Bulletin of Materials Science

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 619–624

Influence of synthesis conditions on particle morphology of nanosized Cu/ZnO powder by polyol method



Cu/ZnO in nanosizes have been synthesized using ethylene glycol at various conditions. The effects of reaction temperature, extent of reduction, various precursors such as CuX2·nH2O, ZnX2·nH2O (X = Cl, NO3, CH3CO2), the addition of water and the removal of volatile compounds including water were studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Cu/ZnO powders with an average diameter of as low as 50 nm was obtained with a very low polydispersity in the absence of a protective polymer. Ethylene glycol oxidation products were also identified by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The morphology of Cu/ZnO powders and the yield of powders are found to be strongly dependent on the synthesis conditions.


Polyol process copper/metal oxide catalysts 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altınçekiç G T and Boz I 2008 J. Nanosci. & Nanotechnol. 8 874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cable Robert E and Schaak Raymond E 2005 Chem. Mater. 17 6835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng W H and Shiau C-Y 1998 Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 18 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fievet F, Lagier J P and Blin B 1989 Solid State Ionics 32/33 198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fridman V Z, Davydov A A and Titievsky K 2004 J. Catal. 222 545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kanzaki Hiroshi, Kitamura Takahiro, Hamada Rei, Nishiyama Satoru and Tsuruya Shigeru 2004 J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 208 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Larry J R, Rosenberg R M and Uhler R G 1988 IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids & Manuf. Technol. CHMT-3 211Google Scholar
  8. Leonard B M, Bhuvanesh N S P and Schaak R E 2005 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127 7326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Molarates M E T, Buschmann V and Dobrev D 2001 Adv. Mater. 13 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Qi L M, Ma J M and Shen J L 1997 Colloid. Interf. Sci. 186 498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schwarzer H C and Peukert W 2004 Chem. Eng. Commun. 191 580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tani H and Oshita K 1996 US Patent Specification No. 5,5880983Google Scholar
  13. Wiley B, Sun Y, Mayers B and Xia Y 2005 Chem. Eur. J. 11 454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yedra A, Fernandez Barquin L, Gomez Sal J C and Pankhurst Q A 2003 J. Magn. & Magn. Mater. 14 254Google Scholar
  15. Zhang Yong Cai, Wang Gui Yun, Hu Xiao Ya and Xing Rong 2005 J. Solid State Chem. 178 1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao Yu, Zhu Jun-Jie, Hong Jian-Min, Bian Nigsheng and Chen Hong-Yuan 2004 Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 20 4072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zheng H G, Li Y D, Li C W, Zhao H Z, Liu Y H and Qian Y T 1997 Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 11 974Google Scholar
  18. Zhou S, Wada T and Sasabe H 1995 J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1525Google Scholar
  19. Zhu Haitao, Zhang Canying and Yin Yansheng 2005 Nanotechnology 16 3079CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringIstanbul UniversityAvcilarTurkey

Personalised recommendations