Advertisement

Medical Oncology

, 34:67 | Cite as

Percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal masses under C-arm conebeam CT guidance: diagnostic performance and safety

  • Chiara Floridi
  • Alfonso Reginelli
  • Raffaella Capasso
  • Enrico Fumarola
  • Filippo Pesapane
  • Antonio Barile
  • Marcello Zappia
  • Ferdinando Caranci
  • Luca BruneseEmail author
Original Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. New Advances in Interventional Oncology: State of the Art

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal masses under conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) and “XperGuide” navigation guidance. From September 2013 to April 2016, 40 patients (25 men and 15 women; mean age 52.5 years; range 18.7–86.4 years) with 40 mediastinal masses underwent CBCT-/”XperGuide”-guided percutaneous needle biopsies. Technical success, sensibility, specificity, positive predictive value (ppv), negative predictive value (npv) and complications rate were evaluated. Technical success evaluated as the correct positioning of the needle inside the lesion was 100%. Based on histopathological diagnosis, 2 of 40 biopsies (5%) resulted a false negative. Diagnostic accuracy was 95%, sensitivity was 95%, specificity was 100%, ppv was 100%, and npv was 33%. The mean total procedure time was 32 min (range 15–60 min) revealing a reduction in time comparing the first group of 20 patients (mean time 45 min) with the last group of 20 patients (mean time 17 min). No major complications were recorded. Only three patients (7.5%) had mild pneumothorax as demonstrated by post-procedural CBCT, resolved spontaneously. CBCT/“XperGuide” navigation system is a new, safe and accurate technique that can be used as guidance for mediastinal mass biopsies. It also permits the use of CT machines for diagnostic examinations relieving them from interventional procedures burden.

Keywords

C-arm conebeam CT Percutaneous biopsy Imaging guidance Mediastinal masses 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Aroor AR, Prakasha RS, Seshadri S, Teerthanath S, Raghuraj U. A study of clinical characteristics of mediastinal mass. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):77–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ching CO, Lynette LST. Imaging of anterior mediastinal tumours. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12:506–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reginelli A, Rossi C, Capasso R, Urraro F, Cagini L, Di Crescenzo V, et al. Evaluation with multislice CT of the hilar pulmonary nodules for probable infiltration of vascular-bronchial structures. Recenti Prog Med. 2013;104:403–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunese L, Greco B, Setola FR, Lassandro F, Guarracino MR, De Rimini M, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer evaluated with quantitative contrast-enhanced CT and PET-CT: net enhancement and standardized uptake values are related to tumour size and histology. Med Sci Monit. 2013;7(19):95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gupta S, Seaberg K, Wallace M. Imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal lesions: different approaches and anatomic consideration. Radiographics. 2005;25(3):763–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Filippo M, Saba L, Silva M, Zagaria R, Concari G, Nizzoli R, et al. CT-guided biopsy of pulmonary nodules: is pulmonary hemorrhage a complication or an advantage? Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(5):421–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Filippo M, Saba L, Concari G, Nizzoli R, Ferrari L, et al. Predictive factors of diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration for solid noncalcified, subsolid and mixed pulmonary nodules. Radiol Med. 2013;118(7):1071–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu Y, Fritz J, Li C, Liu M, Lee P, Wu L, Carrino JA. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy of mediastinal masses. Diagnostic performance and safety. Invest Radiol. 2013;48(6):452–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Braak SJ, Van Strjen MJL, Van Leersum M, Van Es HW, Van Heesewijk JPM. Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy and feasibility. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(5):W445–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Floridi C, Muollo A, Fontana F, et al. C-arm cone-beam computed tomography needle path overlay for percutaneous biopsy of pulmonary nodules. Radiol Med. 2014;119(11):820–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carrafiello G, Fontana F, Mangini M, Ierardi AM, Cotta E, Floridi C, Piacentino F, Fugazzola C. Initial experience with percutaneous biopsies of bone lesions using XperGuide cone-beam CT (CBCT): technical note. Radiol Med. 2012;117:1386–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Busser WMH, Hoogeveen YL, Veth RPH, Schreuder HWB, Balguid A, Renema WK, Schultzekool LJ. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteomas with use of real-time needle guidance for accurate needle placement: a pilot study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34:180–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL. Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7 Suppl):S189–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Racadio JM, Babic D, Homan R, Rampton JW, Patel MN, Racadio JM, Johnson ND. Live 3D guidance in the interventional radiology suite. AJR. 2007;189:W357–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braak SJ, Van Melick HHE, Onaca MG, Van Heesewijk JPM, Van Strijen MJL. 3D cone-beam CT guidance, a novel technique in renal biopsy-results in 41 patients with suspected renal masses. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2547–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Floridi C, Radaelli A, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Grass M, De Lin M, Chiaradia M, Geschwind JF, Kobeiter H, Squillaci E, Maleux G, Giovagnoni A, Brunese L, Wood B, Carrafiello G, Rotondo A. C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in interventional oncology: technical aspects and clinical applications. Radiol Med. 2014;119:521–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee SM, Park CM, Lee KH, Bahn YE, Kim JI, Goo JM. C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules: clinical experience in 1108 patients. Radiology. 2014;271(1):291–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Braak SJ, Herder GJM, Van Heesewijk JPM, Van Strijen MJL. Pulmonary masses: initial results of cone-beam CT guidance with needle planning software for percutaneous lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:1414–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim H, Park CM, Lee SM, Goo JM. C-arm cone-beam CT virtual navigation-guided percutaneous mediastinal mass biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complications. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(12):3508–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Abi-Jaoudeh N, Kruecker J, Kadoury S, Kobeiter H, Venkatesan A, Levy E, Wood BJ. Multimodality image fusion guided procedures: technique, accuracy, and applications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35(5):986–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rotolo N, Floridi C, Imperatori A, Fontana F, Ierardi AM, Mangini M, Arlant V, De Marchi G, Novario R, Dominioni L, Fugazzola C, Carrafiello G. Comparison of cone-beam CT-guided and CT fluoroscopy-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(2):381–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Floridi
    • 1
  • Alfonso Reginelli
    • 2
  • Raffaella Capasso
    • 3
  • Enrico Fumarola
    • 4
  • Filippo Pesapane
    • 4
  • Antonio Barile
    • 5
  • Marcello Zappia
    • 3
  • Ferdinando Caranci
    • 3
  • Luca Brunese
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Radiology DepartmentInsubria UniversityVareseItaly
  2. 2.Department of Internal and Experimental MedicineSecond University of NaplesNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyUniversity of MoliseCampobassoItaly
  4. 4.Department of Health Sciences, Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, San Paolo HospitalUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
  5. 5.Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical SciencesUniversity of l’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations