Dependence of the textural properties and surface species of ZnO photocatalytic materials on the type of precipitating agent used in the hydrothermal synthesis
- 224 Downloads
Abstract
Three different precipitating agents (NaOH, \(\hbox {NH}_{4}(\hbox {H})\hbox {CO}_{3}\) and \(\hbox {CO}(\hbox {NH}_{2})_{2}\)) have been applied for the hydrothermal synthesis of ZnO powder materials, aiming at obtaining various types of porosity and surface species on ZnO. The synthesis procedures were carried out in the presence and in the absence of tri-block copolymer Pluronic (P123, EO20PO70EO20). These materials were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM)–energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), BET method and TG–differential thermal analysis (DTA) method, and their photocatalytic activities were tested in the removal azo dye Reactive Black 5 (RB5). The urea precipitant yields spongy-like surface forms and the greatest share of mesopores. It has the highest specific surface area, highest degree of crystallinity of wurtzite ZnO phase and largest content of surface OH groups in comparison with the other two precipitants. The zinc hydroxycarbonate intermediate phase is missing in the case of NaOH as precipitating agent; therefore, it manifests poorer textural characteristics. The morphology of P123-modified sample is different and consists of needle-shaped particles. The urea-precipitated samples display superior performance in the photocatalytic oxidation reaction, compared with the other precipitated samples. The other two precipitating agents are inferior in regard to their photocatalytic activity due to greater share of micropores (not well-illuminated inner surface) and different surface morphologies.
Keywords
Zinc oxide hydrothermal synthesis porosity photocatalystNotes
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to EBR SANI for the financial support through the contract ‘Development of advanced catalytic systems applicable to chemical and photochemical processes for neutralization of environmental pollutions’.
References
- 1.Sakthivel S, Neppolian B, Shankar M V, Arabindoo B, Palanichamy M and Murugesan V 2003 Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 77 65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kiomarsipour N, Razavi R S, Ghani K and Kioumarsipour M 2013 Appl. Surf. Sci. 270 33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Stambolova I, Blaskov M, Shipochka M, Vassilev S, Dushkin C and Dimitriev Y 2010 Mater. Chem. Phys. 121 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.de Lima J F, Martins R F and Serra O A Opt. Mater. 35 56Google Scholar
- 5.Stambolova I, Blaskov V, Kaneva N, Shipochka M, Vassilev S, Dimitrov O et al 2014 Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 25 244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Suwanboon S and Amornpitoksuk P 2011 Ceram. Int. 37 3515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Athma P V, Martinez A I, Johns N, Safeera T A, Reshmi R and Anila E I 2015 Superlattices Microstruct. 85 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Khalil M I, Al-Qunaibit M M, Al-zahem A M and Labis J P 2014 Arab. J. Chem. 7 1178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Nishizawa H, Tani T and Matsuoka K 1984 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 c98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pudukudy M and Yaakob Z 2014 Solid State Ion. 30 78Google Scholar
- 11.Chen C C, Liu P and Lu C 2008 Chem. Eng. J. 144 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Zhang Y, Dai J Y, Ong H C, Wang N, Chan H L W and Choy C L 2004 Chem. Phys. Lett. 393 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Abdel Aal N, Al-Hazmi F, Al-Ghamdi A A, Al-Ghamdi A A, El-Tantawy F and Yakuphanoglu F 2015 Spectrochim. Acta Part A 135 871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Wang J M and Gao L 2004 Solid State Commun. 132 269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Ni Y H, Wei X W, Hong J M and Ye Y 2005 Mater. Sci. Eng. B 121 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Eliyas A, Stambolova I, Blaskov V, Stoyanova D, Milenova K, Dimitrov L et al 2015 Bulg. Chem. Commun. 47 94Google Scholar
- 17.Stambolova I, Blaskov V, Stoyanova D, Dimitrov L, Milenova K, Eliyas A et al 2015 C. R. Acad. Bulg. Sci. 68 463Google Scholar
- 18.Hussain S, Liu T, Miao B, Kashif M, Aslam N, Rashad M et al 2015 Ceram. Int. 41 4861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Liu I-H and Chen P 2010 Ceram. Int. 36 1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Miao Y, Zhang H, Yuan S, Jiao Z and Zhu X 2016 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 462 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Zhang Z and Mu J 2007 J. Colloid Interface Sci. 307 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Zheng J H, Jiang Q and Lian J S 2011 Appl. Surf. Sci. 257 5083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Moulder J F, Stickle W F, Sobol P E and Bomben K D 1992 In Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy J Chastain (ed) (Eden Prairie: Perkin-Elmer Corporation) p 89Google Scholar
- 24.Das J, Pradhan S K, Sahu D R, Mishra D K, Sarangi S N, Nayak B B et al 2010 Phys. B 405 2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Wang H H and Xie C S 2008 Phys. E 40 2724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wang H H, Baek S H, Song J J, Lee J H and Lim S W 2008 Nanotechnology 19 art. no. 075607Google Scholar
- 27.Al-Gaashani R, Radiman S, Daud A R, Tabet N and Al-Douri Y 2013 Ceram. Int. 39 2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Hu S-H, Chen Y-C, Hwang C-C, Peng C-H and Gong D-C 2010 J. Mater. Sci. 45 5309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Lamba R, Umar A, Mehta S K and Kansal S K 2015 Talanta 131 490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Baruah S, Mahmood M A, Myint M I Z, Bora T and Dutta J 2010 Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 1 14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Bacsa R R and Kiwi J 1998 Appl. Catal. B 16 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Li D and Haneda H 2003 Chemosphere 51 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Yu J C, Yu J and Zhao J 2002 Appl. Catal. B Environ. 36 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Hoffmann M R, Martin S T, Choi W and Bahnemann D 1995 Chem. Rev. 95 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Yang C, Li Q, Tang L, Xin K, Bai A and Yu Y 2015 Appl. Surf. Sci. 357 1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar