Journal of Molecular Neuroscience

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 583–588 | Cite as

Behavioural Variant Frontotemporal Dementia—Defining Genetic and Pathological Subtypes

Article

Abstract

Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a clinically, genetically and pathologically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder caused by FTLD-tau, FTLD-TDP and FTLD-FUS pathologies. Clinically, patients present with behavioural symptoms that may include one or more of disinhibition, apathy/inertia, loss of sympathy/empathy, perseverative, stereotyped and compulsive/ritualistic behaviour or hyperorality/dietary changes. Cognitive deficits, particularly executive dysfunction, are also seen. Neuroanatomically, patients have frontal and/or temporal lobe atrophy on neuroimaging. However, there is currently no clear correlation between the clinical and neuroanatomical phenotype in life and the underlying pathogenetics. With the advent of clinical trials in bvFTD, establishing the underlying pathology accurately during life will become increasingly important. This review therefore investigates current and future biomarkers that may help make a pathological diagnosis in life, i.e. bvFTD-tau, bvFTD-TDP and bvFTD-FUS, including clinical and neuropsychological data, neuroimaging, blood and CSF markers.

Keywords

Frontotemporal dementia Frontotemporal lobar degeneration Tau TDP-43 Progranulin FUS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken at UCLH/UCL which received a proportion of funding from the Department of Health’s NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme. The Dementia Research Centre is an Alzheimer’s Research Trust Co-ordinating Centre.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. Alladi S, Xuereb J, Bak T et al (2007) Focal cortical presentations of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 130(Pt 10):2636–2645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bian H, Grossman M (2007) Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: recent progress in antemortem diagnosis. Acta Neuropathol 114(1):23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bian H, Van Swieten JC, Leight S et al (2008) CSF biomarkers in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with known pathology. Neurology 70(19 Pt 2):1827–1835PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Borroni B, Malinverno M, Gardoni F et al (2008) Tau forms in CSF as a reliable biomarker for progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 71(22):1796–1803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borroni B, Gardoni F, Parnetti L et al (2009) Pattern of Tau forms in CSF is altered in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurobiol Aging 30(1):34–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burrell JR, Hodges JR (2010) From FUS to Fibs: what’s new in frontotemporal dementia? J Alzheimers Dis 21(2):349–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairns NJ, Bigio EH, Mackenzie IR et al (2007) Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 114:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppola G, Karydas A, Rademakers R et al (2008) Gene expression study on peripheral blood identifies progranulin mutations. Ann Neurol 64(1):92–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finch N, Baker M, Crook R et al (2009) Plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutation status in frontotemporal dementia patients and asymptomatic family members. Brain 132(Pt 3):583–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foulds P, McAuley E, Gibbons L et al (2008) TDP-43 protein in plasma may index TDP-43 brain pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 116(2):141–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foulds PG, Davidson Y, Mishra M et al (2009) Plasma phosphorylated-TDP-43 protein levels correlate with brain pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 118(5):647–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghidoni R, Benussi L, Glionna M, Franzoni M, Binetti G (2008) Low plasma progranulin levels predict progranulin mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 71(16):1235–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grossman M, Farmer J, Leight S et al (2005) Cerebrospinal fluid profile in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 57(5):721–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman M, Libon DJ, Forman MS et al (2007) Distinct antemortem profiles in patients with pathologically defined frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 64(11):1601–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodges JR, Davies RR, Xuereb JH et al (2004) Clinicopathological correlates in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 56(3):399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hu WT, Mandrekar JN, Parisi JE et al (2007a) Clinical features of pathologic subtypes of behavioral–variant frontotemporal dementia. Arch Neurol 64(11):1611–1616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu WT, Parisi JE, Knopman DS et al (2007b) Clinical features and survival of 3R and 4R tauopathies presenting as behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 21(4):S39–S43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu WT, Chen-Plotkin A, Grossman M et al (2010) Novel CSF biomarkers for frontotemporal lobar degenerations. Neurology 75(23):2079–2086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Josephs KA, Petersen RC, Knopman DS et al (2006) Clinicopathologic analysis of frontotemporal and corticobasal degenerations and PSP. Neurology 66(1):41–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Parisi JE et al (2010) Caudate atrophy on MRI is a characteristic feature of FTLD-FUS. Eur J Neurol 17(7):969–975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kasai T, Tokuda T, Ishigami N et al (2009) Increased TDP-43 protein in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol 117(1):55–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kertesz A, McMonagle P, Blair M, Davidson W, Munoz DG (2005) The evolution and pathology of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 128(Pt 9):1996–2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim EJ, Rabinovici GD, Seeley WW et al (2007) Patterns of MRI atrophy in tau positive and ubiquitin positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 78(12):1375–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Parisi JE et al (2005) Antemortem diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Ann Neurol 57(4):480–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Knopman DS, Kramer JH, Boeve BF et al (2008) Development of methodology for conducting clinical trials in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain 131(Pt 11):2957–2968PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lillo P, Garcin B, Hornberger M, Bak TH, Hodges JR (2010) Neurobehavioral features in frontotemporal dementia with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 67(7):826–830PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ling H, O'Sullivan SS, Holton JL et al (2010) Does corticobasal degeneration exist? A clinicopathological re-evaluation. Brain 133(Pt 7):2045–2057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lladó A, Sánchez-Valle R, Rey MJ et al (2008) Clinicopathological and genetic correlates of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol 255(4):488–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loy CT, McCusker E, Kril JJ et al (2010) Very early-onset frontotemporal dementia with no family history predicts underlying fused in sarcoma pathology. Brain 133(Pt 12):e158, author reply e159. Epub 2010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mackenzie IR, Neumann M, Bigio EH et al (2010) Nomenclature and nosology for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. Acta Neuropathol 119(1):1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Munoz DG, Neumann M, Kusaka H et al (2009) FUS pathology in basophilic inclusion body disease. Acta Neuropathol 118(5):617–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L et al (1998) Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology 51:1546–1554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Neumann M, Rademakers R, Roeber S, Baker M, Kretzschmar HA, Mackenzie IR (2009) A new subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with FUS pathology. Brain 132(Pt 11):2922–2931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Omar R, Sampson EL, Loy CT et al (2009) Delusions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol 256(4):600–607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pereira JM, Williams GB, Acosta-Cabronero J et al (2009) Atrophy patterns in histologic vs clinical groupings of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 72(19):1653–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Piguet O, Hornberger M, Mioshi E, Hodges JR (2011) Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: diagnosis, clinical staging, and management. Lancet Neurol 10(2):162–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pijnenburg YA, Schoonenboom NS, Rosso SM et al (2004) CSF tau and Abeta42 are not useful in the diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 62(9):1649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Kipps CM et al (2007) Diagnostic criteria for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD): current limitations and future directions. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 21(4):S14–S18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al (2011) Sensitivity of diagnostic criteria in autopsy-confirmed patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD): first report of the international bvFTD criteria consortium (FTDC). Neurology 76(9):A262–A263Google Scholar
  40. Riemenschneider M, Wagenpfeil S, Diehl J et al (2002) Tau and Abeta42 protein in CSF of patients with frontotemporal degeneration. Neurology 58(11):1622–1628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rohrer JD, Warren JD, Omar R et al (2008) Parietal lobe deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by a mutation in the progranulin gene. Arch Neurol 65(4):506–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rohrer JD, Guerreiro R, Vandrovcova J et al (2009) The heritability and genetics of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 73(18):1451–1456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rohrer JD, Ridgway GR, Modat M et al (2010a) Distinct profiles of brain atrophy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by progranulin and tau mutations. Neuroimage 53(3):1070–1076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rohrer JD, Geser F, Zhou J et al (2010b) TDP-43 subtypes are associated with distinct atrophy patterns in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 75(24):2204–2211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rohrer JD, Lashley T, Holton J et al (2011) The clinical and neuroanatomical phenotype of FUS associated frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 16 Jul 2010Google Scholar
  46. Seelaar H, Klijnsma KY, de Koning I et al (2010) Frequency of ubiquitin and FUS-positive, TDP-43-negative frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J Neurol 257(5):747–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seelaar H, Rohrer JD, Pijnenburg YA et al (2011) Clinical, genetic and pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia: a review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82(5):476–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shi J, Shaw CL, Du Plessis D et al (2005) Histopathological changes underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration with clinicopathological correlation. Acta Neuropathol 110(5):501–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Snowden JS, Neary D, Mann DM (2002) Frontotemporal dementia. Br J Psychiatry 180:140–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snowden J, Neary D, Mann D (2007) Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: clinical and pathological relationships. Acta Neuropathol 114(1):31–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Snowden JS, Hu Q, Rollinson S et al (2011) The most common type of FTLD-FUS (aFTLD-U) is associated with a distinct clinical form of frontotemporal dementia but is not related to mutations in the FUS gene. Acta Neuropathol. 20 Mar 2011Google Scholar
  52. Steinacker P, Hendrich C, Sperfeld AD et al (2008) TDP-43 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Arch Neurol 65(11):1481–1487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Urwin H, Josephs KA, Rohrer JD et al (2010) FUS pathology defines the majority of Tau- and TDP-43-negative frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 120(1):33–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whitwell JL, Jack CR Jr, Boeve BF et al (2009a) Voxel-based morphometry patterns of atrophy in FTLD with mutations in MAPT or PGRN. Neurology 72(9):813–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whitwell JL, Przybelski SA, Weigand SD et al (2009b) Distinct anatomical subtypes of the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: a cluster analysis study. Brain 132(Pt 11):2932–2946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitwell JL, Jack CR Jr, Parisi JE et al (2010) Does TDP-43 type confer a distinct pattern of atrophy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration? Neurology 75(24):2212–2220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations