Advertisement

Effects of Osmotic Therapy on Pupil Reactivity: Quantification Using Pupillometry in Critically Ill Neurologic Patients

  • C. Ong
  • M. Hutch
  • M. Barra
  • A. Kim
  • S. Zafar
  • S. Smirnakis
Original Article
  • 30 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Osmotic therapy is a critical component of medical management for cerebral edema. While up to 90% of neurointensivists report using these treatments, few quantitative clinical measurements guide optimal timing, dose, or administration frequency. Its use is frequently triggered by a qualitative assessment of neurologic deterioration and/or pupil size, and anecdotally appears to improve pupil asymmetry suggestive of uncal herniation. However, subjective pupil assessment has poor reliability, making it difficult to detect or track subtle changes. We hypothesized that osmotic therapy reproducibly improves quantitative pupil metrics.

Methods

We included patients at two centers who had recorded quantitative pupil measurements within 2 h before and after either 20% mannitol or 23.4% hypertonic saline in the neurosciences intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the Neurologic Pupil Index (NPi), a composite metric ranging from 0 to 5 in which > 3 is considered normal. Secondary outcomes included pupil size, percent change, constriction and dilation velocity, and latency. Results were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Chi-square and multi-level linear regression to control for other edema-reducing interventions.

Results

Out of 72 admissions (403 paired pupil observations), NPi significantly differed within 2 h of osmotic therapy when controlling for other commonly used interventions in our whole cohort (β = 0.08, p = 0.0168). The effect was most pronounced (β = 0.57) in patients with abnormal NPi prior to intervention (p = 0.0235).

Conclusions

Pupil reactivity significantly improves after osmotic therapy in a heterogenous critically ill population when controlling for various other interventions. Future work is necessary to determine dose-dependent effects and clinical utility.

Keywords

Cerebral edema Mannitol Hypertonic saline 

Notes

Author Contribution

CO was responsible for study design, analysis, interpretation of results, and the writing of the manuscript. MH assisted in statistical analysis of results and entering demographic and clinical data for patients. MB provided pharmacological expertise regarding osmotic therapy and manuscript review. AK was responsible for collecting pupillometry smart guards, entering demographic and clinical data, manuscript review and administrative duties regarding IRB submission process. SZ assisted in study design and collection, manuscript review. SS oversaw study design and provided expertise regarding analysis and interpretation of results.

Source of Support

American Brain Foundation.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Ong reports grants from American Brain Foundation, during the conduct of the study. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Supplementary material

12028_2018_620_MOESM1_ESM.docx (161 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 160 kb)
12028_2018_620_MOESM2_ESM.doc (108 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 108 kb)
12028_2018_620_MOESM3_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 30 kb)
12028_2018_620_MOESM4_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Cadena R, Shoykhet M, Ratcliff JJ. Emergency neurological life support: intracranial hypertension and herniation. Neurocrit Care. 2017;27:82–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hays AN, Lazaridis C, Neyens R, Nicholas J, Gay S, Chalela JA. Osmotherapy: use among neurointensivists. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14:222–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qureshi AI, Geocadin RG, Suarez JI, Ulatowski JA. Long-term outcome after medical reversal of transtentorial herniation in patients with supratentorial mass lesions. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:1556–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koenig MA, Bryan M, Lewin JL 3rd, Mirski MA, Geocadin RG, Stevens RD. Reversal of transtentorial herniation with hypertonic saline. Neurology. 2008;70:1023–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Francony G, Fauvage B, Falcon D, Canet C, Dilou H, Lavagne P, et al. Equimolar doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:795–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ropper AH. The opposite pupil in herniation. Neurology. 1990;40:1707–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mcnealy DE, Plum F. Brainstem dysfunction with supratentorial mass lesions. Arch Neurol. 1962;7:10–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ropper AH. Lateral displacement of the brain and level of consciousness in patients with an acute hemispheral mass. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:953–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ropper AH, Cole D, Louis DN. Clinicopathologic correlation in a case of pupillary dilation from cerebral hemorrhage. Arch Neurol. 1991;48:1166–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisher CM. Brain herniation: a revision of classical concepts. Can J Neurol Sci. 1995;22:83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olson DM, Stutzman S, Saju C, Wilson M, Zhao W, Aiyagari V. Interrater reliability of pupillary assessments. Neurocrit Care. 2016;24:251–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Couret D, Boumaza D, Grisotto C, Triglia T, Pellegrini L, Ocquidant P, et al. Reliability of standard pupillometry practice in neurocritical care: an observational, double-blinded study. Crit Care. 2016;20:99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meeker M, Du R, Bacchetti P, Privitera CM, Larson MD, Holland MC, et al. Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer. J Neurosci Nurs. 2005;37:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Papangelou A, Zink EK, Chang WW, Frattalone A, Gergen D, Gottschalk A, et al. Automated pupillometry and detection of clinical transtentorial brain herniation: a case series. Mil Med. 2018;183:e113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cruz J, Minoja G, Okuchi K. Major clinical and physiological benefits of early high doses of mannitol for intraparenchymal temporal lobe hemorrhages with abnormal pupillary widening: a randomized trial. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:628–37 (discussion 637-628).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roberts I, Smith R, Evans S. Doubts over head injury studies. BMJ. 2007;334:392–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Diringer MN, Zazulia AR. Osmotic therapy: fact and fiction. Neurocrit Care. 2004;1:219–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alvarez B, Ferrer-Sueta G, Radi R. Slowing of peroxynitrite decomposition in the presence of mannitol and ethanol. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998;24:1331–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wise BL, Chater N. The value of hypertonic mannitol solution in decreasing brain mass and lowering cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. J Neurosurg. 1962;19:1038–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grande PO, Romner B. Osmotherapy in brain edema: a questionable therapy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2012;24:407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rudehill A, Gordon E, Ohman G, Lindqvist C, Andersson P. Pharmacokinetics and effects of mannitol on hemodynamics, blood and cerebrospinal fluid electrolytes, and osmolality during intracranial surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1993;5:4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bentsen G, Breivik H, Lundar T, Stubhaug A. Hypertonic saline (7.2%) in 6% hydroxyethyl starch reduces intracranial pressure and improves hemodynamics in a placebo-controlled study involving stable patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:2912–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Brophy GM, Human T, Shutter L. Emergency neurological life support: pharmacotherapy. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(Suppl 2):S48–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suarez JI, Qureshi AI, Bhardwaj A, Williams MA, Schnitzer MS, Mirski M, et al. Treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension with 23.4% saline. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1118–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ropper AH. Management of raised intracranial pressure and hyperosmolar therapy. Pract Neurol. 2014;14:152–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paczynski RP. Osmotherapy. Basic concepts and controversies. Crit Care Clin. 1997;13:105–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nau R. Osmotherapy for elevated intracranial pressure: a critical reappraisal. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000;38:23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chen JW, Gombart ZJ, Rogers S, Gardiner SK, Cecil S, Bullock RM. Pupillary reactivity as an early indicator of increased intracranial pressure: the introduction of the neurological pupil index. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kamel H, Navi BB, Nakagawa K, Hemphill JC 3rd, Ko NU. Hypertonic saline versus mannitol for the treatment of elevated intracranial pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:554–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brown DA, Wijdicks EF. Decompressive craniectomy in acute brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;140:299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shirozu K, Setoguchi H, Tokuda K, Karashima Y, Ikeda M, Kubo M, et al. The effects of anesthetic agents on pupillary function during general anesthesia using the automated infrared quantitative pupillometer. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017;31:291–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Larsen RS, Waters J. Neuromodulatory correlates of pupil dilation. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ropper AH, Shafran B. Brain edema after stroke. Clinical syndrome and intracranial pressure. Arch Neurol. 1984;41:26–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Diggle PJ, Heagerty P, Liang K-Y, Zeger SL. Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Ong
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • M. Hutch
    • 1
  • M. Barra
    • 2
    • 4
  • A. Kim
    • 3
    • 4
  • S. Zafar
    • 2
    • 4
  • S. Smirnakis
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Boston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  2. 2.Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  3. 3.Brigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  5. 5.Jamaica Plain VA HospitalBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations