Advertisement

ERA Forum

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 113–127 | Cite as

Judicial independence in the Member States of the Council of Europe and the EU: evaluation and action

  • Lorena Bachmaier WinterEmail author
Article
  • 168 Downloads

Abstract

This article analyses some of the challenges in implementing and strengthening the principle of judicial independence at European level. It first highlights the difficulties in assessing the level of compliance with the principle of judicial independence and shows the approaches taken by the Council of Europe and the European Union. Next, it discusses some of the most recent decisions of the CJEU regarding Article 47 of the Charter and argues how infringements of the rule of law can undermine the whole principle of mutual recognition. Finally, it will be advocated that the actions taken in strengthening judicial independence need the joining of efforts of the European Union and the Council of Europe.

Keywords

Judicial independence Rule of law European Court of Justice Council of Europe Mutual recognition 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Bovend’Eerdt, K.: The joined cases Aranyosi and Căldăraru: a new limit to the mutual trust presumption in the area of freedom, security, and justice? Utrecht J. Int. Eur. Law 32(83), 112–121 (2016) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kostoris, R.: Handbook of European Criminal Procedure. Springer, Cham (2018) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McBride, J.: Human Rights and Criminal Procedure. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg (2009) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mirandola, S.: European arrest warrant and judicial independence in Poland: where can mutual trust end? (Opinion of the AG in C-216/18 PPU L.M.). European Law Blog 24.7.2018, available at: https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/07/24/european-arrest-warrant-and-judicial-independence-in-poland-where-can-mutual-trust-end-opinion-of-the-ag-in-c-216-18-ppu-l-m/
  5. 5.
    Muñoz Morales, M.: ‘Dime cómo son tus cárceles y ya veré yo si coopero’. Los casos Caldararu y Aranyosi como nueva forma de entender el principio de reconocimiento mutuo’, InDret 1/2017, pp. 1–26 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ollé Sesé, M., Gimbernat Díaz, E.: ‘Orden europea de detención y entrega y tratos inhumanos o degradantes. STJE de 5 de abril de 2016, asuntos C-404/15 y C-659/15PPU: Aranyosi y Caldararu’, La Ley Unión Europea (40) 1–19 (2016) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Europäische Rechtsakademie (ERA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Madrid Complutense UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations