Advertisement

ERA Forum

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 385–398 | Cite as

The new European Border and Coast Guard: yet another “half way” EU reform?

  • Francesca FerraroEmail author
  • Emilio De Capitani
Article

Abstract

The adoption of EU Regulation 2016/1624 is an endeavour to widen the scope of existing measures shaping a fully-fledged EU integrated border policy. This article discusses key innovations and ambiguities in the text in the light of the debate regarding the still lacking supranational model. EU security has become the driving factor of border management system. The article argues that the respect for the principle of institutional balance is threatened by this Regulation as well as the principles of the rule of law and democratic control, notably at national level.

Keywords

EU Integrated Border Management European Border and Coast Guard Rule of law Democratic deficit Solidarity principle EU agencies FRONTEX, Schengen EU Regulation 2016/1624 

References

  1. 1.
    Carrera, S., Den Hertog, L.: A European Border and Coast Guard: what’s in a name? CEPS, no. 88/2016. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/LSE%20No%2088%20SC%20and%20LdH%20EBCG.pdf
  2. 2.
    De Bruycker, P.: The European Border and Coast Guard: a new model built on an old logic. European Papers, no. 2/2016. Available at: http://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/european-border-and-coast-guard-new-model-built-old-logic
  3. 3.
    Ferraro, F., Carmona, J.: Fundamental rights in the European Union. The role of the Charter after the Lisbon Treaty. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels, March 2015 (Original manuscript in English). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/554168/EPRS_IDA(2015)554168_EN.pdf
  4. 4.
    Ferraro, F.: Lo spazio giuridico europeo tra sovranità e diritti fondamentali. Democrazia, valori e rule of law nell’Unione al tempo della crisi (European legal space between sovereignty and fundamental rights: democracy, values and the rule of law in the Union in the times of crisis). Editoriale Scientifica, Napoli (2014) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferraro, F.: Schengen governance after the Lisbon Treaty. European Parliamentary Research Service, Brussels (2013). Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/eplibrary/Schengen-governance-after-the-Lisbon-Treaty.pdf
  6. 6.
    Hofmann, H.C.H., Morini, A.: Constitutional aspects of the pluralisation of the EU executive through “agencification”. European Law Review 37(4), 419–443 (2012) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rijpma, J.: The proposal for a European Border and Coast Guard: evolution or revolution in external border management? Directorate-General for Internal Policies, European Parliament, March 2016. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2016/556934/IPOL_STU(2016)556934_EN.pdf

Copyright information

© ERA 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Naples “L’Orientale”NapoliItaly
  2. 2.Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations