Impact of nano-ZnO/grafted textile on the outer membrane permeability of some pathogenic bacteria
- 77 Downloads
Abstract
Cotton textile grafted by chitosan hydroxyethyl methacrylate has been prepared by gamma radiation as a polymeric stabilizer for ZnO nanoparticles (NPs). The grafting percent and swelling property of the prepared grafted polymer in bi-distilled water were studied and the results showed that the swelling percent of the plain textile is higher than that of all different compositions. The morphology and structure of plain textile, grafted textile and nano-ZnO/grafted textile were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The presence of ZnO in the prepared samples was examined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The particle size of the formed ZnO NPs has been estimated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results indicate the nanoscale of the ZnO particles. Nano-ZnO/grafted textile was tested against some pathogenic strains, and the results show that the nano-ZnO/grafted textile was able to attenuate bacterial growth of MRSA and Klebsiella pneumoniae after 24 h of direct contact. Also, release of potassium ions, loss of absorbing materials and decrease of membrane surface potential were noticed, indicating alteration of cell membrane permeability. Furthermore, SEM observation showed bacterial cell deformation for growth on the nano-ZnO/grafted textile. These results have been promising in the antibacterial field.
Keywords
Textile chitosan HEMA ZnO nanoparticles FTIR pathogenic bacteriaReferences
- 1.Tinker K 2010 Moment of truth: proper air flow critical to healthcare laundries A white paper from the Healthcare Laundry Accreditation Council Google Scholar
- 2.Rattanawaleedirojin P, Saengiettiyut K and Sangsuk S 2008 J. Nat. Sci. 7 75Google Scholar
- 3.Gupta P, Bajpai M and Bajpai S K 2008 J. Cotton Sci. 12 280Google Scholar
- 4.Vinosova J and Vavrikova E 2008 Curr. Pharm. Des. 14 1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Fu L, Liu Z, Liu Y, Hu P, Cao L and Zhu D 2005 Adv. Mater. 17 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Makhluf S, Dror R, Nitzan Y, Abramovich Y, Jelnek R and Gedanken A 2005 Adv. Funct. Mater. 15 1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Stoimenov P K, Klinger R L, Marchin G L and Klabunde K J 2002 Langmuir 18 6679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Holister P, Weener J W, Vas C R and Harper T 2003 Nanoparticles: technology white papers 3 (London: Cientific Ltd.)Google Scholar
- 9.Martinez-Gutierrez F, Olive P L, Banuelos A, Orrantia E, Nino N, Sanchez E M et al 2010 Nanomedicine 6 681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Gao Y and Cranston R 2008 Text. Res. J. 78 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Chen C Y and Chiang C L 2008 Mater. Lett. 62 3607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Duran N, Marcarto P D, De Souza G I H, Alves O L and Esposito E 2007 J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 3 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Sawai J, Kawada E, Kanou F, Igarashi H, Hashimoto A, Kokugan T et al 1996 J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 29 627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Huang Z, Zheng X, Yan D, Yin G, Liao X, Kang Y et al 2008 Langmuir 24 4140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y et al 2007 J. Nanopart. Res. 9 479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ophori E A and Wemabu E C 2010 Nigeria. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 4 1719Google Scholar
- 17.James G 2010 In: M Schuller, T P Sloots, G S James, C L Halliday and I W J Carter (eds) PCR for clinical microbiology ISBN: 978-90-481-9038-6 (Netherlands: Springer) p 209Google Scholar
- 18.AATCC Committee RA31 1961 Antibacterial finishes on textile materials: assessment of AATCC Test Method 100-2004 developed in 1961 Google Scholar
- 19.Eid M and Araby E 2013 Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 171 469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Halder S, Yadava K K, Sarkar R, Mukherjee S, Saha P, Halder S et al 2015 Springerplus 4 672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ali A E H, Shawky H A, El Rehim H A A and Hegazy E A 2003 Eur. Polym. J. 39 2337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Taher N H, Dessouki A M and El-Arnaouty M B 1998 Radiat. Phys. Chem. 53 437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.El-Arnaouty M B, El-Kelesh N A and Abdel-Aal S E 2004 Arab. J. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 37 17Google Scholar
- 24.El-Arnaouty M B, Abedel Ghaffar A M and El-Shafey H M 2008 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 107 744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Taher N H, El-Sayed A H, Dessouki A M and El-Arnaouty M B 1989 Int. J. Radiat. Appl. Instrum. C Radiat. Phys. Chem. 33 129Google Scholar
- 26.El-Hag A A and Al-Arifi A 2009 Carbohydr. Polym. 78 725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Lanthong P, Nuish R and Kiatkamjornwong S 2006 Carbohydr. Polym. 66 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Fang J M, Fowler P A, Sayers C and Williams P A 2004 Carbohydr. Polym. 55 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wang P, Wu X, Xue D, Xu K, Tan Y, Du X and Li W 2009 Carbohydr. Res. 344 851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Fan L, Luo C, Zhen L, Fuguang L and Qiu H 2011 Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 88 574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Atia K S, Al-Arnaouty M B, Ismail S A and Dessouki A M 2003 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 90 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Salehi R, Arami M, Mahmodi N M, Bahrami H and Kharramfor S 2010 Colloid Surf. B 80 86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Begin A and Van Calsteren M R 1999 Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 26 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Singh G, Joyce M E, Beddow J and Mason J T 2012 J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci. 2 106Google Scholar
- 35.Rajendram R, Balakumar C, Ahammed M A H, Jaya Kumar S, Vaideki K and Rajesh E M 2010 Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2 202Google Scholar
- 36.Ignatova M, Manolova N and Rashkov I 2007 Eur. Polym. J. 43 1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Brayner R, Ferrari-Iliou R, Brivois N, Djediat S, Benedetti M F and Fievet F 2006 Nano Lett. 6 866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Sharma D, Rajput J, Kaith B S, Kaur M and Sharma S 2010 Thin Solid Films 519 1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Yamamoto O 2001 Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 3 643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Arakha M, Saleem M, Mallick C B and Jha S 2015 Scientific Rep. 5 9578Google Scholar
- 41.Zhang L, Ding Y, Povey M and York D 2008 Prog. Nat. Sci. 18 939CrossRefGoogle Scholar