Advertisement

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 272–277 | Cite as

Chronology of mineralization of the permanent mandibular second molar teeth and forensic age estimation

  • Pedro Fins
  • Maria Lurdes Pereira
  • Américo Afonso
  • Daniel Pérez-Mongiovi
  • Inês Morais CaldasEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Forensic age estimation frequently relies upon the chronology of mineralization of the third molar teeth. However, even when present, third molar teeth cannot always be used for estimating age in people who are classified as minors. Seconds molars develop earlier and in a more predictable way, and therefore are often more reliable for age estimation in this age group. This study aims to contribute to forensic age estimation using an age threshold of 14-years, studying the stages of development of permanent mandibular second molar teeth mineralization. 367 orthopantograms of a Portuguese population group, aged between 3 and 19 years, were studied. The stages of mineralization of mandibular permanent second molar teeth were studied following the classification stages proposed by Demirjian et al. Stage descriptive analysis was performed, and associations between age and stage were studied. A logistic regression to determine age over 14 years, using maturation stages and sex as a predictive variables, was made. A second sample was used for testing the model. The significance level was set at 5%. The model correctly classified 92.0% of cases overall. The equation was tested in the second sample, and the results showed that there were no statistical significant differences between the binary real age (i.e. age < 14 and age ≥ 14 years) and the estimated age (p = 0.109). The developed model is useful for age estimation using 14-years as a threshold. However, stage maturation analyses showed that stage F, in males, and stages G and H, in both sexes, lead to an estimated age with significant statistical differences from chronological age.

Keywords

Forensic age estimation Dental age estimation Tooth mineralization Second molar teeth Demirjian method 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

No funding to report.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No informed consent was obtained since this was a retrospective study based on anonymized clinical records.

References

  1. 1.
    Chariot P, Caussinus H. Age estimation in undocumented migrant adolescents: medical response to judicial authorities. Presse Med. 2015;44(1):99–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wittschieber D, Vieth V, Timme M, Dvorak J, Schmeling A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the iliac crest: age estimation in under-20 soccer players. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014;10(2):198–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Timme M, Steinacker JM, Schmeling A. Age estimation in competitive sports. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131(1):225–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ratnayake M, Obertova Z, Dose M, Gabriel P, Broker HM, Brauckmann M, et al. The juvenile face as a suitable age indicator in child pornography cases: a pilot study on the reliability of automated and visual estimation approaches. Int J Legal Med. 2014;128(5):803–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Olze A, Bilang D, Schmidt S, Wernecke KD, Geserick G, Schmeling A. Validation of common classification systems for assessing the mineralization of third molars. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119(1):22–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olze A, van Niekerk P, Schmidt S, Wernecke KD, Rosing FW, Geserick G, et al. Studies on the progress of third-molar mineralisation in a black African population. Homo. 2006;57(3):209–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmeling A, Olze A, Reisinger W, Rosing FW, Geserick G. Forensic age diagnostics of living individuals in criminal proceedings. Homo. 2003;54(2):162–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wedl JS, Schoder V, Blake FA, Schmelzle R, Friedrich RE. Eruption times of permanent teeth in teenage boys and girls in Izmir (Turkey). J Clin Forensic Med. 2004;11(6):299–302.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmeling A, Grundmann C, Fuhrmann A, Kaatsch HJ, Knell B, Ramsthaler F, et al. Criteria for age estimation in living individuals. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122(6):457–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol. 1973;45(2):211–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Almeida MS, Pontual Ados A, Beltrao RT, Beltrao RV, Pontual ML. The chronology of second molar development in Brazilians and its application to forensic age estimation. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013;43(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caldas IM, Julio P, Simoes RJ, Matos E, Afonso A, Magalhaes T. Chronological age estimation based on third molar development in a Portuguese population. Int J Legal Med. 2011;125(2):235–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garamendi PM, Landa MI, Ballesteros J, Solano MA. Reliability of the methods applied to assess age minority in living subjects around 18 years old. A survey on a Moroccan origin population. Forensic Sci Int. 2005;154(1):3–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nik-Hussein NN, Kee KM, Gan P. Validity of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation for Malaysian children aged 5–15 years old. Forensic Sci Int. 2011;204(1–3):208 e1–6.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sisman Y, Uysal T, Yagmur F, Ramoglu SI. Third-molar development in relation to chronologic age in Turkish children and young adults. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):1040–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewis JM, Senn DR. Dental age estimation utilizing third molar development: a review of principles, methods, and population studies used in the United States. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;201(1–3):79–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lopez TT, Arruda CP, Rocha M, Rosin AS, Michel-Crosato E, Biazevic MG. Estimating ages by third molars: stages of development in Brazilian young adults. J Forensic Legal Med. 2013;20(5):412–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rousset MM, Boualam N, Delfosse C, Roberts WE. Emergence of permanent teeth: secular trends and variance in a modern sample. J Dent Child (Chic). 2003;70(3):208–14.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Balaraj BM, Nithin MD. Determination of adolescent ages 14-16 years by radiological study of permanent mandibular second molars. J Forensic Legal Med. 2010;17(6):329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee SS, Byun YS, Park MJ, Choi JH, Yoon CL, Shin KJ. The chronology of second and third molar development in Koreans and its application to forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med. 2010;124(6):659–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Olze A, Reisinger W, Geserick G, Schmeling A. Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part II. Dental aspects. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159(Suppl 1):S65–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Geserick G, Olze A. Age estimation of unaccompanied minors. Part I. General considerations. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;159(Suppl 1):S61–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thevissen PW, Kvaal SI, Willems G. Ethics in age estimation of unaccompanied minors. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30(Suppl 1):84–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Duangto P, Iamaroon A, Prasitwattanaseree S, Mahakkanukrauh P, Janhom A. New models for age estimation and assessment of their accuracy using developing mandibular third molar teeth in a Thai population. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131:559–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gulsahi A, De Luca S, Cehreli SB, Tirali RE, Cameriere R. Accuracy of the third molar index for assessing the legal majority of 18 years in Turkish population. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266(584):e1–6.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cavric J, Galic I, Vodanovic M, Brkic H, Gregov J, Viva S, et al. Third molar maturity index (I3M) for assessing age of majority in a black African population in Botswana. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130(4):1109–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Caldas IM, Carneiro JL, Teixeira A, Matos E, Afonso A, Magalhaes T. Chronological course of third molar eruption in a Portuguese population. Int J Legal Med. 2012;126(1):107–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marques MR, Pereira MD, Caldas IM. Forensic age estimation using the eruption of the second permanent mandibular molar: determining age over 14 years-old. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2015;47(3):306–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pinchi V, Norelli GA, Pradella F, Vitale G, Rugo D, Nieri M. Comparison of the applicability of four odontological methods for age estimation of the 14 years legal threshold in a sample of Italian adolescents. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012;30(2):17–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karadayi B, Afsin H, Ozaslan A, Karadayi S. Development of dental charts according to tooth development and eruption for Turkish children and young adults. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44(2):103–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cameriere R, Pacifici A, Pacifici L, Polimeni A, Federici F, Cingolani M, et al. Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth with Bayesian calibration approach. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;258:50–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kumar NN, Panchaksharappa MG, Annigeri RG. Digitized morphometric analysis of dental pulp of permanent mandibular second molar for age estimation of Davangere population. J Forensic Legal Med. 2016;39:85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Carneiro JL, Caldas IM, Afonso A, Cardoso HF. Examining the socioeconomic effects on third molar maturation in a Portuguese sample of children, adolescents and young adults. Int J Legal Med. 2017;131:235–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liversidge HM, Chaillet N, Mornstad H, Nystrom M, Rowlings K, Taylor J, et al. Timing of Demirjian's tooth formation stages. Ann Hum Biol. 2006;33(4):454–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Frucht S, Schnegelsberg C, Schulte-Monting J, Rose E, Jonas I. Dental age in southwest Germany. A radiographic study. J Orofac Orthop. 2000;61(5):318–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Prieto JL, Barberia E, Ortega R, Magana C. Evaluation of chronological age based on third molar development in the Spanish population. Int J Legal Med. 2005;119(6):349–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.ISPUP – EPIUNit – Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.IINFACTS - Institute of Research and Advanced Training in Health Sciences, Department of Sciences, CESPUUniversity Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS)GandraPortugal
  4. 4.CENCIFOR – Centre of Forensic SciencesUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  5. 5.CFE – Centre of Functional EcologyUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations