Doppler Non-invasive Monitoring of ICP in an Animal Model of Acute Intracranial Hypertension
- 451 Downloads
In many neurological diseases, intracranial pressure (ICP) is elevated and needs to be actively managed. ICP is typically measured with an invasive transducer, which carries risks. Non-invasive techniques for monitoring ICP (nICP) have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare three different methods of transcranial Doppler (TCD) assessment of nICP in an animal model of acute intracranial hypertension.
In 28 rabbits, ICP was increased to 70–80 mmHg by infusion of Hartmann’s solution into the lumbar subarachnoid space. Doppler flow velocity in the basilar artery was recorded. nICP was assessed through three different methods: Gosling’s pulsatility index PI (gPI), Aaslid’s method (AaICP), and a method based on diastolic blood flow velocity (FVdICP).
We found a significant correlation between nICP and ICP when all infusion experiments were combined (FVdICP: r = 0.77, AaICP: r = 0.53, gPI: r = 0.54). The ability to distinguish between raised and ‘normal’ values of ICP was greatest for FVdICP (AUC 0.90 at ICP >40 mmHg). When infusion experiments were considered independently, FVdICP demonstrated again the strongest correlation between changes in ICP and changes in nICP (mean r = 0.85).
TCD-based methods of nICP monitoring are better at detecting changes of ICP occurring in time, rather than absolute prediction of ICP as a number. Of the studied methods of nICP, the method based on FVd is best to discriminate between raised and ‘normal’ ICP and to monitor relative changes of ICP.
KeywordsIntracranial pressure Transcranial Doppler Rabbit Pulsatility index
Authors thank Mr. Spencer Harland and Dr. Stefan Piechnik for sharing recorded digital data from experiments.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
Marek Czosnyka and Peter Smielewski are co-authors of the ICM+ software (www.neurosurg.cam.ac.uk/icmplus) and receive licensing fees (Cambridge Enterprise Ltd, UK). Chiara Robba, Joseph Donnelly, Mypinder Sekhon, Marcel Aries, Rita Bertuetti, Danilo Cardim declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have been performed in accordance of UK Animals Scientific Procedures Act of 1986.
- 1.Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD, Young HF, Marmarou A. Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:S59–66.Google Scholar
- 5.Brain Trauma Foundation. American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), AANS/CNS Joint Section on Neuro- trauma and Critical Care. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(Suppl 1):S37–44.Google Scholar
- 21.Czosnyka M, Kirkpatrick P, Guazzo E, et al. Can tcd pulsatility indices be used for a non invasive assessment of cerebral perfusion pressure in head injured patients? In: Naagai H, Kamiya K, Ishii S, editors. Intracranial Pressure IX. Tokyo: Springer; 1994. p. 149.Google Scholar