Advertisement

“Selfie”-related electrocution

  • Drazen Cuculic
  • Ivan SosaEmail author
Images in Forensics

Abstract

Electrical injuries contribute a small but significant fraction to all burn trauma cases, and an even smaller proportion to those that are lethal. Accidental death rates among teenagers are the highest of all age-groups, and taking a “selfie” has been a practice that has, on rare occasions, led to such a death, often from electrocution. The case of a young man and his friend, who were electrocuted after climbing onto the roof of a parked railway wagon to take selfies is reported. One died at the scene, while the other survived. This case demonstrates that electrocution may occur with parked railway wagons, and in the young may be associated with selfie taking.

Keywords

Electrocution Rail Selfie taking Selfies Youth Accidental death 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Robert Arbanas for providing technical details on the accident.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Ethical approval

Case handling was according to national and international ethical standards.

Informed consent

Non-applicable.

References

  1. 1.
    Byard RW, Hanson KA, Gilbert JD, James RA, Nadeau J, Blackbourne B, et al. Death due to electrocution in childhood and early adolescence. J Paediatr Child Health. 2003;39:46–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sleet DA, Ballesteros MF, Borse NN. A review of unintentional injuries in adolescents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jain MJ, Mavani KJ. A comprehensive study of worldwide selfie-related accidental mortality: a growing problem of the modern society. Int J Inj Control Saf Promot. 2017;24:544–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bansal A, Garg C, Pakhare A, Gupta S. Selfies: a boon or bane? J Fam Med Prim Care. 2018;7:828–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flaherty GT, Choi J. The ‘selfie’ phenomenon: reducing the risk of harm while using smartphones during international travel. J Travel Med. 2016;23:tav026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhogesha S, John JR, Tripathy S. Death in a flash: selfie and the lack of self-awareness. J Travel Med. 2016;23.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leary MR, Baumeister RF. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. In: Zukauskiene R, editor. Interpersonal Development. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 57–89.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wick R, Byard RW. Electrocution and the autopsy. In: Tsokos M, editor. Forensic pathology reviews, vol. 5. New York: Humana Press; 2009. p. 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor AJ, McGwin G Jr, Valent F, Rue LW 3rd. Fatal occupational electrocutions in the United States. Inj Prev. 2002;8:306–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim E, Lee JA, Sung Y, Choi SM. Predicting selfie-posting behavior on social networking sites: an extension of theory of planned behavior. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;62:116–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wick R, Gilbert JD, Simpson E, Byard RW. Fatal electrocution in adults – a 30-year study. Med Sci Law. 2006;46:166–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forensic Medicine and criminalisticsUniversity of Rijeka Faculty of MedicineRijekaCroatia

Personalised recommendations