Neurocritical Care

, 11:369

Favorable Outcome From A Locked-In State Despite Extensive Pontine Infarction By MRI

  • Edgar Andres Samaniego
  • Maarten G. Lansberg
  • Michael DeGeorgia
  • Chitra Venkatasubramanian
  • Christine A. C. Wijman
Practical Pearl

Abstract

Introduction

Outcome prediction of patients who are in a locked-in state is challenging. Extensive pontine infarction on diffusion weighted imaging MRI (DWI) has been proposed as a poor prognosticator. We report on three patients with a locked-in state with unexpected favorable recoveries despite DWI evidence of widespread pontine ischemia.

Methods

Report of three cases.

Results

Three young patients (32-, 30-, and 16-years-old) presented with a locked-in state caused by pontine infarction. The first patient did not receive any acute stroke therapies, the second patient underwent endovascular therapy 20 h after symptom onset resulting in partial recanalization of the basilar artery, and the third patient progressed to a locked-in state despite having received intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. The DWI of all three patients demonstrated acute and widespread pontine infarction involving more than two-thirds of the pons. Two patients regained full independence in their activities of daily living. The third patient remained wheelchair bound, but lives with her family, eats independently, uses a typewriter and wrote a book.

Conclusion

Patients who are in a locked-in state may have substantial functional recovery despite DWI evidence of extensive pontine infarction.

Keywords

Cerebrovascular disease Stroke Infarction DWI Locked-in 

References

  1. 1.
    Smith E, Delargy M. Locked-in syndrome. BMJ. 2005;330(7488):406–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    du Mesnil de Rochemont R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in basilar artery occlusion. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(3):398–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho TH, et al. Brain stem diffusion-weighted imaging lesion score: a potential marker of outcome in acute basilar artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30(1):194–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Plum F, Posner JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Contemp Neurol Ser. 1972;10:1–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haig AJ, Katz RT, Sahgal V. Mortality and complications of the locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(1):24–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wijdicks EF, Miller GM. Transient locked-in syndrome after uncal herniation. Neurology. 1999;52(6):1296–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cabezudo JM, et al. Recovery from locked-in syndrome after posttraumatic bilateral distal vertebral artery occlusion. Surg Neurol. 1986;25(2):185–90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Virgile RS. Locked-in syndrome. Case and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1984;86(4):275–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCusker EA, et al. Recovery from the ‘locked-in’ syndrome. Arch Neurol. 1982;39(3):145–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patterson JR, Grabois M. Locked-in syndrome: a review of 139 cases. Stroke. 1986;17(4):758–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kidwell CS, et al. Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2000;47(4):462–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edgar Andres Samaniego
    • 1
  • Maarten G. Lansberg
    • 1
  • Michael DeGeorgia
    • 1
  • Chitra Venkatasubramanian
    • 1
  • Christine A. C. Wijman
    • 1
  1. 1.Stanford Stroke CenterPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations