Aggressive Red Blood Cell Transfusion: No Association with Improved Outcomes for Victims of Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury
Clinical studies have caused blood transfusion practices in critically ill patients to become more conservative in the last decade. However, few studies have focused on trauma patients, particularly those with severe isolated traumatic brain injury.
We conducted a retrospective study to test the hypothesis that patients with severe brain injury would not benefit from aggressive red blood cell transfusion (RBCT). End points of the study were in-hospital mortality and morbidity (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, decubitus ulcer, bacteremia, septic shock, myocardial infarction, and seizure). Included in our retrospective study were patients at two urban, level I trauma centers who were admitted with a diagnosis of isolated head injury and with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less. We recorded demographic, interventional, and outcome variables.
In 289 patients, 24 of 25 (96%) were transfused if their lowest recorded intensive care unit (ICU) hemoglobin level was 8.0 g/dl or less. In contrast, only 9/182 (5%) of these 289 patients were transfused if the hemoglobin levels were 10.0 g/dl or greater. In the remaining 82 patients with lowest ICU hemoglobin levels of 8.0–10.0 g/dl, 52% were transfused. These 82 patients (43 underwent RBCT and 39 did not) were included in our analysis.
The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 32%; rates were similar between the two groups (29%, non-RBCT; 35%, RBCT) (P = 0.64). Likewise, in-hospital morbidity was similar between groups. Logistic and proportional hazard regression analyses identified RBCT as one predictor of mortality.
Our results suggest that a restrictive transfusion practice is safe for severely head-injured patients.
KeywordsAnemia Resuscitation Trauma Head injury Transfusion
- 1.American College of Physicians. Practice strategies for elective red blood cell transfusion. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:403–6.Google Scholar
- 3.Brain Trauma Foundation. Guidelines for the prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. Guidelines for the management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Guidelines for the surgical management of traumatic brain injury. Available at: www.braintrauma.org.
- 4.Winn HR. Youmans neurological surgery: fifth edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 2004.Google Scholar
- 5.Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. J Neurotrauma 1996;13:641–734.Google Scholar
- 6.Brain Trauma Foundation, Inc., American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Part 1: guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. New York, NY: Brain Trauma Foundation, Inc.; 2000. p. 165.Google Scholar
- 8.Fischer J, Mathieson C. The history of the Glasgow Coma Scale: implications for practice. Crit Care Nurs 2001;23:52–8.Google Scholar
- 10.Baker SP, O’Neill B. The injury severity score: an update. J Trauma 1976;6:882–5.Google Scholar
- 12.Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography. J Neurotrauma 1992;1:S287–92.Google Scholar