Neurocritical Care

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 69–76 | Cite as

Continuous Measurement of the Cumulative Amplitude and Duration of Hyperglycemia Best Predicts Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury

  • Qiang Yuan
  • Hua Liu
  • Yang Xu
  • Xing Wu
  • Yirui Sun
  • Jin Hu
Original Article



This study aimed to assess the accuracy and utility of high-resolution continuous glucose recording in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to establish whether a relationship exists between the cumulative amplitude and duration of hyperglycemia and outcome after TBI.


Glucose data for 56 TBI patients were collected continuously at 5-min intervals. The degree and duration of hyperglycemia above treatment thresholds were calculated as “glucose times time dose” (GTD; mg/dL d) using continuous recordings (GTD) for early stage (first 3 days). Long-term neurological functional outcome was assessed using the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the predictive values of GTD, percentage readings, mean, and range of glucose for in-hospital mortality and GOSE.


All measurements of GTD were statistically significantly higher in the group that died. GTD of glucose >150 and glucose >180 had a high-predictive power for in-hospital mortality (areas under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.917; 95 % CI, 0.837–0.998 and 0.876; 95 % CI, 0.784–0.967, respectively) and demonstrated significantly higher predictive power for mortality when compared with %reading >150 and %reading >180, respectively (p < 0.05). GTD of glucose >150 also had a significantly higher predictive power for mortality than mean glucose and range of glucose. GTD of glucose >150 and glucose >180 also had a high-predictive power for poor outcome (areas under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.913; 95 % CI, 0.843–0.983 and 0.858; 95 % CI, 0.760–0.956, respectively).


Continuous collection of glucose recordings is more reliable and accurate than routine discontinuous recordings. Assessing both the duration and the amplitude of the episodes using continuous collection of glucose data helps in better predicting outcomes than the total duration of episodes.


Hyperglycemia Traumatic brain injury Mortality Outcome Continuous glucose monitoring system 


  1. 1.
    Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, et al. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22:341–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ling GS, Marshall SA. Management of traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit. Neurol Clin. 2008;26:409–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brain Trauma Foundation. American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(suppl 1):S1–106.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Ghajar J, et al. Guidelines for the surgical management of traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(2):1–58.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartlett J, Kett-White R, Mendelow AD, et al. Guidelines for the initial management of head injuries. Recommendations from the Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Br J Neurosurg. 1998;12:349–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kreutziger J, Schlaepfer J, Wenzel V, et al. The role of admission blood glucose in outcome prediction of surviving patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 2009;67:704–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wahl WL, Taddonio M, Maggio PM, et al. Mean glucose values predict trauma patient mortality. J Trauma. 2008;65:42–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gale SC, Sicoutris C, Reilly PM, et al. Poor glycemic control is associated with increased mortality in critically ill trauma patients. Am Surg. 2007;73:454–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salim A, Hadjizacharia P, Dubose J, et al. Persistent hyperglycemia in severe traumatic brain injury: an independent predictor of outcome. Am Surg. 2009;75:25–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mastrototaro JJ. The MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2000;2(Suppl 1):S13–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goldberg PA, Siegel MD, Russell RR, et al. Experience with the continuous glucose monitoring system in a medical intensive care unit. Diabetes Teehnol Ther. 2004;6:339–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corstjens AM, Ligtenberg JJ, Van der Horst IC, et al. Accuracy and feasibility of point-of-care and continuous blood glucose analysis in criticality ill ICU patients. Crit Care. 2006;10:178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piper HG, Alexander JL, Shukh A, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring in pediatric patients during and after cardiac surgery. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1176–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Block C, Manuel-Y-Keenoy B, Van Gaal L, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the intensive care unit assessment by continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1750–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barton CW, Hemphill JC, Morabito D, Manley G. A novel method of evaluating the impact of secondary brain insults on functional outcomes in traumatic brain-injured patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow outcome scale and the extended Glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15:573–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Souba WW. Nutritional support. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:41–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1359–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van den Berghe G, Schoonheydt K, Becx P, et al. Insulin therapy protects the central and peripheral nervous system of intensive care patients. Neurology. 2005;64:1348–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S, et al. A prospective randomized multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensiv Care Med. 2001;35(10):1738–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:125–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators, Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Griesdale DE, Tremblay MH, McEwen J, et al. Glucose control and mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. 2009;11:311–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsushima K, Peng M, Velasco C, et al. Glucose variability negatively impacts long-term functional outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Crit Care. 2011;27(2):125–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allen HF, Rake A, Roy M, et al. Prospective detection of hyperglycemia in critically ill children using continuous glucose monitoring. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9(2):153–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vik A, Nag T, Fredriksli OA, et al. Relationship of “dose” of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:678–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kahraman S, Dutton RP, Hu P, et al. Automated measurement of “pressure times time dose” of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2010;69:110–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vespa P, Boonyaputthikul R, McArthur DL, et al. Intensive insulin therapy reduces microdialysis glucose values without altering glucose utilization or improving the lactate/pyruvate ratio after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:850–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oddo M, Schmidt JM, Carrera E, et al. Impact of tight glycemic control on cerebral glucose metabolism after severe brain injury: a microdialysis study. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:3233–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiang Yuan
    • 1
  • Hua Liu
    • 2
  • Yang Xu
    • 3
  • Xing Wu
    • 4
  • Yirui Sun
    • 4
  • Jin Hu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryThe Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Department of NeurosurgeryThe First People’s Hospital of Kunshan Affiliated to Jiangsu UniversitySuzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiologyThe Sixth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryHuashan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations