Advertisement

Molecular Biotechnology

, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 240–247 | Cite as

Covalent Immobilization of Alcohol Dehydrogenase (ADH2) from Haloferax volcanii: How to Maximize Activity and Optimize Performance of Halophilic Enzymes

  • Diya Alsafadi
  • Francesca ParadisiEmail author
Research

Abstract

Alcohol dehydrogenase from halophilic archaeon Haloferax volcanii (HvADH2) was successfully covalently immobilized on metal-derivatized epoxy Sepabeads. The immobilization conditions were optimized by investigating several parameters that affect the halophilic enzyme–support interaction. The highest immobilization efficiency (100 %) and retention activity (60 %) were achieved after 48 h of incubation of the enzyme with Ni-epoxy Sepabeads support in 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 8, containing 3 M KCl at 5 °C. No significant stabilization was observed after blocking the unreacted epoxy groups with commonly used hydrophilic agents. A significant increase in the stability of the immobilized enzyme was achieved by blocking the unreacted epoxy groups with ethylamine. The immobilization process increased the enzyme stability, thermal activity, and organic solvents tolerance when compared to its soluble counterpart, indicating that the immobilization enhances the structural and conformational stability. One step purification–immobilization of this enzyme has been carried out on metal chelate-epoxy Sepabeads, as an efficient method to obtain immobilized biocatalyst directly from bacterial extracts.

Keywords

Enzyme immobilization Sepabeads Halophilic enzyme Alcohol dehydrogenase Haloferax volcanii Organic solvents tolerance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding provided by the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) and by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI). The company Resindion S. R. L. (Milano, Italy) kindly donated the epoxy sepabeads.

References

  1. 1.
    Honda, K., Ishige, T., Kataoka, M., & Shimizu, S. (2006). Microbial and enzymatic processes for the production of chiral compounds. In R. N. Patel (Ed.), Biocatalysis in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries (pp. 529–546). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faber, K. (1997). Biotranformations in organic chemistry (pp. 10–16). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Margolin, A. L. (1993). Enzymes in the synthesis of chiral drugs. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 15, 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yang, Z. H., Zeng, R., Chang, X., Li, X. K., & Wang, G. H. (2008). Toxicity of aromatic ketone to yeast cell and improvement of the asymmetric reduction of aromatic ketone catalyzed by yeast cell with the introduction of resin adsorption. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 46, 322–327.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg, K., Schroer, K., Lütz, S., & Liese, A. (2007). Biocatalytic ketone reduction-a powerful tool for the production of chiral alcohols-part I: Processes with isolated enzymes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 76, 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanefeld, U., Gardossi, L., & Magner, E. (2009). Understanding enzyme immobilisation. Chemical Society Reviews, 38, 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheldon, R. A. (2007). Enzyme immobilization: The quest for optimum performance. Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 349, 1289–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia-Galan, C., Berenguer-Murcia, A., Fernandez-Lafuente, R., & Rodrigues, R. C. (2011). Potential of different enzyme immobilization strategies to improve enzyme performance. Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 353, 2885–2904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mateo, C., Abian, O., Fernández-Lorente, G., Pessela, B. C., Grazu, V., Guisan, J. M., et al. (2006). Immobilization-stabilization of enzymes by multipoint covalent attachment on supports activated with epoxy groups. In G. F. Bickerstaff (Ed.), Immobilization of enzymes and cells. Methods in biotechnology (Vol. 22, pp. 47–55). Totowa: Humana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mateo, C., Abian, C., Fernández- Lorente, G., Predoche, J., Fernández- Lafuente, R., & Guisan, J. M. (2002). Sepabeads: A novel epoxy-support for stabilization of industrial enzymes via very intense multipoint covalent attachment. Biotechnology Progress, 18, 629–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Katchalski-Katzir, E., & Kraemer, D. M. (2000). Eupergit® C, a carrier for immobilization of enzymes of industrial potential. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B, 10, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mateo, C., Abian, O., Fernandez-Lafuente, R., & Guisan, J. M. (2000). Increase in conformational stability of enzymes immobilized on epoxy-activated supports by favoring additional multipoint covalent attachment. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 26, 509–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adams, J. P., Collis, A. J., Henderson, R. K., & Sutton, P. W. (2010). Biotransformations in small-molecule pharmaceutical development. In J. Whittall & P. W. Sutton (Eds.), Practical methods for biocatalysis and biotransformations (pp. 1–82). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mateo, C., Fernández-Lorente, G., Cortés, E., Garcia, J. L., Fernández-Lafuente, R., & Guisan, J. M. (2001). One-step purification, covalent immobilization, and additional stabilization of poly-His-tagged proteins using novel heterofunctional chelate-epoxy supports. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 76, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pessela, B. C., Mateo, C., Carrascosa, A. V., Vian, A., García, J. L., Rivas, G., et al. (2003). One-step purification, covalent immobilization, and additional stabilization of a thermophilic poly-His-tagged β-galactosidase from Thermus sp. strain T2 by using novel heterofunctional chelate-epoxy Sepabeads. Biomacromolecules, 4, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Timpson, L. M., Liliensiek, A. K., Alsafadi, D., Cassidy, J., Sharkey, M. A., Liddell, S., et al. (2013). A comparison of two novel alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes (ADH1 and ADH2) from the extreme halophile Haloferax volcanii. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 97, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alsafadi, D., & Paradisi, F. (2013). Effect of organic solvents on the activity and stability of halophilic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH2) from Haloferax volcanii. Extremophiles, 17, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Koch-Schmidt, A. C., Mosbach, K., & Werber, M. M. (1979). A comparative study on the stability of immobilized halophilic and non-halophilic malate dehydrogenase at various ionic strengths. European Journal of Biochemistry, 100, 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patel, S., Bagai, R., & Madamwar, D. (1999). Stabilization of a halophilic α-amylase by calcium alginate immobilization. Biocatalysis and Biotransformation, 14, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D’Souza, S. E., Altekar, W., & D’Souza, S. F. (1997). Immobilization of Haloferax mediterranei aldolase by cross-linking in a proteinic matrix: Stability and halophilic characteristics. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 13, 561–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Quaglia, D., Pori, M., Galletti, P., Emer, E., Paradisi, F., & Giacomini, D. (2013). His-tagged horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase: Immobilization and application in the bio-based enantioselective synthesis of (S)-arylpropanols. Process Biochemistry, 48, 810–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kastritis, P. L., Papandreou, N. C., & Hamodrakas, S. J. (2007). Haloadaptation: Insights from comparative modeling studies of halophilic archaeal DHFRs. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 41, 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roig, M. G., Bello, J. F., Moreno de Vega, M. A., Cachaza, J. M., & Kennedy, J. F. (1990). Liver alcohol dehydrogenase immobilized on polyvinylidene difluoride. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 49, 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldberg, K., Krueger, A., Meinhardt, T., Kroutil, W., Mautner, B., & Liese, A. (2008). Novel immobilization routes for the covalent binding of an alcohol dehydrogenase from Rhodococcus ruber DSM 4454. Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 19, 1171–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Soni, S., Desai, J. D., & Devi, S. (2001). Immobilization of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase by entrapment and covalent binding to polymeric supports. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 82, 1299–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bolivar, J. M., Wilson, L., Ferrarotti, S. A., Guisan, J. M., Fernandez-Lafuente, R., & Mateo, C. (2006). Improvement of the stability of alcohol dehydrogenase by covalent immobilization on glyoxyl-agarose. Journal of Biotechnology, 125, 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hildebrand, F., & Lütz, S. (2006). Immobilisation of alcohol dehydrogenase from Lactobacillus brevis and its application in a plug-flow reactor. Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 17, 3219–3225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Timpson, L., Alsafadi, D., Mac Donnchadha, C., Liddell, S., Sharkey, M., & Paradisi, F. (2012). Characterization of alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH12) from Haloarcula marismortui, an extreme halophile from the Dead Sea. Extremophiles, 16, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Martins, S., Karmali, A., Andrade, J., & Serralheiro, M. L. (2006). Immobilized metal affinity chromatography of monoclonal immunoglobulin M against mutant amidase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Molecular Biotechnology, 33, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Synthesis and Chemical Biology, UCD School of Chemistry and Chemical BiologyUniversity College DublinDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations