Neurocritical Care

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 3–9 | Cite as

Inferior Vena Cava Distensibility as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

  • Riccardo Moretti
  • Barbara Pizzi
Original Article



The objective of our study is to assess the reliability of the distensibility of the inferior vena cava (dIVC), as measured by ultrasound, as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.


We enrolled 29 adult patients requiring advanced hemodynamic monitoring, sedation, and mechanical ventilation. Inferior vena cava diameter was measured during a single mechanical breath. The dIVC was calculated as (the diameter of the inferior vena cava on inspiration—the diameter on expiration)/the diameter on expiration. All the hemodynamic parameters were collected at baseline and after a fluid challenge (7 ml/kg) with 6% hydroxyethyl starch. A 15% increase of cardiac index was the standard criterion used to differentiate patients with and without a response to fluid therapy.


Apart from stroke volume variation (SVV) and dIVC, which were significantly higher in fluid responders (17 patients), the other baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups (responders versus non-responders). Significant changes in hemodynamic parameters after volume load were observed only in fluid responders. The area under the ROC curve was 0.779 (95% confidence interval 0.587–0.911) for SVV and 0.902 (95% confidence interval 0.733–0.979, P = NS) for dIVC. Central venous pressure was a less reliable indicator of fluid responsiveness than dIVC. A dIVC value of >16% yielded the most favorable balance of test characteristics, with 70.59% sensitivity and 100% specificity. There was a trend toward a lower incidence of delayed ischemic lesions in fluid responders (11.7 vs. 25%, P = NS).


dIVC proved to be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in ICU patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.


Inferior vena cava ultrasonography Fluid responsiveness Preload indicators 


  1. 1.
    Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perel A. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1031–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magder S. Shock physiology. In: Pinsky MR, Dhainault JF, editors. Physiological foundation of critical care medicine. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 1992. p. 140–60.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guyton AC. Cardiac output and circulatory shock. In: Guyton AC, editor. Human physiology and mechanisms of disease. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1991. p. 187–200.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mutoh T, Kazumata K, Ajiki M, Ushikoshi S, Terasaka S. Goal directed fluid management by bedside transpulmonary hemodynamic monitoring after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2007;38:3218–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee VH, Connolly HM, Fulgham JR, Manno EM, Brown RD Jr, Wijdicks EFM. Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an underappreciated ventricular dysfunction. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:264–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lennihan L, Mayer SA, Fink ME, Beckford A, Paik MC, Zhang H, et al. Effect of hypervolemic therapy on cerebral blood flow after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2000;31:383–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mori K, Arai H, Nakajima K, Tajima A, Maeda M. Hemoreological and hemodynamic analysis of hypervolemic hemodilution therapy for cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1995;26:1620–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrigan MR. Cerebral salt wasting syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2001;17(1):125–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sen J, Belli A, Albon H, Morgan L, Petzold A, Kitchen N. Triple H therapy in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:614–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Feltracco P, Biancofiore G, Belgiomini B, Taddei S, et al. Continuous right ventricular end diastolic volume and right ventricular ejection fraction during liver transplantation: a multicenter study. Liver Transplant. 2008;14:327–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia G, Pompei L, Pietropaoli P. Preload and haemodynamic assessment during liver transplantation. A comparison between pulmonary artery catheter and transpulmonary indicator dilution technique. Eur J Anaesth. 2002;19:868–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coudray A, Romand JA, Treggiari M, Bendjelid K. Fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: a review of indexes used in intensive care. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:2757–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Esner S, Maloigne M, Klaghofer R, Genoni M. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anesth. 2005;94:749–55.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Della Rocca G, Costa MG. Preload index and fluid responsiveness: different aspects of the new concept of functional hemodynamic monitoring. Minerva Anesth. 2008;74:349–51.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marik P, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):2642–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheriex E, Leunissen K, Janssen J, Mooy J, van Hoff J. Echography of the inferior vena cava is a simple and reliable tool for estimation of “dry weight” in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1989;4:563–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ando Y, Yanagiba S, Asano Y. The inferior vena cava diameter as a marker of dry weight in chronic hemodialyzed patients. Artif Organs. 1995;19(12):1237–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kusaba T, Yamaguchi K, Oda H. Echography of the inferior vena cava for estimating fluid removal from patients undergoing hemodialysis. Jpn J Nephrol. 1994;36(8):914–20.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lyon M, Blavias M, Brannam L. Sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava as a marker of blood loss. Am J Emerg Med. 2005;23:45–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sefidbakht S, Assadsangabi R, Abbasi HR, Nabavizadeh A. Sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava as a predictor of shock in trauma patients. Emerg Radiol. 2007;14:181–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barbier C, Lubières Y, Schmit C, Hayon J, Ricôme JL, Jardin F, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1740–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(9):1834–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muench E, Horn P, Bauhuf C, Roth H, Philips M, Hermann P, et al. Effects of hypervolemia and hypertension on regional cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(8):1844–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kircher B, Himelman R, Shiller N. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the IVC. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66:493–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vignon F. Evaluation of fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients: back to venous return. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1699–701.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takata M, Wise RA, Robotham JL. Effect of abdominal pressure on venous return: abdominal vascular zone conditions. J Appl Physiol. 1990;69:1961–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nakao S, Come P, Mckay RG, Ransil BJ. Effect of positional changes on inferior vena caval size and dynamics and correlation with right-sided cardiac pressure. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:125–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vivier E, Metton O, Piriou V, Lhuillier F, Cotter-Emard JM, Branche P, et al. Effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure on central circulation. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:701–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia and Critical CareOspedale SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare ArrigoAlessandriaItaly

Personalised recommendations