Molecular Neurobiology

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 254–271 | Cite as

Mechanotransduction: Touch and Feel at the Molecular Level as Modeled in Caenorhabditis elegans

Article

Abstract

The survival of an organism depends on its ability to respond to its environment through its senses. The sense of touch is one of the most vital; still, it is the least understood. In the process of touch sensation, a mechanical stimulus is converted into electrical signals. Groundbreaking electrophysiological experiments in organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals have suggested that this conversion may occur through the activation of ion channels that gate in response to mechanical stimuli. However, the molecular identity of these channels has remained elusive for a very long time. Breakthroughs in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of touch sensation have come from the analysis of touch-insensitive mutants in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. This review will focus on the elegant genetic, molecular, imaging, and electrophysiological studies that demonstrate that a channel complex composed of two members of the DEG/ENaC gene family of channel subunits (named for the C. elegans degenerins and the related mammalian epithelial amiloride-sensitive Na channel), MEC-4 and MEC-10, and accessory subunits is gated by mechanical forces in touch-sensing neurons from C. elegans. I also report here electrophysiological and behavioral studies employing knockout mice that have recently shown that mammalian homologues of MEC-4, MEC-10, and accessory subunits are needed for normal mechanosensitivity in mouse, suggesting a conserved function for this channel family across species. The C. elegans genome encodes 28 DEG/ENaC channels: I discuss here the global role of DEG/ENaCs in mechanosensation, reporting findings on the role of other three nematode DEG/ENaCs (UNC-8, DEL-1, and UNC-105) in mechanosensitive and stretch-sensitive behaviors. Finally, this review will discuss findings in which members of another family of ion channels, the Transient Receptor Potential channels family, have been implicated in mechanosensitive behaviors in organisms ranging from C. elegans to mammals.

Keywords

Caenorhabditis elegans DEG/ENaC Mechanotransduction 

References

  1. 1.
    Cunningham JT, Wachtel RE, Abboud FM (1995) Mechanosensitive currents in putative aortic baroreceptor neurons in vitro. J Neurophysiol 73(5):2094–2098PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cho H et al (2002) Mechanosensitive ion channels in cultured sensory neurons of neonatal rats. J Neurosci 22(4):1238–1247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Drew LJ, Wood JN, Cesare P (2002) Distinct mechanosensitive properties of capsaicin-sensitive and -insensitive sensory neurons. J Neurosci 22(12):RC228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho H et al (2006) A novel mechanosensitive channel identified in sensory neurons. Eur J Neurosci 23(10):2543–2550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hu J, Lewin GR (2006) Mechanosensitive currents in the neurites of cultured mouse sensory neurones. J Physiol 577(Pt 3):815–828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalfie M et al (1985) The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 5(4):956–964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan JM, Horvitz HR (1993) A dual mechanosensory and chemosensory neuron in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:2227–2231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR (2000) C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron 26(3):619–631PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bargmann CI, Thomas JH, Horvitz HR (1990) Chemosensory cell function in the behavior and development of Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55:529–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hart AC et al (1999) Distinct signaling pathways mediate touch and osmosensory responses in a polymodal sensory neuron. J Neurosci 19(6):1952–1958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Colbert HA, Smith TL, Bargmann CI (1997) OSM-9, a novel protein with structural similarity to channels, is required for olfaction, mechanosensation, and olfactory adaptation in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 17(21):8259–8269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tobin DM et al (2002) Combinatorial expression of TRPV channel proteins defines their sensory functions and subcellular localization in C. elegans. Neuron 35:307–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hilliard MA et al (2005) In vivo imaging of C. elegans ASH neurons: cellular response and adaptation to chemical repellents. Embo J 24(1):63–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cosens DJ, Manning A (1969) Manning, abnormal electroretinogram from a drosophila mutant. Nature 224:285–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christensen AP, Corey DP (2007) TRP channels in mechanosensation: direct or indirect activation? Nat Rev Neurosci 8(7):510–521PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hart AC, Sims S, Kaplan JM (1995) Synaptic code for sensory modalities revealed by C. elegans GLR-1 glutamate receptor. Nature 378:82–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sulston J, Dew M, Brenner S (1975) Dopaminergic neurons in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Neurol 163(2):215–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chalfie M, Sulston J (1981) Developmental genetics of the mechanosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 82:358–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chalfie M, Thomson NJ (1979) Organization of neuronal microtubules in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 82:278–289PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Way JC, Chalfie M (1989) The mec-3 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans requires its own product for maintained expression and is expressed in three neuronal cell types. Genes Dev 3:1823–1833PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suzuki H et al (2003) In vivo imaging of C. elegans mechanosensory neurons demonstrates a specific role for the MEC-4 channel in the process of gentle touch sensation. Neuron 39(6):1005–1017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barr MM, Sternberg PW (1999) A polycystic kidney-disease gene homologue required for male mating behavior in C. elegans. Nature 401:386–389PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barr MM et al (2001) The Caenorhabditis elegans autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease gene homologs lov-1 and pkd-2 act in the same pathway. Curr Biol 11(17):1341–1346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoder BK, Hou X, Guay-Woodford LM (2002) The polycystic kidney disease proteins, polycystin-1, polycystin-2, polaris, and cystin, are co-localized in renal cilia. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(10):2508–2516PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nauli SM et al (2003) Polycystins 1 and 2 mediate mechanosensation in the primary cilium of kidney cells. Nat Genet 33(2):129–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chalfie M, Au M (1989) Genetic control of differentiation of the Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons. Science 243:1027–1033PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Driscoll M, Chalfie M (1991) The mec-4 gene is a member of a family of Caenorhabditis elegans genes that can mutate to induce neuronal degeneration. Nature 349:588–593PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chalfie M, Driscoll M, Huang M (1993) Degenerin similarities. Nature 361:504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Canessa CM, Horsiberger JD, Rossier BC (1993) Functional cloning of the epithelial sodium channel relation with genes involved in neurodegeneration. Nature 349:588–593Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Canessa CM et al (1994) Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature 367:412–413Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang M, Chalfie M (1994) Gene interactions affecting mechanosensory transduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 367:467–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lai CC et al (1996) Sequence and transmembrane topology of MEC-4, an ion channel subunit required for mechanotransduction in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol 133(5):1071–1081PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hong K, Driscoll M (1994) A transmembrane domain of the putative channel subunit MEC-4 influences mechanotransduction and neurodegeneration in C. elegans. Nature 367:470–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hong K, Mano I, Driscoll M (2000) In vivo structure-function analyses of Caenorhabditis elegans MEC-4, a candidate mechanosensory ion channel subunit. J Neurosci 20(7):2575–2588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Royal DC et al (2005) Temperature-sensitive mutant of the Caenorhabditis elegans Neurotoxic MEC-4(d) DEG/ENaC channel identifies a site required for trafficking or surface maintenance. J Biol Chem 280(51):41976–41986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Waldmann R, Champigny G, Lazdunski M (1995) Functional degenerin-containing chimeras identify residues essential for amiloride-sensitive Na+ channel function. J Biol Chem 270(20):11735–11737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schild L et al (1997) Identification of amino acid residues in the alpha, beta, and gamma subunits of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) involved in amiloride block and ion permeation. J Gen Physiol 109(1):15–26PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kellenberger S, Gautschi I, Schild L (1999) A single point mutation in the pore region of the epithelial Na+ channel changes ion selectivity by modifying molecular sieving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96(7):4170–4175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kellenberger S et al (1999) On the molecular basis of ion permeation in the epithelial Na+ channel. J Gen Physiol 114(1):13–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kellenberger S et al (2001) Permeability properties of ENaC selectivity filter mutants. J Gen Physiol 118(6):679–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ji HL et al (2004) The role of Pre-H2 domains of alpha- and delta-epithelial Na+ channels in ion permeation, conductance, and amiloride sensitivity. J Biol Chem 279(9):8428–8440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Grunder S et al (1999) Identification of a highly conserved sequence at the N-terminus of the epithelial Na+ channel alpha subunit involved in gating. Pflugers Arch 438(5):709–715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Garcia-Anoveros J, Ma C, Chalfie M (1995) Regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans degenerin proteins by a putative extracellular domain. Curr Biol 5(4):441–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Garcia-Anoveros J, Corey DP (1996) Touch at the molecular level. Mechanosensation. Curr Biol 6(5):541–543PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Staub O et al (1996) WW domains of Nedd4 bind to the proline-rich PY motifs in the epithelial Na+ channel deleted in Liddle’s syndrome. EMBO J 15(10):2371–2380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goulet CC et al (1998) Inhibition of the epithelial Na+ channel by interaction of Nedd4 with a PY motif deleted in Liddle’s syndrome. J Biol Chem 273(45):30012–30017PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Snyder PM (2002) The epithelial Na+ channel: cell surface insertion and retrieval in Na+ homeostasis and hypertension. Endocr Rev 23(2):258–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Xu K, Tavernarakis N, Driscoll M (2001) Necrotic cell death in C. elegans requires the function of calreticulin and regulators of Ca(2+) release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Neuron 31(6):957–971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Goodman MB et al (2002) MEC-2 regulates C. elegans DEG/ENaC channels needed for mechanosensation. Nature 415:1039–1042PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Chelur DS et al (2002) The mechanosensory protein MEC-6 is a subunit of the C. elegans touch-cell degenerin channel. Nature 420:669–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bianchi L et al (2004) The neurotoxic MEC-4(d) DEG/ENaC sodium channel conducts calcium: implications for necrosis initiation. Nat Neurosci 7(12):1337–1344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    O’Hagan R, Chalfie M, Goodman MB (2005) The MEC-4 DEG/ENaC channel of Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons transduces mechanical signals. Nat Neurosci 8(1):43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang Y et al (2000) Mechanically gated channel activity in cytoskeleton-deficient plasma membrane blebs and vesicles from Xenopus oocytes. J Physiol 523(Pt 1):117–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Huang M et al (1995) A stomatin-like protein necessary for mechanosensation in C. elegans. Nature 378:292–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stewart GW, Argent AC, Dash BC (1993) Stomatin: a putative cation transport regulator in the red cell membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta 1225(1):15–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang S et al (2004) MEC-2 is recruited to the putative mechanosensory complex in C. elegans touch receptor neurons through its stomatin-like domain. Curr Biol 14(21):1888–1896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Huber TB et al (2006) Podocin and MEC-2 bind cholesterol to regulate the activity of associated ion channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(46):17079–17086PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sedensky MM et al (2004) A stomatin and a degenerin interact in lipid rafts of the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287(2):C468–C474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wetzel C et al (2007) A stomatin–domain protein essential for touch sensation in the mouse. Nature 445:206–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Harbinder S et al (1997) Genetically targeted cell disruption in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13128–13133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fukushige T et al (1999) MEC-12, an a-tubulin required for touch sensitivity in C. elegans. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 3):395–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Emtage L et al (2004) Extracellular proteins organize the mechanosensory channel complex in C. elegans touch receptor neurons. Neuron 44(5):795–807PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Vogel BE, Hedgecock EM (2001) Hemicentin, a conserved extracellular member of the immunoglobulin superfamily, organizes epithelial and other cell attachments into oriented line-shaped junctions. Development 128(6):883–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Du H et al (1996) Extracellular proteins needed for C. elegans mechanosensation. Neuron 16:183–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rupp F et al (1991) Structure and expression of a rat agrin. Neuron 6:811–823PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mitani S et al (1993) Combinatorial control of touch receptor neuron expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 119(3):773–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gu G, Caldwell GA, Chalfie M (1996) Genetic interactions affecting touch sensitivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6577–6582PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chouinard SW et al (1995) A potassium channel beta subunit related to the aldo-keto reductase superfamily is encoded by the Drosophila hyperkinetic locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92(15):6763–6767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Blobel F, Erdmann R (1996) Identification of a yeast peroxisomal member of the family of AMP-binding proteins. Eur J Biochem 240(2):468–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Miyawaki A et al (1999) Dynamic and quantitative Ca2+ measurements using improved cameleons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2135–2140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kerr R et al (2000) Optical imaging of calcium transients in neurons and pharyngeal muscle of C. elegans. Neuron 26(3):583–594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rankin CH (1991) Interactions between two antagonistic reflexes in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Comp Physiol 169(1):59–67Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Xiong ZG et al (2004) Neuroprotection in ischemia: blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels. Cell 118(6):687–698PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Shreffler W et al (1995) The unc-8 and sup-40 genes regulate ion channel function in Caenorhabditis elegans motorneurons. Genetics 139(3):1261–1272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Tavernarakis N et al (1997) unc-8, a DEG/ENaC family member, encodes a subunit of a candidate mechanically gated channel that modulates C. elegans locomotion. Neuron 18:107–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Brenner S (1974) The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Park E, Horvitz HR (1986) Mutations with dominant effects on the behavior and morphology of the nematode C. elegans. Genetics 113:821–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Shreffler W, Wolinsky E (1997) Genes controlling ion permeability in both motorneurons and muscle. Behav Genet 27(3):211–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Garcia-Anoveros J et al (1998) The nematode degenerin UNC-105 forms ion channels that are activated by degeneration- or hypercontraction-causing mutations. Neuron 20(6):1231–1241PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Sibley MH et al (1993) Genetic identification, sequence, and alternative splicing of the Caenorhabditis elegans alpha 2(IV) collagen gene. J Cell Biol 123:255–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Liu J, Schrank B, Waterston R (1996) Interaction between a putative mechanosensory membrane channel and a collagen. Science 273:361–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Jospin M et al (2004) Patch clamp study of the UNC-105 degenerin and its interaction with the LET-2 collagen in Caenorhabditis elegans muscle. J Physiol 557(Pt 2):379–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Richmond JE, Jorgensen EM (1999) One GABA and two acetylcholine receptors function at the C. elegans neuromuscular junction. Nat Neurosci 2(9):791–797PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Adams CM et al (1998) Ripped pocket and pickpocket, novel Drosophila DEG/ENaC subunits expressed in early development and in mechanosensory neurons. J Cell Biol 140(1):143–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ainsley JA et al (2003) Enhanced locomotion caused by loss of the drosophila DEG/ENaC protein pickpocket1. Curr Biol 13:1557–1563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Price MP et al (2000) The mammalian sodium channel BNC1 is required for normal touch sensation. Nature 407:1007–1011PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Price MP et al (2001) The DRASIC cation channel contributes to the detection of cutaneous touch and acid stimuli in mice. Neuron 32(6):1071–1083PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Wemmie JA et al (2002) The acid-activated ion channel ASIC contributes to synaptic plasticity, learning and memory. Neuron 34(3):463–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wemmie JA et al (2003) Acid-sensing ion channel 1 is localized in brain regions with high synaptic density and contributes to fear conditioning. J Neurosci 23(13):5496–5502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Waldmann R et al (1996) The mammalian degenerin MDEG, an amiloride-sensitive cation channel activated by mutations causing neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Biol Chem 271(18):10433–10436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Garcia-Anoveros J et al (2001) Transport and localization of the DEG/ENaC ion channel BNaC1alpha to peripheral mechanosensory terminals of dorsal root ganglia neurons. J Neurosci 21(8):2678–2686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Alvarez de la Rosa D et al (2002) Functional implications of the localization and activity of acid-sensitive channels in rat peripheral nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(4):2326–2331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Drummond HA et al (1998) A molecular component of the arterial baroreceptor mechanotransducer. Neuron 21(6):1435–1441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wetzel C et al (2007) A stomatin–domain protein essential for touch sensation in the mouse. Nature 445(7124):206–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Goldstein BJ, Kulaga HM, Reed RR (2003) Cloning and characterization of SLP3: a novel member of the stomatin family expressed by olfactory receptor neurons. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 4(1):74–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Walker RG, Willingham AT, Zuker CS (2000) A Drosophila mechanosensory transduction channel. Science 287:2229–2234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sidi S, Friedrich RW, Nicolson T (2003) NompC TRP channel required for vertebrate sensory hair cell mechanotransduction. Science 301:96–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Kim J et al (2003) A TRPV family ion channel required for hearing in Drosophila. Nature 424:81–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Tracey WDJ et al (2003) Painless, a Drosophila gene essential for nociception. Cell 113:261–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Savage C et al (1989) mec-7 is a beta tubulin gene required for the production of 15 protofilament microtubules in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev 3:870–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Savage C et al (1994) Mutations in the Caenorhabditis elegans beta-tubulin gene mec-7: effects on microtubule assembly and stability and on tubulin autoregulation. J Cell Sci 107(Pt 8):2165–2175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Freyd G, Kim SK, Horvitz HR (1990) Novel cysteine-rich motif and homeodomain in the product of the Caenorhabditis elegans cell lineage gene lin-11. Nature 344(6269):876–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Lundquist EA et al (1996) The mec-8 gene of C. elegans encodes a protein with two RNA recognition motifs and regulates alternative splicing of unc-52 transcripts. Development 122(5):1601–1610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Spike CA et al (2002) MEC-8 regulates alternative splicing of unc-52 transcripts in C. elegans hypodermal cells. Development 129(21):4999–5008PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Miller School of MedicineUniversity of MiamiMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations