ERA Forum

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 9–20

Dawn raids of the European Commission: limits to document seizure

Article

Abstract

Regulation 1/2003 confers wide powers of inspection on the European Commission in order to unveil suspected competition infringements. Broad as they are, such powers are not unlimited. The EU Courts have consistently held that the undertakings’ rights of defence shall also be protected and, therefore, a balance must be struck between inspection powers and fundamental rights in this field.

As regards, in particular, the power to examine and seize documents, the case-law sets two specific limits. The Commission cannot gather documents that are either (i) protected by the legal professional privilege; or (ii) unrelated to the subject-matter of the investigation. This article argues that, while the boundaries of legal professional privilege (LPP) at EU level are now clear, this is not the case of documents unrelated to the subject-matter of the investigation, particularly when such documents are electronically stored. Indeed, the Commission believes that it is entitled to take copy-images of hard disks and examine such copy at its premises in the presence of the undertakings’ representatives.

Two recent cases have dealt with this issue, but the General Court has avoided giving a comprehensive response by embracing the Commission’s inadmissibility claims. The question seems likely, therefore, to be raised again in future appeals.

Keywords

Inspections Document seizure Fundamental rights 

References

  1. 1.
    Ainsworth, L.: Competition regime: EU Dawn raids, PLC Competition, Practice Note available at http://www.practicallaw.com (accessed 21 March 2013)
  2. 2.
    Gauer, C., Christ, F.: Procedural infringements in European competition law. In: Concurrences 4 (2012) (in French) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murphy, G.: CFI signals possible extension of professional privilege to in-house lawyer. Eur. Compet. Law Rev. 25(7), 447–454 (2004) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ortiz Blanco, L. (ed.): EC Competition Procedure, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, London (2006) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pike, R.: The English law of legal professional privilege: a guide for American attorneys. Loyola University Chic. Int. Law Rev. 4(1), 51–89 (2006) available at http://www.luc.edu/law/activities/publications/ilrdocs/vol4_no1/vol4_no1/pike_english_law.pdf (accessed 21 March 2013) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    PLC: Competition regime: EU Legal Privilege, PLC Competition, Practice Note, available at http://www.practicallaw.com (accessed 21 March 2013)

Copyright information

© ERA 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rating Legis, S.L.P.BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.J&A Garrigues, S.L.P.BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Faculdad de Derecho Departamento de Derecho y Economía InternacionalesUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations