Advertisement

Mechanical Stretch of High Magnitude Provokes Axonal Injury, Elongation of Paranodal Junctions, and Signaling Alterations in Oligodendrocytes

  • Elena Chierto
  • Anne Simon
  • Francesca Castoldi
  • Delphine Meffre
  • Giulia Cristinziano
  • Francesca Sapone
  • Alex Carrete
  • Didier Borderie
  • François Etienne
  • François Rannou
  • Barclay MorrisonIII
  • Charbel Massaad
  • Mehrnaz Jafarian-Tehrani
Open Access
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Increasing findings suggest that demyelination may play an important role in the pathophysiology of brain injury, but the exact mechanisms underlying such damage are not well known. Mechanical tensile strain of brain tissue occurs during traumatic brain injury. Several studies have investigated the cellular and molecular events following a static tensile strain of physiological magnitude on individual cells such as oligodendrocytes. However, the pathobiological impact of high-magnitude mechanical strain on oligodendrocytes and myelinated fibers remains under investigated. In this study, we reported that an applied mechanical tensile strain of 30% on mouse organotypic culture of cerebellar slices induced axonal injury and elongation of paranodal junctions, two hallmarks of brain trauma. It was also able to activate MAPK-ERK1/2 signaling, a stretch-induced responsive pathway. The same tensile strain applied to mouse oligodendrocytes in primary culture induced a profound damage to cell morphology, partial cell loss, and a decrease of myelin protein expression. The lower tensile strain of 20% also caused cell loss and the remaining oligodendrocytes appeared retracted with decreased myelin protein expression. Finally, high-magnitude tensile strain applied to 158N oligodendroglial cells altered myelin protein expression, dampened MAPK-ERK1/2 and MAPK-p38 signaling, and enhanced the production of reactive oxygen species. The latter was accompanied by increased protein oxidation and an alteration of anti-oxidant defense that was strain magnitude-dependent. In conclusion, mechanical stretch of high magnitude provokes axonal injury with significant alterations in oligodendrocyte biology that could initiate demyelination.

Keywords

Tensile strain Stretch-induced injury Myelin Oligodendrocytes Traumatic brain injury Cerebellum Mechanostimulation White matter injury 

Introduction

Myelin, the concentrically laminated membrane structure that wraps around axons, is a major component of white matter. It is produced by oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system (CNS). Among its different functions, myelin, essential for rapid impulse conduction, serves as an insulator and as trophic and metabolic support to axons [1]. Increasing clinical and experimental evidences suggest that demyelination may play an important role in the pathophysiology of brain injury [2, 3]. While numerous studies reported the effects of traumatic insult on gray matter and resulting neuronal impairment, additional findings show an equivalent importance of white matter damage post-injury [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Marked white matter atrophy and degeneration have been observed in patients who survived to a chronic post-injury stage after moderate to severe head injury [5, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Other studies in humans and experimental models have also shown widespread myelin loss and oligodendrocyte apoptosis following brain insult [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].

In addition, brain injury triggers a complex cascade of metabolic, cellular, and molecular alterations such as increased free radical generation [19]. Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) results in oxidative stress, which has a significant role in the etiology of progressive neuropathology following brain injury [20]. The CNS is extremely sensitive to free radical insults because of its relatively limited total antioxidant defenses [21, 22]. Among CNS cell types, oligodendrocytes are particularly vulnerable because of their lipid-rich membrane, low glutathione reductase activity, and low level of glutathione (GSH) [23, 24]. The endogenous defense system is able to scavenge and prevent formation of free radicals, protecting tissues from oxidative damage [25]. However, ROS can oxidize macromolecules, such as DNA, proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids under pathological conditions [26]. Therefore, oligodendrocytes are a particularly vulnerable cell type in the context of brain injury.

While the aforementioned reports highlight the vulnerability of oligodendrocytes and myelin damage following brain injury, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying white matter impairment are not well known. The brain is encapsulated in a rigid skull, and the mechanical response to an impact involves a combination of stretch, compression, and shear. Among the various mechanical forces causing brain damage [27, 28], stretch-induced injury constitutes a major mode of deformation [29]. In fact, it is known that a major force causing injury of nervous tissue is the rapid tissue deformation and strain, or more simply stretch [29]. In addition, a continuous and sustained stress on brain parenchyma could occur following TBI with the formation of cerebral edema, which begins early after the onset of TBI and evolves over hours post-injury. Evolving brain edema leads to the mechanical displacement of brain structures and may cause herniation. Further injury occurs through axonal stretch, vascular disruption or compression, or a combination [30, 31]. While several studies reported the effect of stretch-induced injury on different CNS cell types (neurons, astrocytes, and microglia), our knowledge regarding oligodendrocytes remains limited. It has been demonstrated that oligodendrocyte progenitors and neural stem cells are mechano-sensitive, and mechanical strain of a physiological magnitude promotes cell differentiation [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. However, the effect of mechanical strain of high magnitude that occurs during and after brain trauma on oligodendrocytes remains under investigated. We hypothesized that such strain can initiate oligodendroglial damage and cause demyelination.

In this study, we aimed to decipher the cellular and molecular responses of oligodendrocytes and myelinated fibers to mechanical tensile strain of high magnitude in vitro and ex vivo, respectively. For the latter, we used organotypic culture of cerebellar slices, because the cerebellum is very rich in myelinated fibers; for the former, we used isolated oligodendrocytes from mouse primary culture or the 158N oligodendroglial cell line. We chose a range of tensile strain (20% and 30% engineering strain) relevant to those occurring in humans during rotational acceleration-deceleration injury [40, 41]. In our study, we assessed two hallmarks of brain injury: (i) accumulation of axonal amyloid precursor protein (APP), a marker of axonal injury [42, 43], and (ii) elongation of paranodal junctions which has been shown to occur following traumatic impact [44, 45]. The effect of mechanical tensile strain was also examined on the expression of myelin proteins and on the activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, which is known to be particularly stretch-responsive [46, 47, 48, 49]. Finally, mechanical tensile strain of different magnitudes was applied to oligodendrocytes to assess cell morphology, cell adhesion, expression of myelin genes and corresponding proteins, activation of MAPK signaling pathway, and redox status.

In this study, we provide evidence that mechanical tensile strain of high magnitude provokes the hallmarks of brain trauma. It causes loss of oligodendrocytes accompanied by alterations of myelin protein expression and MAPK signaling, with an enhancement of ROS production, and deregulation of redox status. Therefore, such mechanical strain initiates axonal injury and molecular alterations that could initiate demyelination and white matter injury.

Materials and Methods

Chemical Reagents and Antibodies

Untreated Bioflex® plates (BF-3001U) and laminin Bioflex® plates (BF-3001L) were purchased from Dunn Labortechnik GmbH (Asbach, Allemagne). Poly-L-lysine (P9404), propidium iodide (P4170), Cell Lysis Reagent (C2978), TRITC-phalloidin (P1951), Hoechst (H2261), and anti α-tubulin antibody (T6074) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Lyon, France). Laminin (23017-015), BME (41010-026), DMEM (11960), HBSS (14060-040), Pierce®ECL 2 Western Blotting substrate kit (PI80196), Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (A21121), anti-APP antibody (51-2700), and CM-H2DCFDA probe (C6827) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Courtaboeuf, France). Cy3 goat anti-rabbit (111-165-003) was purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch (Cambridge, UK). Anti-MAG (MAB1567), anti-MBP (MAB381), anti-phospho-ERK1/2 (05-797R), and anti ERK1/2 (06-182) antibodies were purchased from Millipore (Molsheim, France). Anti-SMI312 (837904) antibody was purchased from Biolegend (San Diego, USA). Anti-Caspr (ab34151) and rabbit polyclonal β-actin (ab8227) antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Anti-PDGFR-α antibody (sc-338) was purchased from Santa Cruz (Dallas, USA). Anti-PLP antibody (NB10074503) was purchased from Novus Biologicals. Anti-JNK (9252), anti-phospho-JNK (9251S), anti-p38 (212), and anti-phospho-p38 (9211) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, USA).

Animals

Organotypic cerebellar cultures and oligodendrocyte primary cell cultures were obtained from 8–10-day postnatal (P8–P10) and P1–P3 wild-type C57Bl/6 mice (Janvier, Le Genest St Isle, France), respectively. Animals were housed in a controlled temperature environment (22 ± 2 °C), under a 12-h light/dark cycle, with access to food and water ad libitum. Animal care and experiments were approved by the Paris Descartes University (CEEA34.MJT.075.12) respecting the French regulations and the European Communities Council Directive of September 2010/63/UE, on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Organotypic Cerebellar Slice Culture

The culture protocol was used as described previously [50]. The organotypic culture of cerebellar slices on silicone membrane was adapted from a protocol of Morrison and collaborators [51, 52]. Briefly, after decapitation, the cerebellum was dissected out and meninges were removed. Parasagittal slices (350 μm) were cut using a Macllwain Tissue Chopper. Slices taken in the vermis of cerebellum were transferred to Bioflex® Plates pretreated in a UV ozone cleaner (Bioforce Nanosciences, Salt Lake City, USA) and coated with poly-L-lysine (320 μg/mL) and laminin (80 μg/mL). Cultures were maintained in BME and HBSS media supplemented with 25% of horse serum. Every 2–3 days, 50% of culture medium was substituted. Cerebellar slices were cultured at 35 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and maintained on a rocker (2D movement, inclination angle 14°, rocking rate 1 cycle/min) to aid gas exchange and diffusion. To avoid an excessive evaporation of medium, a humidifier was inserted in the incubator and turned on for 3 cycles of 5 min per day, equally distributed within 24 h. Cultures were maintained 7 days in vitro (DIV) before being submitted to a mechanical stretch. Just before stretching, the medium was replaced by fresh medium with 5% horse serum.

Oligodendrocyte-Enriched Primary Culture

To prepare the oligodendrocyte-enriched primary cultures, oligodendrocytes were collected after 14 DIV from primary mixed glial cell culture obtained from new-born mice (P0–P3), as previously described [53, 54], with slight modifications. Oligodendrocytes growing on the astrocyte layer were detached mechanically, and microglia were eliminated with a pre-plating step. The pellet containing oligodendrocytes was suspended in supplemented Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM) with insulin, transferrin, and selenium (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, USA) and 2% heat inactivated fetal bovine serum (HI-FBS). Cells were seeded at 4–5 × 105 cells in Bioflex® plates coated with poly-L-lysine (25 μg/mL). Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 2 DIV before being submitted to mechanical stretch.

158N Oligodendroglial Cell Line Culture

The 158N oligodendroglial cell line, which preserves oligodendrocyte characteristics and expresses myelin proteins [55, 56], was kindly provided by Dr. S. M. Ghandour (Strasbourg, France). Cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 5% HI-FBS. Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. For the preparation of the cells subjected to mechanical stretch, cells were trypsinized and plated at a density of 3 × 105 cells per well on laminin-coated Bioflex® plates. Cells were grown at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 72 h before being submitted to a mechanical stretch. Twenty four hours before stretching, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 1% HI-FBS.

In Vitro Model of Mechanical Stretch

Cells or cerebellar slices grown on BioFlex® six-well plates were submitted to mechanical stretch using the Flexcell® FX 5000™ Tension System (Flexcell International Corporation, NC, USA), a computer-regulated bioreactor that uses vacuum pressure to apply a strain to cells/slices cultured on elastic silicone membranes [57]. Organotypic cerebellar slices were subjected to an equibiaxial static strain of 30% for 30 min. The response was evaluated at time 0 h post-stretch. Cells were exposed to two magnitudes of strain, 30% for 30 min and 20% for 20 h. Control (non-stretched) plates were prepared and underwent the same conditions, except the mechanical strain. All analyses were performed at time 0 h post-stretch. It is noteworthy that the three model systems (cell line, primary culture, slice culture) remained viable at least 24 h after stress induction.

Flow Cytometric Analysis

158N cells were trypsinized and collected for analysis with a BD FACSCanto™ II flow cytometer. Cells were centrifuged (1500 rpm, 3 min), washed, and suspended at 106/mL of PBS 0.1 M (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free). For each analysis, 10,000 cells were counted. We considered only the population of cells devoid of aggregates and debris.

In order to evaluate cell viability and ROS production, a double staining with propidium iodide (PI) and carboxy-dichloro-dihydro-fluorescein diacetate (CM-H2DCFDA) was performed [58]. Cells were incubated with 1.25 μM of CM-H2DCFDA probe for 30 min at 37 °C in the dark. Excess probe was washed out and cells were suspended in PBS (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free) and incubated 10 min with 1 μg/mL of PI at room temperature (RT). DCF fluorescence was recorded in the FL-1 (530/30 nm) channel together with PI fluorescence in FL-2 (585/42 nm). We used N-acetylcysteine (NAC) at 5 mM as a positive control for the antioxidant activity, and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBHP) 100 μM as a positive control for ROS production.

Biochemical Analysis

158N cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized and centrifuged (600g, 10 min). Cell pellets were suspended in 1 mL of Cell Lysis Reagent with protease inhibitor (cOmplete, Mini, EDTA-free, Roche, Bâle, Suisse). Cell lysates were then analyzed for all the following biochemical assays.

Determination of Advanced Oxidation Protein Products

Protein oxidation was assessed as described previously [59]. Advanced oxidation protein product (AOPP) concentrations are expressed as micromoles per liter of chloramine-T equivalents.

Determination of Carbonyl Levels

Protein carbonyl groups were detected and quantified using 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) as previously described [60]. Carbonyl levels were expressed as nanomoles of carbonyl per milligram of proteins.

Determination of Superoxide Dismutase Activity

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was evaluated using the nitroblue tetrazolium reduction technique previously described by Beauchamp and Fridovich [61]. Results obtained were normalized to the protein content and expressed as units per milligram of protein.

Determination of Reduced Glutathione Level

Levels of intracellular glutathione (GSH) were assessed spectrofluorimetrically by monochlorobimane staining [62] and expressed as arbitrary units (AU) of fluorescence intensity.

Determination of Glutathione Peroxidase and Glutathione Reductase Activity

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and GRx activities were quantified using Glutathione Peroxidase Assay Kit (Cayman 703102) and Reductase Assay Kit (Cayman 703202), respectively. The results obtained were normalized to the protein content and expressed as units per milligram of protein.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA from cultured cells was obtained using Trizol reagent, and 1 μg was reverse transcribed with random primers (Biolabs, Ipswich, USA) and Reverse Transcriptase MLV-RT (Fisher Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France), according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Quantitative PCR was performed with standard protocols using SYBRGreen (ABgene, Portsmouth, USA) as the fluorescent detection dye in an ABI PRISM 7000, which also contained 300 nM of primers (except for PLP and MAG with 100 nM of primers) and 50 ng of reverse transcribed RNA in 384-well plates. Melting curve analysis was applied to characterize the generated amplicons. Each reaction was performed in triplicate, and the mean of at least three independent experiments was calculated. Results were normalized to 26S mRNA levels and calculated using the ΔΔCt method. The results are expressed as 2−ΔΔCt [ΔΔCt = ΔCt gene of interest − ΔCt reference gene]. The primer sequences used in real-time PCR are listed in the Supplemental Table 1.

Western Blot Assay

Proteins were extracted and separated as previously described [54]. The following concentrations of primary antibodies were used: anti-PLP (1:1000), anti-MBP (1:500), anti-ERK1/2 (1:500), anti-P-ERK1/2 (1:500), anti-JNK (1:500), anti-P-JNK (1:500), anti-p38 (1:500), anti-P-p38 (1:500), and anti-β-actin (1:10000); followed by appropriate horseradish peroxidase coupled secondary antibody (anti-rabbit: 1:20,000). Specific bands were detected with the Pierce®ECL 2 Western Blotting substrate kit, using ImageQuant LAS4000 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, USA). Relative protein amounts were quantified with ImageJ 1.48v software and normalized to β-actin.

Immunolabeling

At time 0 h after stretching, samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) at RT for 40 min for organotypic slices and 25 min for cells. After fixation, membranes were cut from the Bioflex® plates.

Organotypic slices were incubated for 1 h in 0.1 M L-lysine diluted in PBS-GTA (PBS with 0.2% gelatin, 0.25% Triton-X, 0.1% sodium azide) blocking solution and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The following concentrations of primary antibodies were used: anti-MAG (1:1000), anti-APP (1:700), anti-SMI-312 (1:1000), anti-Caspr (1:1000). Samples were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h on a rocker at RT at the following concentrations: Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (1:1000) and/or Cy3 goat anti-rabbit (1:500), both diluted in PBS-GTA.

Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100-PBS for 15 min and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C in PBS-BSA 5%. The following concentrations of primary antibodies were used: anti-MAG (1:250), anti-PDGFR-α (1:500), anti α-tubulin (1:4000). Samples were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h on a rocker at RT at the following concentrations: Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse IgG (1:200) and/or Cy3 goat anti-rabbit (1:100), both diluted in PBS-GTA. TRITC-phalloidin (1:2000) and Hoechst (1:50,000) were used to label F-actin and cell nuclei, respectively.

All samples were mounted with Fluoromount (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, USA).

Immunofluorescence Analysis

All images were acquired using a Zeiss confocal microscope LSM710 for cells or LSM510 for organotypic cerebellar slice and then processed with LSM Image Browser (version 4.2).

For the organotypic cerebellar slice cultures, the analysis of APP accumulation was performed on slices co-immunostained with APP and SMI-312. The number of APP aggregates was quantified per slice, for a total of 4–8 slices per condition from three independent experiments. The analysis of paranodal junctions was performed on slices co-immunostained with Caspr and MAG on images acquired for a total of 4–6 slices per condition from four independent experiments, as previously reported [63, 64].

For the oligodendrocyte-enriched primary culture, the number of Hoechst+ cells, the percentage of MAG+ and PDGFR-α+ cells, and also the area of MAG+ and PDGFR-α+ cells were determined using ImageJ 1.48v software. All analyses were performed in 10–30 different fields (0.26 nm2), randomly selected while avoiding the edge of the membrane, per condition, and from at least three independent experiments.

Statistical Analysis

Unpaired t tests were calculated for two-data set when data followed a normal distribution. Otherwise, the Mann-Whitney test was performed, which does not require the assumption of normal distributions. To test for normality, the d’Agostino-Pearson test was used. All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism6 (San Diego, USA). The criterion for statistical significance was p < 0.05 (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001). Data are expressed as mean values of n experiments ± SEM.

Results

Effects of Mechanical Tensile Strain of High Magnitude on Organotypic Culture of Cerebellar Slices

Mechanical Strain-Induced Axonal Injury and an Elongation of Paranodal Junctions Ex Vivo

In our study, we aimed to mimic the effect of a sustained tensile strain. We chose half-an-hour static tensile strain of 30% (Fig. 1a) to induce two hallmarks of brain trauma, specifically axonal injury and elongation of paranodal junctions in a myelinated tissue.
Fig. 1

Mechanical tensile strain of 30% induces axonal injury in organotypic cerebellar slice culture. a Ex vivo culture and 30% strain model using organotypic slice cultures of cerebellum. b Double immunostaining of organotypic cerebellar slices for APP in red and SMI-312 (pan-axonal neurofilament marker) in green. Images represent control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cultures. The response of slices was evaluated at time 0 h post-stretch. Scale bar, 50 μm. c High magnification of the white square in the stretch panel from b. Scale bar, 20 μm. d Quantitative analysis of the number of APP aggregates per slice. Results represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05. APP amyloid precursor protein, DIV days in vitro

First, we assessed the axonal injury by co-immunolabeling of cerebellar slices with APP and SMI-312 antibodies (Fig. 1b). The number of axonal APP aggregates was significantly increased in stretched slices (+ 47%, p < 0.05) (Fig. 1c, d), and the co-immunolabeling of SMI-312, a marker of axonal neurofilament, indicated an axonal swelling (Fig. 1b, c) in stretched slices.

Second, we investigated the structure of the paranodal junctions by labeling the axonal membrane protein Caspr, an integral component of the paranodal complex, and the myelin sheaths by MAG, a myelin protein. Paranodal junctions are located between the nodes of Ranvier and the juxtaparanodal junctions. The paranodal complex is a structure that connects myelin and the axonal membrane at this region. The co-immunolabeling of MAG allowed us to better visualize the myelinated fibers with their pair of immunolabeled Caspr delimiting each node of Ranvier. Our results showed a significant alteration in Caspr staining in stretched slices compared to control slices (Fig. 2a). In particular, we quantified the nodal (A) length (+ 19.8%, p < 0.001), the paranodal (B) length (+ 7.9%, p < 0.001), and the (B-A) length (+ 4.7%, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2b–e), showing an increase of all these parameters in stretched slices. Our findings suggest an alteration of the paranodal junctions that start immediately after stretch.
Fig. 2

Mechanical tensile strain of 30% induces an elongation of paranodal junction and alteration in MAPK signaling in organotypic cerebellar slice culture. a Double immunostaining of organotypic cerebellar slices for CASPR in red and MAG in green. The response was evaluated at time 0 h post-stretch. Altered paranodal junctions are highlighted within white circles in high-magnification images. Scale bar, 50 μm; inset scale bar, 5 μm. b Sketch of CASPR and MAG labeling in the paranodal junction. Quantitative analysis is characterized by three length measurements: c nodal length called (A); d paranodal length called (B); and e (B-A) corresponding to the total length of the CASPR labeling. fh Proteins were extracted following strain of 30% from control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) slices and western blot was performed for the myelin protein MBP (f), ERK1/2 (g), and p38 (h). The ratio P-ERK on total ERK and the ratio P-p38 on total p38 are presented. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Results represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3). ***p < 0.001. CASPR contactin-associated protein, MAG myelin-associated glycoprotein

Effect of Mechanical Strain on Myelin Protein Expression and MAPK Signaling Pathway Ex Vivo

To evaluate the signaling alterations after mechanical stretch, we performed another set of experiments and extracted proteins from cerebellar slices. First, we investigated the expression of one of the major myelin protein, MBP by western blot. The amount of MBP was not significantly altered immediately after stretch even if a tendency of increase was observed (Fig. 2f).

Second, we studied the activation of MAPK signaling pathway which includes three principal subgroups of proteins, extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (JNKs), and p38 [65, 66, 67, 68], which are known to be responsive to stretch-induced injury and to be involved in myelin protein expression. We focused particularly on the effect of stretch on p38 (43 kDa) and ERK1/2 (44 and 42 kDa) in cerebellar slices (Fig. 2g, h). Our results showed that stretch had no effect on P-p38/p38 (Fig. 2h) but it increased the ratio of P-ERK/ERK by 74.1% (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2g). These results suggest an activation of MAPK-ERK following mechanical stretch injury in cerebellar slices.

Morphological and Molecular Alterations After Mechanical Tensile Strain of High Magnitude on Isolated Oligodendrocytes

Mechanical Strain Provoked Marked Alterations of Oligodendrocyte Morphology In Vitro

We assessed the effect of 30% strain for 30 min on the morphology of oligodendrocyte using oligodendrocyte-enriched primary culture. All analyses were performed immediately after the end of stretching period (Fig. 3; Fig. S1).
Fig. 3

Oligodendrocyte morphology and cell adhesion after in vitro mechanical tensile strain of 20% and 30%. a, c In vitro culture and strain model protocol of oligodendrocyte-enriched primary culture for mechanical strain of 30% and 20%, respectively. b, d Immunostaining of mature oligodendrocytes (MAG in green), their precursors (PDGFR-α in red), and nuclei (Hoechst in blue) in control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells after mechanical strain of 30% and 20%, respectively. Scale bar, 100 μm. e Quantitative analysis of the number of Hoechst+ cells per field (0.26 nm2) after 30% of strain. f Quantitative analysis of the number of Hoechst+ cells per field (0.26 nm2) and of the percentage of MAG+ and PDGFR-α+ cells after 20% of strain. g, h Quantitative analysis of the area of MAG+ cells (g) and PDGFR-α+ cells (h) after 20% of strain. Results represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. DIV days in vitro

Double immunostaining either with markers of cytoskeleton (actin and α-tubulin) or oligodendrocytes (MAG, PDGFR-α) revealed profound cellular damage with loss of oligodendrocyte ramifications and also partial cell loss after mechanical strain of 30% for 30 min (Fig. S1a; Fig. 3a, b, e). As the damage was detrimental to the isolated oligodendrocytes in primary culture, we also used a lower magnitude of strain (20% for 20 h; Fig. 3c), after which cells appeared retracted (Fig. S1b; Fig. 3d).

Applied strain of both magnitudes induced a decrease in the number of Hoechst+ adherent cells by 50% (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3e, f), which lasted at least 24 h after stress induction (not shown). In our experimental conditions of primary culture, we obtained more immature than mature oligodendrocytes (80–90% immature PDGFR-α+ and 10–20% mature MAG+), as expected [69]. Interestingly, the lowest strain magnitude (20%) did not alter the percentage of mature MAG+ (11.50 ± 0.29 versus 13.50 ± 0.87% cells/field) and immature PDGFR-α+ (86.33 ± 0.88 versus 80.33 ± 3.28% cells/field) oligodendrocytes (Fig. 3f), suggesting that there were less Hoechst+ adherent cells with the same proportion of mature and immature cells. In addition, the surface area of MAG+ or PDGFR-α+ cells was reduced following strain of 20% (Fig. 3g, h), in accordance with our data on cytoskeleton (Fig. S1). In the case of 30% strain, oligodendrocytes had an elongated nuclei shape with no cell ramifications (Fig. 3b). It was impossible to identify cells as mature MAG+ or immature PDGFR-α+ oligodendrocytes. Thus, we were not able to provide the analysis of cell surface and ramifications after 30% strain.

Mechanical Strain Altered the Expression of Myelin Proteins and MAPK Signaling Pathways In Vitro

The effect of stretch was also assessed at the level of myelin proteins. The mRNA level of Mag decreased by 30% (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4(a)); however, no significant changes for Cnp (Fig. 4(b)) and Plp (Fig. 4(c)) were observed following 20% strain. In contrast, Plp expression was decreased by 55% (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4(f)), with no significant changes for Mag and Cnp (Fig. 4(d, e)) following 30% strain.
Fig. 4

Alteration in myelin gene expression after in vitro mechanical tensile strain of 20% and 30%. Total RNA was extracted and RT-qPCR was performed in control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells for myelin genes Mag (a, d), Cnp (b, e), and Plp (c, f, g, i) after strain of 20% (a, b, c, g) and 30% (d, e, f, i). Results represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. (h, j) Proteins were extracted from control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) 158N cells and western blot was performed for myelin protein PLP (26 kDa) following 20% (h) and 30% (j) of strain. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Results represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments

In the 158N oligodendroglial cell line, strain of 20% did not affect PLP at the mRNA (Fig. 4(g)) and protein levels (Fig. 4(h)), while strain of 30% significantly decreased PLP by 60% (p < 0.01) at the mRNA level (Fig. 4(i)) without an effect on protein level (Fig. 4(j)). Hence, strain of both magnitudes altered the expression of some myelin protein genes, and interestingly, we observed the same impact of strain magnitude on Plp expression in oligodendrocytes either in primary cell culture or in the 158N cell line.

We also attempted to study the MAPK signaling pathways in the 158N cell line. Mechanical strain of 20% reduced the ratio of P-ERK/ERK by 50% (p < 0.05) while the strain of 30% did not have an effect on ERK signaling (Fig. 5(a, d)). Both 20% and 30% strains decreased the ratio of P-p38/p38 by 60% (p < 0.05) and by 30% (p < 0.001), respectively (Fig. 5(b, e)). Finally, 20% strain increased the ratio of P-JNK/JNK for the 54 kDa isoform (+ 70%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 5(c)), while 30% strain did not affect this ratio (Fig. 5(f)).
Fig. 5

Alteration in MAP kinases ERK1/2, p38, and JNKs signaling after tensile strain of 20% and 30% in the 158N cell line. Proteins were extracted from control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells and western blot was performed for ERK1/2 (a, d), p38 (b, e), and JNKs (c, f). β-Actin (47 kDa) was used as a loading control. The ratio of P-ERK to total ERK and the ratio of P-p38 to total p38 are presented following 20% (a, b, respectively) and 30% (d, e, respectively) of strain. The ratio of P-JNK to total JNK is presented following strain of 20% (c) and 30% (f) for the 54 and 46 kDa isoforms. Results represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001

Mechanical Strain Provoked Increased Level of Intracellular ROS and Oxidized Proteins and Altered the Anti-oxidant Systems In Vitro

The morphological alterations and changes in myelin proteins observed in oligodendrocytes prompted us to further investigate the molecular mechanisms related to oxidative stress induced by mechanical strain. To achieve this objective, we chose the 158N oligodendroglial cell line, as the appropriate cellular model, to perform biochemical assays and FACS analysis. 158N cells were exposed to mechanical strain of 20% and 30%, and all analyses were performed immediately after the end of the stretching period (Figs. 6 and 7).
Fig. 6

Stretch increases the level of intracellular ROS in the 158N cell line after tensile strain of 20% and 30%. The intracellular ROS level was detected by the DCFH-DA fluorescent probe. Representative DCF-stained (FITC channel) and PI-stained (PE channel) pictures of control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells following strain of 20% (a) and 30% (f). Representative picture of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of DCF measured in DCF+/PI cells following strain of 20% (b) and 30% (g). Quantitative analysis of the percentage of DCF+ cells following strain of 20% (c) and 30% (h). Results are expressed as the fold change in comparison to the control group. Values are the mean ± SEM of three experiments performed in triplicate. AOPP (μmol/L) and carbonyls (nmol/mg) were measured in control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells following 20% (d, e) and 30% (i, j) of strain. Results represent the mean ± SEM (n = 5). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. DCF 2′,7′ fluorescent dichlorofluorescein. PI propidium iodide

Fig. 7

Effect of stretch on different oxidative stress parameters in the 158N cell line after tensile strain of 20% and 30%. SOD activity was measured in control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells following strain of 20% (a) and 30% (g). Results represent the mean ± SEM (n = 5). Total RNA was extracted and RT-qPCR was performed in control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells following 20% and 30% of strain for antioxidant genes Sod-1 (b, h), Sod-2 (c, i), Nrf-2 (d, j), Ho-1 (e, k), and Nqo-1 (f, l). Results represent the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001

We used FACS to assess the effect of mechanical strain of high magnitude on cell death and ROS production. In control and stretched cells, the number of PI+ cells was less than 7% regardless of group condition and of stretch severity showing no effect of stretch on cell death in 158N cells (Fig. 6(a, f)). ROS production, evaluated by assessing the redox-sensitive intracellular conversion of H2DCFDA to DCF, was significantly increased in stretched cells compared to control. Stretch induced an increase in the number of DCF+/PI cells either after strain of 20% (+ 15%, p < 0.05) or 30% (+ 20%, p < 0.05) (Fig. 6(b, c, g, h)). We next investigated whether the amount of ROS produced during the stretch period alterated cellular constituents, such as oxidation of proteins, evaluated by the amount of advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) and carbonyls. The amount of AOPP in stretched cells was significantly increased compared to the control group after strain of 20% (326 ± 19.05 versus 239 ± 18.62 μmol/mg; p < 0.05) and 30% (338 ± 6.57 versus 287 ± 5.04 μmol/mg; p < 0.01) (Fig. 6(d, i)). The amount of carbonyl groups did not change after 20% strain (Fig. 6(e)), but it increased after 30% strain (20.40 ± 1.06 versus 15.63 ± 0.90 nmol/mg; p < 0.05) (Fig. 6(j)).

We further investigated the effect of strain on anti-oxidant systems in 158N cell line. Strain of 20% provoked a decrease in the level of reduced GSH, one of the major antioxidant molecules, accompanied by a decrease in activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPx), the enzyme that breaks down H2O2 into H2O (Table 1). After moderate injury, the level of GSH was markedly decreased accompanied by a reduction of GPx activity. Level of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) was also assessed, but it was not detectable in our system analysis. Glutathione reductase (GR) was not affected regardless of group condition and stretch severity (Table 1). We decided to further analyze the status of the antioxidant systems in our cells (Fig. 7). The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), a major antioxidant enzyme, did not change in stretched cells after 20% strain (Fig. 7(a)), while it decreased after 30% strain (9.78 ± 0.17 U/mg for control versus 8.43 ± 0.35 U/mg for stretch condition, p < 0.05) (Fig. 7(g)). The effect of stretch was also investigated at the mRNA level of the cytoplasmic form of this enzyme, Sod-1, and the mitochondrial form, Sod-2. Stretch induced an increase of both Sod-1 and Sod-2 expression after 20% strain (Fig. 7(b, c)), while an opposite response was observed after 30% strain with a decrease in the expression of both Sod-1 and Sod-2 (Fig. 7(h, i)).
Table 1

Effect of stretch on glutathione and enzymes involved in glutathione redox cycle in the 158N cell line after tensile strain of 20% and 30%

 

Ctrl

Stretch

p value

20% strain model

 GSH (AU)

403.7 ± 9.02

363.3 ± 4.41*

0.0159

 GPx (U/mg)

0.392 ± 0.039

0.216 ± 0.024**

0.0020

 GR (U/mg)

0.018 ± 0.005

0.050 ± 0.020

0.1408

30% strain model

 GSH (AU)

421.2 ± 10.13

370.8 ± 7.51**

0.0026

 GPx (U/mg)

0.327 ± 0.014

0.272 ± 0.015*

0.0247

 GR (U/mg)

0.013 ± 0.003

0.030 ± 0.006

0.0668

Reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and glutathione reductase (GR) were measured in control (Ctrl) and stretched (Stretch) cells following strain of 20% and 30%. GSSG was not detectable in our system. Results represent the mean ± SEM (n = 9 for 20% and n = 6 for 30%)

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Next, we evaluated the expression of Nrf2, a transcription factor that regulates the expression of many phase II detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes, such as heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) and NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO-1) [70]. Strain of 20% did not affect Nrf2 expression at the mRNA level (Fig. 7(d)) while strain of 30% decreased levels of the Nrf2 transcript (Fig. 7(j)). We also observed a significant increase of Ho-1 (+ 100%, p < 0.01) and Nqo-1 (+ 50%, p < 0.05) mRNA levels after 20% strain (Fig. 7(e, f)), while no effect was measured after 30% strain (Fig. 7(k, l)).

Discussion

The aim of this work was to decipher the molecular responses of oligodendrocytes and myelinated fibers, and the fate of myelin proteins following a traumatic event induced by a mechanical strain of high magnitude mimicking brain trauma. We developed several models of stretch-induced injury, ex vivo in organotypic cerebellar slice cultures and in vitro in isolated oligodendrocytes (primary culture, and 158N cell line).

Stretched cerebellar slices showed an accumulation of amyloid precursor protein (APP), a marker of axonal injury, and axonal swelling, a sign of altered axonal transport [71]. APP accumulation within axons is recognized as the gold standard for the identification of axonal injury [42, 43]. Therefore, the mechanical strain of 30% applied to our culture of cerebellar slices was sufficient to induce an axonal injury that is a hallmark of brain trauma. In addition, the structure of the paranodal junctions, that flank the nodes, appeared more “elongated” in stretched slices than in control slices suggesting an alteration of the paranodal junctions immediately after stretch. This observation is in line with a study in which paranodal myelin damage was reported in an ex vivo model of stretch-induced injury in guinea pig spinal cord [45]. Another study showed that primary paranodal demyelination modulates axonal depolarization in a model of axonal injury [72]. The paranode regions contain the voltage-gated potassium channels in high density and the injury-induced paranodal demyelination modulates potassium accumulation and membrane depolarization that, in turn, affect the axonal transition to degradation. The authors proposed that the extent of paranodal demyelination should be considered as an “injury parameter” that is likely to determine the stability of axonal function in the temporal window of minutes post trauma [72]. Moreover, the width of the nodes of Ranvier is crucial for a fast conduction. In fact, in normal myelinated axons, the conduction velocity is inversely related to the node width. Taken together, our results showed that stretch induced an alteration of paranodal junctions immediately after the stretch that could initiate demyelination.

Among the in vitro models of traumatic injury, several reports addressed the effect of stretch-induced injury on different CNS cell types including neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. It has been demonstrated that such injury results in structural changes in both glia and neurons [29, 73, 74, 75]. Generally, the extent of damage is proportional to the degree of strain [76, 77]. Recent finding showed that stretch-induced mechano-stimulation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells, in a physiological range of tensile strain (10–15%), is able to promote cell differentiation. However, the effect of tensile strain on oligodendrocytes at higher magnitude (20–30%), which occurs following brain injury [40, 41], remains unknown. Therefore, our aims were to study the effect of such injury on oligodendrocyte morphology and cell loss, and to decipher the subsequent cellular and molecular responses to a mechanical strain of high magnitude.

We addressed the effect of mechanical strain of different magnitudes (20% or 30%) on oligodendrocyte morphology and cell loss in oligodendrocyte-enriched primary cultures. As expected, immature oligodendrocytes expressed PDGFR-α, and mature oligodendrocytes, that form “myelin-like” membranes in vitro, expressed myelin proteins such as MAG [1, 78, 79]. Our data showed a significant loss of oligodendrocytes following both strains of 20% and 30%. The lower strain of 20% did not affect the ratio of mature to immature oligodendrocytes, suggesting that the cell maturation rate was not modified in our experimental condition. Changes in cell morphology contrary to the percentage of cell loss were proportionally related to the magnitude of mechanical strain. In fact, strain of 20% caused cell retraction, while strain of 30% provoked a profound alteration of cell ramifications with disappearance of the cytoskeleton. Cells can respond to mechanical stretch by modulating their spread area, generally as a function of strain magnitude and strain frequency, as previously reported in endothelial cells [46], and in fibroblasts [80]. At the molecular level, the expression of myelin proteins was also affected following stretch with a significant decrease in the mRNA level of Mag (20% strain) and Plp (30% strain). Overall, our findings showed that stretch was able to induce an alteration of cell morphology and myelin protein expression in oligodendrocytes that was strain magnitude-dependent.

Since oligodendrocytes are particularly mechanosensitive and vulnerable to mechanical strain of high magnitude, and also vulnerable to oxidative stress [23, 24], we assessed the effect of mechanical strain of high magnitude on the production of ROS in 158N cells. While stretch did not induce cell death in 158N cells, probably due to our experimental condition (higher cell density compared to primary culture) or cell line resistance, it caused a significant increase in the production of ROS. In our model, elevated ROS levels led to an increase of AOPP after strain of 20% and 30%, and of protein carbonylation only after strain of 30%. In addition, mechanical strain caused a diminution of anti-oxidant defenses, as reflected by the decreased level of GSH, which was strain magnitude-dependent. It was also accompanied by a decrease of GPx, which detoxifies H2O2. GSH is the first line of cell defenses as a ROS scavenger. Hence, the ratio of GSH to GSSG is often used as an indicator of the oxidative stress status [81]. In our system, the significant decrease of GSH indicates an alteration in the glutathione equilibrium following mechanical strain of high magnitude.

In addition, analysis of the cellular oxidative redox status suggested that the activation of anti-oxidant systems was strain magnitude-dependent. The Nrf2 pathway, a major determinant of detoxifying phase II gene induction [70], once activated is able to induce the expression of Ho-1 and Nqo-1, which protect cells from oxidative stress [82]. On one hand, strain of 20% increased the expression of anti-oxidant genes (Sod-1, Sod-2, Ho-1, and Nqo-1), showing that cells were able to activate their anti-oxidant defense system. On the other hand, strain of 30% has an opposite effect accompanied by a decreased SOD activity. Therefore, strain of 30% induced a significant alteration of the antioxidant system rendering cells more vulnerable and incapable of properly activating the antioxidant response.

We also attempted to study the effect of mechanical stretch on MAPK activation, a particularly stretch-responsive pathway. In CNS glial cells, like astrocytes, mechanical injury activates ERK [66] and p38 [68]. The role of the MAPK signaling is emphasized as a point of convergence for various signaling cascades regulating gene expression [83]. In fact, the MAPK pathway is involved in myelin protein expression, oligodendroglial development, and myelination [84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89]. Several studies showed that p38 MAPK inhibition prevents myelin gene expression and OPC differentiation [86, 90, 91]. This is in accordance with our in vitro findings where stretch-induced p38 MAPK inhibition was accompanied with a decreased expression of at least one myelin protein. However, we did not observe p38 MAPK inhibition in slices because what we observed in cerebellar slices is the final response of various cell subpopulations in the cerebellum. ERK1/2 has been also identified as critically important in regulating oligodendroglial development and myelination; in particular, it seems that ERK1/2 plays a key and direct role in promoting myelination (see review [85]). ERK1/2 was activated in cultured OPCs following treatment with rolipram, a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, and seems to be involved in the remyelinating effect of this compound after demyelination ex vivo and in vivo [92]. The activation of ERK1/2 observed in our model of cerebellar slices could be a positive response to counteract the effect of mechanical stretch injury on myelin integrity.

Moreover, a link has been established between oxidative stress and MAPKs (see review [93, 94]). In fact, ROS can induce or mediate the activation of the MAPK signaling pathways. In general, increased ROS production leads to the activation of ERKs, JNKs, and p38. In our model, the activation of JNK after 20% strain in vitro might be related to increased ROS production. Our results confirm also that mechanical stretch was able to activate the JNK pathway, which is known to be responsive to environmental stress [65]. However, the activation of JNK pathway appears to be strain magnitude-dependent since it was only observed following 20% strain. Taken together, mechanical stretch of high magnitude disturbs MAPK signaling in oligodendrocytes and cerebellar slices, which can affect cell survival and the expression of myelin proteins.

In conclusion, we developed several models of stretch-induced injury in oligodendrocytes and cerebellar slices, showing for the first time that stretch-induced injury causes significant alterations of oligodendrocytes and myelin integrity. Mechanical stretch of high magnitude provokes axonal injury and elongation of paranodal junctions that could initiate demyelination. Overall, these models are relevant for studying the pathophysiological events that occur after stretch-induced injury as well as for testing the therapeutic compounds for white matter protection.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the assistance provided by different facilities (animal, molecular biology, FACS, and imaging facilities) from the Faculty of Basic and Biomedical Sciences (Paris Descartes University), particularly Jean-Maurice Petit for confocal microscopy, and Dr. Stéphanie Dupuy for flow cytometry. We acknowledge also Dr. Said Ghandour (CNRS UMR 7357) for providing the 158N oligodendroglial cell line, Dr. Julien Grenier (INSERM UMR-S 1124) for the cell line maintenance, and Marie-Sophie Girault and Rebeca Gallego Ruiz for their technical assistance.

Author Contributions

MJT, EC, and CM designed the study. EC, AS, FC, GC, FS, AC, DB, and FE performed experiments. EC, DM, AS, FR, BM, CM, and MJT analyzed and discussed data. EC and MJT wrote the main manuscript. EC and AS prepared all figures. MJT, EC, AS, DM, and BM revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the non-profit organization “Fondation des Gueules Cassées” (grants to MJT), Paris Descartes University, and INSERM (Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale). E.C. is a recipient of PhD fellowship from French Ministry of Research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Animalcare and experiments were approved by the Paris Descartes University (CEEA34.MJT.075.12) respecting the French regulations and the European Communities Council Directive of September 2010/63/UE, on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

12035_2018_1372_Fig8_ESM.png (1.5 mb)
Fig S1

(PNG 1537 kb)

12035_2018_1372_MOESM1_ESM.tif (6.7 mb)
High resolution image (TIF 6828 kb)
12035_2018_1372_MOESM2_ESM.docx (65 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 64 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Simons M, Nave K-A (2016) Oligodendrocytes: myelination and axonal support. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 8:a020479.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a020479 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Armstrong RC, Mierzwa AJ, Sullivan GM, Sanchez MA (2016) Myelin and oligodendrocyte lineage cells in white matter pathology and plasticity after traumatic brain injury. Neuropharmacology 110:654–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.04.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong RC, Mierzwa AJ, Marion CM, Sullivan GM (2016) White matter involvement after TBI: clues to axon and myelin repair capacity. Exp Neurol 275:328–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.02.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dennis EL, Ellis MU, Marion SD, Jin Y, Moran L, Olsen A, Kernan C, Babikian T et al (2015) Callosal function in pediatric traumatic brain injury linked to disrupted white matter integrity. J Neurosci 35:10202–10211.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1595-15.2015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim J, Avants B, Patel S, Whyte J, Coslett BH, Pluta J, Detre JA, Gee JC (2008) Structural consequences of diffuse traumatic brain injury: a large deformation tensor-based morphometry study. NeuroImage 39:1014–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDonald S, Dalton KI, Rushby JA, Landin-Romero R (2018) Loss of white matter connections after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its relationship to social cognition. Brain Imaging Behav.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-018-9906-0
  7. 7.
    Mierzwa AJ, Marion CM, Sullivan GM, McDaniel DP, Armstrong RC (2015) Components of myelin damage and repair in the progression of white matter pathology after mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 74:218–232CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Owens JA, Spitz G, Ponsford JL, Dymowski AR, Willmott C (2018) An investigation of white matter integrity and attention deficits following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 32:776–783.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1451656 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sidaros A, Skimminge A, Liptrot MG, Sidaros K, Engberg AW, Herning M et al (2009) Long-term global and regional brain volume changes following severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal study with clinical correlates. NeuroImage 44:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tomaiuolo F, Bivona U, Lerch JP, Di Paola M, Carlesimo GA, Ciurli P et al (2012) Memory and anatomical change in severe non missile traumatic brain injury: ∼1 vs. ∼8 years follow-up. Brain Res Bull 87:373–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.01.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrera JJ, Bockhorst KH, Kondraganti S, Stertz L, JL DQ, Narayana PA (2016) Acute white matter tract damage following frontal mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma Available: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/neu.2016.4407
  12. 12.
    Wang Z, Wu W, Liu Y, Wang T, Chen X, Zhang J, Zhou G, Chen R (2016) Altered cerebellar white matter integrity in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the acute stage. Yap P-T, editor. PLoS One e0151489:11.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Caprariello AV, Mangla S, Miller RH, Selkirk SM (2012) Apoptosis of oligodendrocytes in the central nervous system results in rapid focal demyelination. Ann Neurol 72:395–405.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.23606 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flygt J, Djupsjö A, Lenne F, Marklund N (2013) Myelin loss and oligodendrocyte pathology in white matter tracts following traumatic brain injury in the rat. Eur J Neurosci 38:2153–2165.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12179 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flygt J, Gumucio A, Ingelsson M, Skoglund K, Holm J, Alafuzoff I, Marklund N (2016) Human traumatic brain injury results in oligodendrocyte death and increases the number of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 75:503–515.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlw025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Flygt J, Ruscher K, Norberg A, Mir A, Gram H, Clausen F, Marklund N (2018) Neutralization of interleukin-1β following diffuse traumatic brain injury in the mouse attenuates the loss of mature oligodendrocytes. J Neurotrauma.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5660
  17. 17.
    Taib T, Leconte C, Van Steenwinckel J, Cho AH, Palmier B, Torsello E et al (2017) Neuroinflammation, myelin and behavior: temporal patterns following mild traumatic brain injury in mice. PLoS One 12:e0184811.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184811 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Llufriu-Dabén G, Meffre D, Massaad C, Jafarian-Tehrani M. A novel model of trauma-induced cerebellar injury and myelin loss in mouse organotypic cerebellar slice cultures using live imaging. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2018 in press Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiong Y, Mahmood A, Chopp M (2013) Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurosci 14:128–142.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3407 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abdul-Muneer PM, Chandra N, Haorah J (2015) Interactions of oxidative stress and neurovascular inflammation in the pathogenesis of traumatic brain injury. Mol Neurobiol 51:966–979.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-014-8752-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cornelius C, Crupi R, Calabrese V, Graziano A, Milone P, Pennisi G, Radak Z, Calabrese EJ et al (2013) Traumatic brain injury: oxidative stress and neuroprotection. Antioxid Redox Signal 19:836–853.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4981 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sultana R, Perluigi M, Allan Butterfield D (2013) Lipid peroxidation triggers neurodegeneration: a redox proteomics view into the Alzheimer disease brain. Free Radic Biol Med 62:157–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.09.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    French HM, Reid M, Mamontov P, Simmons RA, Grinspan JB (2009) Oxidative stress disrupts oligodendrocyte maturation. J Neurosci Res 87:3076–3087.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22139 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thorburne SK, Juurlink BH (1996) Low glutathione and high iron govern the susceptibility of oligodendroglial precursors to oxidative stress. J Neurochem 67:1014–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mendes Arent A, de SLF, Walz R, Dafre AL (2014) Perspectives on molecular biomarkers of oxidative stress and antioxidant strategies in traumatic brain injury. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/723060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rodríguez-Rodríguez A, Egea-Guerrero JJ, Murillo-Cabezas F, Carrillo-Vico A (2014) Oxidative stress in traumatic brain injury. Curr Med Chem 21:1201–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Darvish KK, Crandall JR (2001) Nonlinear viscoelastic effects in oscillatory shear deformation of brain tissue. Med Eng Phys 23:633–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morrison B, Cater HL, Benham CD, Sundstrom LE (2006) An in vitro model of traumatic brain injury utilising two-dimensional stretch of organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. J Neurosci Methods 150:192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.06.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ellis EF, McKinney JS, Willoughby KA, Liang S, Povlishock JT (1995) A new model for rapid stretch-induced injury of cells in culture: characterization of the model using astrocytes. J Neurotrauma 12:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Winkler EA, Minter D, Yue JK, Manley GT (2016) Cerebral edema in traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology and prospective therapeutic targets. Neurosurg Clin N Am 27:473–488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2016.05.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salehi A, Zhang JH, Obenaus A (2017) Response of the cerebral vasculature following traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab 37:2320–2339.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X17701460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arulmoli J, Pathak MM, McDonnell LP, Nourse JL, Tombola F, Earthman JC et al (2015) Static stretch affects neural stem cell differentiation in an extracellular matrix-dependent manner. Sci Rep 5:8499.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08499 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hernandez M, Patzig J, Mayoral SR, Costa KD, Chan JR, Casaccia P (2016) Mechanostimulation promotes nuclear and epigenetic changes in oligodendrocytes. J Neurosci 36:806–813.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2873-15.2016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jagielska A, Norman AL, Whyte G, Vliet KJV, Guck J, Franklin RJM (2012) Mechanical environment modulates biological properties of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev 21:2905–2914.  https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2012.0189 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jagielska A, Lowe AL, Makhija E, Wroblewska L, Guck J, Franklin RJM, Shivashankar GV, van Vliet KJ (2017) Mechanical strain promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation by global changes of gene expression. Front Cell Neurosci 11:93.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00093 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lourenço T, Paes de Faria J, Bippes CA, Maia J, Lopes-da-Silva JA, Relvas JB, Grãos M (2016) Modulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation and maturation by combined biochemical and mechanical cues. Sci Rep 6:21563.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21563 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rosenberg SS, Kelland EE, Tokar E, Asia R, Chan JR (2008) The geometric and spatial constraints of the microenvironment induce oligodendrocyte differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:14662–14667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shimizu T, Osanai Y, Tanaka KF, Abe M, Natsume R, Sakimura K, Ikenaka K (2017) YAP functions as a mechanotransducer in oligodendrocyte morphogenesis and maturation. Glia 65:360–374.  https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.23096 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Urbanski MM, Kingsbury L, Moussouros D, Kassim I, Mehjabeen S, Paknejad N, Melendez-Vasquez CV (2016) Myelinating glia differentiation is regulated by extracellular matrix elasticity. Sci Rep 6:33751.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33751 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Margulies SS, Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA (1990) Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate. J Biomech 23:823–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meaney DF, Smith DH, Shreiber DI, Bain AC, Miller RT, Ross DT et al (1995) Biomechanical analysis of experimental diffuse axonal injury. J Neurotrauma 12:689–694.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1995.12.689 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gentleman SM, Nash MJ, Sweeting CJ, Graham DI, Roberts GW (1993) Beta-amyloid precursor protein (beta APP) as a marker for axonal injury after head injury. Neurosci Lett 160:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sherriff FE, Bridges LR, Sivaloganathan S (1994) Early detection of axonal injury after human head trauma using immunocytochemistry for beta-amyloid precursor protein. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 87:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maxwell WL (1996) Histopathological changes at central nodes of Ranvier after stretch-injury. Microsc Res Tech 34:522–535.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19960815)34:6<522::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-L CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sun W, Fu Y, Shi Y, Cheng J-X, Cao P, Shi R (2012) Paranodal myelin damage after acute stretch in guinea pig spinal cord. J Neurotrauma 29:611–619.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2086 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hsu H-J, Lee C-F, Locke A, Vanderzyl SQ, Kaunas R (2010) Stretch-induced stress fiber remodeling and the activations of JNK and ERK depend on mechanical strain rate, but not FAK. Vooijs M, editor. PLoS One 5:e12470.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012470 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kaunas R, Usami S, Chien S (2006) Regulation of stretch-induced JNK activation by stress fiber orientation. Cell Signal 18:1924–1931.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.02.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kito H, Chen EL, Wang X, Ikeda M, Azuma N, Nakajima N, Gahtan V, Sumpio BE (2000) Role of mitogen-activated protein kinases in pulmonary endothelial cells exposed to cyclic strain. J Appl Physiol 89:2391–2400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Martineau LC, Gardiner PF (2001) Insight into skeletal muscle mechanotransduction: MAPK activation is quantitatively related to tension. J Appl Physiol 91:693–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Birgbauer E, Rao TS, Webb M (2004) Lysolecithin induces demyelination in vitro in a cerebellar slice culture system. J Neurosci Res 78:157–166.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.20248 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morrison B, Meaney DF, Margulies SS, McIntosh TK (2000) Dynamic mechanical stretch of organotypic brain slice cultures induces differential genomic expression: relationship to mechanical parameters. J Biomech Eng 122:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Morrison B, Eberwine JH, Meaney DF, McIntosh TK (2000) Traumatic injury induces differential expression of cell death genes in organotypic brain slice cultures determined by complementary DNA array hybridization. Neuroscience 96:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Feutz AC, Pham-Dinh D, Allinquant B, Miehe M, Ghandour MS (2001) An immortalized jimpy oligodendrocyte cell line: defects in cell cycle and cAMP pathway. Glia 34:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Meffre D, Massaad C, Grenier J (2015) Lithium chloride stimulates PLP and MBP expression in oligodendrocytes via Wnt/β-catenin and Akt/CREB pathways. Neuroscience 284:962–971.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.10.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Feutz AC, Bellomi I, Allinquant B, Schladenhaufen Y, Ghandour MS (1995) Isolation and characterization of defective jimpy oligodendrocytes in culture. J Neurocytol 24:865–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ghandour MS, Feutz A-C, Jalabi W, Taleb O, Bessert D, Cypher M, Carlock L, Skoff RP (2002) Trafficking of PLP/DM20 and cAMP signaling in immortalized jimpy oligodendrocytes. Glia 40:300–311.  https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.10122 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Vande Geest JP, Di Martino ES, Vorp DA (2004) An analysis of the complete strain field within Flexercell membranes. J Biomech 37:1923–1928.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bass DA, Parce JW, Dechatelet LR, Szejda P, Seeds MC, Thomas M (1983) Flow cytometric studies of oxidative product formation by neutrophils: a graded response to membrane stimulation. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950 130:1910–1917Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Witko-Sarsat V, Friedlander M, Capeillère-Blandin C, Nguyen-Khoa T, Nguyen AT, Zingraff J, Jungers P, Descamps-Latscha B (1996) Advanced oxidation protein products as a novel marker of oxidative stress in uremia. Kidney Int 49:1304–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Reznick AZ, Packer L (1994) Oxidative damage to proteins: spectrophotometric method for carbonyl assay. Methods Enzymol 233:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Beauchamp C, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 44:276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bellomo G, Palladini G, Vairetti M (1997) Intranuclear distribution, function and fate of glutathione and glutathione-S-conjugate in living rat hepatocytes studied by fluorescence microscopy. Microsc Res Tech 36:243–252.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19970215)36:4<243::AID-JEMT3>3.0.CO;2-N CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Llufriu-Dabén G, Carrete A, Chierto E, Mailleux J, Camand E, Simon A, Vanmierlo T, Rose C et al (2018) Targeting demyelination via α-secretases promoting sAPPα release to enhance remyelination in central nervous system. Neurobiol Dis 109:11–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2017.09.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Meffre D, Shackleford G, Hichor M, Gorgievski V, Tzavara ET, Trousson A et al (2015) Liver X receptors alpha and beta promote myelination and remyelination in the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:7587–7592.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424951112 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Kyriakis JM, Avruch J (2012) Mammalian MAPK signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation: a 10-year update. Physiol Rev 92:689–737.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00028.2011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Neary JT, Kang Y, Willoughby KA, Ellis EF (2003) Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by stretch-induced injury in astrocytes involves extracellular ATP and P2 purinergic receptors. J Neurosci 23:2348–2356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Owens DM, Keyse SM (2007) Differential regulation of MAP kinase signalling by dual-specificity protein phosphatases. Oncogene 26:3203–3213.  https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1210412 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhou H, Chen Q, Kong DL, Guo J, Wang Q, Yu SY (2011) Effect of resveratrol on gliotransmitter levels and p38 activities in cultured astrocytes. Neurochem Res 36:17–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-010-0254-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    O’Meara RW, Ryan SD, Colognato H, Kothary R (2011) Derivation of enriched oligodendrocyte cultures and oligodendrocyte/neuron myelinating co-cultures from post-natal murine tissues. J Vis Exp JoVE.  https://doi.org/10.3791/3324
  70. 70.
    Zhang M, An C, Gao Y, Leak RK, Chen J, Zhang F (2013) Emerging roles of Nrf2 and phase II antioxidant enzymes in neuroprotection. Prog Neurobiol 100:30–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Tang-Schomer MD, Johnson VE, Baas PW, Stewart W, Smith DH (2012) Partial interruption of axonal transport due to microtubule breakage accounts for the formation of periodic varicosities after traumatic axonal injury. Exp Neurol 233:364–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.10.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Volman V, Ng LJ (2014) Primary paranode demyelination modulates slowly developing axonal depolarization in a model of axonal injury. J Comput Neurosci 37:439–457.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-014-0515-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Arundine M (2004) Vulnerability of central neurons to secondary insults after in vitro mechanical stretch. J Neurosci 24:8106–8123.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1362-04.2004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gladman SJ, Ward RE, Michael-Titus AT, Knight MM, Priestley JV (2010) The effect of mechanical strain or hypoxia on cell death in subpopulations of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in vitro. Neuroscience 171:577–587.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Gladman SJ, Huang W, Lim S-N, Dyall SC, Boddy S, Kang JX, Knight MM, Priestley JV et al (2012) Improved outcome after peripheral nerve injury in mice with increased levels of endogenous omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Neurosci 32:563–571.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3371-11.2012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ellis EF, Willoughby KA, Sparks SA, Chen T (2007) S100B protein is released from rat neonatal neurons, astrocytes, and microglia by in vitro trauma and anti-S100 increases trauma-induced delayed neuronal injury and negates the protective effect of exogenous S100B on neurons: endogenous S100B and brain cell injury. J Neurochem 101:1463–1470.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04515.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    McKinney JS, Willoughby KA, Liang S, Ellis EF (1996) Stretch-induced injury of cultured neuronal, glial, and endothelial cells. Effect of polyethylene glycol-conjugated superoxide dismutase. Stroke J Cereb Circ 27:934–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Baumann N, Pham-Dinh D (2001) Biology of oligodendrocyte and myelin in the mammalian central nervous system. Physiol Rev 81:871–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Jackman N, Ishii A, Bansal R (2009) Oligodendrocyte development and myelin biogenesis: parsing out the roles of glycosphingolipids. Physiology 24:290–297.  https://doi.org/10.1152/physiol.00016.2009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cui Y, Hameed FM, Yang B, Lee K, Pan CQ, Park S, Sheetz M (2015) Cyclic stretching of soft substrates induces spreading and growth. Nat Commun 6:6333.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7333 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Dalle-Donne I, Rossi R, Colombo R, Giustarini D, Milzani A (2006) Biomarkers of oxidative damage in human disease. Clin Chem 52:601–623.  https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2005.061408 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Kensler TW, Wakabayashi N, Biswal S (2007) Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 47:89–116.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.46.120604.141046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cargnello M, Roux PP (2011) Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev MMBR 75:50–83.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00031-10 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cervellini I, Galino J, Zhu N, Allen S, Birchmeier C, Bennett DL (2018) Sustained MAPK/ERK activation in adult Schwann cells impairs nerve repair. J Neurosci 38:679–690.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2255-17.2017 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gonsalvez D, Ferner AH, Peckham H, Murray SS, Xiao J (2016) The roles of extracellular related-kinases 1 and 2 signaling in CNS myelination. Neuropharmacology 110:586–593.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.04.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Haines JD, Fulton DL, Richard S, Almazan G (2015) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway regulates genes during proliferation and differentiation in oligodendrocytes. PLoS One 10:e0145843.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145843 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Jeffries MA, Urbanek K, Torres L, Wendell SG, Rubio ME, Fyffe-Maricich SL (2016) ERK1/2 activation in preexisting oligodendrocytes of adult mice drives new myelin synthesis and enhanced CNS function. J Neurosci 36:9186–9200.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1444-16.2016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Sanz-Rodriguez M, Gruart A, Escudero-Ramirez J, de Castro F, Delgado-García JM, Wandosell F, Cubelos B (2018) R-Ras1 and R-Ras2 are essential for oligodendrocyte differentiation and survival for correct myelination in the central nervous system. J Neurosci 38:5096–5110.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3364-17.2018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wang L-W, Tu Y-F, Huang C-C, Ho C-J (2012) JNK signaling is the shared pathway linking neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and oligodendroglial apoptosis in the white matter injury of the immature brain. J Neuroinflammation 9:175.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-175 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Chew L-J, Coley W, Cheng Y, Gallo V (2010) Mechanisms of regulation of oligodendrocyte development by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Neurosci 30:11011–11027.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2546-10.2010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Chung S-H, Biswas S, Selvaraj V, Liu X-B, Sohn J, Jiang P, Chen C, Chmilewsky F et al (2015) The p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase is a key regulator of myelination and remyelination in the CNS. Cell Death Dis 6:e1748.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2015.119 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Sun X, Liu Y, Liu B, Xiao Z, Zhang L (2012) Rolipram promotes remyelination possibly via MEK-ERK signal pathway in cuprizone-induced demyelination mouse. Exp Neurol 237:304–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.07.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Espinosa-Diez C, Miguel V, Mennerich D, Kietzmann T, Sánchez-Pérez P, Cadenas S, Lamas S (2015) Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress. Redox Biol 6:183–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.07.008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Son Y, Cheong Y-K, Kim N-H, Chung H-T, Kang DG, Pae H-O (2011) Mitogen-activated protein kinases and reactive oxygen species: how can ROS activate MAPK pathways? J Signal Transduct 2011:e792639.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/792639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elena Chierto
    • 1
  • Anne Simon
    • 1
  • Francesca Castoldi
    • 1
  • Delphine Meffre
    • 1
  • Giulia Cristinziano
    • 1
  • Francesca Sapone
    • 1
  • Alex Carrete
    • 1
  • Didier Borderie
    • 1
    • 2
  • François Etienne
    • 1
    • 3
  • François Rannou
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Barclay MorrisonIII
    • 5
  • Charbel Massaad
    • 1
  • Mehrnaz Jafarian-Tehrani
    • 1
  1. 1.INSERM UMR-S 1124, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté des Sciences Fondamentales et BiomédicalesParisFrance
  2. 2.Service de Diagnostic Biologique AutomatiséHôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre - Groupe Hospitalier Cochin (AP-HP)Paris Cedex 14France
  3. 3.Plateforme de mécanobiologie, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté des Sciences Fondamentales et BiomédicalesUniversité Paris DescartesParisFrance
  4. 4.Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l’Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du RachisHôpitaux Universitaires Paris Centre - Groupe Hospitalier Cochin (AP-HP)Paris Cedex 14France
  5. 5.Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations