Neurocritical Care

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 18–26 | Cite as

Predictors of 1-year outcome after coiling for poor-grade subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage

  • Ana R. Pereira
  • Paola Sanchez-Peña
  • Alessandra Biondi
  • Nader Sourour
  • Anne L. Boch
  • Chantal Colonne
  • Lise Lejean
  • Lamine Abdennour
  • Louis Puybasset
Original Paper



To describe features in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to identify predictors of 12-month outcome.


We conducted a controlled observational study of 51 consecutive patients treated with endovascular coiling within 96 h of rupture for poor-grade aneurysmal SAH (20 men and 31 women, age 54 ± 12 years). We recorded co-morbidities; initial severity; aneurysm location; occurrence of acute hydrocephalus, initial seizures, and/or neurogenic lung edema; troponin values, Fisher grade; computed tomography (CT) findings; treatment intensity; and occurrence of vasospasm. The brain injury marker S100B was assayed daily over the first 8 days. Glasgow Outcome Scores (GOS) were recorded at ICU discharge, at 6 and 12 months. The main outcome criterion was the 1-year GOS score, which we used to classify patients as having a poor outcome (GOS 1–3) or a good outcome (GOS 4–5).


Overall, clinical status after 1 year was very good (GOS 5) in 41% of patients and good (GOS 4) in 16%. Neither baseline characteristics nor interventions differed significantly between patients with good outcome (GOS 4–5) and those with poor outcome (GOS 1–3). Persistent intracranial pressure elevation and higher mean 8-day S100B value significantly and independently predicted the 1-year GOS outcome (= 0.008 and = 0.001, respectively).


Patients in poor clinical condition after SAH have more than a 50:50 chance of a favorable outcome after 1 year. High mean 8-day S100B value and persistent intracranial hypertension predict a poor outcome (GOS 1–3) after 1 year.


Intracranial aneurysms Subarachnoid hemorrhage Poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage Coiling Outcome 



Funding: This study was funded from departmental sources (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris).


  1. 1.
    Epidemiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Australia and New Zealand: incidence and case fatality from the Australasian Cooperative Research on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study (ACROSS). Stroke 2000;31(8):1843–50.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hop JW, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J. Case-fatality rates and functional outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Stroke 1997;28(3):660–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1968;28(1):14–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drake C. Report of world federation of neurological surgeons comittee on a universal subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scale. J Neurosurg 1988;68:985–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rosen DS, Macdonald RL. Grading of subarachnoid hemorrhage: modification of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale on the basis of data for a large series of patients. Neurosurgery 2004;54(3):566–75; discussion 75–6.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360(9342):1267–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer M, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005(4):CD003085.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993;270(24):2957–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM. Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 1980;6(1):1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Korinek AM, Reina M, Boch AL, Rivera AO, De Bels D, Puybasset L. Prevention of external ventricular drain-related ventriculitis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147(1):39–45; discussion 6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okada Y, Shima T, Nishida M, et al. Comparison of transcranial Doppler investigation of aneurysmal vasospasm with digital subtraction angiographic and clinical findings. Neurosurgery 1999;45(3):443–9; discussion 9–50.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biondi A, Ricciardi GK, Puybasset L, et al. Intra-arterial nimodipine for the treatment of symptomatic cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(6):1067–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arakawa Y, Kikuta K, Hojo M, Goto Y, Ishii A, Yamagata S. Milrinone for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage: report of seven cases. Neurosurgery 2001;48(4):723–8; discussion 8–30.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weiss N, Sanchez-Pena P, Roche S, et al. Prognosis value of plasma S100B protein levels after subarachnoid aneurysmal hemorrhage. Anesthesiology 2006;104(4):658–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sznajder M, Leleu G, Buonamico G, et al. Estimation of direct cost and resource allocation in intensive care: correlation with Omega system. Intensive Care Med 1998;24(6):582–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975;1(7905):480–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lannoo E, Van Rietvelde F, Colardyn F, et al. Early predictors of mortality and morbidity after severe closed head injury. J Neurotrauma 2000;17(5):403–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marmarou A, Saad A, Aygok G, Rigsbee M. Contribution of raised ICP and hypotension to CPP reduction in severe brain injury: correlation to outcome. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005;95:277–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Heuer GG, Smith MJ, Elliott JP, Winn HR, LeRoux PD. Relationship between intracranial pressure and other clinical variables in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 2004;101(3):408–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mack WJ, King RG, Ducruet AF, et al. Intracranial pressure following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: monitoring practices and outcome data. Neurosurg Focus 2003;14(4):e3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarrafzadeh AS, Thomale UW, Haux D, Unterberg AW. Cerebral metabolism and intracranial hypertension in poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2005;95:89–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eide PK, Sorteberg W. Intracranial pressure levels and single wave amplitudes, Glasgow Coma Score and Glasgow Outcome Score after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:1267–76.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sen J, Belli A, Petzold A, et al. Extracellular fluid S100B in the injured brain: a future surrogate marker of acute brain injury? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147(8):897–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Outcome of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000;31(10):2369–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Murayama Y, Malisch T, Guglielmi G, et al. Incidence of cerebral vasospasm after endovascular treatment of acutely ruptured aneurysms: report on 69 cases. J Neurosurg 1997;87(6):830–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vanninen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils-a prospective randomized study. Radiology 1999;211(2):325–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kremer C, Groden C, Hansen HC, Grzyska U, Zeumer H. Outcome after endovascular treatment of Hunt and Hess grade IV or V aneurysms: comparison of anterior versus posterior circulation. Stroke 1999;30(12):2617–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miyaoka M, Sato K, Ishii S. A clinical study of the relationship of timing to outcome of surgery for ruptured cerebral aneurysms. A retrospective analysis of 1622 cases. J Neurosurg 1993;79(3):373–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bailes JE, Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Baldwin HZ. Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients. J Neurosurg 1990;72(4):559–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilby MJ, Sharp M, Whitfield PC, Hutchinson PJ, Menon DK, Kirkpatrick PJ. Cost-effective outcome for treating poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 2003;34(10):2508–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Langfitt TW, Kassell NF, Weinstein JD. Cerebral blood flow with intracranial hypertension. Neurology 1965;15:761–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee KC, Huh SK, Park HS, Shin YS, Lee KS. Management of poor-grade patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysm. Keio J Med 1997;46(2):69–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Harrod CG, Bendok BR, Batjer HH. Prediction of cerebral vasospasm in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a review. Neurosurgery 2005;56(4):633–54; discussion 54.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Groden C, Kremer C, Regelsberger J, Hansen HC, Zeumer H. Comparison of operative and endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms in patients in poor grades. Neuroradiology 2001;43(9):778–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Johansson M, Norback O, Gal G, et al. Clinical outcome after endovascular coil embolization in elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroradiology 2004;46(5):385–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jain R, Deveikis J, Thompson BG. Endovascular management of poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the geriatric population. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25(4):596–600.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana R. Pereira
    • 1
  • Paola Sanchez-Peña
    • 1
  • Alessandra Biondi
    • 2
  • Nader Sourour
    • 2
  • Anne L. Boch
    • 3
  • Chantal Colonne
    • 1
  • Lise Lejean
    • 1
  • Lamine Abdennour
    • 1
  • Louis Puybasset
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Pitié-Salpêtrière Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisPierre and Marie Curie-Paris 6 UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisPierre and Marie Curie-Paris 6 UniversityParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Neurosurgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisPierre and Marie Curie-Paris 6 UniversityParisFrance
  4. 4.Département d’Anesthésie-RéanimationHôpital de la Pitié-SalpêtrièreParisFrance

Personalised recommendations