Assessment of Reference Genes for Real-Time Quantitative PCR Gene Expression Normalization During C2C12 and H9c2 Skeletal Muscle Differentiation
- 1.7k Downloads
Skeletal muscle differentiation occurs during muscle development and regeneration. To initiate and maintain the differentiated state, a multitude of gene expression changes occur. Accurate assessment of these differentiation-related gene expression changes requires good quality template, but more specifically, appropriate internal controls for normalization. Two cell line-based models used for in vitro analyses of muscle differentiation incorporate mouse C2C12 and rat H9c2 cells. In this study, we set out to identify the most appropriate controls for mRNA expression normalization during C2C12 and H9c2 differentiation. We assessed the expression profiles of Actb, Gapdh, Hprt, Rps12 and Tbp during C2C12 differentiation and of Gapdh and Rps12 during H9c2 differentiation. Using NormFinder, we validated the stability of the genes individually and of the geometric mean generated from different gene combinations. We verified our results using Myogenin. Our study demonstrates that using the geometric mean of a combination of specific reference genes for normalization provides a platform for more precise test gene expression assessment during myoblast differentiation than using the absolute expression value of an individual gene and reinforces the necessity of reference gene validation.
KeywordsSkeletal differentiation C2C12 H9c2 Myogenesis Real-time quantitative PCR Reference genes Normalization Geometric mean
This work was funded by an NSERC Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship (CGS) to T.J.M., an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship to J.J.L., NSERC Grant # 9043429 to L.C.S. and the Northern Cancer Foundation. The authors would like to acknowledge some initial technical assistance from Tyler Kirwan, and reagents from - and discussions with - Celine Boudreau-Larivière.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- 3.Florini, J. R., Ewton, D. Z., & Coolican, S. A. (1996). Growth hormone and the insulin-like growth factor system in myogenesis. Endocrine Reviews, 17, 481–517.Google Scholar
- 4.Bijlenga, P., Liu, J. H., Espinos, E., Haenggeli, C. A., Fischer-Lougheed, J., Bader, C. R., et al. (2000). T-type alpha 1H Ca2 + channels are involved in Ca2 + signaling during terminal differentiation (fusion) of human myoblasts. Proceedings National Academy Science USA, 97, 7627–7632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ding, Y., Choi, K. J., Kim, J. H., Han, X., Piao, Y., Jeong, J. H., et al. (2008). Endogenous hydrogen peroxide regulates glutathione redox via nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase during muscle differentiation. American Journal of Pathology, 172, 1529–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Favreau, C., Delbarre, E., Courvalin, J. C., & Buendia, B. (2008). Differentiation of C2C12 myoblasts expressing lamin A mutated at a site responsible for Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy is improved by inhibition of the MEK-ERK pathway and stimulation of the PI3-kinase pathway. Experimental Cell Research, 314, 1392–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Wang, L., Ma, W., Markovich, R., Lee, W. L., & Wang, P. H. (1998). Insulin-like growth factor I modulates induction of apoptotic signaling in H9C2 cardiac muscle cells. Endocrinology, 139, 1354–1360.Google Scholar
- 11.Bland, C. S. Wang, E. T. Vu, A. David, M. P. Castle, J. C. Johnson, J. M. Burge, C. B. and Cooper, T. A. (2010) Global regulation of alternative splicing during myogenic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Residues 38, 7651–7664.Google Scholar
- 12.Bland, C. S. Wang, E. T. Vu, A. David, M. P. Castle, J. C. Johnson, J. M. Burge, C. B. and Cooper, T. A. (2010) Global regulation of alternative splicing during myogenic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res 38, 7651–7664.Google Scholar
- 16.Dheda, K., Huggett, J. F., Bustin, S. A., Johnson, M. A., Rook, G., & Zumla, A. (2004). Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. BioTechniques, 37, 112–119.Google Scholar
- 18.Vandesompele, J. De, P. K. Pattyn, F. Poppe, B. Van, R. N. De, P. A. and Speleman, F. (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3, RESEARCH0034.Google Scholar
- 21.Andersen, C. L., Jensen, J. L., & Orntoft, T. F. (2004). Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Research, 64, 5245–5250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Meyers, R. E., & Sharp, P. A. (1993). TATA-binding protein and associated factors in polymerase II and polymerase III transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 13, 7953–7960.Google Scholar
- 40.Souaze, F., Ntodou-Thome, A., Tran, C. Y., Rostene, W., & Forgez, P. (1996). Quantitative RT-PCR: limits and accuracy. BioTechniques, 21, 280–285.Google Scholar