Advertisement

Characterization and Evaluation of Mango Germplasm Through Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Markers Focusing on Fruit Production: An Overview

  • Riaz Ahmad
  • Muhammad Akbar Anjum
  • Waqas Malik
Review
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Mango is also known as ‘King of Fruits’ and is one of the most popular fruit crops in tropical and sub-tropical regions. Characterization through different markers is an important need for mango germplasm conservation and its utilization for various breeding purposes. Description of existing germplasm is essential to detect anticipated traits or genes. Therefore, different markers are applied. Morphological markers comprise those essential traits which can be recorded through naked eye observation and certainly expressed under different agro-climatic conditions. Biochemical markers are fruit constituents also influenced by various factors including prevailing environmental conditions. Molecular markers are more appropriate for accurate description of germplasm on the basis of genetic make-up. These are effectively used in the development of new cultivars having superior traits. However, management of germplasm requires precise information for utilization in crop improvement programs in the future. Hence, there is an urgent need of integration of scattered information regarding several traits for germplasm description. Therefore, the current review provides a critical overview of parameters for documentation of mango germplasm and identification of desired traits through morphological, biochemical, and molecular markers. Accordingly, desired traits or genes can be used in upcoming breeding programs to enhance mango yield with superior fruit quality.

Keywords

Breeding programs Cultivars description Genome sequencing Marker-assisted selection and proteomics 

References

  1. 1.
    Rajwana, I. A., Khan, I. A., Malik, A. U., Saleem, B. A., Khan, A. S., Ziaf, K., et al. (2011). Morphological and biochemical markers for varietal characterization and quality assessment of potential indigenous mango (Mangifera indica) germplasm. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 13, 151–158.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nazish, T., Shabbir, G., Ali, A., Sami, U. A., Naeem, M., Javed, M., et al. (2017). Molecular diversity of Pakistani mango (Mangifera indica L.) varieties based on microsatellite markers. Genetics and Molecular Research: GMR, 16(2), 2–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Litz, R. E. (2004). Biotechnology and mango improvement. Acta Horticulturae, 645, 85–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kobayashi, A., Ebana, K., Fukuoka, S., & Nagamine, T. (2006). Microsatellite markers revealed the genetic diversity of an old Japanese rice landrace ‘Echizen’. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53(3), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krishna, H., & Singh, S. K. (2007). Biotechnological advances in mango (Mangifera indica L.) and their future implication in crop improvement. Biotechnology Advances, 25, 223–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mukherjee, S. K., & Litz, R. E. (2009). Introduction, botany and importance. In: R. E. Litz (Ed.), The mango, botany, production and uses (pp. 1–14). Boca Raton: CAB International.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wahdan, M. T., Abdelsalam, A. Z., Naggar, E. A. A., & Hussein, M. A. (2011). Preliminary horticultural studies to describe and identify two new Egyptian mango strains using DNA fingerprinting. Journal of American Science, 7, 641–650.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IPGRI. (2006). Descriptors for mango (Mangifera indica L.). Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhat, Z. A., Dhillon, W. S., Rashid, R., Bhat, J. A., Dar, W. A., & Ganaie, M. Y. (2010). Role of molecular markers in improvement of fruit crops. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 22–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibert, O., Dufour, D., Giraldo, A., Sanchez, T., Reynes, M., Pain, J. P., et al. (2009). Differentiation between cooking bananas and dessert bananas: Morphological and compositional characterization of cultivated Colombian Musaceae (Musa sp.) in relation to consumer preferences. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 7857–7869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alves, D. S. E. O., Neto, F. P. L., Santos, C. A. F., Melo, D. C. A. F., Holanda, I. S. A., Souza, D. A. P., et al. (2016). Genetic diversity of mango accessions (Mangifera indica) using new microsatellite markers and morphological descriptors. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 10(9), 1281–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ribeiro, S., Santos, C. A. F., & Neto, F. P. L. (2013). Morphological characterization of mango (Mangifera indica) accessions based on Brazilian adapted descriptors. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 3, 798–807.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan, A. S., Ali, S., & Khan, I. A. (2015). Morphological and molecular characterization and evaluation of mango germplasm: An overview. Scientia Horticulturae, 194, 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajan, S., Kumar, R., & Negi, S. S. (2001). Variation in canopy characteristics of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars from diverse eco-geographical regions. Journal of Applied Horticulture, 3, 95–97.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinha, R. (2018). Morphological characterization of different genotype of Langra cultivar of mango. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 7(3), 2232–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yadav, P. K., Chaturvedi, O. P., Yadav, D. K., & Yadav, H. C. (2010). Studies the vegetative growth, flowering and fruiting behavior of promising cultivars of mango. Plant Archives, 10(1), 453–455.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajan, S., Tiwari, D., Singh, V. K., Saxena, P., Singh, S., Reddy, Y. T. N., et al. (2011). Application of extended BBCH scale for phenological studies in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Journal of Applied Horticulture, 13(2), 108–114.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delgado, H. P. M., Aranguren, M., Reig, C., Galvan, F. D., Mesejo, C., Fuentes, M. A., et al. (2011). Phenological growth stages of mango (Mangifera indica L.) according to the BBCH scale. Scientia Horticulturae, 130, 536–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Singh, V. K., Tiwari, A. K. M., Singh, D. K., & Pathak, S. M. (2006). Effect of leaf number and area on the fruit growth of regular and biennial bearing mango (Mangifera indica L.) grown under north Indian conditions. International Journal of Fruit Science, 6(4), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Majumder, D. A. N., Hassan, L., Rahim, M. A., & Kabir, M. A. (2011). Studies on physio-morphology, floral biology and fruit characteristics of mango. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 9(2), 187–199.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chacko, E. K., Reddy, Y. T. N., & Ananthanarayanan, T. V. (1982). Studies on the relationship between leaf number and area and fruit development in mango (Mangifera indica L.). Journal of Horticultural Science, 57, 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davenport, T. L. (2009). Reproductive physiology. In: R. E. Litz (Ed.), The mango: Botany, production and uses (2nd ed., pp. 97–169). Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ramírez, F., & Davenport, T. L. (2016). Mango (Mangifera indica L.) pollination: A review. Scientia Horticulturae, 203, 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chatterjee, D., Maurya, K. R., & Mandal, M. P. (2007). Flowering and fruiting behaviour of some hybrids of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Journal of Interacademicia, 11(3), 283–287.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kulkarni, V. J. (2004). The tri-factor hypothesis for flowering in mango. Acta Horticulturae, 645, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kher, R., & Sharma, R. M. (2002). Performance of some mango cultivars under subtropical rainfed region of Jammu. Haryana Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 31(1/2), 8–10.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bihari, M., Kumar, R., Singh, K., Kumar, A. P., Narayan, S., & Pandey, S. K. N. (2012). Quality parameters studies on Mangifera genus and varieties. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 69(2), 272–276.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ravishankar, K. V., Chandrashekara, P., Sreedharam, S. A., Dinesh, R., Anand, L., & Saiprasad, G. V. S. (2004). Diverse genetic bases of Indian polyembryonic and monoembryonic mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars. Current Science, 87, 870–871.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sennhenn, A., Prinz, K., Gebauer, J., Whitbread, A., Jamnadass, R., & Kehlenbeck, K. (2014). Identification of mango (Mangifera indica L.) landraces from Eastern and Central Kenya using a morphological and molecular approach. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 61, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nayak, D., Singh, A. K., & Srivastav, M. (2013). Estimation of genetic parameters of fruitquality traits in mango hybrid population. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 70, 13–17.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rajwana, I. A., Malik, A. U., Khan, A. S., Saleem, B. A., & Malik, S. A. (2010). A new mango hybrid shows better shelf life and fruit quality. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(4), 2503–2512.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Costa, J. G. (2004). Estimation of repeatability and number of evaluations for characterization of mango germplasm. Acta Horticulturae, 645, 295–298.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kumar, N., & Brahmachari, V. S. (2004). Stone description of some mango varieties at Sabour (Bihar). Progressive Horticulture, 36(1), 99–102.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sachar, R. C., & Chopra, R. N. (1957). A study of the endosperm and embryo in Mangifera indica L. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27, 219–228.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Abirami, K., Nachegowda, V., & Reddy, Y. T. N. (2004). Physico-chemical attributes of certain polyembryonic varieties of mango. South Indian Horticulture, 52(1/6), 291–296.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ramiriez, M. M. A., Robles, G. M. M., & Medina, U. V. M. (2000). Advances sobre embriogenesis somatica en mango Ataulfo Haden. In: M. V. M. Urrutia, P. H. Barraz & C. X. Contreras (Eds.), Control de Floracion Y Mejoramiento Genetico (pp. 47–56), TecomanGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Aron, Y., Czosnek, H., Gazit, S., & Degani, C. (1998). Polyembryony in mango (Mangifera indica L.) is controlled by a single dominant gene. HortScience, 33, 1241–1242.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bompard, J. M. (1993). The genus Mangifera re-discovered: The potential contribution of wild species to mango cultivation. Acta Horticulturae, 341, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sturrock, T. T. (1968). Genetics of mango polyembryony. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 82, 318–321.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ochoa, E. C. M., Rodriguez, A. M., Rodriguez, M. R., & Monter, A. V. (2012). Identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings in polyembryonic mango cultivars. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 47(11), 1629–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Degani, M., Cohen, O., Reuveni, R. F., & Basstri, E. R. (1993). Frequency and characteristics of zygotic seedling from polyembryonic mango cultivars determined using isozyme as genetic markers. Acta Horticulturae, 341, 256–259.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jintanawongse, S., & Changtragoon, S. (2000). Identification of cultivars and certification of hybrids in mango (Mangifera indica L.) by isozymes gene markers. Acta Horticulturae, 509, 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hada, T. S., & Singh, A. K. (2017). Evaluation of potentiality of mango (Mangifera indica L.) Cultivars for physico-chemical attributes of fruit. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(6), 1080–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Joshi, S. P., Prabhakar, K., Ranjekar, P. K., & Gupta, V. S. (2011). Molecular markers in plant genome analysis. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 25(15), 1–19.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Azmat, M. A., Khan, I. A., Cheema, H. M. N., Rajwana, I. A., Khan, A. S., & Khan, A. A. (2012). Extraction of DNA suitable for PCR applications from mature leaves of Mangifera indica L. Journal of Zhejiang University, Science B, 13, 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yamanaka, N., Hasran, M., Xu, D. H., Tsunematsu, H., Idris, S., & Ban, T. (2006). Genetic relationship and diversity of four Mangifera species revealed through AFLP analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 53, 949–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Souza, V. A. B., & Lima, P. S. C. (2004). Genetic variability in mango genotypes detected by RAPD markers. Acta Horticulturae, 645, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Souza, I. G. B., Valente, S. E. S., Britto, F. B., de-Souza, V. A. B., & Lima, P. S. C. (2011). RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity of mango (Mangifera indica) germplasm in Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research, 10, 3080–3089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kumar, M., Ponnuswami, V., Nagarajan, P., Jeyakumar, P., & Senthil, N. (2013). Molecular characterization of ten mango cultivars using simple sequences repeat (SSR) markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(47), 6568–6573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Viruel, M. A., Escribano, P., Barbieri, M., Ferri, M., & Hormaza, J. I. (2005). Fingerprinting, embryo type and geographic differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae) with microsatellites. Molecular Breeding, 15, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bajpai, A., Muthukumar, M., Ahmad, I., Ravishankar, K. V., Parthasarthy, V. A., Sthapit, B., et al. (2016). Molecular and morphological diversity in locally grown non-commercial (heirloom) mango varieties of North India. Journal of Environmental Biology, 37(2), 221–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Samant, D., Singh, A. K., Srivastav, M., & Singh, N. K. (2010). Assessment of genetic diversity in mango using inter simple sequence repeat markers. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 67, 1–8.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tomar, R. S., Gajera, H. P., Viradiya, R. R., Patel, S. V., & Golakiya, B. A. (2011). Phylogenetic relationship among Mango (Mangifera indica L.) landraces of Saurashtra based on DNA fingerprinting. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, 3(13), 379–385.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Damodaran, T., Kannan, R., Ahmed, I., Srivastava, R. C., Rai, R. B., & Umamaheshwari, S. (2012). Assessing genetic relationships among mango (Mangifera indica L.) accessions of Andaman Islands using inter simple sequence repeat markers. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 40(4), 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brumfield, R. T., Beerli, P., Nickerson, D. A., & Edwards, S. V. (2003). The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sherman, A., Rubinstein, M., Eshed, R., Benita, M., Shalom, I. M., Schwager, S. M., et al. (2015). Mango (Mangifera indica L.) germplasm diversity based on single nucleotide polymorphisms derived from the transcriptome. BMC Plant Biology, 15(1), 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Luo, C., Shu, B., Yao, Q., Wu, H., Xu, W., & Wang, S. (2016). Construction of a high-density genetic map based on large-scale marker development in mango using specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1310.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kuhn, D. N., Bally, I. S., Dillon, N. L., Innes, D., Groh, A. M., Rahaman, J., et al. (2017). Genetic map of mango: A tool for mango breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Luo, C., He, X. H., Chen, H., Ou, S. J., & Gao, M. P. (2010). Analysis of diversity and relationships among mango cultivars using Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 38(6), 1176–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Luo, C., He, X. H., Chen, H., Hu, Y., & Ou, S. J. (2012). Genetic relationship and diversity of Mangifera indica L.: Revealed through SCoT analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 59(7), 1505–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nashima, K., Terakami, S., Kunihisa, M., Nishitani, C., Shoda, M., Matsumura, M., et al. (2017). Retrotransposon-based insertion polymorphism markers in mango. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 13(5), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shudo, A., Tarora, K., Makishi, Y., Ichi, R., Takahashi, K., Matsumura, M., et al. (2013). Development of CAPS markers and their application in breeding for mango, Mangifera indica L. Euphytica, 190(3), 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Adato, A., Sharon, D., Lavi, U., Hillel, J., & Gazit, S. (1995). Application of DNA fingerprints for identification and genetic analyses of mango (Mangifera indica) genotypes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 120(2), 259–264.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Masojc, P. (2002). The application of molecular markers in the process of selection. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters, 7, 499–509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pedersen, B. H. (2006). DNA fingerprints of 51 sweet and sour Prunus accessions using simple sequence repeats. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 81, 118–124.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lima, C. S., Monteiro, J. H. A., Crespo, N. C., Costa, S. S., Leslie, J. F., & Pfenning, L. H. (2009). VCG and AFLP analyses identify the same groups in the causal agents of mango malformation in Brazil. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 123, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Deng, X. (2005). Advances in worldwide citrus breeding. Acta Horticulturae, 32(6), 1140–1146.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chunwongse, J., Phumichai, C., Chungwongse, C., Sukansawan, S., Bonreungrawd, R., & Babprasert, C. (2000). Molecular mapping of mango cultivars ‘Alphonso’ and ‘Palmer’. Acta Horticulturae, 509, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zhuang, G. Q., Ma, D. W., Wang, W. G., Wang, S. H., & Chen, F. (2009). Genetic diversity of Pogonatherum paniceum (Lam.) Hack. in Southwest China revealed by AFLP markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 8, 1226–1232.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Parthasarathy, U., Nandakishore, O. P., Kumar, S., & Parthasarathy, V. A. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of inter-simple sequence repeat and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers to study genetic diversity of Indian Garcinia. African Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 6443–6451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Gostimsky, S. A., Kokaeva, Z. G., & Konovalov, F. A. (2005). Studying plant genome variation using molecular markers. Russian Journal of Genetics, 41, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kumar, N. V. H., Narayanswamy, P., Theertha, D. P., Mukund, G. K., & Sondur, S. (2001). Estimation of genetic diversity of commercial mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars using RAPD markers. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 76, 529–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Rajwana, I. A., Tabbasam, N., Malik, A. U., Malik, S. A., Rahman, M., & Zafar, Y. (2008). Assessment of genetic diversity among mango (Mangifera indica L.) genotypes using RAPD markers. Scientia Horticulturae, 117, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Matallana, D. M., Garcia, S. I., Garcia, R. M., & Jaramillo, D. E. H. (2009). Analysis of diversity among six populations of Colombian mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Hilacha) using RAPDs markers. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 12, 1–8.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bhargava, R., & Khorwal, R. (2011). Molecular characterization of Mangifera indica by using RAPD marker. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 1, 47–49.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pruthvish, R., & Chikkaswamy, B. K. (2016). Genetic diversity and relationships among mango varieties using RAPD molecular markers. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 5(1), 778–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kumar, K. L., & Sreekala, A. K. (2016). Genetic diversity study, by using RAPD techniques among the selected natural varieties of Mangifera Indica L. occurring at Nedumangadu Taluk of the Thiruvananthapuram District in Kerala State of India. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(5), 1123–1126.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Galal, O. A., Galal, H. A., & Aboulila, A. A. (2017). Genetic variability and molecular characterization of some local and imported mango cultivars in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 46(1), 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Pandey, S., Ansari, W. A., Choudhary, B. R., Pandey, M., Jena, S. N., Singh, A. K., et al. (2018). Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of hermaphrodite ridge gourd (Luffa hermaphrodita). 3 Biotech, 8(1), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    He, G., Meng, R., Newman, M., Gao, G., Pittman, R. N., & Prakash, C. S. (2003). Microsatellites as DNA markers in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). BMC Plant Biology, 3, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Duval, M. F., Bunel, J., Sitbon, C., & Risterucci, A. M. (2005). Development of microsatellite markers for mango (Mangifera indica L.). Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 824–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Honsho, C., Nishiyama, K., Eiadthong, W., & Yonemori, K. (2005). Isolation and characterization of new microsatellite markers in mango (Mangifera indica). Molecular Ecology Resources, 5(1), 152–154.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Schnell, R. J., Olano, C. T., Quintanilla, W. E., & Meerow, A. W. (2005). Isolation and characterization of 15 microsatellite loci from mango (Mangifera indica L.) and cross-species amplification in closely related taxa. Molecular Ecology Resources, 5(3), 625–627.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Singh, A., Singh, A. K., & Singh, S. K. (2012). SSR markers reveal genetic diversity in closely related mango hybrids. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 69(3), 299–305.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Azmat, M. A., Khan, A. A., Khan, I. A., Rajwana, I. A., Cheema, H. M. N., & Khan, A. S. (2016). Morphological characterization and SSR based DNA fingerprinting of elite commercial mango cultivars. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53(2), 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Lal, S., Singh, A. K., Singh, S. K., Srivastav, M., Singh, B. P., Sharma, N., et al. (2017). Association analysis for pomological traits in mango (Mangifera indica L.) by genic-SSR markers. Trees, 31(5), 1391–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ahmed, M., Anjum, M. A., Khan, M. Q., Ahmed, M. J., & Pearce, S. (2010). Evaluation of genetic diversity in Pyrus germplasm native to Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Northern Pakistan) revealed by microsatellite markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(49), 8323–8333.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Ahmad, R. (2016). Characterization of indigenous Zizyphus (jujujbe) germplasm through inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. M.Sc. (Hons.) thesis, Department of Horticulture, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Gonzalez, A., Coulson, M., & Brettell, R. (2002). Development of DNA markers (ISSRs) in mango. Acta Horticulturae, 575, 139–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Rocha, A., Salomao, L. C. C., Salomao, T. M. F., Cruz, C. D., & Siqueira, D. L. (2012). Genetic diversity of ‘Uba’ mango tree using ISSR markers. Molecular Biotechnology, 50, 108–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kashkush, K., Jinggui, F., Tomer, E., Hillel, J., & Lavi, U. (2001). Cultivar identification and genetic map of mango. Euphytica, 122, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Monden, Y., Fujii, N., Yamaguchi, K., Ikeo, K., Nakazawa, Y., Waki, T., et al. (2014). Efficient screening of long terminal repeat retrotransposons that show high insertion polymorphism via high-throughput sequencing of the primer binding site. Genome, 57, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kim, H., Terakami, S., Nishitani, C., Kurita, K., Kanamori, H., Katayose, Y., et al. (2012). Development of cultivar specific DNA markers based on retrotransposon-based insertional polymorphism in Japanese pear. Breeding Science, 62, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Kobayashi, S., Yamamoto, G. N., & Hirochika, H. (2004). Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science, 304, 982–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Dang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2017). Construction of a genetic linkage map of mango based on SRAP, AFLP and ISSR markers. Agricultural Biotechnology, 6, 109–116.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Taheri, S., Abdullah, L. T., Yusop, M. R., Hanafi, M. M., Sahebi, M., Azizi, P., et al. (2018). Mining and development of novel SSR markers using next generation sequencing (NGS) data in plants. Molecules, 23(2), 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sharma, N., Singh, S. K., Lal, S., & Singh, N. K. (2016). Genome sequence information in fruit crops: Current status. Transcriptomics, 4, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Wu, H. X., Jia, H. M., Ma, X. W., Wang, S. B., Yao, Q. S., & Xu, W. T. (2014). Transcriptome and proteomic analysis of mango (Mangifera indica Linn.) fruits. Journal of Proteomics, 105, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Andrade, J. M., Toledo, T. T., Nogueira, S. B., Cordenunsi, B. R., Lajolo, F. M., & Nascimento, J. R. O. (2012). 2D-DIGE analysis of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit reveals major proteomic changes associated with ripening. Journal of Proteomics, 75, 3331–3341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Castro, D. M., Leyva, O. A., Vergara, C. C. A., Sanchez, P. M. A., Flores, C. S., Flores, S. A., et al. (2015). Mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Kent fruit mesocarp de novo transcriptome assembly identifies gene families important for ripening. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Riaz Ahmad
    • 1
  • Muhammad Akbar Anjum
    • 1
  • Waqas Malik
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of HorticultureBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  2. 2.Genomics Lab, Department of Plant Breeding & GeneticsBahauddin Zakariya UniversityMultanPakistan

Personalised recommendations