Advertisement

Safety and Feasibility of Early Mobilization in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and External Ventricular Drain

  • Bethany YoungEmail author
  • Megan Moyer
  • William Pino
  • David Kung
  • Eric Zager
  • Monisha A. Kumar
Original Article

Abstract

Background/objective

In November 2014, our Neurointensive Care Unit began a multi-phased progressive early mobilization initiative for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and an external ventricular drain (EVD). Our goal was to transition from a culture of complete bed rest (Phase 0) to a physical and occupational therapy (PT/OT)-guided mobilization protocol (Phase I), and ultimately to a nurse-driven mobilization protocol (Phase II). We hypothesized that nurses could mobilize patients as safely as an exclusively PT/OT-guided approach.

Methods

In Phase I, patients were mobilized only with PT/OT at bedside; no independent time out of bed occurred. In Phase II, nurses independently mobilized patients with EVDs, and patients could remain out of bed for up to 3 h at a time. Physical and occupational therapists continued routine consultation during Phase II.

Results

Phase II patients were mobilized more frequently than Phase I patients [7.1 times per ICU stay (± 4.37) versus 3.0 times (± 1.33); p = 0.02], although not earlier [day 4.9 (± 3.46) versus day 6.0 (± 3.16); p = 0.32]. All Phase II patients were discharged to home PT services or acute rehabilitation centers. No patients were discharged to skilled nursing or long-term acute care hospitals, versus 12.5% in Phase I. In a multivariate analysis, odds of discharge to home/rehab were 3.83 for mobilized patients, independent of age and severity of illness. Other quality outcomes (length of stay, ventilator days, tracheostomy placement) between Phase I and Phase II patients were similar. No adverse events were attributable to early mobilization.

Conclusions

Nurse-driven mobilization for patients with EVDs is safe, feasible, and leads to more frequent ambulation compared to a therapy-driven protocol. Nurse-driven mobilization may be associated with improved discharge disposition, although exact causation cannot be determined by these data.

Keywords

Early mobility Mobilization External ventricular drain Subarachnoid hemorrhage Stroke 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

BY is responsible for writing, editing, collecting feedback, and submitting the article. She served as a clinical consultant for ArjoHuntleigh during portions of the study. MM participated in the protocol creation, literature review, and review and editing of the article. WP participated in the protocol creation and review and editing of the article. DK participated in review and editing of the article. EZ participated in review and editing of the article. MK participated in statistical analysis, review, and editing of the article.

Source of Support

None.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board (University of Pennsylvania; IRB 825053).

Informed Consent

Regarding the retrospective portion of this project, for this type of study formal consent is not required. Regarding the prospective quality improvement portion of this project, it was approved by the University of Pennsylvania’s IRB as a quality improvement project and thus did not require formal consent of patients involved.

References

  1. 1.
    Parry SM, Puthucheary ZA. The impact of extended bed rest on the musculoskeletal system in the critical care environment. Extrem Physiol Med. 2015;4:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brummel NE, Balas MC, Morandi A, Ferrante LE, Gill TM, Ely EW. Understanding and reducing disability in older adults following critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2015;2015(43):1265–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1874–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brahmbhatt N, Murugan R, Milbrandt EB. Early mobilization improves functional outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2010;14:321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mulkey M, Bena JF, Albert NM. Clinical outcomes of patient mobility in a neuroscience intensive care unit. J Neurosci Nurs. 2014;46:153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Puthucheary ZA, Rawal J, McPhail M, Connolly B, Ratnayake G, Chan P, et al. Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness. JAMA. 2013;310:1591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tipping CJ, Harrold M, Holland A, Romero L, Nisbet T, Hodgson CL. The effects of active mobilization and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iwashyna TJ. Trajectories of recovery and dysfunction after acute illness, with implications for clinical trial design. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(4):302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kayambu G, Boots R, Paratz J. Physical therapy for the critically ill in the ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1543–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller MA, Govindan S, Watson SR, Hyzy RC, Iwashyna TJ. ABCDE, but in that order? A cross-sectional survey of Michigan intensive care unit sedation, delirium, and early mobility practices. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12:1066–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schaller SJ, Anstey M, Blobner M, et al. Early, goal-directed mobilisation in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:1377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olkowski BF, Shah SO. Early mobilization in the neuro-ICU: How far can we go? Neurocrit Care. 2017;27:141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moyer M, Young B, Maloney-Wilensky E, et al. Implementation of an early mobility pathway in neurointensive care unit patients with external ventricular devices. J Neurosci Nurs. 2017;49:102–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sanborn MR, Thom SR, Bohman LE, Stein SC, Levine JM, Milavanova T, et al. Temporal dynamics of microparticle elevation following subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2012;117:579–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bederson JB, Connolly ES Jr, Batjer HH, Dacey RG, Dion JE, Diringer MN, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council. Am Heart Assoc Stroke. 2009;40:994–1025.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28(1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frontera JA, Claassen J, Schmidt JM, Wartenberg KE, Temes R, Connolly ES Jr, et al. Prediction of symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the modified fisher scale. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(1):21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McWilliams DJ, Atkins GA, Boyers M, Lea T, Hodson J, Snelson C. Feasibility and reliability of the manchester mobility score as a measure of physical function within the intensive care unit. ACPRC J. 2016;48:26–33.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olkowski BF, Devine MA, Slotnick LE, et al. Safety and feasibility of an early mobilization program for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Phys Ther. 2015;93:208–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Titsworth WL, Hester J, Correia T, et al. The effect of increased mobility on morbidity in the Neurointensive care unit. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:1379–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winkelman C, Johnson KD, Hejal R, et al. Examining the positive effects of exercise in intubated adults in ICU: a prospective repeated measures clinical study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2012;28:307–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dubb R, Nydahl P, Hermes C, et al. Barriers and strategies for early mobilization of patients in intensive care units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13:724–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kocan MJ, Lietz H. Special considerations for mobilizing patients in the neurointensive care unit. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2013;36:50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Griffiths RD, Hall JB. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:779–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chavez J, Johnson Bortolotto S, Paulson M, Huntley N, Sullivan B, Babu A. Promotion of progressive mobility activities with ventricular assist and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2015;34:348–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clark DE, Lowman JD, Griffin RL, Matthews HM, Reiff DA. Effectiveness of an early mobilization protocol in a trauma and burns intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2013;93:186–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bailey P, Thomsen GE, Spuhler VJ, Blair R, et al. Early activity is feasible and safe in respiratory failure patients. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:139–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burtin C, Clerckx B, Robbeets C, et al. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:2499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson G, et al. Early intensive care unit mobility in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2238–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Needham DM, Korupolu R. Rehabilitation quality improvement in an intensive care unit setting: implementation of a quality improvement model. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17:271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pohlman MC, Schweickert WD, Pohlman AS, et al. Feasibility of physical and occupational therapy beginning from initiation of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2010;31:2089–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stiller KA, Phillips AC, Lambert P. The safety of mobilisation and its effect on hemodynamic and respiratory status of intensive care patients. Physiother Theory Pract. 2004;20:175–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Thomsen C, Goad A, Taylor K, et al. The role of the critical care nurse in the organization and management of an early ICU mobility team. Poster presented at the National Teaching Institute; 2–8 May 2008; Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zanni JM, Korpolu R, Fan E, et al. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot. J Crit Care. 2009;25:254–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kung DK, Chalouhi N, Jabbour PM et al. Cerebral blood flow dynamics and head-of-bed changes in the setting of subarachnoid hemorrhage. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013:640638.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/640638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karic T, Roe C, Nordenmark TH, Becker F, Sorteberg W, Sorteberg A. Effect of early mobilization and rehabilitation on complications in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:518–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Drolet A, DeJuilio P, Harkless S, et al. Move to improve: the feasibility of using an early mobility protocol to increase ambulation in the intensive and intermediate care settings. Phys Ther. 2013;93:197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Harris CL, Shahid S. Physical therapy-driven quality improvement to promote early mobility in the intensive care unit. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2014;27:203–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hodgson CL, Bailey M, Bellomo R, et al. A binational multicenter pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of early goal-directed mobilization in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:1145–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Diringer MN, Bleck TP, Hemphill JC, et al. Critical care management of patients following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15:211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Connolly ES, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapona JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Good Shepherd Penn Partners at the Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations