Sex determination with morphological characteristics of the skull by using 3D modeling techniques in computerized tomography
Sex determination is a major area of investigation in forensic anthropology. As technology has advanced, imaging methods such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are being investigated as alternatives to conventional forensic anthropological research techniques. This study aimed to investigate the suitability of three-dimensional (3D) modeling of volumetric cranial computed tomography (CCT) images for sex estimation from skull morphology. In this study, CCT angiography images from the Department of Radiology 2017 archives were used retrospectively, and 3D images were obtained after the reconstruction of 85 cases of CCT images. The sex-dependent morphological characteristics of the skull were evaluated by three blinded observers and scored on a scale of 1–5 points according to the “Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains”. The accurate sex estimation rates of the first, second and third observers were 91.8, 92.9 and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of accurate sex estimation for males was 98–100%, while this rate varied between 83.3–86.1% for females. Consistency in sex estimation between the three observers was 83.5%, with a Kappa value of 0.763 (z = 12.2; p = 0.0001*). The glabella was the most effective morphological trait used to estimate sex. The results of this study show that sex can be estimated from morphological features in volume-rendered CCT 3D images. Thus, sex can be estimated by digital images without the need for maceration processes, and the transfer of digital data in place of physical material will make it possible to gain expert opinions in forensic anthropology.
KeywordsForensic medicine Anthropology Buikstra 3D modeling
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was initiated following the granting of approval by the Non-interventional Clinical Trials Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.WEA: workshop of Europian anthropology. J Human Evol. 1980;517–49.Google Scholar
- 2.Byers SN. Introduction to forensic anthropology: a textbook. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2002.Google Scholar
- 4.Saukko P, Knight B. Knight’s forensic pathology. 4th ed. London: CRC Press; 2016. p. 95–132.Google Scholar
- 5.Krogman WM, Iscan YM. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd ed. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1986.Google Scholar
- 6.Krogman WM. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas; 1962.Google Scholar
- 7.Stewart TD. Essentials of forensic anthropology. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield; 1979.Google Scholar
- 11.Acsádi G, Nemeskéri J. History of human life span and mortality. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado; 1970. p. 346.Google Scholar
- 12.Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Proceedings of a seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, organized by Jonathan Haas. Fayetteville, AK: Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No:44; 1994.Google Scholar
- 26.Thali MJ, Braun M, Buck U, Aghayev E, Jackowski C, Vock P, et al. VIRTOPSY—scientific documentation, reconstruction and animation in forensic: individual and real 3D data based geo-metric approach including optical body/object surface and radiological CT/MRI scanning. J Forensic Sci. 2005;50:428–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Lewis ME. The bioarchaeology of children: perspectives from biological and forensic anthropology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 32.Irurita Olivares J, Alemán Aguilera I. Validation of the sex estimation method elaborated by Schutkowski in the Granada osteological collection of identified infant and young children: analysis of the controversy between the different ways of analyzing and interpreting the results. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130:1623–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Gamer MLJ, Fellows I, Singh P. IRR: various coefficients of interrater reliability and agreement. 2013. https://cran.r-project.org/package=irr.
- 36.Couse T, Connor MA. Comparison of maceration techniques for use in forensic skeletal preparations. J Forensic Invest. 2015;3:6.Google Scholar
- 47.Franklin D, Milne N, Freedman L. A geometric morphometric study of cranial sexual dimorphism in selected indigenous populations of South Africa. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2004;123(Suppl. 38):96.Google Scholar