Advertisement

Molecular Neurobiology

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 2301–2313 | Cite as

Dehydroepiandrosterone Induces Temozolomide Resistance Through Modulating Phosphorylation and Acetylation of Sp1 in Glioblastoma

  • Wen-Bin Yang
  • Jian-Ying Chuang
  • Chiung-Yuan Ko
  • Wen-Chang Chang
  • Tsung-I HsuEmail author
Article
  • 175 Downloads

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most malignant type of brain tumor for which there are currently no effective treatments. Patient prognosis is improved by radiation combined with temozolomide (TMZ) therapy but only for a short period of time due to the high prevalence of recurrence. Although O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-mediated DNA repair is a well-defined characteristic of TMZ resistance, the mechanism by which MGMT-deficient glioblastoma counteracts TMZ-induced DNA damage, leading to apoptosis, still remains unclear. Previously, we determined that aberrantly activated cytochrome P450 17A1 causes TMZ resistance in MGMT-deficient glioblastoma by increasing the secretion of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a neurosteroid that maintains the health of neurons and astrocytes. However, the precise mechanism by which DHEA alters the response of glioblastoma to TMZ has not been studied. In the present study, we found that DHEA prevents TMZ-induced apoptosis by attenuating DNA damage in MGMT-deficient glioblastoma. In addition, DHEA activated the LYN-AKT cascade to induce Sp1 phosphorylation. Phospho-Sp1 localized in TMZ-damaged DNA, prevented further DNA damage, and was deacetylated through the recruitment of HDAC1/2. Deacetylated Sp1 recruited proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) to attenuate DNA damage. To confirm whether the DHEA-induced cellular process contributes to TMZ resistance, we established a TMZ-resistant glioblastoma cell line, A172R, and isolated primary resistant tumor cells, PtR#1, from a glioblastoma patient exhibiting chemotherapeutic resistance. Sp1 exhibited phosphorylated and deacetylated status, and associated with HDAC1/2 and PCNA in TMZ-resistant cells. Based on these findings, we conclude that DHEA induces TMZ resistance in glioblastoma via the induction of phospho-Sp1-mediated DNA repair.

Keywords

Glioblastoma Temozolomide resistance Dehydroepiandrosterone Phospho-Sp1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank for the support by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 106-2320-B-038-003-MY2, 106-2320-B-038-001-, and 105-2320-B-038-062-) and by Taipei Medical university (TMU105-AE1-B20).

Author Contributions

Wen-Bin Yang: execution of experiments and data organization.

Jian-Ying Chuang: concept integration and collection of clinical materials.

Chiun-Yung Ko: execution of experiments.

Wen-Chang Chang: manuscript preparation.

Tsung-I Hsu: concept development and integration, execution of experiments, data interpretation and organization, and manuscript preparation.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The use of human specimens was approved by the Institute Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee from the office of human research in Taipei Medical University (Taipei, Taiwan). The consent of each patient was obtained and approved by Taipei Medical University IRB protocols, Nos. 201006011 and 201402018.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

12035_2018_1221_MOESM1_ESM.docx (858 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 858 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Vecchione-Koval T, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2017) CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010-2014. Neuro-Oncology 19(suppl_5):v1–v88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Omuro A, DeAngelis LM (2013) Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. JAMA 310(17):1842–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang J, Stevens MF, Bradshaw TD (2012) Temozolomide: mechanisms of action, repair and resistance. Curr Mol Pharmacol 5(1):102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Happold C, Weller M (2015) New insights into acquired temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma? Brain 138(Pt 12):3468–3470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nagel ZD, Kitange GJ, Gupta SK, Joughin BA, Chaim IA, Mazzucato P, Lauffenburger DA, Sarkaria JN et al (2017) DNA repair capacity in multiple pathways predicts chemoresistance in glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res 77(1):198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang WC, Hung JJ (2012) Functional role of post-translational modifications of Sp1 in tumorigenesis. J Biomed Sci 19:94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bocangel D, Sengupta S, Mitra S, Bhakat KK (2009) p53-Mediated down-regulation of the human DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) via interaction with Sp1 transcription factor. Anticancer Res 29(10):3741–3750PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fletcher SC, Grou CP, Legrand AJ, Chen X, Soderstrom K, Poletto M, Dianov GL (2017) Sp1 phosphorylation by ATM downregulates BER and promotes cell elimination in response to persistent DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Res 46(4):1834–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nishida Y, Mizutani N, Inoue M, Omori Y, Tamiya-Koizumi K, Takagi A, Kojima T, Suzuki M et al (2014) Phosphorylated Sp1 is the regulator of DNA-PKcs and DNA ligase IV transcription of daunorubicin-resistant leukemia cell lines. Biochim Biophys Acta 1839(4):265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goellner EM, Grimme B, Brown AR, Lin YC, Wang XH, Sugrue KF, Mitchell L, Trivedi RN et al (2011) Overcoming temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma via dual inhibition of NAD+ biosynthesis and base excision repair. Cancer Res 71(6):2308–2317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beishline K, Kelly CM, Olofsson BA, Koduri S, Emrich J, Greenberg RA, Azizkhan-Clifford J (2012) Sp1 facilitates DNA double-strand break repair through a nontranscriptional mechanism. Mol Cell Biol 32(18):3790–3799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hung JJ, Wang YT, Chang WC (2006) Sp1 deacetylation induced by phorbol ester recruits p300 to activate 12(S)-lipoxygenase gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol 26(5):1770–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waby JS, Chirakkal H, Yu C, Griffiths GJ, Benson RS, Bingle CD, Corfe BM (2010) Sp1 acetylation is associated with loss of DNA binding at promoters associated with cell cycle arrest and cell death in a colon cell line. Mol Cancer 9:275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kimonides VG, Khatibi NH, Svendsen CN, Sofroniew MV, Herbert J (1998) Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA-sulfate (DHEAS) protect hippocampal neurons against excitatory amino acid-induced neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(4):1852–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aly HF, Metwally FM, Ahmed HH (2011) Neuroprotective effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Biochim Pol 58(4):513–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moriguchi S, Shinoda Y, Yamamoto Y, Sasaki Y, Miyajima K, Tagashira H, Fukunaga K (2013) Stimulation of the sigma-1 receptor by DHEA enhances synaptic efficacy and neurogenesis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of olfactory bulbectomized mice. PLoS One 8(4):e60863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Charalampopoulos I, Alexaki VI, Lazaridis I, Dermitzaki E, Avlonitis N, Tsatsanis C, Calogeropoulou T, Margioris AN et al (2006) G protein-associated, specific membrane binding sites mediate the neuroprotective effect of dehydroepiandrosterone. FASEB J 20(3):577–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chuang JY, Lo WL, Ko CY, Chou SY, Chen RM, Chang KY, Hung JJ, Su WC et al (2017) Upregulation of CYP17A1 by Sp1-mediated DNA demethylation confers temozolomide resistance through DHEA-mediated protection in glioma. Oncogenesis 6(5):e339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chang KY, Hsu TI, Hsu CC, Tsai SY, Liu JJ, Chou SW, Liu MS, Liou JP et al (2017) Specificity protein 1-modulated superoxide dismutase 2 enhances temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma, which is independent of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Redox Biol 13:655–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu X, Stern DF (2003) NFBD1/KIAA0170 is a chromatin-associated protein involved in DNA damage signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 278(10):8795–8803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, Baer R, Lukas J et al (2007) Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450(7169):509–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seluanov A, Mao Z, Gorbunova V (2010) Analysis of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells. J Vis Exp (43):2002.  https://doi.org/10.3791/2002
  23. 23.
    Boiteux S, Guillet M (2004) Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 3(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chuang JY, Wang SA, Yang WB, Yang HC, Hung CY, Su TP, Chang WC, Hung JJ (2012) Sp1 phosphorylation by cyclin-dependent kinase 1/cyclin B1 represses its DNA-binding activity during mitosis in cancer cells. Oncogene 31(47):4946–4959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Charalampopoulos I, Margioris AN, Gravanis A (2008) Neurosteroid dehydroepiandrosterone exerts anti-apoptotic effects by membrane-mediated, integrated genomic and non-genomic pro-survival signaling pathways. J Neurochem 107(5):1457–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O'Hare T, Eide CA, Deininger MW (2008) Persistent LYN signaling in imatinib-resistant, BCR-ABL-independent chronic myelogenous leukemia. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(13):908–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schwarz LJ, Fox EM, Balko JM, Garrett JT, Kuba MG, Estrada MV, Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Mills GB et al (2014) LYN-activating mutations mediate antiestrogen resistance in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Invest 124(12):5490–5502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Essers J, Theil AF, Baldeyron C, van Cappellen WA, Houtsmuller AB, Kanaar R, Vermeulen W (2005) Nuclear dynamics of PCNA in DNA replication and repair. Mol Cell Biol 25(21):9350–9359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gil Del Alcazar CR, Todorova PK, Habib AA, Mukherjee B, Burma S (2016) Augmented HR repair mediates acquired temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Res 14(10):928–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee AJ, Endesfelder D, Rowan AJ, Walther A, Birkbak NJ, Futreal PA, Downward J, Szallasi Z et al (2011) Chromosomal instability confers intrinsic multidrug resistance. Cancer Res 71(5):1858–1870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davis AJ, Chen DJ (2013) DNA double strand break repair via non-homologous end-joining. Transl Cancer Res 2(3):130–143PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moen EL, Stark AL, Zhang W, Dolan ME, Godley LA (2014) The role of gene body cytosine modifications in MGMT expression and sensitivity to temozolomide. Mol Cancer Ther 13(5):1334–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gaspar N, Marshall L, Perryman L, Bax DA, Little SE, Viana-Pereira M, Sharp SY, Vassal G et al (2010) MGMT-independent temozolomide resistance in pediatric glioblastoma cells associated with a PI3-kinase-mediated HOX/stem cell gene signature. Cancer Res 70(22):9243–9252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Labrie F (2011) Blockade of testicular and adrenal androgens in prostate cancer treatment. Nat Rev Urol 8(2):73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of Medical SciencesCollege of MedicineTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.The Ph.D. Program for Neural Regenerative Medicine, College of Medical Science and TechnologyTaipei Medical University and National Health Research InstitutesTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Center for Neurotrauma and Neuroregeneration, College of Medical Science and TechnologyTaipei Medical UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations