Advertisement

Medical Oncology

, 35:154 | Cite as

Factors affecting crizotinib-induced hepatotoxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients

  • Dasom Jung
  • Ji Min Han
  • Jeong Yee
  • Jae Youn Kim
  • Hye Sun GwakEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Crizotinib is an orally available tyrosine kinase inhibitor for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite that crizotinib-induced hepatotoxicity may cause a dose reduction or interruption that can affect the patient’s treatment, there is no study to investigate factors for crizotinib-induced hepatotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors affecting crizotinib-induced hepatotoxicity. From February 2012 to April 2018, a retrospective study was performed on NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib. Various factors were reviewed including sex, age, body weight, height, body surface area, underlying disease, smoking history, genetic mutation, and concomitant drugs. Among 153 patients, incidence of crizotinib-induced hepatotoxicity of grade I or higher was 83% (n = 127). The presence of liver disease or HBV revealed significant effect on hepatotoxicity within 28 days after crizotinib administration in univariate analysis. Patients with liver disease or HBV carriers revealed 2.3 times the hazard of time to hepatotoxicity compared to those without liver disease or HBV. Use of H2-antagonist or H2-antagonist/proton pump inhibitor revealed 1.7 times the hazard of time to hepatotoxicity compared to those that did not use those medications. Thus, close monitoring of liver function is recommended, especially in patients with liver impairment or using anti-acid secreting agents.

Keywords

Crizotinib Hepatotoxicity Time to reach hepatotoxicity H2-antagonist Proton pump inhibitor Presence of liver disease or hepatitis B virus 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

The Asan Medical Center Clinical Research Ethics Committee approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent due to the retrospective nature of the study with collection of anonymous-subject data (IRB Number: 2018-0339).

References

  1. 1.
    Huang X. The potential role of HGF-MET signaling and autophagy in the war of alectinib versus crizotinib against ALK-positive NSCLC. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Girard N, Audigier-Valette C, Cortot AB, Mennecier B, Debieuvre D, Planchard D, et al. ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancers: how best to optimize the safety of crizotinib in clinical practice? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(2):225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mao J, Johnson TR, Shen Z, Yamazaki S. Prediction of crizotinib-midazolam interaction using the Simcyp population-based simulator: comparison of CYP3A time-dependent inhibition between human liver microsomes versus hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41(2):343–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malik SM, Maher VE, Bijwaard KE, Becker RL, Zhang L, Tang SW, et al. Food and Drug Administration approval: crizotinib for treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer that is anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(8):2029–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Solomon BJ, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, Felip E, et al. Final overall survival analysis from a study comparing first-line Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2251–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2167–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ettinger DS, Aisner DL, Wood DE, Akerley W, Bauman J, Chang JY, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2018. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(7):807–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rothenstein JM, Letarte N. Managing treatment-related adverse events associated with Alk inhibitors. Curr Oncol. 2014;21(1):19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kazandjian D, Blumenthal GM, Chen HY, He K, Patel M, Justice R, et al. FDA approval summary: crizotinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements. Oncologist. 2014;19(10):e5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mok T, Kim DW, Wu Y-L, Solomon BJ, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, et al. First-line crizotinib versus pemetrexed–cisplatin or pemetrexed–carboplatin in patients (pts) with advanced ALK-positive non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of a phase III study (PROFILE 1014). J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:8002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blackhall F, Kim DW, Besse B, Nokihara H, Han JY, Wilner KD, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in PROFILE 1007: a randomized trial of crizotinib compared with chemotherapy in previously treated patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(11):1625–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park YH, Cho S, Yee J, Kim JY, Rhie SJ, Gwak HS. Factors affecting time to reach and recover from gefitinib-induced hepatotoxicity. Anticancer Drugs. 2018;29(5):471–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Timm A, Kolesar JM. Crizotinib for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70(11):943–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujiwara Y, Hamada A, Mizugaki H, Aikawa H, Hata T, Horinouchi H, et al. Pharmacokinetic profiles of significant adverse events with crizotinib in Japanese patients with ABCB1 polymorphism. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(8):1117–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson TR, Tan W, Goulet L, Smith EB, Yamazaki S, Walker GS, et al. Metabolism, excretion and pharmacokinetics of [14C]crizotinib following oral administration to healthy subjects. Xenobiotica. 2015;45(1):45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang SC, Nguyen LN, Sparidans RW, Wagenaar E, Beijnen JH, Schinkel AH. Increased oral availability and brain accumulation of the ALK inhibitor crizotinib by coadministration of the P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) inhibitor elacridar. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(6):1484–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hodges LM, Markova SM, Chinn LW, Gow JM, Kroetz DL, Klein TE, et al. Very important pharmacogene summary: ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein). Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2011;21(3):152–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Budha NR, Frymoyer A, Smelick GS, Jin JY, Yago MR, Dresser MJ, et al. Drug absorption interactions between oral targeted anticancer agents and PPIs: is pH-dependent solubility the Achilles heel of targeted therapy? Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;92(2):203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    van Leeuwen RW, van Gelder T, Mathijssen RH, Jansman FG. Drug–drug interactions with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a clinical perspective. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):e315-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Converging Clinical & Public HealthEwha Womans UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of PharmacyAsan Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.College of Pharmacy and Division of Life and Pharmaceutical SciencesEwha Womans UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations