Neurocritical Care

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 163–173 | Cite as

The Ketamine Effect on ICP in Traumatic Brain Injury

  • F. A. ZeilerEmail author
  • J. Teitelbaum
  • M. West
  • L. M. Gillman
Review Article


Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of ketamine in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its effects on intracranial pressure (ICP). All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to November 2013), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. Two reviewers independently identified all manuscripts pertaining to the administration of ketamine in human TBI patients that recorded effects on ICP. Secondary outcomes of effect on cerebral perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, patient outcome, and adverse effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently extracted data including population characteristics and treatment characteristics. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology. Our search strategy produced a total 371 citations. Seven articles, six manuscripts and one meeting proceeding, were considered for the review with all utilizing ketamine, while documenting ICP in severe TBI patients. All studies were prospective studies. Five and two studies pertained to adults and pediatrics, respectively. Across all studies, of the 101 adult and 55 pediatric patients described, ICP did not increase in any of the studies during ketamine administration. Three studies reported a significant decrease in ICP with ketamine bolus. Cerebral perfusion pressure and mean blood pressure increased in two studies, leading to a decrease in vasopressors in one. No significant adverse events related to ketamine were recorded in any of the studies. Outcome data were poorly documented. There currently exists Oxford level 2b, GRADE C evidence to support that ketamine does not increase ICP in severe TBI patients that are sedated and ventilated, and in fact may lower it in selected cases.


Ketamine ICP Traumatic brain injury 

Supplementary material

12028_2013_9950_MOESM1_ESM.doc (29 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 29 kb)


  1. 1.
    Aroni F, Iacovidou N, Dontas I, Pourzitaki C, Xanthos T. Pharmacological aspects and potential new clinical applications of ketamine: reevaluation of an old drug. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49:957–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts DJ, Hall RI, Kramer AH, Roberston HL, Gallagher CN, Zygun DA. Sedation for critically ill adults with severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(12):2743–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sedev RS, Symmons DAD, Kindl K. Ketamine for rapid sequence induction in patients with head injury in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Himmelseher S, Durieux ME. Revising a dogma: ketamine for patients with neurological injury? Anesth Analg. 2005;101:524–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wyte SR, Shapiro HM, Turner P, Harris AB. Ketamine-induced intracranial hypertension. Anesthesiology. 1972;36(2):174–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shapiro HM, Wyte SR, Harris AB. Ketamine anesthesia in patients with intracranial pathology. Br J Anaesth. 1972;44:1200–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gardner AE, Olson BE, Lichtiger M. Cerebrospinal-fluid pressure during dissociative anesthesia with ketamine. Anesthesiology. 1971;35(2):226–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    List WF, Crumrine RS, Cascorbi HF, Weiss MH. Increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure after ketamine. Anesthesiology. 1972;36(1):93–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Visser E, Schug SA. The role of ketamine in pain management. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60:341–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bar-Joseph G, Guilburd Y, Guilburd J. Ketamine effectively prevents intracranial pressure elevations during endotracheal suctioning and other distressing interventions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(12):A402.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bar-Joseph G, Guilburd Y, Tamir A, Guilburd J. Effectiveness of ketamine in decreasing intracranial pressure in children with intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4:40–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boirgoin A, Albanese J, Leone M, Sampol-Manos E, Viviand X, Martin C. Effects of sufentanil or ketamine administered in target-controlled infusion on the cerebral hemodynamics of severely brain injured patients. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(5):1109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boirgoin A, Albanese J, Wereszczynski N, Charbit M, Vialet R, Martin C. Safety of sedation with ketamine in severe head injury patients: comparison with fentanyl. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(3):711–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Albanese J, Arnaud S, Rey M, Thomachot L, Alliez B, Martin C. Ketamine decreases intracranial pressure and electroencephalographic activity in traumatic brain injury patients during propofol sedation. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1328–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolenda H, Gremmelt A, Rading S, Braun U, Markakis E. Ketamine for analgosedative therapy in intensive care treatment of head-injured patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1996;138:1193–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmittner MD, Vajkoczy SL, Horn P, Bertsch T, Quintel M, Vajkoczy P, et al. Effect of fentanyl and S(+)-ketamine on cerebral hemodynamics, gastrointestinal motility, and need of vasopressors in patients with intracranial pathologies a pilot study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2007;19:257–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yurkewicz L, Weaver J, Bullock MR, Marshall MF. The effect of elective NMDA receptor antagonist traxoprodil in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22(12):1428–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morris GF, Bullock R, Marshall SB, Marmarou A, Maas A, Marshall LF, et al. Failure of the competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist Selfotel (CGS 19755) in treatment of severe head injury: results of two phase III trials. J Neurosurg. 1999;91:737–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stewart L, Bullock R, Teasdale GM, Wagstaff A. First observations of the safety and tolerability of a competitive antagonist to the glutamate NMDA receptor (CGS 19755) in patients with severe head injury. J Neurotrauma. 1999;16(9):843–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. Accessed 25 October 2013.
  21. 21.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Straus S, Haynes B, Dawes M. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence Version 2009. Accessed October 2013.
  23. 23.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336:924–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ. 2008;336(7651):995–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336(7653):1106–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Jaeschke R, Helfand M, Liberati A, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7654):1170–3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Vist GE, Liberati A, et al. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7652):1049–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P, Schünemann H, Levy MM, Kunz R, et al. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ. 2008;337:a744.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. A. Zeiler
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • J. Teitelbaum
    • 2
    • 3
  • M. West
    • 1
  • L. M. Gillman
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Section of Neurosurgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Section of Neurocritical Care, Montreal Neurological InstituteMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Section of Neurology, Montreal Neurological InstituteMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  4. 4.Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of MedicineUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  5. 5.Section of General Surgery, Department of SurgeryUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations