburst, Lunar Planetary Science XXXIX, 1627Google Scholar
  35. Trigo-Rodriguez J. M. et al. 2010, Outburst activity in comets – II. A multiband photometric monitoring of comet 29P/Schwassmann–Wachmann 1, MNRAS, 409, 1682Google Scholar
  36. Wesołowski M., Gronkowski P. 2018a, A new method for determining the mass ejected during the cometary outburst – Application to the Jupiter-family comets, New Astron., 62, 55ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wesołowski M., Gronkowski P. 2018b, A New Simple Model of Comets-Like Activity of Centaurs, Earth Moon and Planets, 121, 105ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zamorano J., de Sánchez M. A., Ocaña F. et al. 2016, Testing sky brightness models against radial dependency: A dense two dimensional survey around the city of Madrid, Spain, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 181, 52ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and Natural SciencesUniversity of RzeszówRzeszówPoland

Personalised recommendations