Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 503–508 | Cite as

The assessment of airbag deployment and seatbelt use in preventing facial injuries

  • Miroljub Todorovic
  • Batric VukcevicEmail author
  • Milenko Cabarkapa
  • Nemanja Vukcevic
  • Tanja Boljevic
  • Nemanja Radojevic
Original Article


This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of airbags and seatbelts in the prevention of facial fractures and slight facial injuries in relation to the speed and kinetic energy experienced in frontal collisions. All cases of vehicle occupants who had been in frontal collisions and had subsequently been examined in the Institute for Emergency Medical Assistance and the Clinical Center of Montenegro in 2017 were analyzed. There were 29 cases of facial fractures (Group 1), 35 cases of slight facial injuries (including nondisplaced nasal fractures) (Group 2), and 26 cases of occupants who had suffered no facial injuries (control Group 3). In all assessed cases all of the subjects had been wearing a seatbelt and the airbag had deployed at the time of impact. A frontal collision is defined as a collision in which the principal force acts within a range of 90° from the longitudinal axis of the vehicle. Using the mass and the speed of the vehicles, the total kinetic energy (KE) of all frontal collisions being analyzed was calculated. The cut-off value of total KE in frontal collisions that were associated with either facial fractures or slight facial injury was estimated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The cut-off amounts of KE were then used to calculate the barrier equivalent velocity (BEV). The BEV for a vehicle of average mass was estimated to be 55.7 km/h (34.6 mph) in Group 1, and 49.2 km/h (30.6 mph) in Group 2. Airbags and seatbelts are effective in preventing facial injuries in vehicles of average mass that are traveling at speeds under 49.2 km/h (30.6 mph) at the point of impact, but they do not protect from facial fractures when the vehicle speed exceeds 55.7 km/h (34.6 mph).


Airbag Facial fracture Kinetic energy Seatbelt 



This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. For this type of study formal consent is not required.


  1. 1.
    Fischer K, Zhang F, Angel MF, Lineaweaver WC. Injuries associated with mandible fractures sustained in motor vehicle collisions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:328–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Worrall SF. Mechanisms, pattern and treatment costs of maxillofacial injuries. Injury. 1991;22:25–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iida S, Kogo M, Sugiura T, Mima T, Matsuya T. Retrospective analysis of 1502 patients with facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;30:286–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hitosugi M, Mizuno K, Nagai T, Tokudome S. Analysis of maxillofacial injuries of vehicle passengers involved in frontal collisions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:1146–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pappachan B, Alexander M. Biomechanics of cranio-maxillofacial trauma. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012;11:224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bédard M, Guyatt GH, Stones MJ, Hirdes JP. The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities. Accid Anal Prev. 2002;34:717–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clarke DD, Ward P, Bartle C, Truman W. Killer crashes: fatal road traffic accidents in the UK. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42:764–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Decade of Action for Road Safety: 2011-2020.2011. Accessed 12 Jun 2018.
  9. 9.
    Čabarkapa M. A problem of the safety of vulnerable road users in Montenegro. Int J Inj Control Saf Promot. 2018;5:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Čabarkapa M, Avramović ZŽ. Focus areas and measures to improve road traffic safety at the local level. Management. 2017;7:75–83.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lau IV, Horsch JD, Viano DC, Andrzejak DV. Mechanism of injury from air bag deployment loads. Accid Anal Prev. 1993;25:29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cunningham K, Brown TD, Gradwell E, Nee PA. Airbag associated fatal head injury - case report and review of the literature on airbag injuries. J Accid Emerg Med. 2008;17:139–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crandall CS, Olson LM, Sklar DP. Mortality reduction with air bag and seat belt use in head - on passenger car collisions. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153:219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Batstone MD, Monsour FNT, Pattel P, Lynham A. The patterns of facial injury suffered by patients in road traffic accidents: a case controlled study. Int J Surg. 2007;5:250–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mouzakes J, Koltai PJ, Kuhar S, Bernstein DS, Wing P, Salsberg E. The impact of airbags and seat belts on the incidence and severity of maxillofacial injuries in automobile accidents in New York State. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:1189–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sato Y, Ohshima T, Kondo T. Air bag injuries—a literature review in consideration of demands in forensic autopsies. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;128:162–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zador PL, Ciccone MA. Automobile driver fatalities in frontal impacts: air bags compared with manual belts. Am J Public Health. 1993;83:661–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Čabarkapa M, Brčić D, Vešović V. Development of strategic goals of road safety management: a case study of Montenegro. Promet-traffic and. Transportation. 2016;28:651–60.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Čabarkapa M, Avramović ZŽ, Vešović V. The control of road infrastructure safety management procedures. IJTTE. 2018;7:7–14.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cummings P. Association of seat belt use with death: a comparison of estimates based on data from police and estimates based on data from trained crash investigators. Inj Prev. 2002;8:338–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Begg DJ, Langley JD. Seat-belt use and related behaviors among young adults. J Saf Res. 2000;31:211–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 12353–1:2002. Road vehicles — Traffic accident analysis. 2002. Accessed 12 Jun 2018.
  23. 23.
    Fryar CD, Gu Q, Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2011-2014. Vital Health Stat 3. 2016;39:1–46.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arajarvi E. A retrospective analysis of chest injuries in 280 seat belt wearers. Accid Anal Prev. 1998;20:251–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Griškevičius P, Žiliukas A. The crash energy absorption of the vehicles front structures. Transport. 2003;18:97–101.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simoni P, Ostendorf R, Cox AJ 3rd. Effect of air bags and restraining devices on the pattern of facial fractures in motor vehicle crashes. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5:113–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yokoyama T, Motozawa Y, Sasaki T, Hitosugi M. A retrospective analysis of oral and maxillofacial injuries in motor vehicle accidents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1731–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hitosugi M, Takaso M, Matsumoto A, Koseki T, Furukawa S, Mizuno K. Analysis of injuries requiring ophthalmological check-ups because of frontal vehicle collisions. Rom J Leg Med. 2016;24:261–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Major MS, MacGregor A, Bumpous JM. Patterns of maxillofacial injuries as a function of automobile restraint use. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:608–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shkrum MJ, Green RN, McClafferty KJ, Nowak ES. Skull fractures in fatalities due to motor vehicle collisions. J Forensic Sci. 1994;39:107–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miroljub Todorovic
    • 1
    • 2
  • Batric Vukcevic
    • 2
    Email author
  • Milenko Cabarkapa
    • 3
  • Nemanja Vukcevic
    • 2
  • Tanja Boljevic
    • 2
    • 4
  • Nemanja Radojevic
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.General Hospital “Danilo I”CetinjeMontenegro
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of MontenegroPodgoricaMontenegro
  3. 3.Institute of Faculty of Traffic, Communications and Logistics, BudvaAdriatic UniversityBarMontenegro
  4. 4.Clinical Center of MontenegroPodgoricaMontenegro

Personalised recommendations