Medical Oncology

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 513–518 | Cite as

The clinical relevance of urine-based markers for diagnosis of bladder cancer

  • Sanaa Eissa
  • Menha Swellam
  • Amr Amin
  • Mohamed E. Balbaa
  • Galila Ahmed Yacout
  • Tarek Mostafa El-Zayat
Original Paper

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic relevance of urinary fibronectin (FN), telomerase (RTA), and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) mRNA in comparison with voided urine cytology (VUC). The study included 132 patients with bladder cancer, 60 patients with benign bladder lesions, and 48 healthy individuals. All were subjected to urine cytology, estimation of fibronectin by ELISA, RTA by TRAP, and CK20 mRNA by conventional RT–PCR in urothelial cells from voided urine. The best cutoff point for FN was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve (41.7 ng/mg protein) revealed the highest sensitivity for malignant (80%) followed by the benign (70%) than the healthy individuals (4.1%) at P < 0.001. Also, RTA and VUC showed significant difference among the three investigated groups (P < 0.001). The overall sensitivity (89.3%) and specificity (98.4%) were the highest for CK20 mRNA. Combined sensitivity of VUC with FN, RTA, and CK20 mRNA together (98.4%) was higher than either the combined sensitivity of VUC with any of them or than that of the biomarker alone. Accordingly, when the diagnostic efficacy was considered, CK20 mRNA had the highest sensitivity and specificity compared to all investigated markers.

Keywords

Fibronectin Relative telomerase activity Cytokeratin 20 mRNA Voided urine cytology Bladder cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Egyptian Academy of Research and Technology, the Technical development and Scientific Sector. The Science and Technology Center, Project 21/2. The authors acknowledge Dr. Kahled Kamel, Assistant Professor of Cytopathology at Early Cancer Detection Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt for his help in the cytological and pathological examinations of all investigated urine samples.

References

  1. 1.
    Catto JWF. Old and new urinary markers: which one is the PSA for bladder cancer? Eur Urol. 2008;7:422–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raab SS, Lenel J, Cohen MB. Low grade transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cytology diagnosis by key features as identified by logistic regression analysis. Cancer. 1994;74:1621–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raitanen MP, Aine R, Rintala E, Kallio J, Rajala P, Juusela H, et al. Differences between local and review urinary cytology in diagnosis of bladder cancer. An inter-observer multi-center analysis. Eur Urol. 2002;41:284–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Katayama M, Hino F, Kamihagi K, Tltanl K, Koto L. Urinary fibronectin fragments (a potential tumor marker) measured by immunoenzymatric assay with domain specific monoclonal antibodies. Clin Chem. 1991;37:466–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Menedez V, Fernadez-Suarez A, Galan JA, Perez M, Garcia-Lopz F. Diagnosis of bladder cancer by analysis of urinary fibronectin. J Urol. 2005;65:284–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanchini MA, Gunelli R, Nanni O, Bravaccini S, Fabbri C, Sermasi A, et al. Relevance of urine telomerase in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. JAMA. 2005;294:2052–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim NW, Piatyszek MA, Prowse KR, Harley CB, West MD, PdL Ho, et al. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science. 1994;266:2011–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miettinen M. Keratin 20: immunohistochemical marker for gastrointestinal, urothelial, and merkel cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 1995;8:384–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buchumensky V, Klein A, Zemer R, Kessler OJ, Zimlichman S, Nissenkorn I. Cytokeratin20: A new marker for early detection of bladder cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1998;160:1971–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Cancer staging manual. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Pa-Raven Publishers; 1997. p. 241.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Papanicolaou GN, Marshall VF. Urine sediment smears as a diagnostic procedure in cancers of the urinary tract. Science. 1945;101:519–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eissa S, Kassim S, El-Ahmady O. Detection of bladder tumours: role of cytology, morphology-based assays, biochemical and molecular markers. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:395–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eissa S, Kassim SK, Labib RA, El-Khouly IM, Ghaffer TM, Sadek M, et al. Detection of bladder carcinoma by combined testing of urine for hyaluronidase and cytokeratin 20 RNAs. Cancer. 2005;103:1356–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burchill SA, Bradbury MF, Pittman K, Southgate J, Smith B, Selby P. Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:278–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Southgate J, Smith B, Burchill SA. Detection of epithelial cancer cells in peripheral blood by RT–PCR. Br J Cancer. 1995;71:278–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eissa S, Ahmed MI, Said H, Zaghlool A, El-Ahmady O. Cell cycle regulators in bladder cancer: relationship to schistosomiasis. IUBMB Life. 2004;56:557–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eissa S, Swellam M, Ali-Labib R, Mansour A, El-Malt O, Tash FM. Detection of telomerase in urine by three methods: evaluation of diagnostic accuracy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2007;178:1068–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eissa E, Zohny SF, Swellam M, Mahmoud MH, El-Zayat TM, Salem AM. Comparison of CD44 and cytokeratin 20 mRNA in voided urine samples as diagnostic tools for bladder cancer. Clin Biochem. 2008;41:1335–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Konety BR. Molecular markers in bladder cancer: a critical appraisal. Urol Oncol. 2006;24:326–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sanaa Eissa
    • 1
  • Menha Swellam
    • 2
  • Amr Amin
    • 1
  • Mohamed E. Balbaa
    • 3
  • Galila Ahmed Yacout
    • 3
  • Tarek Mostafa El-Zayat
    • 4
  1. 1.Oncology Diagnostic Unit, Medical Biochemistry Department, Faculty of MedicineAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, Biochemistry DepartmentNational Research CenterGizaEgypt
  3. 3.Biochemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt
  4. 4.Urology Department, Faculty of MedicineAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations