Optimizing radiation exposure in screening of body packing: image quality and diagnostic acceptability of an 80 kVp protocol with automated tube current modulation
- 211 Downloads
The aim of this study was to evaluate the objective and subjective image quality of a novel computed tomography (CT) protocol with reduced radiation dose for body packing with 80 kVp and automated tube current modulation (ATCM) compared to a standard body packing CT protocol. 80 individuals who were examined between March 2012 and July 2015 in suspicion of ingested drug packets were retrospectively included in this study. Thirty-one CT examinations were performed using ATCM and a fixed tube voltage of 80 kVp (group A). Forty-nine CT examinations were performed using a standard protocol with a tube voltage of 120 kVp and a fixed tube current time product of 40 mAs (group B). Subjective and objective image quality and visibility of drug packets were assessed. Radiation exposure of both protocols was compared. Contrast-to-noise ratio (group A: 0.56 ± 0.36; group B: 1.13 ± 0.91) and Signal-to-noise ratio (group A: 3.69 ± 0.98; group B: 7.08 ± 2.67) were significantly lower for group A compared to group B (p < 0.001). Subjectively, image quality was decreased for group A compared to group B (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). Attenuation of body packets was higher with the new protocol (group A: 362.2 ± 70.3 Hounsfield Units (HU); group B: 210.6 ± 60.2 HU; p = 0.005). Volumetric Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) were significantly lower in group A (CTDIvol 2.2 ± 0.9 mGy, DLP 105.7 ± 52.3 mGycm) as compared to group B (CTDIvol 2.7 ± 0.1 mGy, DLP 126.0 ± 9.7 mGycm, p = 0.002 and p = 0.01). The novel 80 kVp CT protocol with ATCM leads to a significant dose reduction compared to a standard CT body packing protocol. The novel protocol led to a diagnostic image quality and cocaine body packets were reliably detected due to the high attenuation.
KeywordsBody packing Cocaine Radiation dose reduction Acute abdominal Forensic radiology
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No Conflict of interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
All patients either gave written informed consent to the imaging or a judicial decision was obtained before the CT scan. Written informed consent for the study was not obtained due to the retrospective design of the study.
- 4.Bulakci M, Kalelioglu T, Bulakci BB, Kiris A. Comparison of diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography and X-ray in the detection of body packing. Eur J Radiol [Internet]. 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23357250. Accessed 23 September 2016.
- 7.Aissa J, Rubbert C, Boos J, Schleich C, Thomas C, Kröpil P, et al. Low-tube voltage 100 kVp MDCT in screening of cocaine body packing: image quality and radiation dose compared to 120 kVp MDCT. Abdom Imaging [Internet]. 2015. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048697. Accessed 30 October 2016.
- 14.The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report No. 96. Am Assoc Phys Med. 2008; College Park.Google Scholar
- 15.Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations (Report 204). American Asssociation of Physicists in Medicine. 2011. http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_204.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2015.