Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 395–406 | Cite as

On the origins of the anisotropic mechanical behaviour of extruded AA2017 aluminium alloy

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This paper presents some experimental investigations about the origins of the anisotropic behaviour in cyclic loadings of AA2017 aluminium alloy. In the first step, fatigue damage evolutions were quantified for controlled proportional cyclic loadings in axial and shear directions. In this stage, the aim was to confirm the anisotropic mechanical behaviour, which has recently been revealed. To this end, several models of fatigue damage quantification were used. After a comparative study between the obtained results we confirmed the anisotropic nature of the used material. In the second step, microstructural investigations were performed in order to understand the origins of the anisotropic mechanical behaviour. We used scanning electron microscopy to analyse phases and precipitates in the transversal and the longitudinal sections. It was deduced that the structure and the morphology of these entities are responsible for the anisotropic behaviour of the used aluminium alloy. Moreover, the results obtained using Kikushi diagrams, poles figure and inverse poles figures have also confirmed these conclusions. Indeed, these results have shown great differences in crystallographic texture of the material.

Keywords

Anisotropic behaviour extruded aluminium alloy fatigue damage microstructures EBSD and Kikushi diagrams. 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the French Team of Oxford Instrument for their grateful help in releasing the EBSD/EDS analyses using their best material resources.

References

  1. 1.
    Bois-Brochu A, Blais C, Goma F A T, Boselli J and Brochu M 2014 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 62 597Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Immarigeon J P, Holt R T, Koul A K, Zhao L and Beddoes J C 1995 Mater. Charact. 35 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    May A, Belouchrani M A, Taharboucht S and Boudras A 2010 Proc. Eng. 2 1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams J C and Starke E A Jr 2003 Acta Mater. 51 5775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    May A, Belouchrani M A, Manaa A and Bouteghrine Y 2011 Proc. Eng. 10 798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moy C K S, Weiss M, Xia J, Sha G, Ringer S P and Ranzi G 2012 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 48 552Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouzaiene H, Rezgui M A, Ayadi M and Zghal A 2012 Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. 22 1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Araújo D, Carpio F J, Méndez D, García A J, Villar M P, García R, Jiménez D and Rubio L 2003 Appl. Surf. Sci. 208 210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carpio F J, Araújo D, Pacheco F J, Méndez D, García A J, Villar M P, García R, Jiménez D and Rubio L 2003 Appl. Surf. Sci. 209 194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang L, Liu X S, Wang L S, Wu S H and Fang H Y 2012 Trans. Nonferr. Metal. Soc. 22 2777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kluger K 2015 Int. J. Fatigue 22 80Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kluger K and Łagoda T 2014 Int. J. Fatigue 66 229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taharboucht S, Aberkane A and May A 2016 Thesis p 62Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mayer H, Papakyriacou M, Pippan R and Stanzl-Tschegg S 2001 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 48 314Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kofto D G 1990 Strength Mater. 22 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    May A, Taleb L and Belouchrani M A 2013 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 123 571Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Le V-D, Morel F, Bellett D, Saintier N and Osmond P 2016 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 426 649Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pineau A, Amine Benzerga A and Pardoen T 2016 Acta Mater. 107 508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Celentano D J and Chaboche J-L 2007 Int. J. Plast. 23 1739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Djebli A, Aid A, Bendouba M, Amrouche A, Benguediab M and Benseddiq N 2013 Int. J. Nonlin. Mech. 51 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chaboche J L 1987 Nucl. Eng. Des. 19 105Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chaboche J L 1989 Int. J. Plast. 5 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang C, Wang X, Ding Z, Xu Y and Gao Z 2015 Int. J. Fatigue 11 78Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aid A, Amrouche A, Bouiadjra B B, Benguediab M and Mesmacque G 2011 Mater. Des. 32 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nouailhas D, Chaboche J L, Savalle S and Cailletaud G 1985 Int. J. Plast. 1 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walvekar A A, Leonard B D, Sadeghi F, Jalalahmadi B and Bolander N 2014 Tribol. Int. 79 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thionnet A, Chambon L and Renard J 2002 Int. J. Fatigue 24 147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lukáš P, Jardin A, Leblond J-B, Berghezan D and Portigliatti M 2010 Proc. Eng. 2 1643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Szusta J and Seweryn A 2011 Int. J. Fatigue 33 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Trebuňa P F, Sága M, Kopas P and Uhríčík M 2012 Proc. Eng. 48 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lemaitre J 1985 Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 51 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chak-yin T, Jianping F, Chi-pong T, Tai-chiu L, Luen-chow C and Bin R 2007 Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 20 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim D, Dargush G F and Basaran C 2013 Eng. Struct. 52 608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shen F, Hu W and Meng Q 2016 Int. J. Fatigue 90 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kauppila P, Kouhia R, Ojanperä J, Saksala T and Sorjonen T 2016 Proc. Struct. Integrity 2 887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jiang M 1995 Eng. Fract. Mech. 52 971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crooks R, Wang Z, Levit V I and Shenoy R N 1998 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 257 145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Al-Maharbi M, Karaman I, Beyerlein I J, Foley D, Hartwig K T, Kecskes L J and Mathaudhu S N 2011 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528 7616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Khan A S and Baig M 2011 Int. J. Plast. 27 522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li X, Al-Samman T and Gottstein G 2011 Mater. Des. 32 4385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cho J -H, Jae Kim W and Gil Lee C 2014 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 597 314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gilles G, Hammami W, Libertiaux V, Cazacu O, Yoon J H, Kuwabara T, Habraken A M and Duchêne L 2011 Int. J. Solids Struct. 48 1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Joo M S, Suh D W, Bae J H, Sanchez Mouriño N, Petrov R, Kestens L A I and Bhadeshia H K D H 2012 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 556 601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Banumathy S, Mandal R K and Singh A K 2010 J. Alloys Compd. 26 500Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Williams B W, Simha C H M, Abedrabbo N and Mayer R 2010 Int. J. Impact. Eng. 37 652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brünig M 1995 Fin. Elem. Anal. Des. 20 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dillard T, Forest S and Lenny P 2006 Eur. J. Mech. A-Solid 25 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Khadyko M, Dumoulin S, Børvik T and Hopperstad O S 2015 Comput. Struct. 15 60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saï K, Taleb L and Cailletaud G 2012 Comput. Mater. Sci. 65 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dong C, Yang X, Shi D and Yu H 2014 Mater. Des. 55 966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vanegas E, Mocellin K and Logé R 2011 Proc. Eng. 10 1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Garmestani H, Kalidindi S R, Williams L, Fountain C and Lee E W 2002 Int. J. Plast. 18 1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang Z-W, Yuan Y-B, Zheng R-X and Ameyama K 2014 Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. 24 2366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Papasidero J, Doquet V and Lepeer S 2014 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 610 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hajizadeh K, Tajally M, Emadoddin E and Borhani E 2014 J. Alloys Compd. 588 690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zong C, Zhu G-H and Mao W-M 2013 J. Iron. Steel Res. Int. 20 66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hales S J and Hafley R A 1998 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 257 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mizera J, Driver J H, Jezierska E and Kurzydłowski K J 1996 Mater. Sci. Eng. A 94 21Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Khan S, Kintzel O and Mosler J 2012 Int. J. Fatigue 37 112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Henry D L 1955 Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 77 913Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Golos K and Ellyin F 1987 Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 7 169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bui-Quoc T 1982 Exp. Mech. 22 180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire Génie des MatriauxEcole Militaire PolytechniqueBordj El BahriAlgeria

Personalised recommendations