Review of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
- 393 Downloads
Currently, the standard management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection. Despite the significant improvement in local recurrence, survival benefits are not gained due to distant failure and radiotherapy-associated toxicity. Compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy is also poor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by surgery may be an alternative. The objective of this review is to determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in operable LARC.
Materials and Methods
Electronic databases searched (from database inception–December 2013) were Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, and the Clinical Trials Register. Specific journals were also hand searched. The selection criteria were studies published in English investigating stage II–III non-metastatic rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (oral, intravenous or rectal route) followed by curative resection. The primary outcome measure was tumour response. Secondary outcome measures included acute toxicity, operative morbidity, R0 resection, local recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
One randomised phase III trial, six single-arm phase II trials and one retrospective case series study were eligible for inclusion. Six studies administered fluoropyrimidine-based multiple agent regimens and two studies administered fluorouracil-based monotherapy. The studies with multiple agents and stronger chemotherapy regimens (intravenous and/or oral) followed by delayed surgery showed better tumour response rates. The overall objective response rate was good and ranged from 62.5 to 93.7 %. Pathological complete response ranged from 3.8 to 33.3 %. The R0 resection and compliance rates were also high ranging from 90 to 100 % and 72 to 100 %, respectively. Grade 3–4 toxicities ranged from 2.3 to 39 %. Four- to 5-year OS and DFS ranged from 67.2 to 91 % and 60.5 to 84 %, respectively.
This review demonstrates that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be affectively administered in LARC and could provide a good alternative to chemoradiotherapy in moderate-risk rectal cancers without compromising short- and long-term outcomes.
KeywordsRectal neoplasm Preoperative period Preoperative care neoadjuvant therapy Combined modality therapy Drug therapy
Oxaliplatin and capecitabine
Continuous intravenous infusion
Complete pathological response
Circumferential resection margin
Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid
Irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin
Intention to treat
Low anterior resection
Magnetic resonance imaging
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Randomised controlled trial
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours
Total pelvic exenteration
Oxaliplatin and capacitabine
Conflict of Interest
All the authors declare no conflict of interests.
- 1.Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C and Parkin DM. GLOBOCAN 2008 v2.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC Cancer Base No. 10. 2010.Google Scholar
- 2.Cancer Research UK. Cancer statistics report: cancer incidence in the UK in 2010. 2013.Google Scholar
- 4.Bujko K, Nowacki M, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Michalski W, Bebenek M, Kryj M. Long-term results of a randomised trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1215–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Marijnen C, van de Velde C, Putter H, van den Brink M, Maas C, Martijn H, et al. Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(9):1847–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Seymour MT, Ferry DR, Meade AM, Thompson L, Griffiths GO, Parmar MK, et al. Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9582):143–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Dewdney A, Cunningham D, Tabernero J, Capdevila J, Glimelius B, Cervantes A, et al. Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial comparing neoadjuvant oxaliplatin, capecitabine, and preoperative radiotherapy with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision in patients with high-risk rectal cancer (EXPERT-C). J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1620–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Greene F, Page D, Fleming I, et al., editors. Colon and rectum. In: AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. Springer, New York: American Joint Committee on Cancer; 2002. p. 113–123.Google Scholar
- 25.Armijo‐olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, Biondo PD, Cummings GG. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):12–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Higgins J, Deeks JJ. Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins J, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 ed.: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.Google Scholar
- 29.Fernandez-Martos C, Estevan R, Salud A, Pericay C, Gallen M, Sierra E, et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in intermediate-risk rectal cancer (RC) patients defined by magnetic resonance (MR): GEMCAD 0801 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting Abstracts 2012; vol 30 (No 15_suppl (May 20 Supplement)): Abstract no. 3586.Google Scholar
- 32.Hasegawa J, Tsunekazu M, Ho MK, Yasuhiro M, Hiroyoshi T, Hiroshi T, et al. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab for locally advanced rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol (meeting abstracts). 2013;31(No 4_suppl (February 1 Supplement)): Abstract number:566.Google Scholar
- 33.Cercek A, Weiser M, Goodman K, Reidy D, Wong W, Guillem J, et al. Complete pathological response in the primary of rectal or colon cancer treated with FOLFOX without radiation. J Clin Oncol (ASCO meeting abstracts). 2010;28(28 (15S Suppl, May 20 Supplement)):Abstract no. 3649.Google Scholar
- 39.Francois Y, Nemoz C, Baulieux J, Vignal J, Grandjean J, Partensky C, et al. Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: the Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(8):2396.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Goldberg R, Sargent D, Morton R, Fuchs C, Ramanathan R, Williamson S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(1):23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(7):679–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar